Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from pat362:
(thaavi's Reply)
The comment section is not where you should be posting this info but on your review. The people interested in the site probably won't read comments if there is a recent review.
|
06-04-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
2
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from pat362:
(thaavi's Reply)
If you think that because TBP has done a review and offered technical info that you and almost everyone else who has done a review doesn't need to add anything then you have completely missed the point of PU and the people who post reviews.
Here's a list of things that you might want to consider.
1-TBP's review is already 4 months old so there could have been some changes since that review.
2-We all see things a little differently so it's important that a review have as much info from the reviewers point of view so that we can see the site through his or her eyes.
3-None of us would have had an issue if only one person had posted a less than decent review but there are have been 5 reviews in the last four days and only one had the decency to write an unbiased review.
4-Do you realise that 2 of the reviews had zero cons and the other 2 had lack of BTS content as the con. I sometimes have a hard time finding cons in some sites but I still try to add some because there is no such thing as a perfect site.
5-Almost everybody said that she is artistic and creative as a pro. That sounds nice but what does that mean? If you had at least written more info talking about the content then those words would have had some meaning.
|
06-03-13 06:42pm
|
Reply
3
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#15
from exotics4me:
(thaavi's Reply)
I don't know whether to laugh at this point or slap myself on the head for even wasting another reply. I can see now that English isn't your first language since most of what you're saying to me doesn't make much sense so I will give you a break there.
Where I won't give you a break is on your reasoning for not listing the technical numbers of the site. What if someone doesn't know there is a The Best Porn review for I Dream of Jo and just reads your review here on Porn Users? Think the numbers might be useful to them? It's not like it's time consuming to add those. Those also add credibility to your review. I can promise you, putting the numbers is more likely to help others want to join the site than saying, "Jo loves animals and when she plays with them, itīs wonderful".
And please spare me on telling me what Porn Users reviews are for. You've been a member here for 1 week and have 1 review. I've been a member here for 6.5 years and have 233 reviews. While it's true that the reviews should show each person's different perspective, it's also true that 90% of your pros could be things that no one else cares about. Which is why putting the numbers would help. Here's an example that should be able to get beyond our language barrier.
You're going to buy a new vehicle. You want cupholders, air conditioning, leather seats, cd player, power windows and automatic transmission.
You read user reviews on the exact car you're wanting. The first one says, "It's a great car!!! I love it!!! It has everything I need!!!" Did that review help you decide if you want the car?
It also should be noted that not all sites have updated facts from The Best Porn and those facts that you linked to will be somewhat out of date in 6 months. If someone writes a review for I Dream of Jo in 6 months should they too leave out the facts, even though they've changed?
|
06-03-13 01:53pm
|
Reply
4
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from RagingBuddhist:
(thaavi's Reply)
Ok - that's it - thaavi has made it clear that there's no longer any need to do reviews. TBP has all the information we need. Might as well shut PU down. On the plus side, we won't get 5 commercials for an obscure site in two days. I take that back - 4 commercials and one review.
|
06-03-13 07:19am
|
Reply
5
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from exotics4me:
(thaavi's Reply)
thaavi, I never said it's a rip off site. I was asking if the content had been used on Viv's other sites, then reused here. It's a common thing for sites to do. Since I have the majority of the content for Eve from Viv's sites, I wanted to know if I was going to sign-up for I Dream of Jo and end up with a bunch of scenes I already had.
|
06-02-13 11:52pm
|
Reply
6
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from exotics4me:
(thaavi's Reply)
thaavi, if I could offer some friendly advice. You're starting to sound like you work in the porn industry to know who Eve only works with these days. I do know she isn't with DDF though and made note of it in my review of DDF's Network since they are still listing her site as having new updates.
Similar to as I told another person on this same subject, I have to reviews to show that I'm a fan of Viv Thomas. My 2009 review of Viv Thomas Video.
https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=36187
Quoted from the review.
"Viv Thomas, to me, is probably one of the top 3 producers/photographers of Euro porn."
|
06-02-13 11:30pm
|
Reply
7
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from exotics4me:
(thaavi's Reply)
I was suspicious because:
#1 In the new updates there is a scene with Eve Angel. I haven't seen a new solo or girl/girl Eve Angel set in quite a long time. The one's being posted on Eve Angel Official are scenes that are 3-4 years old.
#2 Each and every review I've found of this site rate it between 70-83. Three near perfect reviews pop up over a day or two period for a site that had never had a user review on here before.
#3 Because you just admitted the admin told you about the possibility of writing your opinion here. Now, if you really believe that the sites is a 95+, that's fine, it really is, but why isn't that admin who told you all of this possibility, defending against what I posted in my comment? You've made it clear he/she knows about this site. He/she has replied to one of your "great" reviews. Would seem like instead of replying to a 100 scored review, he/she would be replying and defending his site from recycling old content as new.
The #2 one shows why anyone would have a reason to be skeptical. The site has been listed on here since May 2011, so 0 reviews in roughly 2 years, then 3 (perfect and near perfect scores) reviews come in, in 2 days. That wouldn't make you skeptical?
|
06-01-13 11:00pm
|
Reply
8
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(thaavi's Reply)
We're suspicious because you just confirmed the suspicions. Fine - it wasn't the mistress who sent you here, it was the site admin. I can't speak for anyone else, but I doubt I'm alone in thinking that there's something wrong with a site asking it's members to do reviews.
As far as the quality of the site goes, and like I mentioned to Elmien, try submitting a balanced review, consistent with the outline on this page and maybe you'll get a better reception from the people here.
|
06-01-13 08:21pm
|
Reply
9
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Marcus:
(thaavi's Reply)
I know you're joking, but no, it wouldn't.
The top rating you can give here is 100%, and I agree with mbaya that you should deduct at least something because 100% is a perfect score for a site even you admit isn't 100% perfect. It's just not helpful.
I guess the webmaster has sent people here to review the site which is fine, but the reviews would be a lot more credible if they went into detail and were more balanced.
None of the reasons in the pro really seem to separate Jo's site from most others on PU. I just fail to understand why it's QUITE so good, and none of the reviews over the last couple of days of her site have done anything to convince me to join.
|
05-31-13 10:04am
|
Reply
10
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
thaavi's Review
from mbaya:
You should deduct for your cons. No site that has cons should get a score of 100.
|
05-30-13 06:12pm
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
