Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Review from monty4321:
I do apologize if this isn't a detailed review including specs and so on. I just wanted to do a quick one.
I will also add that if you do like very good quality in the photos - ATK Hairy is much better so far. I just got a membership there only days ago. With some of the sets, I have never seen this good of quality on any site hands down. However, so far it's looking as though the volume of those super good quality ones may be a bit limited.
|
02-06-12 07:21pm
|
Reply
27
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
from messmer:
I would like to see full frontal body shots, standing, with panties still up more often. That's my greatest regret, that too many photographers think it is more artistic to have the model bend forward with thumbs hooked in the waistband with the panties partially down already, or that they show the model from the rear while she is taking off her panties.
Only one or two frontal, standing, panties all the way up pictures would be enough to satisfy me! :-)
|
12-13-11 03:23pm
|
Reply
28
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(monty4321's Reply)
Hi Monty, I find this site generally very good when it comes to natural colors. It will change from photographer to photographer, of course, but generally you don't find any of those hateful orange-y skin tones that other sites seem to major in.
|
12-13-11 08:46am
|
Reply
29
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
from Capn:
Hi Monty,
There is a good deal of variation in quality as they use quite a few photographers at once and not all are first rate.
That said, it isn't usually lighting that gives a problem, it is usually focus & framing issues.
The poses vary with models, but generally there is a weighting in favour of held open & toy use, neither of which I care for.
The site owner has been asking for more standing full body shots;always at a premium; with limited success.
1) You get some of, although a lot are spoilt with excessive 'touchy, feely.'
2) Is usually fairly well covered.
3) There is some of that but usually they go for the closer in shot.
The coding on the site is arguably its best feature. The user defined custom zips are very slick & useful. Basil is always very helpful & attentive, but is limited by what his contract photogs supply.
I don't want to urn this into a mini review, but I would say it was worth a month's punt to see for yourself.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-12-11 04:09pm
|
Reply
30
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from messmer:
(monty4321's Reply)
Yes, they have become that bad, monty. At least they were when I was a member recently. We Are Hairy would be a better choice for you at the moment. Especially since they increased their updates to four a day. In their case I am just worried about the trend to cater to a more radical crowd at the expense of the "normal" lovers of a hairy pubis.
|
11-02-11 09:40am
|
Reply
31
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Basil:
(monty4321's Reply)
We're considering this, in the mean time you can disable these categories in less than 5 seconds by going to "My settings" menu. Thanks!
Basil
|
11-01-11 08:49pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
