| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Ladies Kiss Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Thanks for the review.
Sounds similar to my experience of 'Lick Nylons', part of the same stable. Content lacked passion.
|
07-04-10 01:04pm
|
Review
27
|
Lick Nylons
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- down and dirty masturbation
- vids are reasonable quality, lighting ok
- provides access to a range of other Ferro Cash sites
- navigation straightforward, easy to get to content
- seemed like it would get regular updates |
| Cons: |
- selection was small: don't believe the tour come on
- bored looking models: clinical, disinterested
- repetitive scenes
- mostly East European girls, so not much in the way of understandable talk
- zero interaction with models |
| Bottom Line: |
There's plenty of better sites giving you solo or girl-girl masturbation which are better value than this. Twistys or Suze would do.
On the plus side, you do get access to a big load of other content. However, that content is much the same.
It would be nice to have the girl come on to the camera. But, on sites like these I get the feeling that most of the "models" are street pros who are bored stiff. There's no need to speak English, but a bit of lust directed at the camera would help.
This was not money well spent and I will be steering clear of Ferro Cash sites. |
|
04-26-10 05:04am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
28
|
Lick Nylons
(0)
|
|
10-05-08 07:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Only Silk And Satin
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- growing selection of photoshoots and videos
- daily updates
- very good search feature based on clothing type
- model index
- each set has a good selection; well composed and well lit
- generally pretty models, mostly smiling and seemingly enjoying the shoot
- videos also nicely lit
- zipped photoshoots
- most recent shoots have a selection of photo sizes; "ultra size" are 3000x2000, 250 dpi
- videos in several formats including HD
- nice selection of clothing, lingerie, stockings, pantyhose, shoes and boots
- reasonably active forum
- seems like there's feedback from the producers |
| Cons: |
- some of the sets/videos are a bit repetitive
- some of the outfits are repeats
- not much more than topless
- videos are on the short side
- some of the videos lack direction - girls don't really know what to do
- could do with more videos
- not much interaction with models
- creeping cross sales
- irritating FastTrack feature |
| Bottom Line: |
Only Silk and Satin delivers. You get a very good and expanding selection of pretty girls in a variety of sexy, silk and satin outfits.
Don't expect hardcore. This is strictly soft, not much more than the famous Page 3 range of UK tabloids newspapers. But, then, that's why you signed up, isn't it?
Well, that said, from comments I've seen and from my own taste, I would like to see a site that caters for clothing fetishes that provides some good masturbation scenes. Stripping from fully clothed is great, but I do want a little bit more. I guess Only is not going to give that.
As with other Only sites, there's a biased towards photoshoots. One or two videos a week and some of these look familiar to some of the photosets.
The Only brand has established itself well and is providing a regular stream of good quality product. It perhaps needs to take things to the next level. I've got a bit tired of the creeping repitition of sets and models. Perhaps Only can branch out into Only Boots or something like that. (Now that would really sell me!)
I really don't like the FastTrack feature which allows previews of content for a month at a time. Don't think this adds to the site and detracts from what is otherwise a good value site.
Overall? I've had a couple of bites of Only sites. I might come back again later. Only Boots would be a great sell. I guess we're going to have to wait for another provider to give that extra bit. |
|
04-26-10 04:49am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
30
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yeah. It is a good deal.
However, I've just checked though and I was last at Twistys in October 2009. So, I'm probably going to wait for at least 6 months before going back. Shame to miss that deal though. :-(
I'm going to check out Viv Thomas instead though looking at the possibility of In Focus Girls.
I was last at Digital Desire in March 2009. Probably a bit too pricey to go back just yet.
|
05-02-10 05:32am
|
Reply
31
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
anyonebutme's Reply
Thanks!
I'm probably due a revisit to Twistys. Either that or Digital Desire.
|
04-29-10 12:52pm
|
Comment
32
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
04-28-10 02:40pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
33
|
VIP Area
(0)
|
|
10-16-16 12:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
34
|
Viv Thomas Video
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- large collection of pics (over 1300 sets by my count) and vids (500+)
- regular photo and video updates
- great looking babes
- familiar faces
- good mixture of solo, lesbian/multi girl and boy/girl, 2+1, 2+2 hardcore (some pissing too)
- choice of bitrates (some choices labelled as HD)
- zipped photosets
- nice range of indoor and outdoor locations
- nice clothing, underwear, hose
- search by model and type
- ratings for sets, models |
| Cons: |
- older photosets of indifferent picture quality
- no choice of photo sizes
- no choice of video type (all wmv)
- a smattering of subtitled videos
- some of the videos poorly lit
- search facility is terrible
- zero model interaction
- no model info (though a lot of familiar faces) |
| Bottom Line: |
It's some time since I visited a Viv Thomas site. I recall that on my previous visit there was only streaming video available, but I might be mistaken.
Anyway, Viv Thomas is a site bursting with content and quality. Viv's been in the game a long time and knows how to shoot a beauty in a variety of poses and scenes. Earlier hardcore scenes are bit poorly staged, but later stuff is very good.
The videos are generally nicely composed, all the girls give out; no tentative amateurs here. That said, the more recent content is getting a bit stale and there's an impression that Viv or the webmaster is going through the motions.
All of the videos are culled from DVD releases which slightly detracts from exclusivity. But, few complaints about the content.
The search facility is minimal - chose from video or photo; solo, girl/girl, hardcore; or by model. It could be a lot better. Why do so many sites fall down on this point? It isn't that difficult so long as content is well tagged. ('Only' sites, IMHO, do this very well.)
Interaction is non-existent. You can rate content, but there's no indication how many users actually vote: probably very few.
Updates were regular though there's not a huge amount of content being added each week - about 1/2 vids and 7 photo sets. And, as pointed out above, the newer content is getting stale.
I had no technical issues. Photos are an okay size though I'm sure most users would prefer something crisper than 250 dpi. Videos come as Windows Media only. Streaming is available. Download speeds were fine, which for me means slow given the craptastulic speeds available here.
I spent a couple of months as a member. That's a compliment in its own right.
Overall, a lot of positives; very good content a few minor grumbles.
I'm sticking to a 90, but there's question mark about future content. That said, there is enough on the site right now to merit a month's investment. |
|
06-06-10 02:08pm
Replies (0)
|
|
