| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
101
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
There's a vague maximum limit for me whenever I have to stop and ask myself "Is this even porn?" And this doesn't even mean something looks painful or abusive, just a simple case of what the fuck! But a lot of BDSM/Kink.com-style stuff is generally unappealing to me as well.
|
09-15-13 01:30am
|
Reply
102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I'm okay with women not getting fully nude. After all, they can always leave their socks on. ;-)
|
09-15-13 01:27am
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
MILF is a really overused and inaccurate term, but I guess it's sexier than saying "mature" or "old."
For example, [ignore]Nina Hartley[/ignore] is almost always in the MILF category at this point in her career though she has said in interviews she's never had kids. I guess the term is meant to conjure up some long lost teenage fantasy viewers had about fucking their friend's mom. No thanks, I was too busy eying the sisters who were much closer in age and experience. ;-)
|
09-13-13 06:30pm
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Poll
I'd say 20s, since that's younger than me and is a pretty ambiguous decade when performers can still get away with many of the young tropes in porn--barely legal, teens, college co-eds--even if they may not match any of those labels in age or experience. Similarly some women have entered the industry at 18 as moms in real life but not MILFs in front of the camera (I guess method acting is underappreciated).
[ignore]Aurora Snow[/ignore] started at 18 and was portrayed as barely legal for the first few years, and then was told one day, at age 24, she was now a MILF. Never mind that she had never given birth to anything beyond a pretty decent porn career (okay, and some decent creampie scenes) the director that day apparently knew otherwise.
Outside of porn however, the term young, particularly "young woman," is not always one of affection but sometimes a euphemism for saying a woman is naive, inexperienced, or just plain dumb. In all honesty though I still prefer young in porn over the whole MILF genre as I find motherhood, whether real or implied, not particularly attractive or fuckable.
|
09-12-13 10:40pm
|
Reply
105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, just not of the quantity and rainbow of colors of Suicide Girls or Burning Angel (of course those are mostly girls :-) ) and fortunately none of the Asian lettering or tribal designs either.
|
09-08-13 02:43am
|
Reply
106
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Hee hee...you said "first up."
:-)
|
09-04-13 03:53am
|
Reply
107
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's one of those things that if it's not happening to me in real life I just don't care to watch it--there's just not much visual appeal in it for me because it's focused on the man and not the woman. However watching a girl get fingerbanged can be pretty entertaining!
|
09-04-13 03:51am
|
Reply
108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I store by website name, then whatever model name the site originally used. Otherwise it just gets too complicated and disorganized for me.
|
09-02-13 06:55pm
|
Reply
109
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
My PS3, though I have yet to watch any Blu-Ray porn on it, or even that many Blu-Rays period. But it's versatile enough to where I can watch most digital porn with an external hard or flash drive. Gotta love that!
|
08-31-13 09:32am
|
Reply
110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I certainly find it much more entertaining for the money than a lot of mainstream entertainment out there, and certainly less scolding than the surplus of services out there that are so obsessed with gobbling up the dollars of "the family." (I swear the way Netflix keeps asking me to select between either the normal or "Just for Kids" versions worries me that I could have a kid somewhere in the world!)
If nothing else, at least in comparison to the other types of adult entertainment, porn probably has way fewer long term costs like STD tests and therapy sessions. :-/
|
08-29-13 08:00pm
|
Reply
111
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Poll
"How they perform" over everything else. Granted their performance is by definition not completely genuine--otherwise they wouldn't be performing--but I think it's easier to respond to then looks. Makeup, hair, wardrobe (if any) are all tuned to crank up the hawt factor for the primates that we really are.
The Jenna Jamesons and Tera Patricks of the world don't really appeal to me as much as the more shy-but-naughty types do. The ones who make it look like they might actually be enjoying what they are doing and didn't have to visit a surgeon to do so.
Of course the other day I watched a short video and all I remember was the color of the girl's eyes (a striking blue hue) so who knows!
|
08-28-13 06:12pm
|
Reply
112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Pat, it's more than just a cultural thing, it's the law, or at least how the law is most widely interpreted, as they worry that showing the genitals, or even pubic hair, is legally considered obscene. It does seem crazy in 2013 and in a modern, socially liberal country at that, but the U.S. has plenty of equally crazy morals-and-decency type laws on the books at the local and state levels that most likely wouldn't pass the smell test with the 1st Amendment if seriously challenged in court.
The odd thing is the genitals are a legal no-no but the ass apparently isn't...so there are some weird looking anal videos out there where the lady's vagina is either pixelated or covered with what look likes a giant Band-Aid (which I think is way more disturbing, but it's probably a fetish at this point) and her backdoor is uncensored in all it's glory.
|
08-23-13 03:25pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Hate it, but then I don't watch much Japanese porn and when I do it's usually the uncensored stuff. Considering the Dadaist craziness they come up with to put in their porn the pixelating almost makes it worse--like they are censoring out something much more grotesque than bare genitals. And though I may just be uninformed because I don't watch enough or there is too much censorship, but the Japanese seem less, let's say "creative," with their genitals. I can't remember seeing any tattoos or piercings, especially compared to Western porn where you could probably start up a healthy scrap metal business from all the jewelry they're sporting below the belt.
On a lighter note to this topic, SomethingAwful.com has reviewed some Japanese porn movies over the year in extensive and hilarious detail (in a section called "The Horrors of Pornography"), and they describe the pixelation as making the women look like they have enormous mustaches every time they give a blowjob. :-)
|
08-23-13 03:04pm
|
Reply
114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Over two--hell, almost twice that this summer--but it's a desktop and still pretty upgradable.
Thanks in part to sites like this, and knowing my own browsing and downloading history, I'll probably have to take the hard drives to my grave though, or at least to someplace like in the end of Terminator 2. :-0
|
08-17-13 01:37am
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Other, or none of the above.
I don't know what "brutal" could entail as their is only so much appetite for what the Max Hardcore types out there will do for the camera (or in his case the prosecution). I think we will at least see a continuation of the HotKinkyJo and Kink.com flavors of filth be produced and paid for, but not necessarily in any more mainstream ways than they already are. Also with the pleasure police still sticking their noses into everything in the name of "the children" it's going to be hard for sites to go beyond the Internet to market and sell their product, even when demand increases.
The bigger question for the future isn't so much content but format; how exactly will porn be sold to still be profitable? I can't see long scenes or features being too popular, the same way iTunes and MP3s have sucked much of the lifeblood out of the album format in the music industry.
Either way porn isn't going anywhere. :-)
|
08-13-13 05:07pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's useless content, in my opinion.
Too much (usually unhappy) information yet frequently very boring as well. So I can learn which family member/ex-boyfriend abused the performer the most while simultaneously being bored out of my skull because watching someone force a smile for the thousandth time just isn't that entertaining. Unfortunately too many webmasters have got it in their head that this is what we prefer to see.
|
08-11-13 01:45pm
|
Reply
117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I like chocolate cake. :-)
|
08-11-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. A girl with a muscular jawline and six pack isn't attractive at all. Also, women naturally have more body fat than men (and in different areas) so when they work out/body-build to make it even less than what most men have it gets to be quite unappealing to me.
Sometimes I think guys who look at other guys(' muscles and bodies) are just being more honest than the guys who look at girls with the same build.
|
08-04-13 09:44pm
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I'll come out and admit to watching both, but with a definite preference for watersports over squirting, at least as squirting is usually depicted in porn.
Porn squirting just comes off as so overblown and forced. All the ear-splitting screams, twitching, and labored breathing is like a bad sex comedy--shitty acting so as to reward viewers with a fake result. It's entertaining, that's for sure, but I don't find it that sexy.
And if it's all faked, or the majority of it is, then you can see basically the same thing in watersports without the melodramatic foofaraw. Watersports/peeing porn should at least get some credit for honesty.
Even though squirting seems rarely genuine it's marketed as a point of pride for the girls performing it; while watersports is genuine but the women are a lot more bashful about it. In real life it seems most guys with any squirting experience (by pure luck apparently) have the same story: girlfriend/partner thought it was pee and was embarrassed as a result. You just can't win!
|
07-23-13 05:21am
|
Reply
120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
To be fair, the poll doesn't specify sexes so you could easily interpret it any way you please. :-)
And there are probably more straight guys who would admit a preference for porn with "normal" cumshots from guys on/at girls than the squirting "cumshots" from girls (though I could be wrong).
|
07-23-13 04:53am
|
Reply
121
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Oh, I had almost forgotten about the browser history! I'm sure the NSA or the FBI or whoever has had a good laugh over it but I'm not sure a tech guy who has to meet me in person would be so kind.
I'm kinda worried what will happen when The Google finally gives up it's "Don't be evil" code of conduct and my search history goes up for grabs to the highest data-mining bidder. I don't think "It's research--nothing more!" will be much of an excuse at that point.
|
07-19-13 03:07pm
|
Reply
122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Far more personal information (site passwords, financial info, etc.) would prevent me from taking it to a repair shop before the porn ever had me worried.
And in this day and age of Tumblr, Sasha Grey doing everything but porn, and whatever the hell goes on at Chatroulette, is some porn on a single guy's computer really that unexpected or even embarrassing anymore (minus the really extreme stuff we work extra hard to hide ;-) )? Granted it now seems you can have a lot of choice in almost any category of business to use to express your political and moral prejudices--hell, even Steve Jobs hated porn--but I doubt most tech places are that shielded from the real world.
If anybody is hesitant, think of it this way: you don't get it fixed you might not have access to any porn to get embarrassed about, at least for a little while.
|
07-18-13 05:05am
|
Reply
123
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
No.
Reminds me of what I think every time Sports Illustrated releases its annual swimsuit (non-nude) issue; What's the point?
|
07-16-13 10:59am
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Worse...it went from just solo girl and girl-girl to now also doing hardcore! ALS Scan just isn't the same anymore.
: - (
It's also now owned by a much larger, if at least still adult (Met-Art), company with other sites under its tentacles. I'm not quite sure if this makes it better or worse, but the boy-girl definitely irks me.
|
07-14-13 03:21am
|
Reply
125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I have tried not to repeat myself in the Bottom Line as well, and then I'm also trying to sound different from previous reviewers.
|
07-10-13 08:31pm
|
