Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Actually I spend very much time to browse sites & download than watching porn. I'm always afraid to miss something important.
|
04-22-09 06:02am
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
There are not no default sites.
|
04-22-09 02:22am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually use the DownThemAll add-on of Firefox.
|
04-22-09 02:17am
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
The beauty of the models does matter too.
|
04-22-09 02:14am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It depends on the quality and the price of the site and of course how rich I am.
|
04-22-09 02:10am
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
There are too many so-so looking girls in the porn industry.
|
04-22-09 02:05am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
For the same price you can have a real sex experience !
|
04-22-09 02:03am
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I think there are not enough sites with HD videos. The files size is not a issue with an high speed connection and with the big size of hard-drives now.
|
04-22-09 01:58am
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
No problem with rebilling if I trust the billing company (ccbill, epoch, etc.).
|
04-22-09 01:52am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
What I wish to see are the most beautiful women of the world doing porn. But quality of the media is important too (especially videos for me).
|
04-22-09 01:47am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
I live alone so no risk. 4 years ago (I was 32 years old !) I was afraid because I lived at my parents.
|
04-22-09 01:40am
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I dislike totally shaved pussies whereas I prefer to lick pussies rather than to be sucked.
|
04-22-09 01:10am
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I vote for Ashley Blue.
|
04-19-09 08:25pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have changed my vote because I first didn't understood the question.
|
04-19-09 08:18pm
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I only play with PC games.
|
04-19-09 06:53pm
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
Both quality models and high resolution.
|
04-19-09 03:49pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Poll
It's simply ugly.
|
04-19-09 03:17pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
KMPlayer.
|
04-19-09 03:08pm
|
Review
44
|
1 By Day
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-A lot of very pretty european models
-High quality videos & photos. Videos : highest resolution is in HD 1280*720p px, photos : 2000*1328 px.
-Videos are downloadable and can be watched in streaming in various formats and resolutions
-You can download each clip in different parts
-Each photoset is downloadable in zipfile
-You can browse each photoset with the "Cooliris" plugin which can display a slideshow
-Great amount of content
-Updated daily with one video clip (between 15 & 30 min length) & one photoset (about 100 pics for each). See also cons
-The great majority of material is exclusive. See also cons
-1By-Day is mainly oriented toward solo action but there are also some boy/girl hardcore action (about once a week) & a fair amount of lez material. See also cons
-A lot of old material has been reedited in a better quality
-The content is very entertaining and not repetitive. There is a magic DDF touch
-Models infos are rather well detailed |
Cons: |
-Some boy/girl hardcore material is shared with Handsonhardcore which is another DDF site I well know
-Once a week there is an update from ALS (AllLadiesShaved) but not as a bonus stuff
-The amount of boy/girl hardcore material could be greater
-Since 04/01/2009 the site is updated only once a day instead of twice between July 2007 & March 2009
-Since April 2009 the site design has changed and you can't anymore browse the pics and the clips separately
-Although the material is taged with many links which lead to their respective niches there is not anymore a categories section that gather all these niches
-The effectiveness of the search engine is doubtful and doesn't work at all for the archive section (stuff dated before July 2007)
-The archive section can be browsed only by updates log. There is neither a models index nor a search engine for this section
-The price is high and has not been lowered despiste the loss of the update rate |
Bottom Line: |
For me DDF Company produces the best porn of the world but I have to be objective and lower my score which was formerly 96/100.
1By-Day has changed for the worst with unfair practices & besides the site now lacks of many essential technical features. |
|
04-19-09 07:47am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
45
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I joined the site on 03/23/09 for half the normal price ($15) via TBP.
|
04-19-09 04:57am
|
Reply
46
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
You are very fair with me. thx
|
04-18-09 06:52pm
|
Reply
47
|
Eve Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the info.
I've made a bad choice for a new review :(
I suppose that I can't earn any point with this review.
Sorry I've just seen my review has been approved. Thanks !
|
04-18-09 06:40pm
|
Review
48
|
Eve Angel
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-One of the most pretty european model
-High quality photos in zipfile sets : 2048*1365 px
-Videos can be downloaded in 2 formats (WMV & MOV) or watched in streaming with 2 bitrates (see cons)
-High speed download
-1 update per day : photoset or video
-Equal amount of photos and videos updates which are generally matching together
-Great amount of solo explicit action where Eve Angel appears in various dress, indoor (mainly), outdoor
-Fair amount of lez action featuring Eve Angel
-Very good amount of other european models (Zafira, Zuzana Z, Aneta Keys, Yasmine gold, Yulia Bright, etc...) who appears in solo or lez or boy/girl hardcore action (see cons)
-Some feet fetish stuff
-Some backstage stuff
-Few black & white stuff
-Few very soft stuff
-Site rather easy to browse with models index & categories (see cons)
-You can put the stuff you like in a "favorites" area |
Cons: |
-Very so-so video quality : 640*480, 1350 Kbps for downloadable files
-Quantity is not large : updates begin in June 2006
-Other models are perhaps too prominent : for many months material featuring Eve Angel makes up less than half of the whole amount of stuff
-Very rare boy/girl hardcore action (see summer 2008) & none with Eve Angel
-Downloadable video files : only 2 formats (see pros), only 1 resolution & only 1 part
-Can not browse separately videos versus photos stuff
-Sometime an update is linked to no material but it's very seldom (see caution in bottom line)
-No search engine
-When I want to register to the forum to interact with Eve Angel I always receive this message "Sorry, the board is unavailable at the moment" (I didn't contacted the support)
-High price : $29.95 per month |
Bottom Line: |
CAUTION ! Eve angel is charged to recycle & resale her own material to other websites. I don't know in depth the scandal so I didn't taken into account the exclusivity criteria.
When I joined the site I was not disapointed because Eve Angel is very pretty, horny & entertaining girl & I knew that she makes no more boy/girl hardcore for a very long time.
But I think the video quality is not enough good for a such famous model, while those who prefer photos will be fully satisfied.
The great amount of other models can be considered as a pros or cons point. My point of view is that makes the content less repetitive.
I was unable to interact with Eve Angel via the forum. Actually it's not a serious problem for me but those who expect interaction with Eve Angel will be disapointed if they meet the same issue. Anyway there is no cam to cam chat in this site.
That's all folks ! |
|
04-18-09 05:37pm
Replies (10)
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Exhibitionism turn on me and also spanking not for its SM aspect but as infantilism fantasy.
|
04-18-09 05:35am
|
Reply
50
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Hi,
3 times the price is too expensive. I have not tried these channels that's why I didn't written about them in my review.
|
04-18-09 05:26am
|