| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
576
|
Bang.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Reply
Thanks for the comment. Yeah, 97 is high for me. I think some of that may be subjective. I try really hard to limit any subjective influence but I was hung over this morning when I finished the review...
Seriously though, this is a great site.
|
08-05-17 01:09pm
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I've always got room for more favourites, but I have many models that will always be on the list. Heck, I have favourite models I still watch from the mid-1990s.
|
08-04-17 12:47pm
|
Reply
578
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
Divinx's Reply
Yeah, I joined a site once that hid the fact that they were streaming only. The Terms of Service were vague at best. I added a comment here and the webmaster threatened to sue me.
|
08-04-17 12:45pm
|
Reply
579
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WurstKanone's Comment
Welcome to PU. I hope you stick around for a while.
Unfortunately you've fallen into the same trap that's snagged so many of us that TBP/PU won't even list them here any longer. Their primary biller, Centrobill, seems to be a front for a scam.
Sadly, being scammed by Centrobill isn't really an exclusive club...
|
08-02-17 04:10pm
|
Reply
580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Yup... put me down as agreeing with Jay G as well. The hunt is a big part of the hobby for me. And I also like having to catalogue and maintain my collection too. 'Curating' my collection is probably the most time consuming part of it.
|
08-02-17 04:07pm
|
Reply
581
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Agreed on them being a bit lazy... that also explains the site design that looks like it's from 15 years ago.
|
08-02-17 04:04pm
|
Reply
582
|
Family Strokes
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks. I don't think I've ever joined this site and it's a niche I like so I'll definitely be joining soon based on your recommendation.
|
08-02-17 04:03pm
|
Reply
583
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer shooting styles other than POV but if a model I like is in a POV scene I'll still download it.
|
08-01-17 01:30pm
|
Reply
584
|
The Black Alley
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
You might be right that this site is pretty much dead and that the 'old' download limit is from that time too. I'm not a member so I can't tell you if they update at all.
|
07-31-17 01:05pm
|
Reply
585
|
Fantasy HD
(0)
|
Reply of
chtonia's Comment
Most of the scenes seem to still be available in up to 1080p but there are a few - even the newer ones - that are only available in 720p as the highest resolution. I can't recall if this site ever offered scenes in anything higher than 1080p.
The worse news is that the site seems to be dormant now. It hasn't been updated since November 2016. While that's bad, subscribers will often be offered a great deal at joining sister sites for a one-time annual fee or some similar offer. Those can be great deals.
BTW - welcome to PU. I hope you hang out and continue to contribute.
|
07-25-17 01:11pm
|
Reply
586
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
It's entirely possible that I just remember getting a discount offer to WUNF but didn't really. That's possible because I like both sites a lot so when I join one I join the other and price isn't really the determining factor. Both sites offer some amazing porn (as you describe) and I'm always willing to pay for that.
|
07-22-17 09:16am
|
Reply
587
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
if the site is well organized then I usually don't use the search function. If it could use some better organization I'll use the search function to find anal scenes and scenes with specific models I like.
|
07-22-17 09:13am
|
Reply
588
|
Net Video Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
This is purely subjective but whenever I join this 'network' I just consider Net Video Girls an add-on and don't download much from it. Back when I first started joining I think all there was were Exploited College Girls (my favourite), Backroom Casting Couch (my second favourite) and NVG. I think part of my thoughts about NVG is that the site is just so bad. It really could use a thorough modernization.
Having said that, I do have some scenes from NVG that I really like.
|
07-18-17 04:35pm
|
Reply
589
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Thanks for posting such a thorough review. This is a favourite site of mine too and I've joined it several times since I wrote my review. Like you, I wish there was a discount for joining WCX and WUNF together but I find that once you join WCX the discounted offer for WUNF is enough to entice me to join that site too. I can't recall what the discounted price is. I always join both sites and I get access to Woodman Films so I don't know if that's because I've joined both sites or if it's linked with WUNF.
Obviously you'll need to make your own choice here, but WUNF is my favourite of the two. I like WCX but I like WUNF even more. But that's purely subjective.
|
07-18-17 04:30pm
|
Reply
590
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
Amanda's Reply
Thanks Amanda. The site is what, 10 years old now? In human years that must be 50 and as someone who is 50 now I can forgive some slowness!
|
07-18-17 04:24pm
|
Reply
591
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
They eventually appeared, and I'm always glad to weigh in on any new reviews but especially to say hello to a familiar long-term member.
|
07-18-17 04:23pm
|
Reply
592
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Amanda's Poll
Zero for me but I am reminded of a line from a restaurant sketch in Monty Python from almost 50 years ago: "I met my second wife at an orgy. Trust me to arrive late."
|
07-18-17 04:22pm
|
Reply
593
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I forgot to mention something even if my original post pops up sometime...
For my American friends who are a bit dismayed by Donald Trump as POTUS I have another reason that you'll want to move to Canada: we still get the peeing videos. :-)
|
07-17-17 03:26pm
|
Reply
594
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I just wanted to let you know that I wrote a long-ish reply to your review but when I clicked 'add reply' I got a warning that my post was invalid. That's happened before and it has showed up later, but in case it doesn't I just want you to know that took the time to read your review and comment on it.
(BTW - one of the things I mentioned is that in the past couple of weeks I'm seeing an improvement in download speeds.)
|
07-17-17 03:24pm
|
Reply
595
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I'm always interested to read what people think about Legal Porno. I've kept credits there pretty much constantly for the past few years because I like a lot of what they do. One thing that they seem to have more of these days are American stars.
I'm seeing an improvement in download speeds lately (though that could be temporary). The speeds are still slower than I get elsewhere but at least they're better now.
If you're interested in reading this, Alexa Nova posted a blog and she talks about her scenes with LP (all of which are amazing, BTW). It's a fascinating read with the most fascinating part being when Alexa talks about the economics of a scene. She specifically mentions her 5-on-1 scene (where she sticks a toy football up her ass) and notes that the scene got 189,000 views at the time. I don't know if this is true or not, but Alexa says that in order to be counted as a view the person must purchase it. So if the scene costs $5 USD per view then this scene generated revenues of almost $1 million so far. Who says there isn't still money in porn?
Here's a link to the blog: https://steemit.com/life/@alexanova/diary-of-a-pornstar-i-m-back-recap-of-my-2017-so-far
|
07-17-17 03:21pm
|
Reply
596
|
Family Strokes
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Thanks to your review I was reminded that I liked this site when I joined it a couple of years ago. It's also a niche I like, and some of my favourite models have done scenes for them since the last time I was there so I think it's time I joined again...
|
07-17-17 03:02pm
|
Reply
597
|
Nubiles Casting
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I really liked this site too. I liked the whole premise of a hot model casting another hot model, engaging is some girl sex and then bringing in a guy to complete the casting. Many of their scenes feature two of the hottest models at that time. I suspect these were expensive scenes to produce and that could be what killed them.
You're correct that Nubiles Casting is part of a larger network. There is one umbrella site that has everything but that can be filtered to seven niche sites. Those are:
- Nubiles Casting
- Moms Teach Sex
- Petite HD Porn
- Driver XXX
- Petite Ballerinas Fucked
- Step Siblings Caught
- Teacher Fucks Teens
All of those except Nubiles Casting and Driver XXX are updating so the network is still a good value.
|
07-10-17 10:25am
|
Reply
598
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Often but not always. It really depends on the circumstances. I know this isn't answering the question, or at least it's bad logic, but if the situation is sexual then I find the nudity sexual.
I recall seeing a site (I wasn't a member) where each model had a series of photos where she slowly undressed and then when nude would turn and face different directions. I didn't find anything about that to be sexual or arousing.
Casting scenes are sort of like the above but I do find some of those to be sexual. A good example are the scenes from Woodman Casting. In some of the scenes it really is just a casting with the model being interviewed, undressing and then posing a bit. Those are sexual (for me) in that I like the anticipation of seeing if it will turn into a sex scene. Many of the scenes on Woodman casting do turn into sex but many also do not. Once I've watched a scene once then I find that knowing it turns into sex makes the sterile interview and posing more sexual for me.
Or maybe I'm just confused...
|
07-08-17 07:34am
|
Reply
599
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
Reply of
Steve01's Reply
I don't want to add fuel to the fire when that fire has died down but I did just want to say three things:
1) lk2fireone has been around here for a long time and writes clear and unbiased reviews. I know you were just expressing some frustration and I get that. I reviewed Team Skeet and scored it high because at the time, admittedly a year or so ago, I didn't experience any of the issues that you have. Your complaints are corroborated by others here and that bad because TS is or maybe was one of the best sites on the internet. I hope they get things fixed.
2) I really hope that your individual issue gets cleared up with TS. I join there once and year and will be hesitant to do so until I get better news.
3) Welcome to Pornusers. If you're a member at any other porn forums I think you'll find this one can be quite a bit different. For one thing the members here are a lot more civil and tend to be helpful. The other big advantage is that when users review sites they are quite different from 'professional' reviews because users take a deep dive. For example, I've hit a daily download limit where the TBP reviewer didn't simply because I had the time to spend with the site. Being able to combine the TBP reviews with the PU reviews gives an in-depth look at the site that has a lot of value. This information has saved me money by giving me information that a site that looks good is really a dud, but overall TBP and PU have cost me a small fortune because I'm able to join more sites and be confident that I'm getting value and my card information is safe.
I hope you stick around here and continue to contribute.
|
07-06-17 04:11pm
|
Reply
600
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Whew... no one voted for Granny panties!
|
07-06-17 03:58pm
|
