Weird you mention interviews because that was one of the favorite things I liked about the site. The fact that most were interviewed by a woman which made a better atmosphere in my opinion and the teasing the models would do. As far as the 'more is better' thing, I dunno if I'm right. I'm just throwing it out there :) I think it makes sense but I think it might be a combo of that and the fact that almost every site does it as well. It's probably a huge factor that most sites do it that the directors/producers feel the need to do it to so they are not the odd ones out. I have to agree that I'm sure that the masses must enjoy dildos or that there are just not enough of the majority complaining about it that they must think that this is what the masses want.
Ah yes, the dildo routine. I liked this site because of the stray away from mostly all that. I remember even seeing some machine use. I have to say you are probably right when it comes to dildos. I think that just most producers/directors probably just think a models use of only fingers does not give enough 'umpff' to the content. Therefore, the result is bringing in toys. However, I've always thought that the simple use of fingers shows much more erotism amongst models because they are using their own technique in such a simple way to get themselves off. But, back to what I said, I think a lot of makers of porn tend to see more as better and toys are the solution in the eyes of them :( Stinks but it is what it is I guess.
That's a stinker :( Were the videos for purchase webcam videos made especially for members who sent her money? I've seen a few models on their sites do that. Too bad you won't find much of those outfits here as you already know :( So I'm guessing this is the only site that features her, let alone in videos? Good thing you checked back to this site so you get snatch these up!
4 or 5 softcore sets to 1 hardcore for each model usually with an occasional model doing 2 hardcore scenes. Photo sets are good but have quite a bit of photoshopping.
Hmm I just wrote a review a few days ago and I'm hoping I covered some of this. Messmer has wrote a well founded and informative review as well, you should check them out for more information if you need it. Or you can ask me more here if you need it, my membership just cancelled yesterday and I have evey single thing you can download up to yesterdays date.
haha yeah it definitely is subjective and that's why I asked your opinion as a fellow PU who enjoys older women. I fully agree on what you believe is a mature model for sure. Being a bit younger than you, I suppose I think a 'mature' model would be about 10 years older than me so that's about 37+. However, maybe mature sites think the same way and think that their target audience may be in the 18-21 range and a 10+ year old model would range around 28-35 or so. I never really thought about that until now and I think that may be why models on most 'mature' sites are getting late 20's and early 30's models and marketing them as 'mature'.
So many of these models on these mature sites could keep their original titties and natural features but be more demanding that the models keep in shape and this would result in really hot models. This is my opinion, but I hate the fact that a lot of 'mature' models tend to be early 30 somethings with huge fake tits and that means they are quality mature models. I like a natural sag as well (I think you like them a bit more and I respect that for sure) but I want my photos to feature them in the flesh as I would see them if I MET them in the flesh, ya know? For example, At Anilos, I love Chennin Blanc because of her natural look and her freckles but these are only present in the videos. If you look at her images, they are not there. A huge disapointment in my opinion :(
Now that you bring it up, I would not mind seeing a touch of gray in the hair of these models if they have it. It just adds to the natural look in older women that I love. Thanks for the insight and the reply!
Thanks for the vote of confidence in the review, buddy ol' pal :) This is definitely a site in the forefront for quality mature content and I basically joined based on your review and feedback. And....I was not disapointed! I'm glad you took my 'imperfections' remark the right way, I had a feeling I was going to get some negative feedback on that opinion but I'm happy to hear that I am not the only one who felt that way. These so called 'imperfections' that people tend to observe creates a downfall in some sites, IMHO. One of the largest qualities in mature women is the natural freckles many have (huge turn on for me) and I saw a lot of these attributes 'washed out' with image altering which pissed me off in the photos. You can see them in the videos which is great but they are air brushed in the photos (BOOOOOOOO!!!!). This is probably one of the largest quirks of this site that I found, that and the fact that model selection are a bit young to be featured on a mature site :( Don't get me wrong, they are quite attractive but I wanna see natural older women!
I think this is the most dissatisfying thing I find in sites that are considered to be in the 'mature' niche. While the argument is there for what is a true 'mature' model, I think this site is not entirely spot on in this aspect. However, the site is great and I do feel we think the same way on this issue. What do you think are some descriptions of what makes a true 'mature' model? I'd love to hear your feedback. Thanks again for the reply and take care.
I'm glad you found Messmer and I's review useful in making a decision to join a site that I'm sure you will enjoy as a fellow PU who enjoys mature content. Can't wait to see your thoughts on the site as well!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Exclusive content of older women doing mostly masturbation with fingers or toys and quite a bit of hardcore mixed in as well.
- No DRM.
- Updates daily with either a photo set or video scene.
- Videos are offered in a lot of different ways including in-browser streaming, in parts, and full scenes offered in mp4, mpeg, and WMV. Best and newest quality is WMV at 1280 X 720 at ~3650 kbps. Older videos are at 640 X 480 at ~1500 kbps.
- Photos are well done and available in two different resolutions (1200 X 800 and 2400 X 1600) with all the option to view in browser or download via zip.
- Solid bio pages for almost all models with a lot of information plus a model stats area for quick facts and info.
- Ability to add your on tags to sets and scenes for easier searches later on.
- Active forum for feedback and discussions.
- Model index for easier navigation.
- Great site design that is easy on the eyes.
- Wallpapers and niche (ass, tits, etc.) photos offered for each model.
Cons:
- While most models are certainly considered 'older' women, they are by far not what I would be call true mature models. A lot are in the late 20's and lower 30's which can sometimes look like a model featured at almost any site and not a 'mature' site.
- While many are all natural, there is a solid mix of many models with fake boobs and other minor surgeries. While obviously present because many older models probably feel they need to be more 'tight' so they look more youthful, this can stray many away looking for natural aged bodies.
- I'd say the majority of the captured scenes are great quality but some are obviously the routine solo scene with a toy and there is no emotion present. Just a model sticking it in and out for 10 minutes and a blank stare on her face.
Bottom Line:
Anilos is definitely in the forefront when it comes to one of the better sites that provides quality and real mature content to the masses. However, the site cannot be overly praised for this because I feel they have somewhat dropped the ball when it comes to finding true mature models. However, the site showcases extreme quality in a large number of traits that many sites lack. For example, the site design and navigation is awesome, the professional quality of the content is great, and the extra little features exhibits the people running the site care for the site and its future.
The models involved are usually dressed in a range of outfits but are staying within the dolled up glamour niche mostly. Usually a nice dress, lingerie, business suits, and/or everyday wear are featured. However, I'd say the majority are in dresses or business suits. A good amount of make-up is used and most of the hair is stylized. Overall, a good mix of outfits for each model.
The videos provided are well made when it comes to the technical aspects. Overall, Anilos offers a great resolution with great lighting, bright settings, and a decent range of long shots with close ups at the right time. When it comes to footage captured, I think Anilos demonstrates an honest attempt to record scenes that not only include the regular hardcore and solo with toy scenes but add sybian, machine, and bathing footage. However, the majority is still solo play with mixed results. Some models are obviously truly getting themselves off genuinely while others are going through the motions. While obviously this can be expected for most sites, I do believe there are more legit than non-legit. There are quite a few interview scenes as well which include a vocal interview and the model stripping during the scene as well. Overall, the site offers a great amount of mix it ups to create a quality amount of captured footage.
The photography is well done in terms of professionalism as well. Good lighting, a non-intrusive watermark, and range of shots make these photos something to look at. However, I did find a good amount of photoshopping which killed a lot of my favorite models pictures. These models are older and are still human so of course many have 'imperfections'. But, this is what makes someones model their favorite. Therefore, lets keep things natural. Besides that, the photography is extremely well done.
All-in-all, the site is well done and should be visited one time by fans of women in the 'older' range. While every model may not hit what many to think as a true mature model, they do have a lot of them present and they are extremely good looking. Expect plenty of great special features such as wallpapers, interviews, bios, photographer feedback, searches, tags, and dated updates which increase the overall experience. With that and a great mix of solo and hardcore footage with even a bit of lesbian mixed in, the site is above average when it comes to a mature model site.
It appears the site will finally get an official review from our friends at TBP. It says the date is still TBA, but I can't wait to see the new thoughts about the site. I am about to join really soon here, as I believe it may be the best place to get genuine older ladies with the best quality of content. Now, I have not joined yet but based on previews, chats with others, and the stats, it may even excel All Over 30. Can't wait to see what the official score from TBP will give!
Wow that it her and I totally looked at that index. I must have totally overlooked the picture because it seriously did not look like her at all until I put both pages next to each other. Thanks a lot for this, I would have never looked at that page again until you checked this out. Now the hunt is on... :)
I tried looking on searches and model directories for more info on this model but I cannot find anything. In the model directory here, she goes by "Leticia". Anyone know if this is the name she always goes by or maybe this is the only site featuring her? Any info would be great.
Hey,
man I didn't even notice you could go to the model index without a subscription. Thanks. And yes, these models look great so far. No doubt though, this site is on it's way to become something great! Thanks for the quick reply man.
Great review. I have a question as far as being comparable to the other mature sites out there. I joined all over 30 earlier this month and I like the site so far... (review later) but I have noticed between the attractive ones, a lot are unattractive. Is it the same thing here? How wide spread are the truly attractive models in comparison to the unattractive. I know attractiveness varies between most people but I think you may get my drift in my example?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- True High Def Videos (1280 X 720, 4002 kbps)
- High res pictures (1500 X 1000)
- Considered one of the hottest ladyboy models online out there
- No DRM protection anymore
- Simple design but still looks great
- Easy to navigate
- Exclusive material
Cons:
- 'Extras' are lacking and rarely updated
- Updates can be considered a bit slow (maybe once a week) for a solo site
- Videos can be lacking (more in bottom line)
- Pictures are stills from videos
- 3-4 GB Download limit (more explained in bottom line)
- A bit expensive even with the discount from loyalty sites
Bottom Line:
This site showcases what might be considered one of the hottest or even the hottest ladyboy in the online industry to this date. The site focuses on her beauty and sexuality. However, there are hits and misses with the actual footage contained of her. Moreover, the site may become redundant to fans that are mega fans. Also, if you are a megafan, you could even be a bit dissapointed in her content and features within the site.
The videos are shot in one of the best high def quality that I've seen so far. The videos are compressed and keep quality so high, it's such a wonderful thing (300-700MB) at about 10-20 mins long each. The videos vary in theme, usually keeping a main theme of something like a schoolgirl to a army girl. Usually, she interacts with the props well which is a better attribute of the videos. She is usually quite enthusiastic during her videos which are primarily masterbation scenes. However, the greatest quirk I have with the scenes are the lack of cumshots. There are quite a few which conclude with these but I just don't see a point of shooting a shemale masterbation scene without ending in this. Seeing Areeya masterbate so sensually and in to it, then suddenly stopping, look to the camera and wave goodbye can be very dissapointing. Moreover, I can see these scenes getting a but redundant to ladyboy fans that want hardcore. There are two scenes involving another ladyboy but they are not hardcore at all. However, lovers of solo scenes will enjoy Areeya's videos, at least the ones she cums in.
The pictures are just stills of the videos. It's a shame considering they are great quality in rez and could be a great area of the site if she including photo shoots that are not just stills (this is your site, these are all YOUR fans, give them MORE).
There is a limit which seems to range from 3 to 4 GB's, or at least just under. I can download to about under 3.6 before getting the boot, however, the site says there's a 3 GB limit. I just wanted to mention this.
The biggest reduction of the overall score goes to the so called extras. The extra's area provides wallpapers, her DJ mixes, a diary, and a 'soon to come' web cam. However, nothing is updated at all. The last diary entry was early 2008 (a year) and I don't see this being updated soon at all. Also, I was a member when this site had DRM about 6 months ago and this site was saying the web cam would be 'arriving soon' then. Who knows when this will be up.
Overall, the site caters to Areeya's fan base and new comers to a certain extent. If you are a megafan, I'm sure you are dissapointed and to new comers, I say you may just want to join this site as a bonus from the other exoticgold sites because you get a discount. But, to me that seems still a bit pricy for this site. With average updates, lacking videos, and limited extras this is a site you may want to join for 1 month to add to your collection.
Yeah the mosaics don't bother me much. I mean I would not complain if they took them away lol :) But, I have a skewed outlook anyways because I find Japanese women to be the most attractive females in the world, so I think my threshold for dealing with mosaics is higher. This site was worth it at $29.95 because of their library and offer of WMV videos. WMV are almost non-existant in JAV sites which usually offer AVI files. Most of these AVI files are not supported through the PS3 media player, while most if not all WMV's are. That was one of my major perks of wanting to join this site. But, I wont pay $40 for the site, that's for sure.
I have to agree on the price. Up until a few months ago, this site was the regular $29.95 and was always on my list to join. After the price bump, I have deleted it from my list to join and will stick to the other JAV sites like J Sex Network and SexAsian18.
Just went to the preview and noticed the site is offering 1080p blu-ray movies for download! I don't think any of the other JAV sites has this yet? Maybe this is why the site is now gone up $10 at $39.95 instead of $29.95 though. However, this is great news!
I was wandering through the preview and noticed that while this site has a lot of bukkake based dvd's, but it has some mainstream stuff as well? Just wondering if anyone with a bit if experience as a member can give me an idea of the amount they have, whether it's just a minority within the site or if it's a good mix. Thanks.
Isn't it safer to say that P2P ripped off their videos from here? :) But, in all honesty, you mention that bukkake is a huge genre but what does this site not carry that you can get anywhere else? I guess I'm also a bit confused as to what is considered mainstream in the bukkake genre? My knowledge of this genre is not huge, however, it is not totally limited I'm just confused as to what is considered non-mainstream? Maybe to help others in this review you can attempt to distinguish this a bit more clearer.
After recently checking out the tour, I've noticed that many of the recent updates are featuring models that are considered more 'professional'. It seems the site featured more 'Amateur' models until recently but maybe I'm mistaken. Therefore, I'm asking if any recent members can comment on this. Were these recent updates in the minority or were there always professional models updated and mixed in with amateurs? Any information about this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time.
I hope you do not feel like I'm giving you a hard time when I say these next few things. First, you do state that there is value here and you can get it in one day. It would be better to describe what is actually of value and why. Second, I say this because, you can get a cheap 3 day full access trial to the content for only $2.95 and a lot of members use this option for lower end sites like this. So, if there is any value, would the trial be worth it to get what is offered? I am just saying this stuff to help get a better understanding for newer reviewers to get a thought process on the site as a whole for others to get a better understanding to what the site has to offer. I do agree that the site is definintly in the lower end and everyone has bias in their reviews. I am not slamming your review or any of your thoughts. Plus, I've read your other reviews and I've found most to be quite informative and you can only get better as time goes on, I am just trying to help out in maybe hoping that some feedback like this may help you go a bit more in depth in future reviews. Please don't take my replies as being insulting. Why? Because like I said before, I did enjoy your past reviews and I do look forward to your reviews in the future!
Fair enough. I suppose I just did not feel from what you provided in the review was sufficient enough to justify a 50. Usually when a site scoes such a high or low rating from a user, the user can go on forever on how well or bad the site was and this review seemed to be just a short tid bit about an average site that neither you liked or completely disliked. Plus, it seemed that you were just dissatisfied to the point to write a few bad things about the site to let others know rather than provide a large amount of facts why the site is the worst of worst made me feel that maybe the site was not as bad as you stated. However, I have never been a member nor am I prospecting to join, I was just a bit unclear why the score was a 50. Plus, I'm not saying that your opinion is invalid, so I hope you did not feel that I am coming off that way. Keep up the reviews and I hope to see more soon!
You don't think that the exclusivity of the site brings any value to the site at all? Exclusivity in the Asian niche is a rarity and I have to think that this may bring SOME merit to the site. While the video options appear to be a bit dated, how do they look? TBP states an okay bitrate, if they are quite clear that has to bring some more points right? A 50 is the lowest of the low, maybe you do think it's garbage but do you think it's one of the worst sites ever made? You could be right, but I just don't see it being this way from some of the info from TBP or the info stated in your review.
Anyone been a member since '05 and can tell me more about the site? The one person who reviewed this site has not responded since I asked a question 6 months ago so I thought this would be the best approach. Any info on video size/bitrate, image quality, amount of updates a week, if updating, etc etc would be greatly appreciated to anyone who knows and has read this. Thanks.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
