| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
326
|
Tushy Lickers
(0)
|
Reply of
Getreal's Review
I was a member of one of their sister sites. I found the videos to be too short and just when it looked like things where going to get really interesting the scene ended. No Zip files where a disappointment. If the site was grouped with several others for the same asking price it would be worth the monthly asking price. I would rate the site more like a 70.
|
10-03-07 12:10am
|
Reply
327
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Reply
I agree with your comments. I would not rank a 92 like the reviewer did. I would say a 82 is more realistic.
|
10-02-07 04:02am
|
Reply
328
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
Schnitzel's Review
I couldn't have wrote any different of a review. AbbyWinters is on my list for a re-visit this winter, LOL winter...Winters, whatever. I just wish they would say it for once, that room is filled with hot cunny aroma during the photo shoots and the videos. Natural girl next door models that are having total fun being naughty. The site is worth a visit if you want to see Real girls exploring their sexuality. 89 rating...yes I agree. On the mark review.
|
10-02-07 02:45am
|
Reply
329
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
boobyluver666's Review
I agree with booyluver666. SapphicErotica is a stunning site. Its a top teen lezzie site and very xxx hardcore. Fisting and anal licking round the site out nicely. Every babe is a hottie barely legal girl. Large zip files for easy downloading with large pictures. Excellent erotic xxx closeups, stunning outdoor backgounds for the photo/video shoots. The videos are well done but can always improve. Navigation is well laid out and user friendly. I just wish the girls spoke in their native language a little. Lots of newbie models that go hardcore lezzie from the very first layout they pose for. Just wish they used more lube to highlight the girls pussies. A must see for lezzie fans.
|
10-02-07 02:34am
|
Reply
330
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Why bother when the internet is much more user friendly. Plus the quality of eroticism for cable/satellite is marginal. Alone in hotel room yes. At the privacy of home, go to the latest site you joined. Plus its too costly.
|
10-02-07 02:04am
|
Reply
331
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Review
I agree Teenrotica is a good site but it needs more work. I thought the videos where totally poor in quality and content. The pictures where great if your a shaved teen fan, but they tend to repeat in likeness from pic to pic. The models moving an inch or the photographer just slighty moving the camera becomes a bit boring. The girl is right there looking all spunky and ready to go but the camera person is stuck in slow speed just clicking at the same angle. So much lost potential. The poor quality of the videos really turned me off from this site. The big wait as quoted can make or break this site.
|
09-30-07 01:02am
|
Reply
332
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
IKnoPorn's Review
I was a memeber for two months and really explored the site. If I was to write a review my thoughts would have been similar to all the other reviewers. FTV is worth a look but its a once and done site. The pic's are good but they need to use better equipment. Alison is annoying with her non-BI attitude and simple dislike of being in front of the cmaera with other models. 'She really is not all that.' Why join in with the girls if its not really your thing? Overall IKnoPorn review is true and to the point just like the other reviews and replays.
|
09-30-07 12:44am
|
Reply
333
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I nick pick and demand quality over content. Sites that skip the little features that make a site really work are usually missing the really important features. Time tested and proven. If your site doesn't offer Zip Downloads its usually non-exclusive and just rip offs from porn videos with maginal quality. Too often the free tour looks great and the members contents is flat and stale. I learned to do my homeowrk and read reviews to learn as much as I can about the site before spending the cash and time on a site.
|
09-30-07 12:16am
|
Reply
334
|
abbywinters
(0)
|
Reply of
abbywinters's Reply
I agree 100% with Abbywinters. As a former memeber your site is very niche and I joined solely on your free tour. The whole sites niche is natural looking girls exploring their sexuality. So of course the girls are hairy and natural. Why the reviewer didn't know that before joining I can't understand?
|
09-30-07 12:08am
|
