| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Microminimus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from rearadmiral:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Thanks for that info on rebilling.
I read your comment and agreed with all of it. I hope you put up a full review too. P/U members can always benefit from different opinions.
|
02-01-13 05:09pm
|
Reply
52
|
My Free Cams
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
from Jay G:
Excellent review for a site I use all the time. I now follow a strict budget and have found models who it is a pleasure to tip because I really like their personalities.
My general experience is that models who post lots of prices do what they say they will do, but without fun or enthusiasm......it is worthwhile to keep the tips in your pocket until you establish a nice "relationship" with the model.
Those models who whine about "freeloaders" are wasting everybody's time and I "hide" them so I don't accidentally go back to their room. If they think I'm only there to see nakedness they must think I haven't found out that nakedness is free on the internet and very available, I want a lot more on a webcam site.
Like any other pursuit of women, this is a fun thing to do, but you must take time and be careful to really enjoy it.
|
12-31-12 05:35am
|
Reply
53
|
Nubile Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Monahan:
(KET924aab's Reply)
I don't think so. Reading through all of the details on TBP, it looks like the two sites are totally different and are shown as being owned by different companies.
Unfortunate that the newer site (Nubile Films)chose that name.
|
05-09-13 11:09am
|
Reply
54
|
Nubile Films
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from cjd2004:
(KET924aab's Reply)
I believe so, which would be why they focus on the younger performers.
|
05-09-13 04:04am
|
Reply
55
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RedRoger:
(KET924aab's Reply)
It will if e-commerce providers like Vendo keep getting complaints and have to keep giving refunds. Passion-HD will not be able to find a service provider and they'll be out of business. You can help by spreading the word.
|
02-18-13 10:21am
|
Reply
56
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Newsgroups are still around.
I used to collect Playboy Playmate photos years ago.
I just rejoined a newsgroup yesterday, because I was frustrated at how much time and effort it takes to collect Playmate photos from Playboy Plus. It was at least 5 years or more since I was a newsgroup member.
I have to learn how to use a newsreader again, and there are other methods I have to learn. But to build a collection of Playboy Playmates, and to organize it, newsgroup access is still so much easier and less time-consuming than trying to use Playboy Plus.
|
03-19-13 08:32am
|
Reply
57
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Playboy Plus Categories:
Girls
Playmates
Cybergirls
College girls
Amateurs
International
Celebrities
Articles
entertainment
nightlife
lifestyle
sex & dating
celebrities
sports
news
gaming
funny
Videos
World of Playboy
Hugh Hefner
Magazine
Shop
Sitemap
Playboy Mobile
Webmasters
|
03-11-13 08:21am
|
Reply
58
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from lk2fireone:
(KET924aab's Reply)
I would guess that all the playmates would have their original photosets on this site.
The photosets are different from the original spreads that were published in the print magazine.
If you ever joined a newsgroup and collected the playmate photosets, you would have a better understanding of what I mean.
The site structure could be laid out much better.
To try to find a playmate, you can either enter her name in the search box, which gives her photos and videos, plus any other matching name. Like I said in the review, if you enter the search term "Christine Maddox", the results include any model named "Christine", and any model named "Maddox". So you get results that don't include "Christine Maddox", and you have to search (open) each file to see if that model is in that file, or use some other way to exclude files that are not what you want.
Trying to collect all the photosets for each playmate is a time-consuming process.
The site stucture does not make it easy.
The Playboy Plus site has the following categories:
(But here again, searching through each category is a time-consuming process. It would have been much better if they organized the contents based on the date the playmate-model-cybergirl was first published in the physical magazine or on the internet site).
|
03-11-13 08:21am
|
Reply
59
|
Pure 18
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from elephant:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Hi luv Lickin Clit
Sorry yeah never mention that, not something I bothered with to be honest but yeah there is photos of each scene as well if photos are you thing. My membership is finished now so couldn't say what the quality is like for the photos, but I would imagine they will be hi-resolution of the scene.
|
02-01-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
60
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
from Monahan:
Basic question. Any touching, masturbation or other stuff that's "harder" than Met Art?
|
08-11-15 12:02pm
|
Reply
61
|
Showy Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
from guy7414:
Plain and simple, most of the girls are too skinny, and not at the 18-19 year old "sweet spot".
|
05-22-15 06:31pm
|
Reply
62
|
Streamate.com
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
from littlejoe:
so true about them being addictive. i went from $30 a week to a couple $60 a week. having my hours reduced at work has put me in check tho
|
12-21-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
63
|
Team Skeet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Tree Rodent:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Cheers luv lickn clit - FYI quite a few of the tats are small (and the girls are beautiful). It's me being fussy. I just hate tats, any tats.
|
01-25-13 05:12pm
|
Reply
64
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Dracula:
(KET924aab's Reply)
I was going to sign up, but when I saw that price I backed away. If they lower their price again, I'll gladly do a review. :)
|
04-28-13 06:34am
|
Reply
65
|
VideosZ
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from RustyJ:
(KET924aab's Reply)
HD is 720p. Frankly, I'm not sure if any studio titles releases on Bluray are 1080p to begin with. The few Blurays I own are 720p.
|
01-16-13 05:44am
|
Reply
66
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Zoltan:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Yes that's still the case. Pics are available for viewing in Small(1200Px), Medium(2000Px) and Large(5184/5760Px), but available for download only in Small(1200Px in a ZIP file) and Medium(2000Px, with a choice of PDF format or RAR file)
|
03-14-13 08:37am
|
Reply
67
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from skippy:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Nearly all of the videos are behind-the-scenes sets of the photo shoots and are pretty short. A few were done separately at the photo shoot site with nice POV. It seems like the girls that have their own sub-sites have slightly better videos...Monika, for eexample. Nearly all of them are 2-3 minutes or less, probably to keep the size down. I think they are all 720p but a very few older sets, like some of those of the beautiful but retired Marketa, were remastered from lesser resolution. Most of the soundtracks are music and there at least a couple of older videos that have distracting animations or effects in them. Largest video file size I see is about 150k.
|
01-20-13 04:04pm
|
Reply
68
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Comment
from tangub:
No need for an email, just visit the site from the PU/TBP link for the same discounted price. Can also be found for $9.95 if you know where to look.
|
04-01-13 02:12am
|
Reply
69
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Cybertoad:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Hi there,
I switched to chrome and it worked fine.
Still no answer from support and there are a few dead links and weird run arounds taking me where I didn't want to go. But I gave it a better score now. A brand new video gave 403 errors which means its their server not showing it. Still not happy and they should test with Firefox, I mean a site should be compatible with the big three at least.
Thank you both for suggesting switching browsers.
|
04-21-14 10:26am
|
Reply
70
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(KET924aab's Reply)
I dropped Reality Kings bc I had major issues with the site. Suggestion was to switch from FireFox to IE. That solved the problem, but now that Micfrosoft is no longer supporting IE, I decided to blacklist RK.
CT, what browser are you using?
|
04-13-14 11:53pm
|
Reply
71
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from dieselman:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Good day luv lickn clit!
There is no guest gateway for Diesel Access sites, but we do have one for our members, so once you join it, you will see it.
I would be very glad to read your review here! And of course, you will love to see your membership turns to all sites membership very soon :)
|
02-04-13 09:55pm
|
Reply
72
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from dieselman:
(KET924aab's Reply)
Hello luv lickn clit!
While I am sure porn users will advise you here, but right now, you can join any site of ours as we are about to change our membership policies very very soon and as a member of any DieselAccess site, you will get access to all DXS sites from a first day.
I hope it will be released this weekend, as we are very close, but if not, it will be released by the next weekend for sure.
I would start from YoungLegalPorn, it will give you enough fun until release.
Enjoy and welcome on board!
|
02-04-13 09:30am
|
Reply
73
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from lk2fireone:
(KET924aab's Reply)
To join 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, or Wow Porn, each site charges $29.97/month (recurring). That is the price Porn Users shows.
But if you go to each site, you see different price for Wow Girls.
Currently, I see Wow Girls for for $0.67/day, recurring monthly, with free access to Wow Porn. So that's approximately $20.10/month, giving you access to Wow Girls and Wow Porn. Porn Users does not mention the free bonus access you get, probably because this is a recent development, which might or might not last.
18 Only Girls site shows $0.97/day, recurring monthly, with free access to SkinnySuperGirl. So that's approximately $29.10/month.
Young Legal Porn site shows $0.97/day,recurring monthly, with free access to SkinnySuperGirl. So that's approximately $29.10/month.
Wow Porn is the newest site, with the smallest amount of content (videos and photosets).
Wow Girls is the next newest site, with more content than Wow Porn, but far less than Young Legal Porn or 18 Only Girls.
So you get the most content for your money with 18 Only Girls.
Then comes Young Legal Porn as the next most content for your money.
Many of the models at each site (18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, Wow Porn) appear at each of the other sites.
As a side consideration, if you remain a member of 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn for more than 2 months (this was true last year, so I assume it's still true today), you get access to all 14 sites in the Diesel Access network.
Wow Girls and Wow Porn are not part of the Diesel Access network.
So I would recommend joining 18 Only Girls, if this is your first introduction to these sites.
The truth is, a video or photoset that appears at any one of the 4 sites, could just as easily be placed in any of the 4 sites.
If you study the videos and photosets at 18 Only Girls and Young Legal Porn, you will find photosets of some videos, where the video is at 1 of those sites, and the matching photoset is at the other of those sites.
The 2 Wow sites are the newest, so in general they have the highest overall quality of the videos and photosets. But I would join either 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn because they have greater quantity.
But any 1 of the first 3 sites I recommend should give you a good introduction/sample of what these sites are offering.
|
02-03-13 12:48pm
|
