Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : GCode (0)  

Feedback:   All (585)  |   Reviews (54)  |   Comments (100)  |   Replies (431)

Other:   Replies Received (313)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 351-375 of 587 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
351
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
Reply of alexmedia's Reply

Thanks for the response and I'm glad you enjoyed or found the review helpful. I appreciate any feedback and I'm happy you enjoyed the site yourself. See ya around.

01-17-10  01:00pm

Review
352
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)

86.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content of mostly Thai TS models but also other Asian models doing mostly solo masturbation but hardcore and stripping as well.
- Updates once a week but with 5 models showcasing usually a video and photoshoot each.
- No DRM.
- Videos are quite good in quality with newest ones averaging at 1280 X 720 with ~ 2,500 kbps or 640 X 480 with ~2,000 kbps. These are common for files between 2006 to present. Years lower are available in parts and avi or rm only.
- Streaming is now available.
- Photography is professional with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Nice site design with easy enough navigation.
- Search features that appear accurate with the option to add tags for yourself to find files quicker.
- Voting system and comment area for models and content.
- Active forum for communication and discussion.
- Extra comic section for entertainment.
- Coming soon section to see what updates are about to happen for the month.
- Girl of the month feature for 'hotter' models.
Cons: - Photo resolution is still low with newest images updating at ~1280 X 800. If the site went up to a more updated res at about 1600 or higher the site could go in to the 90's for me. However, the photography is still good but is in a low resolution.
- As with most sites that have been around a long time, quality diminishes around 2005 and lower. There appears to be no plans to revamp this material so it is what it is.
- Price can be considered quite high at $35 but can be discounted through a ticket system.
- Some videographers/photographers are a lot better than others. Therefore, some content may be more lacking than others but this is all opinion.
- A lot of ladyboy sites have contact information for models but this site does not. This does not bother me but it may for others.
Bottom Line: Ladyboy-Ladyboy is a grooby site that contains all sorts of Asian ladyboys but mostly Thai. However, there is an honest attempt to create a mix which is almost unheard of with a site showcasing ladyboys. The model selection is plenty and range in features from the classic femboy to all out post ops. Plus, another great thing is the site has been around awhile and many models return, so it's almost like their transformation is documented as their looks change. Overall, the site has a lot of content and a huge model selection.

The videos are good quality if you get them at the right year. Mostly all videos from 2006 and up are available via full scene in different qualities. The footage captured is usually a strip to masturbation scene. However, this site gets many more points from me because almost every update showcases a cumshot which the other Grooby sites kinda stray away from with all their updates. Meaning, this site features way more cumshots from models than the other sites from the company. The settings are usually located on a bed in either a hotel or home and the lighting is fine. However, the location rarely changes so get used to beds. Plus, there is sometimes quite a bit of chitter chatter and groping from the videographer. A big no-no for me when it comes to videos but this is not the main vision of the whole content. Meaning, most of the videos do not feature this. However, it is present. Also, there are quite a few hardcore scenes involving mostly TS on TS models which can be quite hot. They are not updated every time but they do come quite often. Overall, the site gives a nice mix of content for offer.

The photography is well off but the res is way too low for a site in 2010. But, I cannot knock the images for being bad. They are usually shoots taken around the same time of the video. So, most are shoots that accompany the videos. Meaning, the sets locations and outfits are the same but they are not vid caps. The images are all available to download via zip for every set at one resolution.

The site offers plenty but the price can still be seen as high in my opinion. However, the videographers here tend to focus more on the climax of the scene (cumshot) which is great news in comparison to the other sites within this company. There is a wide variety of types of models and many of the superstars as well as unknowns are featured here. Plus, the site contains plenty of extra features that makes navigation a lot easier because the model index is so large. Many might complain that they update everything on the one day of the week but at least it is more than one photoshoot and video per week. Honestly, they should get the resolution of the images higher and keep the same quality while stabilizing the resolution of the video updates when it comes to which will come out by creating a standard. Then, the site would probably get in to the 90's in my opinion. I'd say check the site out once if you are a fan of ladyboys, for sure.

01-06-10  12:07pm

Replies (2)
Reply
353
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
Reply of furry feet's Reply

ah I see, well I'm mostly in to solo ladyboy scenes with some occasional hardcore. Is that what this site pretty much is? ah, and a femboy is usually a shemale who takes hormones and has those small hormone titties but has not got fake tits. Also, they can look more on the masculine side (don't get it confused with a cross dresser) but this is only sometimes and it's nothing as masculine as like facial hair or something like that. Hope that helps and thanks for the input.

-GCode


03-14-09  09:09am

Reply
354
Visit Ladyboy Ladyboy

Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
Reply of furry feet's Review

This is a high scored review. Have you been to other ladyboy sites and would you recommend this over them? I've been looking for some other sites to join. I went to the site preview and it seems most of these ladyboys are moreover femboys. What's your take?

-GCode


03-06-09  06:46pm

Review
355
Visit Ladyboy Player

Ladyboy Player
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive material
-No DRM Protection
- High quality video available in two formats (.WMV, 1280 X 720, 5487 kbps and .MPEG, 848 X 480, Medium quality)
- High quality pictures (1360 X 910) and lower quality pictures (850 X 569) available in .zip format
- Updates are once or twice a week
- Hits all niches of ladyboy qualities, from totally fake silicone fems to femboys
- Mix of scenes, not just solos but hardcore and bj's
- Bonus video and pictures section
- Simple design with easy navigation
- Great search system with great tags
- Stellar guide to Thailand's ladyboy district
- Average to fast connection speed
- Free loyalty bonus sites after 1 month of subscription
Cons: - Older videos are only in medium .MPEG quality
- Pictures are stills of video scenes
- Inactive forum
- 2-4 GB download limit (more explained in bottom line)
- Only POV camera work in hardcore and bj scenes
- Descriptions of videos can vary in humor and can be quite clever but is a bit like reading a high school girl's blog
Bottom Line: Well, I can pretty much account for this site being a breath of fresh air. The content is different than what is usually seen and the concept is fresh with the genre being from the POV of the camera man (or in fantasy land, you). The design is easy on the eyes and the navigation is very simple to find what you want. It includes a great search with over 20 tags and a model index to get what you want quickly.

The videos are in great quality if you pick .wmv and vary in the quality of the content. I can pretty much say a lot will be happy in the fact that there is a lot more hardcore content that is seen than on most ladyboy sites. Almost every scene the ladyboy gives the camera man a bj and occasionally there is sex. However, this is not a total hardcore site so don't come in here thinking you will get a huge amount. Also, almost every video the ladyboy cums but there is not a lot of cumshots from the camera man, even when he's getting a bj or has sex. This can be a burden to some who wants to see the ladyboy get a popshot from someone other than themselves. The camera work is okay with some good closeups and direction (even though he states his Thai is horrible). This sometimes comes back to haunt him leading to just a ladyboy sitting still in a solo scene on a bed. Overall, this is the bread n' butter of the site, they are above average videos and the quality is superb. There are currently 113 videos with about the first 15 being in only lower .MPEG quality.

The pictures are just stills of the video episodes and this always makes me give a site lowered points. Videos are great, but a lot of people want some exclusive photos that are not just stills. Being in some decent quality, this would be a great section of this site if this was taken in to account.

The bonus stuff is not bad. It includes 33 extra galleries of ladyboy photo shoots that were done before this site was up. This includes some superstars which is a great addition. There are also 10 extra movie scenes that are approved from Shemax that seem to be quite random, from dvd's and other sites.

While finding the content is easy and great, getting it is quite annoying. There is a download limit that is not stated anywhere of supposably 4 GB a day. However, after many dealings with the support, I fail to believe this. I downloaded up to the limit and got booted. I waited 24 hours and downloaded again. I made it to 2.5 GB and didn't understand what was going on. Support emailed me back my usage and it was all wishy washy, saying I downloaded on days I didn't even log in. Therefore, I think their limits reset at certain times that are unknown or the limit is not right. Therefore, I download between 2 to 3 GB's on certain days. This is very disapointing and will be a huge burden once the site gets a bit larger.

All in all, this site is above average. It caters to every niche within the ladyboy genre. Recommended for everyone in to the ladyboy scene who may enjoy POV action.

03-19-09  10:04am

Replies (0)
Comment
356
Visit Ladyboy Player

Ladyboy Player
(0)

Download limit/Trouble downloading

This site seems to be good so far and I'll be reviewing it soon. However, I am really having a hard time downloading from here. The speed is great, but I keep getting an error message which the customer service states as a download limit. They said the limit is at 4 GB. Moreover, after this, twice I waited 24 hours after their 'download limit' and it never lets me get to 4 GB. Ususually, 2 to 2.5 GB max. Customer service has yet to email me back about this. By the way, I've noticed on thebestporn.com express review and other sites that have reviewed this have no idea there is a limit. I never even seen anything posted anywhere on the site that there even is a limit but customer service did tell me this. So, I just thought I'd post this to see if anyone has seen this or been through this.

-GCode

03-06-09  12:03pm

Replies (0)
Comment
357
Visit Ladyboy Pros

Ladyboy Pros
(0)

Is The Site Still Updating?

I keep going to the preview page every once in awhile and it's always the same update scene for the past few months. Is this site updating still or did they go dead really soon? If not, what's the range of scenes that can be downloaded? How often do they update? Any information would be great.

07-01-09  09:28am

Replies (0)
Review
358
Visit Ladyboy Pussy

Ladyboy Pussy
(0)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive content of about 20 post-op Ladyboy models in mostly solo masturbation and stripping but some hardcore as well.
- No DRM.
- One photo and one video update per week.
- Latest videos are high def at 1280 X 720, ~3,175 kbps. Scenes before that vary at about 720 X 540, ~1025 kbps.
- Latest photo shoots are available via zip download and highest are at 2000 X 1333 resolution. In fact, I think all sets are available in this format.
- New models don't come often but when they do, they are usually top of the line. There is a nice variance in the models as well, skinny with small tits, skinny with large tits, or a bit thicker with different attributes.
- These are some authentic looking models, if you are looking for prime post-op models which will probably fool anyone; this is the site.
- Price is fair if using discount but a bit on the high side if not using it. Be sure to use it to join.
- Supposedly, you can contact models for chat but I'm not sure if this feature is up to date.
Cons: - Small model selection. Like the sister site for pre-op Ladboys, Ladyboy Gold, this site focuses on featuring one or two models for a month or two and then moving on to a few more. Therefore, this results in lots of content for one model but a smaller selection. So, take a look at the featured models and like them before joining!
- A minor flaw, but some of the re-constructive surgeries are better than others. It is what it is, but a bad surgery CAN ruin the model in a way.
- The site mentions you can email the models but a forum for special shoots or webcam shows would make the site a bit more 'intimate'.
- Some videos can be cut short. However, seeing the same 'in and out' routine with a dildo or striptease can get repetitive; a happy medium would be awesome. It just seems a video is either too long or too short.
- Bonus content is not really a bonus, just filler to make the site seem better. Old candids, decent bar info, and non-exclusive videos just make it all pointless IMHO.
Bottom Line: Ladyboy Pussy is one of a kind in its genre. I've seen a few featured post-op TS models on a few sites but never a site dedicated to only these models. The end result of most of these transitions really result in some stunners! Besides the fact that surgery to this day cannot re-construct a perfect snatch, I would bet some good money that anyone would not know the majority of these models were transsexuals, especially with clothes on and/or in photos/videos.

The content is really solo model focused with the majority of the content resulting in striptease and solo toy play. The content with a male involved is usually a handjob but some penetration is present. However, the focus is primarily solo stuff. Even a few post-op on post-op action is present, but it's all in the minority.

The lighting is well done and the outfits are amazing. They change from cosplay type outfits, dinner date dresses, and even just regular 'going out' clothes that the models would wear. They really spend a good amount of time making these models look pretty and it results in some credible content. If you are looking for photos, these really shine here. Photoshop is little to not used, the images are large, vary, and look crisp. I really think the site is photography based because the videos are a bit average in comparison. However, the videos are not sub-par by any means the grand scheme of things, but they are clearly not as good as the photos.

The largest quirk I have is the model selection. I know these kind of models and of this caliber are probably far and few but the way the site updates irks me. While the small selection is a bit disappointing, it is how they update. For example, old models are rarely brought back for an update and new models content all comes basically at one time period. Once the models content is showcased, say goodbye to the model. It's a shame because some models I loved and I knew I'd never see how they look now or later...or ever again. Many may enjoy a smaller based model selection with tons of updates of one model which isn't bad if they brought old ones back every once in awhile.

Anyways, overall the site is top notch in the technical aspect, model selection, and change of settings/clothing. But, I have some quirks with the updating scheme and model selection quantity. Also, the site has this feeling of just not being 'intimate' enough. As in, the site just has no personal edge to it. There is no communication between members, models are not personalized, and members just seem to have no part of anything in the site; besides viewing the site's content. However, this is quality content in the specified niche. Not all sites need the 'intimate' qualities to succeed and I don't think the 'lack there of' breaks this site. It may improve an already above average site and that's all. This site surely creates a standard if any other sites want to specialize in post-ops only and deserves a high score, even if it could be better in a few ways.

06-08-11  08:33pm

Replies (0)
Reply
359
Visit Ladyboy Pussy

Ladyboy Pussy
(0)
Reply of alexmedia's Review

This site is in the same company as Ladyboy Gold. Do they do the same thing and only let you download zipped photo sets after being a member for more than a month? Plus, can you give me any info about the size of the pictures and the videos? Any info would be great. Thanks.

09-08-09  10:53am

Comment
360
Visit Ladyboy Universe

Ladyboy Universe
(0)

Anyone got anything?

Anyone take the delve with the site? Always looking for new sites but of course, I have to ask if anyone knows any details about the site. Lemme know if you know anything. Thanks for your time :)

03-28-10  12:12am

Replies (0)
Reply
361
Visit Ladyboy Wank

Ladyboy Wank
(0)
Reply of IslandDollars's Reply

Thank you for the information. Much appreciated.

02-26-10  05:22pm

Comment
362
Visit Ladyboy Wank

Ladyboy Wank
(0)

No Zip Downloads Until After One Month?

This site is in within the company that does Ladyboy Gold. One of my peeves with Ladyboy Gold was that zip downloads for photo sets were not available until after being a member for one month. Anyone know if this site does the same thing? Plus, anyone joined this site and can give me any more info on the site? Thanks for your time.

02-08-10  04:31pm

Replies (2)
Reply
363
Visit Latin Shemales

Latin Shemales
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

Congrats! I'm glad to see you reviewing a site that is not exactly your main interest but still delivering quality details and useful information. Thanks for the read.

04-02-11  06:51pm

Review
364
Visit Latina Tranny

Latina Tranny
(0)

75.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Exclusive and non-exclusive content of Latina TS models in solo and hardcore.
- Updates every two days.
- No DRM.
- Order shoots by date or alphabet.
- Site design is good, plenty of niches and model qualities to choose from.
- Videos include plenty of options. Quicktime: 500 X 281. Real media: 280 X 156. Mp4: 640 X 480. 3 diff WMV formats: (Low: 320 X 180, Med: 500 X 284, High: 1280 X 720; ~3,150 kbps). Older videos highest is 640 X 480, ~2,000 kbps.
- Extras include random drawings, information on clubs around the world that are TS friendly, agenda or gossip (kinda like a blog, no longer updated as of 10/13/2007), and escorts list.
- Message board with active webmaster, appears to take requests.
- Newest pics available in 1600 x 1600, 1200 x 1200, and 1024 x 102 with slide show. Older sets usually average 900 X 675. All available via zip with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Free webcam access for webmasters private shows.
- Model list does include thumbnails and some info.
Cons: - Random username and password set up.
- Older quality is non exclusive (Also from Shemale-Club).
- Lower quality in movies from 05/14/2008 and 10/26/2007. Before that it is extremely low quality at 352 x 288.
- Lower quality in pics in earlier sets.
- Poor navigation for model list index and getting to the index. It's actually under 'Extras' but should be a main tab to click on. Model list index does not contain all content, one has to go to the 'all movies' section to get all the movies because they are not all in the index.
- Penty of 'Behind The Scenes' videos used as regular updates. Also, as of late, poor quality FLV (Flash) only videos of the webmasters private webcam video casts are included as regular updates.
- Sometimes only screencaps available for video scenes or vice versa.
- Models' info including stats, escort number, cock size, and location may have info on the model or not. Basically, it's a gamble and who knows how updated or correct escort numbers are.
Bottom Line: Latina Tranny is a TS model site operated and mostly shot by TS model, Nicole Montero (Nikki). It has been running for several years with the newer content containing exclusive only content while older content before roughly December 2007 include both exclusive and non-exclusive content. Lately, the site appears to have taken the turn in to becoming more of a solo model site of Nikki with some updates of her friends.

The videos on the site are great quality when it comes to how they look, at least from 05/14/2008. The are quite sharp and have great lighting. Nikki does a great job with the camera and gets quality shots most people want. Before that, only smaller sized videos with lower bitrates are available and sometimes only in parts which may or may not be shot by Nikki. As far as what is included in the content varies. Most of the content are solo shoots with the model stripping and masturbating. However, a huge negative with these solo shoots is the majority of these shoots stop before cumshots. Therefore, there is no real climax to the shoots and they tend to just end abruptly with no actual 'real' finish. I've always found this to be a large negative when shooting solo TS content. However, there are some great hardcore scenes which include Nikki with other models, men, and other TS models. I've found the scenes with Nikki and other TS models to be a bit less 'professional' in terms that the shoots usually include lots of dialogue (even interviews) and a bit more spontaneous sessions. The good thing is these scenes usually end with proper endings unlike most of the solo shoots.

The site stands out more as a photo shoot site. The are far more photo sets than videos. As of 08/18/2008 all pics can be available in the highest res at 1600. The shoots by Nikki are extremely well done. I will admit that she has a keen eye for photography and gets the shots that most TS fans want. This includes long shots mixed in with close ups and not a whole lot of repetitive shots that create huge sets with the same picture over n' over again. The settings tend to change, whether they are outdoors, in a studio, or being in a home. However, remember that not all these sets are exclusive and many are available at Shemale-Club around December 2007 and earlier.

Overall, the site has a lot to offer but fails to deliver in terms of exactly what many TS fans want in solo video shoots and quality updates. While it is great that the site updates every two days which is higher for a TS site, many of these updates include short BTS clips, interviews, or poor quality webcam shoots. Also, many photoshoots have no video. However, the site does include many positives that many TS sites do not include with Nikki being interactive with members and maybe even doing requests. Plus, the technical aspects such as video and photo quality are a huge plus. But, I just can't give a site a huge score when they are lacking what many want to see with TS content, the cumshot.

06-10-10  11:11am

Replies (0)
Comment
365
Visit Latina Tranny

Latina Tranny
(0)

Clone Site Misleading....Kinda

I am trying to get to the bottom of this. I recently became a member after talking to the webmistress about the site. She claims the site is different with this response:

I am Nicole from www.LatinaTranny.com

the review on The best porn is from like 2007, 3 years old...

LatinaTranny has exclusive content for almost 3 years now, with updates every other day with no fail...

so yes we are different than shemale-club and exclusive.....
any questions please lemme know

Nicole.

After becoming a member, I do recognize some extremely old material as the same content that shemale club offers from like 3 years ago and beyond. However, during this time as well there seems to be exclusive content as well. From what I can tell, the site is associated with Shemale Club while being different in its own. I think during the first few years, this site was updating exclusive content by Nicole while updating updates that shemale club was offering as well. But, at about 2-3 years ago all the content became exclusive. I have gone through the recent and not so recent updates and Shemale Club and Latina Tranny. I have not found any content that was updated here as well as Shemale Club for some time. Therefore, I think the site is less of a clone but more of a site in its own right but older updates had exclusive and non-exclusive updates. Hope this may help and clear up some things.

05-11-10  06:43pm

Replies (1)
Comment
366
Visit Latina Tranny

Latina Tranny
(0)

Old Review, Looking For New Info

The review is about 3 years old from TBP. While I have nominated the site for a new review and it says it is high priority, does anyone have any info in the meantime about the site? As in, were they members in '09 to present and can they let me know anything about the site as far as updating schedule, video/pic res, type of footage that you can get, how long it is, zip downloads, model index, etc? Thanks for your time if you have any info.

02-07-10  09:29am

Replies (0)
Reply
367
Visit Little Mutt

Little Mutt
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

Just to kinda reinforce and add to what may be wrongly worded statements by the reviewer, dracken, but I felt that as far as reading this review that I would expect Russian models as well. Clearly, dracken stated a language barrier was involved and with that stated and the combination that 'anyone who wants to see more Russian girls...', I'd definitly see this as a Russian site with these words. However, the webmaster states that this is not so I think there is a legit argument for the response that is not a Russian site nor contains Euro women and should maybe be re worded to get it straight. However, I can see where dracken is coming from if the models do not talk much in the videos because this is something that is very dominant in euro videos. But, that is if the models do not actually talk which was pointed out by dracken.

I'm not trying to say either one of you are wrong or right, nor trying to take sides. I can just see how the webmaster could see this review as portraying a Euro site when the site is not, while I can see how the reviewer could think this was a Euro site. Good luck and I hope this may add more insight between both of your discussions as a third party.


01-13-10  08:46pm

Review
368
Visit Long Mint

Long Mint
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-06-09  07:35pm  (Update History)
Reason: DRM was removed, added 5 points to score because of this.
Pros: - Exclusive Material.
- No DRM Protection.
- Easy site navigation and a pretty good design.
- High res videos in WMV Format (1280 X 720, 4002 kbps) and lower res only through browser. Very Crisp and reasonably sized.
- High res photos available in zip format (1500 X 1000 and 1024 X 768).
- Adaquete updates at once a week and are dated.
- Access to webcams in extras that includes mint as well as others for free.
- Can email mint with questions, However, I don't know if any response will come, but the contact info is there.
- While primarily a solo masterbation site, there appear to be some straight sex updates coming, so eventually this may have a great mix.
- Can rate and comment scenes while both options are available for others to view as well.
Cons: - Expensive at $29.95, even the bonus site price is a bit high at $24.95.
- 4 GB Download limit.
- Solo masterbation scenes sometimes do not end with a cumshot.
- Extras do include a webcam, it is often not online with mint, but others.
- Extras are only a webcam and wallpapers, However, the wallpapers are only 4 and are a bit older.
- Photo shoots are accompyning photos of the videos, while they are not screen caps, they are the same outfit and location of the videos provided. Therefore, expect almost the same photo shoots and videos provided.
Bottom Line: Mint is a good model and oozes sexuality. While being a quite well known and sought after star because of her biggest asset (huge 9 inch cock) and the fact that she can suck it, she delivers just average in her solo site. While she keeps her attitude great and seems to be enjoying herself a lot, the scenes and sets can get a bit repetitive. Yes, this is to be expected, due to the fact that she provides mostly masterbation videos in different outfits but some of the 'same' type locations. However, I think doing only weekly updates keeps the site a bit fresher than it would be if she updated more.

As for the content, you have to really like the model, of course, because it is her site. If you do then you will like this site to a certain extent. The videos are Mint dressed in a fetish costume ranging from a police officer to a baby. She will strip and then masterbate plus usually provides quite a bit of dialogue (her english is not bad), usually using a prop that is involved with the costume (handcuffs and a baby bottle). However, during a nice span of about 2 months I have noticed she is cutting the videos off before she cums which is very disapointing because one of her biggest qualities is a huge cock that usually shoots a huge load. It could be she is maxing out on hormones and may not be avoided. However, despite this, she still keeps the scene hot. The videos are done very professionaly with no chitter chatter and vary with multiple shots. Everything is crisp and well lit, definitely top of the line here. While the site is relatively new so the video content is not super large, she is attempting to vary the videos a bit more than before. There are some more different locations than obviously a hotel room, by going to the beach or jungle for different scenary. Her locations before were a bit of a quirk with the hotel stuff, anything outside would drastically make the videos better. Currently the site has 55 different videos with mostly masterbation scenes but 1 bj scene and 3 hardcore scenes.

The pictures are high quality but are all similar to her video shoot in terms of location and dress. This is kind of a bummer for picture lovers that want exclusive content of her that was not so similiar to her video content already. Some softcore, exclusive shoots that differ in appearance would be highly recommended given the fact that the site is a bit expensive. This type of updating just does not cut it. Plus, even if some other content of her was provided that is not exclusive would be great, this is her site, let's get all her content that we can. With this department and extras so lacking, I cannot give the site a high mark. But, there are quite a few of the above sets at 55.

Overall, if you love this model and are willing fork over $30, this is actually a great site for some extra video content. It is recommended for about a month stint because even with the dl limit, you can get all the content in a month's stay for sure. Average site.

02-23-09  11:03am

Replies (0)
Comment
369
Visit Louisa May

Louisa May
(0)

White Girl Doing Japanese Style Porn?

Well, the preview is surely Japanese in style with katakana and other certain Japanese things. However, the actual content appears to be mostly Western solo play. Anyone been a member and can comment on how Western the content is? Are there any Japanese type scenes available? Or, does she mainly cosplay with regular solo play? Any information would be greatly appreciated! Thanks for your time.

11-17-10  09:14pm

Replies (0)
Reply
370
Visit Male Digital

Male Digital
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I agree, feel free to post even 'gay' site reviews if you want to. There is no discretion between what type of porn you like and want to review. Hell, even some others in the background may want to know some thoughts on sites you like. I'd love to see a Bisexual male's point of view on certain sites. Keep 'em coming and don't be afraid.

07-31-10  09:47pm

Review
371
Visit Masturbation Instructors

Masturbation Instructors
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Exclusive content featuring POV dirty talking models with the concept that you are looking in on them and masturbating (and they know it).
- Model selection has some good variance in nationality, ethnicity, and age.
- Weekly updates with one video and one photo still set.
- NO DRM protection.
- No Download limit.
- Video quality is average with 3 different options in terms of quality with one format being in WMV. Highest format available in 640 X 480, ~1200 to ~1400 kbps.
- 13 extra adult games available to play if interested.
- About 20 or so short sex stories available to read if interested.
- I joined at their lower price of $24.95 and got the gold membership which includes access to 5 other sites (the actual gold membership was $10 more and I think it's the same access). Don't quote me on this that you will get access but there was no clear special when I joined, so it may work for others. However, there are cons.
Cons: - Photo sets are not proper shoots, but are video stills and are not available in zip format. For the actual content, they are quite pointless but worth mentioning. Average resolution found was 1200 X 900.
- Extra sites in the network are quite terrible. Access to a handjob site, a forced asian masturbation site, a spreading site featuring women, and a female dominating men site. However, I found myself downloading about 3 or 4 videos from only the handjob and spreading site. Needless to say, they are not very good extra sites.
- Navigation for the site is a bit on the weak side. There is no model index and to download the videos, the link takes you to another page where it streams the video selected and another link is available to download the video at the bottom of the page.
- The concept of the website is a bit misleading (I will fully discuss this in bottom line).
- Most of the videos are quite short at only 5 to 10 minutes long.
Bottom Line: Masturbation Instructors is the name of the site. However, the site name and preview is a bit misleading when it comes to the actual concept of the site. The expectation is that the site delivers POV instructions from the model captured on how fast to go, what to do, how well you are doing, and how much the model likes it. However, the site is a lot different than this. The content within the site is actually POV dirty talk with mostly teasing the 'watcher' to the fact that he cannot have the model within the video, usually for reasons such as being a loser, a small penis, or other humiliating reasons. Most of the time, the content will display the model on the same couch as the others, notices you are 'there', get mad, and therefore will talk down to you as they know you are masturbating. However, in a few, the model will not get mad and actually like the fact that you are masturbating to her. In a large amount of the content, the model will not even get undressed or even show a nipple. This is all fine and dandy but I think if the site made a clearer picture as to that this was going to be what the content was, I'd be more happy.

The videos are average in resolution and quality. I was not entirely disapointed dispite the stats but they could be better. Plus, the camera work is quite amateurish (if there is camera work at all). Sometimes, it is just a camera on record on top of a tripod. The editing can be choppy and poorly done because sometimes the model can clearly be improvising and say something that makes no sense or even laugh. Also, sometimes they just don't know what else to say and just repeat the same thing over and over. The only 'instructing' I got from any of the models is to maybe go faster or slower with the classic masturbating 'hand motion' but any elaborate instruction is non-existant. However, anyone looking for some women talking dirty and degrading directed at the viewer, the site does deliver within the videos. There are weekly updates and at the time of the review, there are 76 different videos.

The model selection is great in terms of variance. However, there are only a handful of true gems on the site when it comes to looks. I know differences between people when it comes to looks is plenty, but I can assure you there are a lot of unattractive models here. Many appear to be amateur women off the street that keep their clothes on and just talk dirty to the camera. I don't mind some teasing with the clothes staying on, but I think this just adds to site in negativity with the concept already being misguided, camera work being poor, and model quality.

The site does have some positives in terms of being a bit in the realm of its own in terms of innovativeness. However, the site immediatley gets shot down from poor technical deliverance and the inability to put this innovative concept in to play correctly. Up the quality of videos, add more actual instruction, get better models, undress more, and it's a winner.

07-15-09  09:28am

Replies (0)
Reply
372
Visit Max Mix DV

Max Mix DV
(0)
Reply of exotics4me's Comment

TBP states the sites vids are 640 with 800 kbps. I just can't see these vids clarity looking very well at this rate. But, who knows I have been surprised before. Anyways, most of these comments are cons which pushes me off to begin with. A shame though, a pretty good price for some Japanese DVD content when compared to most but I just can't give in....

07-07-09  07:54pm

Reply
373
Visit Meet A Wife

Meet A Wife
(0)
Reply of navycolt's Comment

I've always been quite skeptical about these so called dating sites in general. Honestly, through just shifting through comments from here in the dating niche, I feel I have confirmed these thoughts because almost all tend to be negative. Thanks for the heads up to anyone that might be interested here. See ya around!

07-10-09  09:05pm

Reply
374
Visit Melissa Midwest

Melissa Midwest
(0)
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Reply

I agree with the fact that this review was better posted as a comment to tell us that the site is no longer updating. While this is great info for a review, I do believe tech stuff can easily be thrown in there for 1 line in the pros or cons or in bottom line and the user could describe what is in the scenes more in full to create a more in depth review. My philosophy is bigger is better, I do find users who do short and sweet reviews as trustworthy as others.

But let's get for real, if you are actually planning on joining the site and giving YOUR money to them, everyone would want more details than this. This review just leaves anyone as a potential consumer to ask more questions which RagingBuddhist did and rightfully so in my honest opinion. If you are just looking to read this as never being interested in the first place, it adds a fact that you now know the site is no updating which is a great comment.


05-28-09  10:16am

Reply
375
Visit MetArt

MetArt
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Reply

Man, it's been awhile since I was a member but I know there was a search engine that was quite comprehensive as far as tags goes. Meaning, I do believe you can do searches including breast size, hair color, location, and so on. Hopefully a current member can give you more insight.

06-22-09  11:16pm


Shown : 351-375 of 587 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.37 seconds.