| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
from RustyJ:
It's right on the top when it comes to photos. Premium sites scenes have large photosets and the quality is very good. Some sites these days offer up to 21 megapixel images in zips that can be closer to a gigabyte in size so they might be even too large for some.
The artistic vision is not the absolute best but very good still.
|
09-14-11 12:46am
|
Reply
27
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
from Tree Rodent:
What Denner says. Pictures are generally very good. For some reason in some shoots there are very few of them. I don't know why this is. The number can vary from 100-200 down to 30-50. Mostly I consider the photos to be very good. You also get screenshots for most videos (numbers of which can also vary). I agree with Denner on there being too many gynaecological close ups, but there's enough quality on here to make it my favourite network. I am currently on my second month of membership and will be going for a third.
|
09-13-11 06:18am
|
Reply
28
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
from Denner:
First - take your time to go through the MANY reviews from other PUs - and the one from TBP - guess you'll find a lot of answers here..
Photos are top-quality in my opinion though not the big pix fan.
BUT: What strikes me as a member here a many times - on and off - are a couple of items concerning vids:
1) By all means: top viewing quality (the larger file, the better quality)
2) A - sad - tendency - to focus too much on close-up - both soft and h/c. I really miss some of the earlier full body/posing/strip.
3) And yes, anal has more and more focus here - too much for my taste (too).
|
09-13-11 05:43am
|
Reply
29
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
from pat362:
It's true that anal is a main theme in many of their shoots but they also have a lot of content that is solo or vag B/G. I downloaded the most recent solo model update at Club sandy and there are 132 pics in the set. The resolution for the HQ version of those pics is 6048x4032 and it included asome of the shots you were talking about.
It's hard for me to tell you if you'll find enough content to make it worth it since I'm not sure if you want softcore, midcore or hardcore vag pics.
|
09-12-11 08:37am
|
Reply
30
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Review
from greg909:
I'd have to agree with your review. What you say is also true of ATK Galleria -- despite the larger image sizes that they now offer, ATK's images often lack detail and look processed. I think at least part of this is due to over-compression.
ATK Hairy is probably the best quality, but it's still a mixed bag, some photographers being pros, while others are clearly amateurs.
|
07-19-11 08:15am
|
Reply
31
|
ATK Exotics
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Review
from Capn:
Hi Monty,
Welcome to PU.
A well reasoned & argued review, if a little light on stats.
It sounds like your preferences are similar to my own.
Cap'n. :0)
|
07-18-11 11:27am
|
