| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
3D Lesbian
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Review
Good interesting review. Have you tried 3D Sex Games by the same company? I believe 3D Lesbian is just a subset of it. You will probably get more models and locations out of 3D Sex Games (check my review there for stats). Even though 3D Sex Games is geared towards boy-girl, you can use female models only and most likely achieve the exact same scenes as in 3D Lesbian.
Unfortunately, you will probably be unable to transfer any personalization you might have made in 3D Lesbian. I believe you won't be able to run both games at the same time either.
|
12-14-08 02:57am
|
Reply
352
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Cool idea but I think it's pretty unlikely. AFAIK, Babes.tv is 100% exclusive while Babelicious is clearly not. Crisis or not, they still have to pay for the exclusive content.
What's more, as a former member of Babelicious, I received last month a newsletter offering me to join Babelicious and the 8 additional sites that come with it for 9.95 USD and also an offer to join Babes.tv alone (no extra sites) for 19.95 USD.
I must say that while I was a member of Babelicious for a month I downloaded much more content during the cross-sale 3-day trial I got for Babes.tv. At least for me, Babes.tv is way more interesting than Babelicious. If I ever come back to one of them, it will be Babes.tv even though it's more expensive.
|
12-13-08 10:38am
|
Reply
353
|
Sleep Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I was sincerely upset with the theme of the site and that's why I ranked it so low. I also happen to like the "belly-down-flat" position but it doesn't appeal to me at all if the models allegedly stay unconscious throughout the scene. I strongly feel they should add some intro or epilogue to justify it. Otherwise, it's just too creepy.
|
11-22-08 04:34am
|
Reply
354
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I remember a similar discussion on Curry Creampie. In fact, several of the scenes, like the Sativa Rose and Keri Sable one, come from a DVD titled "Mexicum" which can be found at DVD sites.
What's even weirder than the performer name change is that you can see Porn.com watermarks on some of the tease thumbnails but this site doesn't seem to be owned by Porn.com.
|
11-15-08 07:46am
|
Reply
355
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
Thanks for pointing out this site. I felt other well known DVD sites were absolute lacklusters in search engine terms.
In case you haven't noticed it, they have added an excerpt of your review on the front page:
"Having tried many of the popular DVD content giants, I can honestly say that American Vice is better than all of them."
- Toadsith - #1 Reviewer at Porn Users
|
11-11-08 12:04pm
|
Comment
356
|
Monica F
(0)
|
|
11-09-08 10:27am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
357
|
I'm Live
(0)
|
|
11-07-08 02:13pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
358
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Let me friendly disagree on most of the content being years or decades old. There is a fair amount of 90s porn and you aren't getting the scenes the day after the studio releases the original DVD. But, looking at this last week updates alone, I saw more than a handful of DVDs released in 2007-2008 and just a couple of 90s porn. And I wouldn't mind if they had more than the current 15 Jeanna Fine scenes (she's listed in 400+ titles at iafd).
As further proof, if you look at the stars with the most scenes you find mainly still active performers (Trina Micahels, Jenna Haze, Tory Lane, etc). If you go to the bottom of the list, you will find models who started last year with some movies (Missy Stone and Stephanie Cane already have at least 4 each one and they currently have only 20-30 movies at iafd).
The site has flaws (for instance, adding the DVD production date and the name of the male performers to the movies would be a nice touch) and it certainly would be nice if they could add the promo stills companies usually shoot for their movies (Wicked Pictures and Vivid are a couple of examples of companies which I believe that offer a good amount of picture content). But, as it currently is, I believe I'm not the only one who feels it's a dream come true.
|
11-04-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
359
|
Natalie Sparks
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Very good review. Looks like the site delivers and has everything a solo amateur site should offer. The girl has the looks. I'd probably join if she didn't have that huge tattoo on her foot.
On a side note, the site looks plain but, from what I saw in the free section, it makes well thought out use of web standards for presentation. This is rarely seen in porn sites so it speaks good of the people behind it.
|
11-02-08 12:01pm
|
Comment
360
|
Nicole Graves
(0)
|
|
10-26-08 10:24am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
361
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
10-26-08 05:28am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
362
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Regarding the download issues, I've also had them; probably the same as obsessedoverit. I believe that my problem was that they keep changing the file directory structure of the site: the URL a particular video file has now is not the same it will have in an hour. So, after you've added a bunch of videos to download, that automatic directory script may come into action and you end up with a bunch of file not found errors and half downloaded files. It's really annoying and is one of the reasons I cancelled my membership.
|
10-25-08 11:13pm
|
Reply
363
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
They are using regional pricing: different regions get different prices. Many other sites also use it. Some webmasters have replied to questions similar to yours.
There are a couple forum threads on this issue:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=115
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=264
|
10-21-08 09:57pm
|
Reply
364
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
marat93's Comment
I got a trial for Playboy's CyberClub a couple days ago. Got billed by Local Billing and was able to cancel the trial membership online without any problem. I am still on the trial period but I already got a confirmation email for my cancellation.
As this site is listed as a clone of Playboy's CyberClub, maybe you should try joining that site.
|
10-20-08 10:53am
|
Reply
365
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks. I guess I already said it in my review but this is the first Score site I've ever joined but I've added Scoreland to my list of sites to join in the future: it has a nice TBP discount and I believe it's the one with the most content.
|
10-17-08 09:11am
|
Reply
366
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Regarding the broken downloads, I believe I also experienced them: it's because they change the website's subdomain every time you login. So, when you restart your computer, the queued downloads are no longer valid and you have to add them again. The site is not very download-manager-friendly.
You're right regarding the current lack of video content but the site just launched. Looks like they started with lots of photo galleries and no videos and they have been adding videos once per week ever since. I don't think 1 video and 1 photo gallery is such a bad update rate for a solo model site, though.
|
10-15-08 11:42am
|
Reply
367
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Glad you liked the review. To each his own, though. Funny thing is I'm not a big fan of extremely huge boobs either and the usual body type of SCORE models has never done it for me but there was something with Christy Marks that prompted me to join and no complaints. The BGG scene with "major boobage" Janet Jade alone was well worth the price of admission.
|
10-13-08 03:11pm
|
Reply
368
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Watermarks on the pictures I've checked are always on the top right corner. It's the same one they have on the videos. On large pics, the CHRISTY part is about 170x70px and it's an almost solid block because of the typeface; there's a 40px-high part below with "Marks.com" which has a much lighter typeface.
I usually don't mind watermarks but these might be somewhat obtrusive, specially on the portrait pictures : they have a long axis of only 1200px which I hadn't realised when I wrote my review.
As I said, I feel pictures are quite good. They are not taken while filming the video: model is always looking and striking poses at the photo camera.
|
10-13-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
369
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova."
I should have said "just TWO videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more" : no bonus acess to other sites or other girlfriends sets. I've edited the review to remove any confusion.
Glad that you found my review interesting too.
|
10-13-08 11:15am
|
Reply
370
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
You get the discount but, according to reviews and comments, you will probably also get charged for other sites you didn't sign up for. Many people report having had to cancel their card.
If joining through ccbill does get you access to the site without additional charges, those extra 10$ seem very well worth it.
|
10-12-08 01:41pm
|
Reply
371
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Pornluver's Comment
I doubt ccbill would actively participate in the type of double billing these guys are known for. Incredible Pass is able to double bill people because you are sending your credit card data directly to them: notice that the page where you enter CC data is at their site while sites that use ccbill send you to enter CC data at ccbill's domain.
My only concern is whether a membership purchased at ccbill's store is always a valid one. I had never noticed you could buy memberships directly through ccbill's site but I see there's an option to buy access to incrediblepass.com there. I searched for some other sites and the descriptions don't match at all.
So, I don't think you should be concerned with your CC data if you enter it at ccbill; as long the ccbill store is legitimate, you should get access to the site.
|
10-12-08 10:10am
|
Reply
372
|
Mia McKinley
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Another site powered by the same people, Naughty Natalie XOXO, also got a rave review with little info. I wrote a review for another site by them, Miss Laura Lee, whose picture content info shouldn't be much different from the one here.
The free section from these people usually shows the amount of content available in the members area. Be advised, though, that pictures are probably quite small and cannot be downloaded. Video sizes are probably big but there's no info on resolution or duration. Only a handful of videos. There's a free video sample which is 1280x720 (6000kbps); IMHO, very bad camera work, though.
|
10-12-08 05:35am
|
Reply
373
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Short answer: yes.
Long answer: wait for my review later this week.
|
10-09-08 01:51pm
|
Reply
374
|
Valentina Vaughn
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I was interested in Valentina Vaughn but, as my review shows, I was quite disappointed with the site she is offering. I knew what I was getting into, though. I see things haven't improved since I left: no updates with Valentina Vaughn during last month.
Haven't been at Misha Online yet but I'm not sure Misha has any connection with this site apart from a few photosets. Maybe she helped get the site started (design, etc) but the exclusive content is mostly very artsy and doesn't seem something Misha would shoot, I believe. Given the great amount of Marquis Models content, I thought instead there might be some connection with Angela Melini.
|
10-02-08 02:45pm
|
Reply
375
|
Francine Dee
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Cybertoad, maybe I didn't see it clear enough the other day but I just want to say that your review is well worth it and I'm sure that a surfer looking for HD video will find the recounting of your experience valuable and avoid this site at all costs once they see the advertised HD video is nowhere to be seen.
I see your review and rating are honest for someone looking for a regular solo model site but Morphious seems to be so much into this site and model that I'd very much like him to arrange his thoughts and explain what makes this site so absolutely special for him.
The thing is I believe the site perhaps only SEEMS to advertise itself falsely for several reasons:
a) we usually expect solo model sites (or sites in general) to deliver mainly photos and video on a regular basis: journals, chats, live cams are a rare extra and not the main course;
b) at one point in its 8+ years of existence, the site was a usual solo model site and its design mostly stuck with it;
c) the site design fails at conveying to the visitors what it's really about;
When someone arrives at the site, he sees the model and some white text on a sky blue background on the right that he just ignores: hard to read and his eyes are probably fixed on the girl (at least, that's what I did). He scrolls down the page and sees the icons you mentioned: HD Videos, photos and all. OK, he thinks, we just found a usual solo model site, girl's hot, I like HD video, let's type in the credit card number and get the party started. Reality check: 3 streaming-only video updates in a year and lots of photos which aren't his favorite dish.
That text he ignored (rightfully, as it looks like they wanted people not to read it) says "Welcome to the internet's newest and most extensive reality show yet! Live cams are running 24 hours a day seven days a week to fulfill your voyeuristic pleasures. Go behind the scenes of a woman's world and enjoy". For once, I believe it's not lies in its entirety and this site is, in fact, delivering live voyeur video on a regular basis. OK, I guess those spy cams show recorded video during some hours of the day but Morphious seems to hint that he once caught Francine Dee having sex live on one of the "spy cams"! My crush on Francine Dee died a long time away (never was a member of the site, and never will) but, if that thing can happen in this site, I think it's pretty remarkable.
When you are so much into a model as Morphious seems to be, getting a weekly live chat plus video blogs plus contests plus spy cams plus getting her to call you on the phone during a chat plus being able to bid on her lingerie must make you live with a constant hard-on. HD what? Pictures? You get her LIVE daily! This site fails miserably to deliver HD video by all accounts but 3 different people came here to praise the site (2 reviews, 2 comments). Morphious seems to be the only one who didn't hit and run so I'd very much like him to make some sense of his initial review.
|
10-01-08 12:23pm
|
