| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
226
|
Cam With Her
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks for your input. Self control is much needed here. I enjoyed this site but I would never recommend it to anyone with an addictive personality.
As I said in my review, this is the first cam site I've ever bought credits at. The main problem, here and probably in any cam site, is that there's no limit to the amount you can spend in a given time period. Here you can buy up to 100 USD, blow them in 10 minutes and nothing prevents you from buying a 100 USD more half an hour later.
This site offers, though, a simple but very clear account of all your transactions: credits bought and spent. You may even filter by performer and/or date interval. I don't know if other cam sites offer similar information but I found this feature very helpful.
|
01-07-09 03:32pm
|
Reply
227
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks for the info. I see they haven't changed much over the years except for the somewhat higher resolutions. They always have given more importance to quantity over quality. Also, they've been pulling that bigger preview trick from day one. It doesn't make much sense to have so many picture content and that they care so little about it.
|
01-05-09 07:13am
|
Reply
228
|
Vivid
(0)
|
Reply of
User's Review
You don't mention anything about the pictures. What resolutions are there? Are they grouped by movie only or also by star?
I was a member several years ago and I remember they had quite extensive galleries for each movie although the resolution was quite small.
|
01-04-09 10:35am
|
Reply
229
|
Sister Reunion
(0)
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Reply
Thanks for the info. This site, though, so far seems more like a mainstream US porn site; I believe most of the models are known to those familiar with US porn: Britney and Whitney Stevens, Ashli Orion, Havana Ginger, the Love twins, Rhylee and Rhyse Richards, ...
I must say, though, that the sister/twin thing isn't really something I'm into; I just came across this site trying to figure out the relationship between Havana and Savana Ginger (they are sisters). Since this site seems to be US based, I was wondering how many sister groups who are already somewhat known and already active were left in US porn so they could make it to this site. Thanks again for your input.
|
01-01-09 07:18am
|
Reply
230
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Follow-up to my previous comment: turns out Savana Ginger is Havana Ginger's real-life sister. No wonder why they look so similar.
|
01-01-09 05:08am
|
Reply
231
|
Club Kayden
(0)
|
Reply of
juanchopancho's Comment
Have you checked the review at another review site listed at the bottom of TBP Site Facts? The screen capture there of inside the members area looks promising indeed; site seems well done and updating regularly.
Even though there seems to be more photo updates than videos, the video previews at the site tour have an amateur flare but they look quite fresh and interesting. I'd probably have joined already if they were somewhat less expensive and used a decent payment processor instead of DHDMedia.
As for Tori Black, I believe she's fairly new to the industry and I doubt she has a site of her own yet.
|
12-30-08 06:01am
|
Reply
232
|
It's Real
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
It's not part of the main Reality Kings network but its new sister network Muffia. I got access to Muffia as a cross-sale from Reality Kings.
Scenes usually involve some prosthetics (double-dicked guy, three-titted woman, four-nipple woman, two-vagina girl, extremely hairy bushes, bifid tongue and so on) but there are a couple scenes which are, in fact, real (big real tits, mainly). Except for a couple, models are probably American but unknown to me.
There's a scene with a model with huge areolae. Funny thing is they name the model "Savana Ginger" and she physically reminds quite a bit of "Havana Ginger", a porn star who does have similar huge areolae.
Currently, there are 17 scenes and the schedule says they update once a month.
|
12-28-08 09:17am
|
Reply
233
|
Matrix HD
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Good review. They are great content producers but their websites are subpar. This one is better than Matrix Nudes in some things but worse in others.
Just a very minor correction, though. I believe pictures at this site are offered in 4 sizes: maximum axis is 750, 1024, 1600 or 2000 pixels. Most of them are portrait and you have to click four times on the popup window every time to get to the highest resolution. I don't know if they license their photo content at greater than 2000px resolutions.
|
12-23-08 12:26pm
|
Reply
234
|
3D Lesbian
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Reply
I understand your point. I hadn't noticed the price difference and 3D Sex Games probably has the same lesbian content as this so, if you are looking for lesbian content, you wouldn't get there anything more than this one offers.
|
12-15-08 11:08am
|
Reply
235
|
3D Lesbian
(0)
|
Reply of
biker's Review
Good interesting review. Have you tried 3D Sex Games by the same company? I believe 3D Lesbian is just a subset of it. You will probably get more models and locations out of 3D Sex Games (check my review there for stats). Even though 3D Sex Games is geared towards boy-girl, you can use female models only and most likely achieve the exact same scenes as in 3D Lesbian.
Unfortunately, you will probably be unable to transfer any personalization you might have made in 3D Lesbian. I believe you won't be able to run both games at the same time either.
|
12-14-08 02:57am
|
Reply
236
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Cool idea but I think it's pretty unlikely. AFAIK, Babes.tv is 100% exclusive while Babelicious is clearly not. Crisis or not, they still have to pay for the exclusive content.
What's more, as a former member of Babelicious, I received last month a newsletter offering me to join Babelicious and the 8 additional sites that come with it for 9.95 USD and also an offer to join Babes.tv alone (no extra sites) for 19.95 USD.
I must say that while I was a member of Babelicious for a month I downloaded much more content during the cross-sale 3-day trial I got for Babes.tv. At least for me, Babes.tv is way more interesting than Babelicious. If I ever come back to one of them, it will be Babes.tv even though it's more expensive.
|
12-13-08 10:38am
|
Reply
237
|
Sleep Creep
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I was sincerely upset with the theme of the site and that's why I ranked it so low. I also happen to like the "belly-down-flat" position but it doesn't appeal to me at all if the models allegedly stay unconscious throughout the scene. I strongly feel they should add some intro or epilogue to justify it. Otherwise, it's just too creepy.
|
11-22-08 04:34am
|
Reply
238
|
Sex A Mexican
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I remember a similar discussion on Curry Creampie. In fact, several of the scenes, like the Sativa Rose and Keri Sable one, come from a DVD titled "Mexicum" which can be found at DVD sites.
What's even weirder than the performer name change is that you can see Porn.com watermarks on some of the tease thumbnails but this site doesn't seem to be owned by Porn.com.
|
11-15-08 07:46am
|
Reply
239
|
American Vice
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Review
Thanks for pointing out this site. I felt other well known DVD sites were absolute lacklusters in search engine terms.
In case you haven't noticed it, they have added an excerpt of your review on the front page:
"Having tried many of the popular DVD content giants, I can honestly say that American Vice is better than all of them."
- Toadsith - #1 Reviewer at Porn Users
|
11-11-08 12:04pm
|
Reply
240
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Comment
Let me friendly disagree on most of the content being years or decades old. There is a fair amount of 90s porn and you aren't getting the scenes the day after the studio releases the original DVD. But, looking at this last week updates alone, I saw more than a handful of DVDs released in 2007-2008 and just a couple of 90s porn. And I wouldn't mind if they had more than the current 15 Jeanna Fine scenes (she's listed in 400+ titles at iafd).
As further proof, if you look at the stars with the most scenes you find mainly still active performers (Trina Micahels, Jenna Haze, Tory Lane, etc). If you go to the bottom of the list, you will find models who started last year with some movies (Missy Stone and Stephanie Cane already have at least 4 each one and they currently have only 20-30 movies at iafd).
The site has flaws (for instance, adding the DVD production date and the name of the male performers to the movies would be a nice touch) and it certainly would be nice if they could add the promo stills companies usually shoot for their movies (Wicked Pictures and Vivid are a couple of examples of companies which I believe that offer a good amount of picture content). But, as it currently is, I believe I'm not the only one who feels it's a dream come true.
|
11-04-08 12:02pm
|
Reply
241
|
Natalie Sparks
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Very good review. Looks like the site delivers and has everything a solo amateur site should offer. The girl has the looks. I'd probably join if she didn't have that huge tattoo on her foot.
On a side note, the site looks plain but, from what I saw in the free section, it makes well thought out use of web standards for presentation. This is rarely seen in porn sites so it speaks good of the people behind it.
|
11-02-08 12:01pm
|
Reply
242
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Regarding the download issues, I've also had them; probably the same as obsessedoverit. I believe that my problem was that they keep changing the file directory structure of the site: the URL a particular video file has now is not the same it will have in an hour. So, after you've added a bunch of videos to download, that automatic directory script may come into action and you end up with a bunch of file not found errors and half downloaded files. It's really annoying and is one of the reasons I cancelled my membership.
|
10-25-08 11:13pm
|
Reply
243
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
They are using regional pricing: different regions get different prices. Many other sites also use it. Some webmasters have replied to questions similar to yours.
There are a couple forum threads on this issue:
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=115
https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...ad.html?threadid=264
|
10-21-08 09:57pm
|
Reply
244
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
Reply of
marat93's Comment
I got a trial for Playboy's CyberClub a couple days ago. Got billed by Local Billing and was able to cancel the trial membership online without any problem. I am still on the trial period but I already got a confirmation email for my cancellation.
As this site is listed as a clone of Playboy's CyberClub, maybe you should try joining that site.
|
10-20-08 10:53am
|
Reply
245
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks. I guess I already said it in my review but this is the first Score site I've ever joined but I've added Scoreland to my list of sites to join in the future: it has a nice TBP discount and I believe it's the one with the most content.
|
10-17-08 09:11am
|
Reply
246
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Regarding the broken downloads, I believe I also experienced them: it's because they change the website's subdomain every time you login. So, when you restart your computer, the queued downloads are no longer valid and you have to add them again. The site is not very download-manager-friendly.
You're right regarding the current lack of video content but the site just launched. Looks like they started with lots of photo galleries and no videos and they have been adding videos once per week ever since. I don't think 1 video and 1 photo gallery is such a bad update rate for a solo model site, though.
|
10-15-08 11:42am
|
Reply
247
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
Glad you liked the review. To each his own, though. Funny thing is I'm not a big fan of extremely huge boobs either and the usual body type of SCORE models has never done it for me but there was something with Christy Marks that prompted me to join and no complaints. The BGG scene with "major boobage" Janet Jade alone was well worth the price of admission.
|
10-13-08 03:11pm
|
Reply
248
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Watermarks on the pictures I've checked are always on the top right corner. It's the same one they have on the videos. On large pics, the CHRISTY part is about 170x70px and it's an almost solid block because of the typeface; there's a 40px-high part below with "Marks.com" which has a much lighter typeface.
I usually don't mind watermarks but these might be somewhat obtrusive, specially on the portrait pictures : they have a long axis of only 1200px which I hadn't realised when I wrote my review.
As I said, I feel pictures are quite good. They are not taken while filming the video: model is always looking and striking poses at the photo camera.
|
10-13-08 12:00pm
|
Reply
249
|
Christy Marks
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
> "Extras section is just a couple of videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova."
I should have said "just TWO videos from Busty Merilyn Sakova and nothing more" : no bonus acess to other sites or other girlfriends sets. I've edited the review to remove any confusion.
Glad that you found my review interesting too.
|
10-13-08 11:15am
|
Reply
250
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
You get the discount but, according to reviews and comments, you will probably also get charged for other sites you didn't sign up for. Many people report having had to cancel their card.
If joining through ccbill does get you access to the site without additional charges, those extra 10$ seem very well worth it.
|
10-12-08 01:41pm
|
