| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
Horndog's Reply
I believe that is standard quality. The Gold membership gets you higher quality downloads, although I'm not sure if you can stream them at that resolution. I've never really been interested in streaming their videos. If you're going to log on everyday, download all the segments, and watch them from your hard disk, I'd say the gold membership is worth the extra $5. If you're going to stream, maybe the standard membership is the way to go. Either way, you can't beat the price.
|
04-05-09 10:04pm
|
Reply
27
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
polacrilex's Review
Actually, the videos are available in a variety of formats. You just need to adjust your video preferences. Usually, it asks you if you want a Mac or PC format as one of the menus as you're browsing for videos to download.
Furthermore, I would argue that, while .H64 availability is frustrating, two days is plenty, so long as you keep up with the show during your subscription. Yeah, it would be nice if you could download every show they ever did in the highest quality format, but when you look at the price, it seems reasonable to me. But, that's just my opinion.
|
04-02-09 12:44am
|
Review
28
|
Naked News
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
If you're a fan of softcore erotica and you're looking for something different, this could be it. If you log on and watch the intro video, you'll have a pretty good idea of what to expect. A woman reports on the news and slowly takes off her clothes (or sometimes it's lingerie, or even costumes). If that sounds intriguing, you'll love the site. If not, well, that's pretty much the entire site.
Surprisingly, the news reporting is actually decent. It's a fun way to stay up on current events. The video quality is excellent and available in a variety of formats for both Mac and PC. You can download the two most current programs in very high resolution, or you can download the last 150 days shows in your choice of low/medium/high resolution. However, you'll need to buy the "gold" membership to get the very high quality videos.
Additionally, various years old segments are available for streaming, but not downloading. |
| Cons: |
I'll try to address some common complaints so that prospective subscribers know what they're getting:
The show is not really about sex. Some people may not find it erotic in the slightest. There's no romantic component and, more than anything, it feels kind of silly and carefree. It's actually a fun site, but it's not about sex.
There are about 20 downloadable pictures for some of the anchors, but for some bizarre reason, they're only semi-nude. You won't see things that you see in the video. Think of Demi Moore on the poster for "Striptease." The pics are really more like a bonus than anything else.
It's impossible to tell who the actual current anchors are. You'd think Michelle and Yukiko were still involved, but they're not. This is a bit frustrating. Not all of the anchors are amazing. Some have fake breasts and some are very skinny, but mostly they're pretty hot.
Finally, not everyone is nude all the time. If that's a problem, you'll be frustrated by the site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've subscribed off-and-on for years and I've always been pleased with the content. There is a real sense of teamwork and friendship between the anchors, and you get a real sense of their personalities.
The video quality, as I said, is outstanding and the download speeds are fast. Add to that the extremely low cost of membership, and you can't lose.
The fundamental question is, do you find the content stimulating? I suspect that for many, the answer is no - it's just too soft and has nothing to do with sex. However, you may find it irresistible.
There are a few specious notions floating around this forum, so please post a response if you want clarification on any point. |
|
04-02-09 12:38am
Replies (2)
|
Review
29
|
New Nude City
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Richard Kern has had a long and colorful career from his early experimental film work with the 'cinema of transgression' to his current more straightforward "adult" photography. While his photographic style on NNC is more-or-less conventional, there are still fragments of his early days that peak through - back when he was a rebel with this DIY punk aesthetic. This all lends an edgy depth to his work.
There is a nice selection of diverse models with a variety of body types. They're substantially different from the common Eastern European models that we see everywhere.
There are some videos and they're downloadable in a variety of formats (.wmv & .mov), although they're small and low-resolution.
The price is amazing. A subscription is a no-brainer if you like erotic photography with a real girl-on-the-street edge. Indeed, many of these models *were* found on the streets of NYC (Kern provides little comments on how he met them and what they were like). |
| Cons: |
The photo sets tend to be fairly small compared to what we're seeing these days. The newer sets are slightly larger, but the old sets are just tiny. The same goes for the videos - they're very small and the quality is certainly not HD, or anything close.
The site doesn't really track its updates. They claim its updated regularly, but during my subscription, I didn't necessarily see evidence of that. Maybe I was always looking in the wrong place, but I couldn't tell if new stuff was showing up at all.
The site isn't huge. There are over 100 models, but when you compare it to MET or Abby Winters, it's pretty small. However, the site compensates by having unique, interesting content, and a very reasonable membership fee. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kern is definitely an artist, although I don't necessarily count the content of NNC as art, per se. The important thing is, he has a unique eye for interesting compositions with interesting models. It's one of the few sites out there that feature actual American models that don't look like Playboy playmates or porn stars (i.e. fake breasts and all that).
If you like erotic photography and are looking for something different, NewNudeCity is definitely worth checking out. |
|
03-31-09 11:51am
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Perfect 10
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Perfect 10 is something like a British Playboy, although the models appear slightly more natural. You won't find any fake breasts here. The pictures are colorful and appealing, and the content is very soft. It's essentially "wholesome," but with a slightly naughty edge. In that sense, it's a lot like what Playboy used to be - the all American girl next door, who was secretly a raging sex kitten. |
| Cons: |
The pictures are small and there are no zip files. Theoretically, if zip files were available, you could download the entire site in a couple days. However, there is a ridiculous download limit imposed, so you actually can't download all the content right away.
Some may think the content is much too soft. Some of the models are merely topless. Personally, I enjoy softcore of this nature, but it's important to understand that this is very very soft stuff.
I've subscribed twice. Strangely, some of the content from my first membership disappeared when I returned a year later. I have no idea why a website with such limited content would actually *remove* pictures, but they did. |
| Bottom Line: |
My recommendation is to choose the trial subscription to see if you like it. Just be warned: only look at the stuff you're definitely interested in because once you hit the download limit, that's it.
Ultimately, I cannot recommend purchasing a regular subscription. It's not like the site updates, so there isn't a nice stream of new content. It does softcore modeling very well, but considering the small picture size, lack of updates, and lack of zip files, it's not worth a month's subscription. |
|
03-31-09 08:40pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
31
|
Perfect 10
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
I agree 100%. I was very disappointed with the site. I'll probably write a review myself, although yours covers it very nicely.
|
03-31-09 11:55am
|
Review
32
|
Rare Asians
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As hard as I try, I cannot think of anything really good to say about this site. The most positive comment I can make is that it uses CCBill, which makes it easy to cancel your trial subscription once you gain access to the site and realize that there is almost no content to download! |
| Cons: |
This is an extremely poor site.
-Small pictures
-Low quality pictures
-Models are very average-looking
-20 Models total, some with as few as 120 pictures
-No zip files
-Membership signs you up to a sister site, which you then need to go and cancel
-Daily download limit (5gigs, which is amusing seeing as there probably isn't 5 gigs worth on content on the entire site!) |
| Bottom Line: |
I was not expecting much here, but my low expectations weren't even satisfied. Basically, I joined for one single model that I had seen on ATK Exotics. Her pictures were exceptional in comparison to the typical photo sets on RareAsians. I assumed that there would at least be a few similar models, but no.
The bottom line is, there is almost no content on this site. A selection of 20 sub-par models does not a porn site make. I expect a minimum of quality photography (in focus, decent lighting, correct exposure), but again, that was too much to ask.
In my opinion, the 'official' review is much too generous. If you want Asians, you're much better off looking at Graphis Nudes or even ATK Exotics. |
|
11-01-09 02:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
33
|
Ray Spade
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This is the private collection of a photographer who has, over the course of his life, photographed a fair amount of women. The content is entirely exclusive and, for vintage photography, it's pretty decent.
The models appear realistic and authentic (more on that below). Even though the compositional and posing style is similar to vintage Playboy, the models are clearly amateurs. In many instances, they seem like neighbors wives looking for a thrill - demure, but slightly adventurous. |
| Cons: |
There are no updates, so I can see no reason to use anything but the trial. I believe there are less than 80 galleries (7 of which were unavailable for the duration of my subscription), so one can easily get all the content in a few hours. Of course, there are no zip files either.
The photography ranges from decent to 'not so great.' I believe some of the pictures just haven't aged well - maybe they weren't stored properly through the years.
Most of the models are merely topless. This wasn't necessarily a problem for me, but it might be for some. Essentially, there's nothing here you won't see in 50s/60s era Playboy.
Some of the models are not conventionally attractive. Typically, I like models that appear realistic and authentic. However, I draw the line at breasts covered in bright red stretch marks (granted, only two models were like that). |
| Bottom Line: |
If the idea of paying a nominal 'trial' fee for a small, but unique collection of softcore vintage photos sounds good to you, by all means, give it a try. It was worth my money.
However, the site is very small, the photo sizes aren't very large, maintenance seems to be non-existent, and the idea of subscribing to such a small, non-updating site seems, to me, a bit ridiculous! If all you want is some vintage photography, there are plenty of sites out there with far more content, better content, and an actual update schedule. |
|
04-02-09 01:01am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
34
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
Reply of
Xororos's Comment
*Update*
The admin has posted a few replies on the Rookie Babe forum. The issue where you cannot navigate the site while downloading (or have parallel downloads) isn't due to heavy traffic - it's an ERROR IN THE SITE!!! Apparently, the issue has been forwarded to the web programmer. Talk about amateur hour.
Also, I got confirmation that the old content will indeed show up at the rate of one set per day as part of the highly touted "daily update" schedule. Those of us who waited around for the new site to launch were rewarded with the prospect of getting the same old stuff all over again. Yes, it's higher resolution, but it's old content!
In light of these new development, I can definitely offer this advice: stay away until Rookie Babe gets its act together. For one thing, Zip files don't save you time if you can't do anything else while they're downloading (one at a time). Plus, there are exactly 31 photo sets (as of 4.23.09). That's hardly worth the increased subscription price (now $29.99 instead of $24.99). What a shame!
Oh, and CCBill is not yet available to new subscribers. Existing subscriptions remain active under CCBill, but new subscribers have to use an alternative billing source.
|
04-23-09 02:28pm
|
Comment
35
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
|
04-23-09 01:16am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
36
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
|
03-22-09 10:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
The Good Nudes
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
This site is very similar in content to both FigureBaby and Grace & Beauty. All three feature figure models in photos that are more artistic and sensual than sexual. They also share a few of the models (Idaho has photos on all three, Leona and Lara are on TGN and G&B, and more).
The photographs are reasonably well composed and the models have that certain authenticity, as if you could expect to meet them on the street. The best thing in this site's favor is the quality collection of models. |
| Cons: |
The sets are small, as are the pictures. With all the quality, high resolution images offered by photography sites these days, this quality level is kind of inexcusable. There are "high res" versions of some of the pictures, but this is laughable when you compare the to what MET calls "high res."
The content is very soft and artistic. As I always say, this is actually what I like, but I know some will be disappointed that the images aren't more sexual in character. |
| Bottom Line: |
Seeing as this site does not compare favorably with FigureBaby and Grace & Beauty, I cannot really recommend it. The best I can say is, if you subscribe to the aforementioned sites, download all the content, and still want more, TheGoodNudes is an adequate stopgap until the other sites fill up with updates again. |
|
04-02-09 01:14am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
38
|
WTF Hot Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Yeah, they do say that. To me, however, that doesn't translate into "some of these models are not naked at all." Anytime where I have to dig through a long statement of purpose and parse a sentence, I think it should be clearer and more direct.
The secretive nature of the site (making you sign up for a free account before you can see anything) just doesn't agree with me.
|
04-25-10 03:29pm
|
Review
39
|
WTF Hot Girls
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good photography, very beautiful models, zip file downloads, extremely high resolution. |
| Cons: |
First of all, this site is about 90% non-nude. I don't understand the reason anybody would want 300 pictures of a woman standing around fully clothed - unless, that is, they were operating under the perfectly reasonable assumption that an adult site features nudity unless otherwise specified!
I found the pricing system ridiculous. You purchase all the work of a single model (around 2 gigs of content) for a flat fee (between $15 and 20). When you compare that to the amount of content on virtually any other site, the price is staggering. I thought I would try it and see if it truly was worth it.
Sadly, what I got were 12 huge (200-300 photos) sets of a pretty woman not taking off her clothes. Wonderful. Typically the model removes some clothes and is sometimes topless, but she's virtually always posed to cover certain areas. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site needs to be much more up-front about what exactly you're getting. Their lengthy mission statement doesn't really cut it. I honestly don't see how they can justify the enormous price. It's a terrible deal and even though the models are uniformly excellent, it's just not an adult site.
My advice: save your money and look elsewhere. |
|
04-05-10 10:42pm
Replies (2)
|
|
