| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Teen Brazil
(0)
71.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
See my review of AllElitePass for Pros. |
| Cons: |
See my review of AllElitePass for Cons (IMPORTANT). Especially, beware pre-checked cross sells that will bill you $80 one day after you join.
Only 33 videos, with no updates since October 2008. |
| Bottom Line: |
When you join, you become a member of AllElitePass. See my review of AllElitePass for billing concerns (IMPORTANT). I joined CollegeFuckFest and thus was able to access this site as one of the 97 sites under their umbrella.
TeenBrazil has anal sex in most scenes, and the sex tends to be rough. Most of the scenes have no chemistry, no arousal, no laughing or fun, just rough sex.
There were a handful of videos that I liked:
Pilar is a gorgeous, skinny, petite, dark-skinned lovely who seems to enjoy getting fucked, and fucking back. Bianca gets it on convincingly. Honorable mention: Debby, Mima. |
|
06-20-10 06:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
52
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
I agree that it must be hard for a young woman to get aroused in front of a camera crew, lights, etc. especially if the stunt cock isn't attractive to her, and in any case is rushed and mechanical. I would be interested if you list specific videos or actresses representing "the most aroused females in porn ... in solo or girl/girl sets". Then I could take a look without sifting thru hundreds where they aren't aroused! I have been providing such lists in my reviews and I hope others will begin doing the same. Anyway, there are plenty of aroused young females in porn, but you have to look hard sometimes to find them. Again, see the lists in my reviews for some winners. As for your Viv Thomas tip, too bad my TeenDreams subscription has already expired.
|
08-28-09 12:50pm
|
Comment
53
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
|
08-24-09 07:19pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
54
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 06:26pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
55
|
The Habib Show
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Unique content with real pay for play street/bar girls, no faking, no acting.
- Fun party atmosphere. Some street scenes during pickups.
- Wide range of female body types, some young and gorgeous.
- All videos are downloadable.
- Videos can be sorted by most popular or latest.
- I reported a bad download link and they replied within 24 hours saying they fixed it (I didn't verify that). |
| Cons: |
- Horrible, very jerky, amateurish camera work is hard to watch and often misses the best parts.
- Large annoying watermark often blocks what you most want to see!
- Video resolution varies from poor to excellent.
- Video format seems to depend randomly on which camera they used. Each video is available in only one format: wmv, mp4, divx.
- Bulk of each video is conversation, undressing, showering. Sex is typically just a few minutes.
- Guys make little or no effort to pleasure the girls.
- Trailers are mixed in with full length videos.
- Stills are lo-res screenshots from the videos with no artistry whatsoever.
- Occasionally they use fake semen ("big willie").
- Download speed was sometimes very good but sometimes very poor -- varies widely.
- Downloaded video files have unique names but those names are often hard to relate to the title of the video -- so you may not be able to find it again.
- Bonus sites are very poor. |
| Bottom Line: |
I was disappointed with these videos. I joined for one month and will never re-join.
They are mildly interesting documentary but just not very erotic. It is sort of fun to see these guys pick up pay for play street/bar girls in various countries and what the girls say when they get back in the hotel room. Basically Habib just videos hotel rooms where he brings pay for play girls, and most of the videos are her arriving, undressing, horsing around, maybe some smoking, showering, just a few minutes of sex. A rare few of these girls managed to get off and enjoy themselves, but not because the guys made much effort. I don't like it when the guys bang away forever -- I prefer that they show some excitement and enjoyment and shoot their load in a natural amount of time -- but these guys mostly have no stamina at all -- no real attention to arousing the woman, then a couple of minutes in and out and they are done. The men often have trouble even getting hard. Too much booze and too little sleep? Nothing exciting about that either.
Condoms are used in nearly all of these videos. Under the circumstances of what they are doing, I applaud that. However it doesn't increase the erotic value of the videos.
Due to very amateurish videography with really no effort being made to produce a watchable video, the video quality is horrible. Lighting is often poor.
There are no cancellation links on the site so keep your subscription email info! Canceling was straightforward by going directly to the billing site.
I downloaded and watched 47 videos. There are probably over 100 full length videos on the site but it is hard to estimate. Only about 10 seemed worth keeping to watch again someday, and only about 5 of those were somewhat erotic and had orgasms (a couple from rubbing their own clits while being fucked). |
|
08-01-13 03:38pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
56
|
The Sandfly
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Occasional videos of real amateurs, really aroused.
- Amusing random clips (but these are rare): clit piercing, wild parties, girl pissing on beach fire, sex on a trampoline, etc.
- Low price: $20 for 4 months. |
| Cons: |
- Not much good content -- fair number of clips but most very short and horrible quality.
- Mostly very short videos. Most of the minority that show any excitement end before anyone has a climax.
- Mostly horrible resolution, like an old cell phone video. ALL uniformly small format (about 360 x 400 pixels), and no "full screen" display option.
- Often very amateurish jerky camera work, usually POV.
- Often very poor light -- some so dark you can't see anything.
- The majority of amateur videos are just blowjobs. Next most common is solo girl masturbation but often not to climax. Next is just girls undressing or prancing around, often not even nude. There are a small number of boy-girl fucking scenes.
- Some members have uploaded commercial porn clip that you may well have seen on free sites.
- The video player has no time scale.
- Streaming only, no downloads. You cannot right-click and download the video.
- No search mechanism. No organization for videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
The guy who apparently runs this site, "SandFly", takes spy voyeur videos of girls and couples on the beach. Most of these are just women with bare breasts, sometimes nude, sunbathing. Low resolution, jerky, telephoto from a long way away. There are only a handful showing man-woman couples or groups having sex, and most of those end before anything much happens. Actually, you'll find better voyeur spy vids of amateurs on xhamster. There are roughly 110 of these videos.
The other side of this site is user-uploaded videos. You can earn access to the site by uploading videos so a lot of boring or duplicate stuff is uploaded.
There are about 120 "big clips" (a few minutes long instead of less than a minute). And there are more than 1,000 short clips uploaded by users. Both categories suffer from the "cons" listed above. And there are quite a few duplicates within these counts.
There are also still picture sets but I didn't bother to look at them.
Bottom line: for such a cheap price one can hardly complain or expect more, but not worth the time I spent looking thru the videos. |
|
10-04-12 08:25pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
57
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
CONS CONTINUED:
-There are many key terms for searching, but female orgasms is not one of them. I've asked Victor to add it and he said he's working on it.
-Most of the girls are not as young and gorgeous as at other sites. That would be OK if they were genuinely aroused, but most aren't. In some early videos, they have matted disgusting hair.
-Many of the recent videos are split into intro, main, and aftermath. I don't see the point of having to download 3 pieces when the intro and aftermath are very short, yet add significantly to the main video.
-Navigation problem: when you find a video by actress or title, you can't find out the action keywords, or what year it was made.
-They limit you to 5 gigs/day. Once, this caused me to be blocked for 24 hours, but for the most part, it isn't a problem.
-Although less than half of the videos have anal (which I could do without), Victor seems to love it and makes a big deal of a girl's first anal, also her first facial. I dislike the emphasis that this site puts on those, but YMMV. None of the anal was with condom, which makes it worse.
-In the early years, still photos appear to have been taken during video shoots, not separate modeling sessions. Generally, I find them much less erotic than those at other sites where there are separate sessions optimized for still shots. Also, there are typically just a handful of full body shots, then dozens and dozens of blowjob and facial shots. Not to my taste at all. There are way too many closeups in the still photos. Even when I find the actress quite attractive, in the early years of the site, usually I can't find a single still that I want to keep! In the last few years, stills went to 1600 pixels, and many are of better quality and some are more erotic. Still not as good as the stills on many sites.
|
11-20-09 03:21pm
|
Review
58
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-I agree with the previous reviews. There is real amateur porn here, some of it quite refreshing.
-There are several hundred videos here.
-About 1 in 8 of the videos have real chemistry, affection, and the woman gets aroused and in some cases has orgasms.
-The price of $14.95/month is great.
-Some of the bonus photos (from other sites) are 1024 pixels and quite worth saving, especially from Met-Art and Hegre.
-If you like facials (I don't) you can download the facial excerpt from every video here, separately from the long main video.
-Good support. Victor thanked me for pointing out a couple of errors, and responded politely and substantively to my suggestions.
-The super closeups don't last very long, and they hush the annoying music when the action gets hot so you can hear the actors. |
| Cons: |
-Victor, the proprietor, insists on a facial in every video, which I detest. He seems to insist that every woman say "I want you to come in my face" in every video. This seems to me ridiculous and demeaning to both parties.
-Victor's direction seems to me to push many of the amateur couples into attempting standard (boring) porn. In particular, the guys hold off too long and end up jacking themselves off, which I find very unerotic. I wish he'd let them do what they want. Some of the more creative couples do manage quite interesting things anyway.
-So even for the amateur couples, the sex is usually unrealistic (guy holding off for way too long, no creampies, running thru standard positions mechanically).
-About half of the videos consist of a non-amateur giving a BJ to Victor, ending in a facial. These don't appeal to me at all. But the other half are mostly real amateur couples, and about 1 in 4 of those I found to be erotic.
OUT OF ROOM -- CONS CONTINUED IN A "REPLY". |
| Bottom Line: |
I have never kept my subscription into a second month except here. The quantity of videos, photos, and bonus photos kept me going thru the 2nd month. I ended up keeping about 90 videos. Thus I rate this site better than KarupsHA (I kept 40-some) and YoungLibertines or YoungModels (I kept only about 20 from each). VelvetEcstasy is fantastic for the money!
They have real amateur couples and it could be great porn if they would only stop forcing them into porn cliches -- let the couple do sex the way they like it (not trying to make "porn"), let the guys cum when they want to, no facials, some creampies. There are a handful where the guy comes more than once (nice!). If the girl likes it after the guy cums, let him satisfy her orally or use a vibrator or both. Also, like most sites, it would help so much to have accurate descriptions of the videos. Do the girls orgasm in an obvious and convincing way? More than once? This is hardly ever mentioned in the descriptions, and "Orgasms" is not one of their categories!
There are very few girl-girl videos and few solo girls that really cum. I don't mind this, but don't come to this site if you want these.
OK, if your taste agrees with mine (boy/girl scenes with real chemistry, laughing, fun, real arousal, real female orgasms, no fake moaning, guy coming from sex not jacking) here are some lists that will give you a huge advantage. My picks for the best are grouped first. (Numbers like _06, _07 are years released, but I stopped keeping track in later years -- the good videos span all years of the site.)
bodyrub_sensual_not_the_usual_06, dancingdick_08, laptease_06, laptease-bonus, mysistersfriend, oilylizzie, pointsofinterest, quickdraw, rainysunday_08, squealsofecstasy_07, squealsofecstasy_interview_07, taketwo, velvetkarma, witchyways_07.
autumnshakes_07, backyardbang_06, bellyrub_07, birthdaybuttfuck, lovelyrita, morningpayback, newyearpop, sexualhealing_07, studybreak, tremors, wyldfire_07, wyldfire_bts_07, zombigasms.
anteupmyass, barelynineteen, beantownbang, blindpresent_06, bustinout_08, chocolateoil_08, comeoutswinging_06, flooded_06, foothold, gisellesrub, gisellesrub_introduction_07, havingfaith_06, homemade_06, lovebites, lubingcallie, milkandhoney, poleposition, prettymama, redpassion, squirtgirl, tightfit, wetnwild, whippedfudge. |
|
11-20-09 03:19pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
59
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Goldfish's Review
Thanks for the helpful review, Goldfish. I've noticed that Eastern European girls, though beautiful, tend to be inhibited and passive in sex scenes, either not getting excited, or hiding their excitement/orgasms. I much prefer girls who show an interest in sex, are active participants, enjoy the scene, and let us know when they are cumming. How do the X-Art models do in these respects?
|
09-15-12 05:51pm
|
Comment
60
|
Yes-Movies
(0)
|
|
12-03-09 11:32am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
61
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 07:51pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
62
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
Cons continued because I ran out of room:
- Infrequent updates, about one/week while I was watching.
- The “top visited” and “top rated” lists are relatively useless: they list only 10 each (a mix of photosets and videos, so less than 10 in each category), and the number of ratings are low.
- Dialog is in Russian(?), and there are no subtitles.
(END OF CONS)
|
09-28-09 07:44pm
|
Review
63
|
Young Libertines
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Occasional videos with real sexual excitement and orgasms.
- Beautiful young bodies (both men and women).
- Occasionally what might be real couples with real chemistry in homemade videos.
- No super closeups! Few closeups at all. You get to enjoy the beautiful writhing bodies!
- The stunt cocks are generally nice, gentle and non-abusive (if boring).
- I asked several questions via a support form, and got prompt and helpful answers.
- Photos can be viewed online, downloaded individually or in zipped sets. |
| Cons: |
- Most videos are mechanical, there is no chemistry, so they are un-erotic. Perpetual optimist that I am, I was hoping for better at this site!
- Video quality varies widely. Some shot by a cameraperson (those are best). Some homemade with fixed camera. Some POV (usually too jerky). Some low-res, most OK resolution.
- Way too many videos end with the guy jerking off in girl’s face. I hate that.
- About five guys are the stunt cocks in many of the videos. None have any personality. They bang hard with no imagination. Its up the girl to make something good in these. Most fail.
- When you download a video, the default filename is a useless fulllength-high.wmv, or fulllength-low.wmv. Its up to you to rename every one.
- Several ads for other sites interspersed on every page! Annoying!
- Static images (1500 px) modest quality (inferior cameras?), poor lighting (flash), and red-eye not removed. Models’ teeth often yellow. Generally unexciting.
OUT OF ROOM, CONTINUED IN 1ST "REPLY". |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I was disappointed with this site (as with nearly all), but it was not a total loss, as I was able to find 20-some videos that I really liked to add to my collection. However, as seems nearly universally the case, the truly erotic videos seem to be accidents that happened in spite of bad direction and lack of imagination.
WMV is the only video format offered. “High quality” is 640 x 480 but quality varies. There is also a “low bitrate” video download option, which I never used.
Video download speed was so so, taking about 20-some minutes for the typical 400 megabyte file. However, after I got the first few, I could keep occupied watching them while downloading more, so I didn’t have to wait. I was able to downloade up to 6 or 8 concurrently with no problem (other than reduced speed per file, of course).
They list a large number of bonus sites and feeds listed as “coming up”, but no bonus sites actually available. Some bonus feed sites are available – e.g., not downloadable. I took a look at a couple and they seem really boring.
Very few of the videos have anal penetration. That is a pro for me and a con for some. Many use condoms openly. That is a plus for me. Most of the girls were shaved, but some were just trimmed – I like the mix. A few of the videos end in creampies, and refreshingly, they don’t belabor the dripping pussy.
There are about 150 videos available. Navigation is by date added, or you can search for the name of the video. Descriptions of the videos are ridiculous and useless, and seem to have no connection to the content (same for the titles). There is a 5-star rating system, which seemed somewhat useful. Generally, I found the 2-star videos to be boring, while some of the 3-star videos were good.
I downloaded and watched about 80 videos. I deleted 40-some immediately as I would never want to watch them again, simply because the sex was mechanical, no chemistry, no excitement. I kept about 25 that had some excitement, chemistry, intimacy, fun, laughing, and most of all, female orgasms. I much prefer when the guy comes from real excitement “right out of the box” over the girls tits or butt. If your tastes are similar to mine, you can save time by starting with these (search for the titles). Remember, the titles bear no relation to the contents. These are in 3 groups, best first, alphabetical within each group. Sorry I can’t put them in a column because of PU’s annoying 40-line restriction here.
Silly chick is in a movie now (my favorite).
Depraved couple; Fyl018; Marki peeping on Silvia; Real homemade video; Red-haired goddess; Silly Cathy; Summer day suck and fuck; W041; W108.
Excited Joyce; F061; H005; Lucky guy and two girls; So nice ass; Too-young-to-have-sex; W047; W111; While her parents are home.
Don’t pull my hair you goon; Every day work on sex skills; F032; Sexy tattooed girl; Shy Marta; W093. |
|
09-28-09 07:40pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
64
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
05-10-10 07:14pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
65
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
12-02-09 05:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
66
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
10-02-09 09:54am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
67
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
khf2004's Reply
Dear khf2004, I cannot find the message you sent me via PU. I don't know where to look for it, I guess. However, I did receive your message at my yahoo email, and replied there. Thanks for dealing with this issue!
|
09-29-09 03:04pm
|
Comment
68
|
Young Models
(0)
|
|
09-28-09 08:05pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
69
|
Young Models
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Occasional vids with horny young girls who forget they're on camera (or like it) and come and come and come.
- Directing does not get in the way of real arousal and chemistry when it happens.
- Pretty young girls, some handsome young guys.
- Good videography, well lit, some closeups but they don't go on too long. Mostly you can see whole bodies.
- Special $20/month (NETBilling), recurring, cancellation easy.
- Full access to all 12 of their sites for one fee.
- I downloaded wmv; not sure if they offer other formats.
- I had no problem with downloading speed, seemed smooth and reliable.
- Photo sets available as well as vids, but I didn't pay much attention to photos b/c I prefer videos. |
| Cons: |
- Most of the vids are standard fare with no female orgasms, no chemistry, nobody having fun or getting aroused -- just fast HC banging. You have to look hard to find the few wonderful gems listed below.
- Resolution is good but not HD. |
| Bottom Line: |
- Resolution is good but not great, mostly 640 x 480 pixels, some on Creampies were 480 x 360. Most files I downloaded were 200 - 250 megabytes.
What I liked a great deal about YM is that I was able to find a few scenes where amateur-looking girls were very horny, seemed to forget (or enjoy) that they were on camera, and just came and came and came. My favorite was Sabrina, a tiny brunette who came with oral, jumps into a vigorous CG coming in about 3 minutes, and again in a couple more minutes. She is definitely using the guy! Next she comes in mish and at least twice again in K9. End is a disappointing tired jack off on her face. Sabrina has a large vine tattooed wrapped around one leg, which I found quite hot.
Another favorite is Ginger. I've seen this blonde model on other sites, but here she really comes hard, first to oral, then to CG and RCG, then she pumps away in K9 but doesn't seem to come, then comes in mish. This ends a little better with the guy withdrawing and immediately coming over her tits.
Other gorgeous comealot girls are Sammy (tho she has an ugly tattoo), and readhead Brandimay, who has a cute giggly personality.
A subscription to YM includes access to a bunch of other sites: AmateurCouples, DrippingCreampies, Interracial, ButtBunnies, DPBabes, GapingGirls, MomsASlut, LesbianTraining, SweetPinkHoles, SuckThatDick, and StripTeaseThenFuck. Not being into anal or g/g, I didn't visit all of these. I found scenes that I liked a lot at the first three.
Dripping Creampies (videos are labeled CreampieFucking): Denisa is a gorgeous model who really enjoyed the sex and appeared to me to be multiorgasmic, tho quiet about it. Barbie Cummings has a nice short scene where the guy comes in a normal (short) amount of time. Lorena's scene has a great throbbing dick closeup, coming inside, as do those with Nikki and Stacey.
At Interracial (videos are labeled InterracialSlut), Lisa Marie, Christie, and Brooke (all white) are multiorgasmic and fun.
At AmateurCouples (videos are labeled AmateurCouplesSex), there's good chemistry, affection, and cumming aplenty in Heather (Silky) and Rick, Missy and Dave, and MacKenzie and Noah.
BOTTOM LINE: While there is not much real arousal or excitement or fun in most of the videos at these sites, there are enough gems (listed above) that I found a one-month subscription well worthwhile. Those gems illustrate how it is possible, when the director doesn't interfere too much, for the rare horny porn stars with personality and couples who like sex and exhibitionism to be genuinely aroused and erotic. If your tastes agree with mine (see my profile, and the forum thread "Against the grain"), you'll know just which scenes to download first.
These sites also have photo sets, but I'm not into static photos much so I didn't pay much attention to those. |
|
07-29-09 10:26am
Replies (0)
|
|
