| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
276
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Yeah at first I was ready to rip in to these people after seeing that screenshot. You are right, the concept is actually quite good from a business stand point but it really messed me up because all these review sites were saying they had all these videos and sets and I was at about 6-8 videos each model and 10-15 sets which was like half of what all these extremely old reviews were saying them had. Thinking to myself like, ummm, what's going on. Good thing they responded with that news and the changes are said to actually be during my term as a member so I will be able to get all the content. However, it's all about them actually deliver these promises in that time span now and waiting.
|
05-27-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
277
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
GCode's Comment
Wow moments after posting this and looking even more in to things, I noticed that an image screenshot from a review at PornInspector shows the members area and the UPCOMING UPDATE is the same exact UPCOMING UPDATE they have scheduled this week and it says this review was written in 2007! Great, so they are obviously shady then.
|
05-25-09 06:24pm
|
Reply
278
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
First off, thanks for what help you could give me. I just wanted to point out I have $29.94 for the price and that seems to be the damn norm for all TS sites, they know it's a specialized niche and always charge more. The zip thing kills me but sometimes you can get around this with DownThemAll and some other progs, but I have had problems trying to get pics even with these progs if the set up is different (in terms of how they embed the pics). Thanks for the response on the vids, that's an okay quality, I just don't understand some places these days with their lower quality in this day n' age. The preview is okay and they seem to have a lot of Amy (YUM YUM) so I might have to make my way there for $30 even with the zip problem. Thanks for your help again.
|
05-10-09 01:04pm
|
Reply
279
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
Hey james4096,
I noticed you made this comment which means you may have been a member of this place recently. After looking at the site more throughly, I noticed that there are about 9 models listed, are these the only models shown on this site? I am leaning towards going here because they have Amy which is my favorite ts model of all times. I may have to deal with the no zip download thing just to get more exclusive stuff of her! What else could you maybe tell me about the site, the zip thing is a bit over the top but to get more Amy I might be persuaded to 'overlook' this :) Anything you could think of would help if you remember. Thanks man.
|
05-09-09 04:38pm
|
Reply
280
|
Ladyboy Gold
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Comment
Sounds absolutely stupid and pointless. However, I really have no intentions on joining this one soon but thanks for the heads up for sure. I like pics just as equal to vids and implementing this is outrageous imho.
|
03-31-09 08:05pm
|
Reply
281
|
Ladyboy Goo
(0)
|
Reply of
sah2809's Reply
Ouch...that's an extremely low amount of content. Thanks for the heads up, I think I'd wait almost a year to this date if I ended up joining!
|
09-29-10 07:48pm
|
Reply
282
|
Ladyboy Goo
(0)
|
Reply of
Druppie's Reply
Sorry Druppie, I do not know how many videos are available because I've never been a member. However, I do know that I've enjoyed most to all of the content that this company has put forth in their other sites. Usually, this companys side projects do updates at once a week. It just launched at June 2010 and probably started with 10 or so videos, so I'd say there are only a 12-15 videos so far, if that. That's just a guess but it's what I think. You can always try emailing support and asking, I have dealt with this company customer service and it was solid from what I remember. If you ever do find out an exact number, please let me know as well because I'm interested as well. Sorry I could not be more of a help.
|
07-11-10 08:44am
|
Reply
283
|
Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Reply
Thanks for the response and I'm glad you enjoyed or found the review helpful. I appreciate any feedback and I'm happy you enjoyed the site yourself. See ya around.
|
01-17-10 01:00pm
|
Reply
284
|
Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
|
Reply of
furry feet's Reply
ah I see, well I'm mostly in to solo ladyboy scenes with some occasional hardcore. Is that what this site pretty much is? ah, and a femboy is usually a shemale who takes hormones and has those small hormone titties but has not got fake tits. Also, they can look more on the masculine side (don't get it confused with a cross dresser) but this is only sometimes and it's nothing as masculine as like facial hair or something like that. Hope that helps and thanks for the input.
-GCode
|
03-14-09 09:09am
|
Reply
285
|
Ladyboy Ladyboy
(0)
|
Reply of
furry feet's Review
This is a high scored review. Have you been to other ladyboy sites and would you recommend this over them? I've been looking for some other sites to join. I went to the site preview and it seems most of these ladyboys are moreover femboys. What's your take?
-GCode
|
03-06-09 06:46pm
|
Reply
286
|
Ladyboy Pussy
(0)
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Review
This site is in the same company as Ladyboy Gold. Do they do the same thing and only let you download zipped photo sets after being a member for more than a month? Plus, can you give me any info about the size of the pictures and the videos? Any info would be great. Thanks.
|
09-08-09 10:53am
|
Reply
287
|
Ladyboy Wank
(0)
|
Reply of
IslandDollars's Reply
Thank you for the information. Much appreciated.
|
02-26-10 05:22pm
|
Reply
288
|
Latin Shemales
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Congrats! I'm glad to see you reviewing a site that is not exactly your main interest but still delivering quality details and useful information. Thanks for the read.
|
04-02-11 06:51pm
|
Reply
289
|
Little Mutt
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
Just to kinda reinforce and add to what may be wrongly worded statements by the reviewer, dracken, but I felt that as far as reading this review that I would expect Russian models as well. Clearly, dracken stated a language barrier was involved and with that stated and the combination that 'anyone who wants to see more Russian girls...', I'd definitly see this as a Russian site with these words. However, the webmaster states that this is not so I think there is a legit argument for the response that is not a Russian site nor contains Euro women and should maybe be re worded to get it straight. However, I can see where dracken is coming from if the models do not talk much in the videos because this is something that is very dominant in euro videos. But, that is if the models do not actually talk which was pointed out by dracken.
I'm not trying to say either one of you are wrong or right, nor trying to take sides. I can just see how the webmaster could see this review as portraying a Euro site when the site is not, while I can see how the reviewer could think this was a Euro site. Good luck and I hope this may add more insight between both of your discussions as a third party.
|
01-13-10 08:46pm
|
Reply
290
|
Male Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree, feel free to post even 'gay' site reviews if you want to. There is no discretion between what type of porn you like and want to review. Hell, even some others in the background may want to know some thoughts on sites you like. I'd love to see a Bisexual male's point of view on certain sites. Keep 'em coming and don't be afraid.
|
07-31-10 09:47pm
|
Reply
291
|
Max Mix DV
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
TBP states the sites vids are 640 with 800 kbps. I just can't see these vids clarity looking very well at this rate. But, who knows I have been surprised before. Anyways, most of these comments are cons which pushes me off to begin with. A shame though, a pretty good price for some Japanese DVD content when compared to most but I just can't give in....
|
07-07-09 07:54pm
|
Reply
292
|
Meet A Wife
(0)
|
Reply of
navycolt's Comment
I've always been quite skeptical about these so called dating sites in general. Honestly, through just shifting through comments from here in the dating niche, I feel I have confirmed these thoughts because almost all tend to be negative. Thanks for the heads up to anyone that might be interested here. See ya around!
|
07-10-09 09:05pm
|
Reply
293
|
Melissa Midwest
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I agree with the fact that this review was better posted as a comment to tell us that the site is no longer updating. While this is great info for a review, I do believe tech stuff can easily be thrown in there for 1 line in the pros or cons or in bottom line and the user could describe what is in the scenes more in full to create a more in depth review. My philosophy is bigger is better, I do find users who do short and sweet reviews as trustworthy as others.
But let's get for real, if you are actually planning on joining the site and giving YOUR money to them, everyone would want more details than this. This review just leaves anyone as a potential consumer to ask more questions which RagingBuddhist did and rightfully so in my honest opinion. If you are just looking to read this as never being interested in the first place, it adds a fact that you now know the site is no updating which is a great comment.
|
05-28-09 10:16am
|
Reply
294
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Man, it's been awhile since I was a member but I know there was a search engine that was quite comprehensive as far as tags goes. Meaning, I do believe you can do searches including breast size, hair color, location, and so on. Hopefully a current member can give you more insight.
|
06-22-09 11:16pm
|
Reply
295
|
Miss Hybrid
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
Look at the forum. Where have u been lol? That's all I'm saying and I'm not getting involved. However, I do believe his review was well thought out but...well...just look elsewhere. But, I can guarantee u that this guy was prolly not gonna review anything else....
|
04-12-10 11:21pm
|
Reply
296
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
slategrey's Reply
Yeah the site sucks for trying to start a queue and leave for a few. That's what I dislike the most...
|
11-28-10 11:52pm
|
Reply
297
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I actually had no success with the other suggestion to pause the download. I just tried your idea and I have success, however, the downloads are going at like 80 kbps each but what can ya do? :) It's better than downloading one by one for sure. It just stinks cause this site has so much content to sift through and I can only basically do it 10 videos at a time to see if I like anything. Bummer :(
|
10-23-10 07:19pm
|
Reply
298
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Reply
Awesome, I'll try that. Yeah it's just a one month deal and thanks for the heads up. I'll try your trick and see how it works. Appreciate it a lot!
|
10-22-10 11:39pm
|
Reply
299
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
This can be seen in non porn movies and shows as well :( How many times do I see something in a high school setting and all the 'kids' look like men and women in their early or mid twenties with flawless features. I guess it's just a reality in all forms of entertainment. I am surprised that naughty america and the other old n' young sites don't go and try to get male performers 'just of age'. They do this with the female stars, why not the males too? I don't see this as a problem when the male performers are supposed to be older in the same niche, they seem to do a better job and get actual older stars (dunno bout this place but in general).
|
05-14-09 10:55am
|
Reply
300
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Highly agree with the repetitive thing with this site. I think the major flaw that resulted in the lack innovativeness is the fact that they found a nice 'formula' for their scenes within the different fantasies. Then, they decided to just switch the stars and do limited improv that fits in to the scene resulting in the same thing over n' over again. I think instead of doing this formula for every scene, they could easily have written in more elaborate fantasies and implement them in to the scenes to create more successful difference in scenes. However, I really think this will ever change for this site or most sites in general. Once a site kind of finds a formula for a scene, they roll with it. Plus, with us being a bit more knowledgable and experienced in the porn world, we see the same things over and over as a bad thing while I believe a lot like these formulas because they just don't know better or care. PU'ers in general want difference and our expectations are a bit higher, I remember this was the first site I joined (I joined this site before I even had any idea the world of internet porn and was renting dvd's at that time) and this site was like a gold mine. I had no clue about really anything in the ways of porn and this site did the so called 'reality fantasies' and it was so different and somewhat realistic, I loved the site. As time went on and I got more in to porn from a technical side and so on, the less I found this site as the gold mine I thought of before.
The site does offer quite a bit and I think they do a great job there, but the formula's been going on for years now, the scenes are just getting stale. Plus, the 'fakeness' factor is high as you said with the silicone and surgery models. They are the classic American stars with the mindset that more is better.
You are right Messmer, the fact of the eroticism is almost nonexistant. They are so caught up in other things, they lost the focus of the fantasy in general and it become what Denner said, "Wham, bam, thank you, ma'am" scenes. Good review for this site and the honesty within it.
|
05-09-09 12:44pm
|
