| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
HairyPotter's Review
I would add that some (most?) of the scenes shot in the last 2/3 years are available for download in 4k. (a recent member as of June 2022).
Their front page shows 20/21 videos in 4k.
Woodman seems to employ newer video technology as the industry employs it over time.
|
11-18-22 12:12pm
|
Reply
2
|
Private Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
Alybator's Reply
What it means is that many of the actresses on the site are included on Woodman's site (nothing to do with the number of DVDs he produced).
It may provide some circumstantial evidence as to why the content from the 60's/70's/80's/90's is missing so many stars from those decades.
There is probably legal reasons why the content is limited to the stars they had/have under contract.
The decade labelled as "00" (meaning the 2000's) is loaded with his stuff.
|
06-27-20 11:08am
|
Reply
3
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
hardog's Comment
I took the time to dispute the $5.56 charge with Bank America and they credited my account. Just an FYI to others who feel like deceptive advertising enticed them to join a site only to find out they were misled. Note: after joining I spent about 5 minutes at that domain realized what had happened and never returned. The amount of money was never the issue... trying to get this site and others like them to stop with the deceptive tricks to get people to join can only happen when they get enough back lash (and pain in the ass paper work) to get them to rethink their marketing practices.
|
04-09-16 11:33am
|
Reply
4
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
clubseventeen's Reply
Too bad I can't post the actual AD which never mentions "streaming only" and too bad the AD says 100% Satisfaction guarantee. That's OK Mr. Webmaster for $5.56 you saved me the cost of ever joining this site again. And it's not about the $5.56 it is about the manipulation involved in stealing the $5.56 by lies and deception. For those who read this and choose to join Clubseventeen look twice/look three times before making that click/purchase. Their prices are all over the map. The $10.51 it costs to join thru P.U. morphs into $29.95 at their site if you're not careful. I will contest the $5.56 with the CC Company but have to wait 15 days from the join date.
|
03-20-16 11:38pm
|
Reply
5
|
Backroom Casting Couch
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeC's Reply
BCC comes with benefits ;-) It includes free access to Exploited College Girls, Net Video Girls and Broke Model. Of the 4 site package, Net Video Girls has more great scenes then the others (IMO). As far as girls that have been on other sites. You'll recognize girls from ATK Gallery and other sites as well as girls going from BCC to ECG. It's worth a membership month if you like this genre. BTW: If the link to BCC doesn't include the free sites, try going to Exploited College Girls for the sign up (its where I signed up and rx'd the other free sites). OH... some of the girls on NVG you'll recognize as they are now main stream big stars.
|
08-11-15 08:07am
|
Reply
6
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
First joined Teen Core Club in 2006. I know what they use to be and what they are now. Original content (in 06) was allot of the same guy, same scene, different girl. Then eventually a second, then a third guy then a black guy then additional sites... What they've done recently is 1) almost every site offers zip files for the pictures (even the oldest sites you would think would be ignored). 2) almost every site has some newish content (2006, 2009, 2012, now) that I haven't seen since the last time I paid $49.95 to join. 3) About half of the 250 videos on "Try Teens" now offer 1080P video so many of those will be "new" to anyone seeing the higher resolution for the first time. 4) There are 7 new sites (for me) that were not there in 2012. Fab Sluts, Anal Checkup, Teen Gina, Dreams HD, Teen Drillers, Nylon Sweeties. Personally, I think they should be commended for lowering their price for the "Club", adding zip files for 30 of the 31 sites. So far I've had as many as 11 downloads going at one time and have not hit any download limits, barriers or slowdowns. I visit Pornusers to see what is new and possibly discounted for the group. When I first posted the comment a few days ago I did so because this site still showed the price as $49.95. Anyone who has never been a member or has been in the past, this is worth a look. BTW: you can get a decent idea as to the content by clicking the links for each individual website.
|
04-26-15 11:37am
|
Reply
7
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
After further review... they have everything set up with zip files now even the oldest material. This used to be a major source of contention. Additionally... where the video format in the past was limited to WMV and the content (6/7/8 years ago) was always 480/540P they've remastered even the oldest videos to MP4 & sites like Try Teens now offer 720/1080P. Video sizes in the past averaged 250/400MB in size are now 1.3/2.2GB at the highest resolutions. The owner(s?)of the site have put a ton of hours into "re-making" the content fresh and the site is the best its ever been. Is it perfect? No because it still lacks a model search engine but I find it hard to believe they put the effort into it this to let it die on the vine. Is the newest content all leased content? Hell, I don't know the answer to that... I do know some of the hottest/latest stars have videos on this group of sites that I have not seen anywhere else. Pat, as far as being a long term member... at 29.97 a month why would anyone want to be "long term"? I know my modus operandi is to join a site for 30/60 days and discontinue the member ship for 6/8/10 months and then come back if the initial experience was worth while. One more thing, I have a 50MB download speed and have seen 4/6 videos at a time downloading at 1-1.5MB each (single videos hitting 6MB plus) so they've spent some money on their servers too.
|
04-23-15 11:37pm
|
Reply
8
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jake88's Review
Effective 2/1/15 there is no longer an option to download WMV videos. Unfortunately many of the older videos that were 200/300/400MB WMV files are now offered only as 70/80/90MB MP4 files. The video resolution of the smaller MP4 files do not compare to the higher resolution (crispness & clarity) of the older WMV format. IMHO this negates their previous attribute of having an outstanding older massive library. I suppose the task of converting the larger WMV files to MP4 was too much of a task for them to take.
|
02-02-15 07:20am
|
Reply
9
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
There is a decent tour available at the main link where it shows each site in the network.
Look for "Watch the site" in hypertext and visit the tour page for each site listed.
teencoreclub.2006
teencoreclub.2010
teencoreclub.2009
teencoreclub.2012
teencoreclub.2011
Been a member 5 times since 2006. Worth the money in my opinion. They've added new content (and sites) every year. Its a network where you spend 50.00 one time a year... I remember spending $30.00 in a seedy bookstore and walking out with a single magazine.
BTW: there is a program/extension for Firefox called DownThemAll that lets you download all the pictures on a page at one time. TeenCoreClub puts 50 pics on a page. DownThemAll lets you download 50 at a time. It's still more tedious than a zip file but it beats grabbing pictures one at a time.
|
12-27-13 09:23am
|
Reply
10
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
jook's Review
Regarding Mac and WMV format...
"VLC" does for WMV as Quicktime does for .mov ...
Use VLC
_______
VLC media player is a free and open source media player, encoder, and streamer made by the volunteers of the VideoLAN community.
VLC uses its internal codecs, works on essentially every popular platform, and can read almost all files, CDs, DVDs, network streams, capture cards and other media formats!
|
12-27-13 08:42am
|
Reply
11
|
Euro Teen Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Going back to 4/1/12 ...
They are adding 1 update a week on average. In the last 16 updates, 13 are 1080P.
They got lazy and use the same HD logo for 720P and 1080P.
6 solo girl
4 B/G
6 G/G
Going back another 16 updates to late December 2011
5 solo girl
8 B/G
3 G/G
2 @ 1080P
12 @ 720P
2 @ 720x576
|
07-19-12 07:46am
|
Reply
12
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Sorry for crying wolf!
________________________
Just received this...
XZXZ,
"It sounds like a possible case of a false positive. If you would like to send us the zip file in question, we would be happy to scan it and confirm a false positive. You can send the zip file to us at..."
________________________
My apology to Karups! Sorry for impugning your reputation! The zip file in question caused a "false positive" for some reason.
Karups is and has been a safe and reliable source for adult content. Thank you for your understanding in working to clear this up!
|
11-11-10 04:26pm
|
Reply
13
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Just sent this reply to Brent...'
http://www.spectorsoft.com/products/spectorpro_windows/
Same thing occurs... same three images in Andrea set come up with Spector Pro 2010 8.0.3256 Keylogger . Fresh download of the zip file. New scan of the contents, same spyware hit.
Program used "Macscan".
I'll send you the three images if you want them (however you should be getting the same result by downloading the zip file and opening the zip...
The fact that your antivirus software isn't seeing this only means the culprits have done a job blinding the virus software you're using.
Sorry again!
________
Still waiting to hear from Macscan...
So the question boils down to this... can the "people" who write this type of malware successfully hide it from all the best virus protection software (for Windows) yet a little known "MAC" company called macscan can see it by name and serial number?
Just asking.
|
11-10-10 06:22am
|
Reply
14
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
I received this message...
The set of Andrea, is an exclusive set from on our trusted photographers. This content comes in a different format and we have to process the content into the JPG format to make it web ready. Last night we also used "Kaspersy Internet Security 2011" which is widely regarded as the best antivirus software, to scan the set/files you mentioned, and they came out perfectly clean.
Can you please let me know what program you are using to scan for malware? And can you send over the log file that produced reporting the warnings you received.
_______
I'm working with the software company in order to respond to the log file request...
If this turns out to be a wild goose chase because of a false-positive I'm going to feel like a dufus. I'm tempted to pull my original post until I know for sure. I hate to impute Karups as they are surely one of the most reputable adult content sites on the internet.
|
11-09-10 07:04pm
|
Reply
15
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
http://www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-2979331.php
http://www.sophos.com/security/threat-sp...otlight.html#threat2
http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Se...eBinder.shtmlhttp://
Karups first reply was "just had a couple guys in the office scan using malwarebytes and Avira Anti virus and we got nothing found in those 3 images."
Second reply was, "We absolutely do not put keylogger programs into your images or zips. That said I am sending your finds onto our tech department to make sure that nothing has been compromised on our side. I just loaded up those images you mentioned, as well as the zip file for them and my scanner did not report anything back.
I will let you know when I hear back."
_______
Apparently the technology to embed malware in zip files, jpgs, pdf, xls, etc has been available for some time now...
:(
|
11-08-10 06:19pm
|
Reply
16
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ekim's Comment
If you use Firefox with the download manager "DownloadHelper" you can grab all the images on each page at one time.
Versus one image at a time...
|
08-29-10 08:16am
|
Reply
17
|
Hardcore Youth
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
If you use Firefox there's an " Firefox add-on" called "download helper".
You can set it to download the number of images you see on the web page... set it once then queue up the pages.
50 images at a time instead of 1 image at a time... it makes it worth the time and effort.
Fairly simple and easy.
|
08-07-10 12:34pm
|
Reply
18
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I'm not crazy and I have no reason to lowball the score other than ITS MY HONEST OPINION.
You may see it differently.
Sure would be fun to see a poll from the members here.
I still say 70.
|
10-15-09 09:58pm
|
Reply
19
|
X Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
It shows the last update being 7/7/09. Two in June, two in May, two in April.
When I click on "all episodes" it lists 31 pages with 4 different videos on each page so 124 total videos.
|
09-01-09 07:58pm
|
Reply
20
|
DVD Box
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I relayed what was sent to me without editing... sorry it didn't work for you. Maybe (just maybe) they limited the number of signees and X number signed up before you at the lower price :-).
It was never anything I could control.
|
07-15-09 02:58pm
|
Reply
21
|
Spunky Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Just joined the "Spunky Teen" site and "Porn Users".
First the positives...
* 20.07 USD for 30 days
* Some cute girls
* Content quantity "C" average
* Content quality "C" average
Now the bad news...
** 1 Download at a time (OK sometimes 2 if you can get the server to respond).
** So far, about half the "Zip" files lead to a blank page and no zip file.
Would I join again?
No.
|
05-08-09 07:25am
|
