Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from RagingBuddhist:
(Elmien's Reply)
[And to get to the review posting guide lines....
I've never been good at following it...]
Very few of us have written the kind of review that's expected here when we first started writing them. It takes time and a little patience to get them together.
[How do you choose a certain amount of good qualities if there is so many?]
List them in order of importance until you hit the character limit.
[And the cons? What cons? I call it space to improve... Not cons...]
If there is room for improvement, that is, indeed, a con
[Sorry but by writing a review is not to follow guide line but to express your experience and knowledge of the site...]
That's where the balance factor comes in. We all write review to let people know about our experience with a site and there is quite naturally a bit of subjectivity in what we write. But, again, to rave about the webmistress without giving us any details about the rest of the site doesn't tell us anything about the total experience.
|
06-01-13 11:06am
|
Reply
2
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(Elmien's Reply)
Tell you what. Take a look at the reviewers with the most reviews and see what their reviews have in common. Then look at all of the recent reviews for Jo's site and you will notice that they don't have any of the important stuff needed to make a good review. What you basically have right now are a bunch of fans fawning over a porn performer and who cannot remove their feelings from their reviews.
The people who might be interested in joining want to know what they will find inside the members area and not that Jo is a girl next door type. They want to know if she does solo, b/g and g/g. What quantity of each. They want to know video resolution and photo resolution.
Let me see if I can make this simple. They want facts first and then fawning.
|
06-01-13 10:38am
|
Reply
3
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from KET924aab:
(Elmien's Reply)
Settle down everyone! Elmien, it does raise a red flag when 2 members join PU on the same day, and both post favorable reviews of a site within hours of each other. Both reviews were lacking the kind of detail that everyone here has come to expect.
For what it's worth, I was a member at Viv Thomas a few years back, and there were plenty of girl/girl vids with Jo and her playmates. You are correct about her--she truly enjoys other women, and the scenes I have of her and her girlfriends are almost all very hot! But other members here are looking for detail in reviews and maybe comparison to other similar sites. That's what we need to figure out if its a site that we would consider joining.
For example, if you've had memberships at Sapphic Erotica, Euro Girls on Girls, and/or 21st Sextury, how does Jo's site compare? If you could edit your review, and provide that info, it would be a lot more useful.
|
06-01-13 03:30am
|
Reply
4
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from RagingBuddhist:
(Elmien's Reply)
No, I'm not kidding you. Compare what you and thaavi have written against the majority of the reviews on here. Neither of you have included much of anything in the way of details but both of you have raved about the webmistress. That lacks the balance that we're looking for in reviews. It also doesn't help that two people have come in on the same day to give perfect and near-perfect scores for a relatively obscure site. The regulars here have seen this way too many times before and it's why the scores from new members to PornUsers aren't factored into the sites overall score.
I'll invite you to check out this page to see what reviews are supposed to contain, paying particular attention to #3.
|
05-31-13 11:45pm
|
Reply
5
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Elmien's Review
from RagingBuddhist:
Here we go again. A relatively unknown site, a perfect and damn near perfect score back to back. Nothing coincidental about that...
|
05-31-13 03:47pm
|
Reply
6
|
I Dream Of Jo
(0)
|
Reply of
Elmien's Review
from Nick Spillum:
Thanks for the review Elmien, it's a good one. I'll chat to Jo to see if we can come up with some kind of back story each week.
Would that help, or do you have any other suggestions?
|
05-31-13 12:34am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
