| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1176
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I may have misinterpreted your description of some of their content but you said that it could make Max Hardcore and the guys at Facial Abuse cringe so I just assumed that they are way too extreme for my taste. Painfull anal and ATM is hard for me to watch. These guys claim to have dirty ATM and that falls under the unwatchable. My view on dirty atm is that it's a dofter version of scat porn and that's all. Another problem is that the preview section that I checked out all had scenes that are a couple of years old.
|
01-10-12 07:23am
|
Reply
1177
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
I do the same thing as you when it comes to other members encounter with webmasters. If they had a bad one then why should I bother in joining his sites. It's not like I'm going to have a better one.
I thought your recent experience with sinnistar was a very good one. I felt bitter sweet about your review of the site because it has been on my radar for a long time but they have a horrible preview section that I've never felt comfortable with buying a membership. of course now that i know that their content is as bad if not worse than facial abuse then I'm not sad that I didn't join. I would have been very disapointed.
|
01-09-12 06:12pm
|
Reply
1178
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from jberryl69:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Hey - thanks for the reply.
|
01-04-12 08:09pm
|
Reply
1179
|
White Teens Black Cocks
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from joekramer08:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
no problem...I have joined a few different networks by now, and Teen Core Club is my favorite...their camera angles are simply the best...they choose smart camera angles that are best for showing off the girl's body, and like i said, they zoom out so you can really see the girl's body...i find it hard to watch any other porn after getting used to their superior camera angles.
|
01-02-12 08:05pm
|
Reply
1180
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from slutty:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
There is a link at the bottom that says "no thanks skip this offer", or at least it shows up for me. You are cancelling directly through the support link on the RK website right?
|
01-02-12 02:48pm
|
Reply
1181
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from slutty:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah, also if you are going to have a DL limit on the site, it might be useful to list the damn file size. So many times I started to download a file and then was like, oh wait that's too large, I should download the smaller version... I don't recall ever hitting a limit here before either, so perhaps it is a new thing, or at least enforcing it is.
|
01-02-12 01:56pm
|
Reply
1182
|
House Of Taboo
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from RustyJ:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
And in any case, if you've never been a member, the network has a HUGE archive of scenes so I'm almost sure that it's worth the one months price.
|
01-02-12 11:58am
|
Reply
1183
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from slutty:
Nice review rearadmiral, I joined just before the holidays, and really wish I hadn't. I have hit the limit every day I have tried at under 10 GB (usually like 9.5), even when I hadn't logged in for several days. I don't know why I keep coming back here, it just seems to go further downhill every year. I think your 75 is appropriate, and will probably change my score to something similar, if not lower.
Also, DTA works at RK, but you have to be careful about losing the queue if the cap kicks in.
|
01-01-12 09:08pm
|
Reply
1184
|
Sinnistar
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review from rearadmiral:
An update on my review for anyone interested in particular models. I’ve reviewed the scenes on Sinnistar with known porn chicks and even some unknown to me but listed on IAFD and have a list of some exclusive scenes for anyone who collects specific models.
Keep in mind that if you are interested in any of these, when I say oral, that normally includes throat-fucking. The anal sex can be pretty rough too. Not all models do ATM, but most do.
- Anne Howe (aka Melissa Ashley) – one b/g anal scene, one oral
- Aaliyah Jolie – four scenes, one is only oral, one is a b/g/g (with ATOGM), one is pretty rough b/g oral and anal with her in bondage and one is b/g with an attempt at anal fisting.
- Amber Chase – three scenes, one b/g/g with some bondage and two b/g anal
- Amber Wild – four scenes, two b/g anal and two b/g/g anal (with ATOGM)
- Aurora Snow – one b/g anal scene (appears to be fairly early in her career)
- Jessica Right – oral only
- Liv Wilder – b/g anal (appears to be fairly early in her career)
- Mia Lina – two oral scenes
- Staci Thorn – one b/g anal
There are also some exclusive scenes with models who had very short careers or who at least have little listed at IAFD.
- Julie Ellis – one scene, oral only
- Little Lexis – two b/g anal scenes
- Katie Kross (aka Katie May) – two scenes, one b/g anal, one oral only with bondage
- Sara Sinn – one b/g anal scene
- Sophie Perez (aka Gina Lopez) – one oral scene
- Vanessa Lynn – one oral scene
I hope this information is useful to some of the members here.
|
12-31-11 06:50am
|
Reply
1185
|
MetArt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from otoh:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Thanks readadmiral & Denner for your replies. My opinion is of course very subjective - some folk may find the stuff here exciting and sexy - but my tastes are generally pretty tame and this just doesn't work for me at all.
I would, though, again recommend my previously reviewed site Juliland - possibly art, but creative, exciting stuff.
|
12-30-11 04:27pm
|
Reply
1186
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
No question that porn is a huge Worldwide industry but it's still a small profit industry for most studios and porn companies.
I post regularly on ADT and PU. I sometimes post twice as much on ADT because they are a lot more threads going and far more participating members. PU is still years ahead in regards to the quality of it's posters.
|
12-29-11 08:21am
|
Reply
1187
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
The original Captain Stabbin got so many newbies first on screen anal that it's hard to know where to start the name game. That's the main reason why I always came back to his site.
It's true that the porn industry is multi-billion industry but you never read that this is gross profit for the entire planet's porn industry. The other thing that is pure bullshit is when they compare it to the mainstream industry. No offense but there is no comparaison and anyone that says there is has an agenda against porn. Here's some simple examples. Avatar made 2 billions dollars in gross profit from worldwide box office takes. The last 2 Harry Potter movies which were really part 1 and part 2 of the same movie made a combined 2.2 billions gross profit in worldwide box office takes. That's not counting the profit they've made on dvd, Blu-ray and other streaming methods.
P.S: I really like ADT. Not everyone is as polite and nice as hear but the moderator are quick to deativate those that push the line. The bulk of the discussion are on performers and movies so it's good to particiapete here because we mostly talk about sites.
|
12-28-11 07:51am
|
Reply
1188
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from pat362:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
It's possible that RK would have loved to make new Captain Stabbin scenes but the people involved with that series stopped doing them a few years ago. RK has done a couple of recent ones but these were with different performers. RK and Bangbros are primarily shot in Florida and I think that can be a good thing but the recent problems with performers being tagged as HIV+ were both in Florida and there have also been some police related issues at a couple of other times and shooting in Florida may no longer be such a geat thing.
When you couple that with the major down turn in the porn industry and I think Brazzer is the only studio with similar content who's actually making any money. I use an anal barometer to do this predicttion. When studios that used to shoot regular anal scenes and now only do them on rare occasion or remaster older ones then they are in financial trouble. Anal is more expensive than standard vags so if a studio shoots mostly that then they are looking to save on production cost.
Now in regards to Tanner. The simple answer is that there are very few studios that can afford to pay her price for an anal scene. Not too mention that very few stuios shoot on a regular basis. Having Tanner do anal in a video is sure to help sales but I read somewhere that dvd sales are very low. Most studio sell about 700-1200 units per most dvd's and the better ones about 1000-2000 units. If they make 10$ on each on these then their gross profit is anywhere from 7000$ to 20,000$. If the dvd has 4 standard b/g scenes with some established performer then the cost for each scene is going to be about 1000$ to 1500$. That means that just the performers are going to cost 4000$ to 6000$. You also have to pay a director, cameraman, editor and the cost of transfer to dvd. Imagine a performer asking for 4000$ for her anal scene. That's a small amount because I read that Breanne Benson wants 7000$ for her anal scene. If you have to pay 7000$ for only one scene then you have to be one of those lucky bastards that gets to sell at least 2000 or more units to even hope to make some profit.
|
12-27-11 07:07am
|
Reply
1189
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from exotics4me:
I had meant to get back to you on the wording in the terms, but the holiday got in the way. My terms say the same as yours and I think you might have nailed it when you said "A site can certainly impose whatever conditions they want, but those conditions should be clear and applied equally to all members." While I like that RK doesn't seem to ever impose the limit on my account, it looks bad on the ones of us that review a site or post a comment that says no download limit then they impose it on others. Even worse is when they let me download unlimited. Let you download less than 10 GB per day one day then let you download much more the next. I have tried to figure up some kind of rhyme or reason for how their DL limit works, but I can't.
And the type of models is another reason PU works so well, if members read multiple reviews. I was ready to be blown away by Teen Mega World after so many high reviews only to be letdown because nearly all the models were slim. RK, on the other hand, as you're seeing is full of curvy women, which is more my preference.
|
12-26-11 07:21pm
|
Reply
1190
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
from pat362:
Thanks for the review. This is a network that I used to keep track of but I notice that in the past year they almost never have any updates that appeal to me and recently the site no longer makes it easy to see their newer scenes. Not too mention that looking for older content is a clkusterfuck. I really wish you had asked the question about the Tanner anal scene prior to joining. I would have given you the bad news and saved you from joining for her anal scene.
P.S: I have some good news on Tanner and anal stuff. She shot one or two movies for Evila Angel which should be released in January.
|
12-26-11 06:12pm
|
Reply
1191
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Too right mate I do think it would be great to have a network site for kink but totally see that their stuff is unique and if you're into it its second to none, trouble is with me I only like to dip my toe in to bdsm when the mood takes for something different so not always what I wanna see, only half into some of the niches they have so struggle to know which site to join, I have joined everything butt and whipped ass in the past.
I agree some of those pretty sloppy, anal buffet and milk nymphos certainly do stretch your imagination at what is possible in anal porn, first time I saw so of that stuff my eyes nearly popped out of my head, OMG, when you're in the mood for something totally kinky and extreme anal those movies certainly deliver. I wish sinplex also had a pay site as I join that in a flash too, their stuff is pretty far out.
|
12-25-11 12:57pm
|
Reply
1192
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah no doubt VB fault, hope they sort it soon.
I've just been having a look at some of the kink updates, there is some bloody seriously kinky stuff on there, I'd love to have a network access for say $45, some of the anal stuff on these sites is mind blowing. I noticed that evilangel stuff is also at kinkondemand now.
|
12-24-11 08:16am
|
Reply
1193
|
Zellys
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Capn:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
On the plus side, I have just noticed that there is a flag for non-nude, topless & nude on each listed update.
If they are actually accurate, ( unlike OT :0E ) I will commend them for doing that.
Cap'n. :0)
|
12-21-11 12:01pm
|
Reply
1194
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah if I wasn't a member of VB not too long ago I might of looked into it more but for me it would be for just the kink sites so probably worth waiting a while till they have more and there is more from VB I need.
But sounds a good deal if you can sample all them kink movies for $10. I agree though they need to sort out the labelling of their kink sites, you need to know quickly what site at least it is from to establish if you want it instead of clicking everyone.
|
12-21-11 05:28am
|
Reply
1195
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from elephant:
Thanks for putting the mini review up Rearadmiral. Doesn't sound like they have too many scenes yet then, I liked the look of the gangbang site, whipped ass, everything butt and public disgrace but might have to wait a while till they get more scenes.
How much was it you had to pay.
|
12-21-11 02:53am
|
Reply
1196
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#13
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Blimey that doesn't sound too good 8GB, I don't think I'll be joining this site now again.
|
12-21-11 02:04am
|
Reply
1197
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#14
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Good on yer Rearadmiral, I shall look forward to reading it and seeing if its worth the while if I joined Videobox again next year.
|
12-21-11 02:02am
|
Reply
1198
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Comment
from slutty:
Ha! That instant stream thing pisses me off to no end as well, so many times forgetting to mute my speaders...
Thanks for the info on Kink, sounds like a reasonable way to get a sampling without having to join all the sites. How to the video specs compare with what you would get directly from Kink?
|
12-20-11 10:32pm
|
Reply
1199
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from exotics4me:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah, I agree about the wiggle room. Someone else had posted that they were told by RK that the limit was between 60-70 big files per day. I have tried hitting it the last two days, but can't. I tried the same thing I had asked you about, downloading the biggest files possible, 48 GB one day, 62 the next. I'm now even wondering about location you download from since I'm not that advanced in technology, I wouldn't know if longer distances cause more stress on servers. Either way, they have always been loose about their rules. To put it in perspective, over 4 memberships this year, I have the entire sites, 8th Street Latinas, We Live Together, In the VIP, CFNM Secret, Mike in Brazil and Mike's Apartment, just add the newest updates when they come out and randomly add from the other sites when it's a model I like. And this too is my lack of technology understanding, but comes from my experience buying hard drives. Amount of gigabytes are rounded or never are the number we see. Seems like member Justme explained it in the forum one time, something about binary numbers, technical gibberish that I don't put forth the effort to fully understand.
Last thing, you may be onto something with the part about downloading from them everyday. I only have 3 days a week that I download and even then I sometimes have more than one site membership, so it could be that my limit, since not downloading sometimes for as many as 6 days in a row, builds up, if it's cumulative. And if I look at my RK folder on my external, it is a total of close to 1 TB this year. Four memberships 10 GB per day x 30 days = 300 GB per membership or 1.2 TB. I'll try a few more times over the next 2 weeks of this membership and see how much it lets me download.
|
12-20-11 11:43am
|
Reply
1200
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from elephant:
(rearadmiral's Reply)
Yeah that's strange that your buddy never got capped and you did, have you had an answer yet from these guys., were you unlocked at 24 hours.
|
12-20-11 04:51am
|
