| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from redsfan3233:
You're right. Babes has not updated in several years now.
|
01-16-23 07:31am
|
Reply
2
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from exotics4me:
A few things to note when reading a TBP review:
Under "dates" on the top right of the review you will see "date listed", "facts updated (with date)".
The last time the facts were updated was 5-16-2018 on Babes Network.
It's one of the dilemmas with reading reviews. As you can see, the date the facts were updated was right around the time you're seeing problems with their updating. With the amount of sites that are reviewed and updated there will always be a chance of running into the problem you're running into. Sites change how they update, sometimes overnight, without telling anyone.
If you will look in the Porn Users reviews on the Babes Network, you'll see that there are newer reviews than TBP has. It's one of the strengths of Porn Users, owned by TBP, members post reviews with newer information than TBP has.
If you'll notice, the newest Babes Network review by a Porn User was on 12-18-18, and that member only scored the network a 70.
This is coming from a member of PU, not a staff member. Porn Users often times has the newest information on a site. You should consider writing a review (on Porn Users) on Babes Network it will at least help someone avoid the problems you had. And trust me, we've all been there and I think it's how most of us ended up here on Porn Users.
|
02-13-19 06:20pm
|
Reply
3
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(anonuser718's Reply)
To be honest, I'm fine with a two-tiered membership - as long as they are upfront about it. It isn't that I need to pay a bit more to get downloads, I just want to know that going in.
BTW - I had this happen with a couple of Gamma sites too. Evil Angel and XEmpire. I joined each with a deal too good to refuse ($5 I think) but didn't realize that it was streaming only until after I joined. There was an option to upgrade there too. But I have to admit that if I looked closely enough I may have been able to find out that it was streaming only. But maybe not. I can't even say this is a case of 'buyer beware' if the buyer is subject to deceptive practices.
You'd think that with so much piracy in the porn business that sites would treat paying customers better.
|
02-06-19 05:41pm
|
Reply
4
|
Babes Network.com
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I had a similar issue with two other Mindgeek sites over Christmas. I took advantage of a TBP discount and nothing in the join pages indicated that I'd have to pay an additional $15 to get downloads. This is definitely deceptive.
I don't download UHD files so I can't comment on that.
|
01-29-19 02:41pm
|
Reply
5
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from rearadmiral:
I don't have an active membership at FTV now but this is one of the few sites where I do download photos and I find them to be excellent quality. I agree that file size is no indication of quality since they may be soft focus or intentionally 'artsy' to give a specific effect. But my experience with the photos is that they are clear, sharp and crisp.
The photos are available in at least two resolutions. (I can't confirm because I don't have a current membership.) The most recent photos I downloaded were from a couple of months ago and those are 3280x4928. Each photo is excellent quality and is somewhere around 10MB per photo.
I hope this helps.
|
12-08-18 05:23am
|
Reply
6
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from exotics4me:
I've never looked at the samples but I've never noticed any fuzzy or grainy pictures in the members area. I've been a member 50 of the last 60 months and have always thought the pictures here are some of the best on the internet.
|
12-06-18 06:33pm
|
Reply
7
|
Teen Fidelity
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from rearadmiral:
Thanks for pointing that out. 60GB is a reasonable limit in my opinion but I wasn't aware that there was a limit at all. This is useful information.
|
11-30-18 03:58am
|
Reply
8
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(anonuser718's Reply)
That's excellent news! The first I heard of it going back to the old way was a user comment at Rabbitsreviews. Now that you've provided confirmation I think I'll sign up again.
Thanks for posting this.
|
11-12-18 05:43pm
|
Reply
9
|
Zero Tolerance On Demand
(0)
|
Reply of
anonuser718's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Too bad - another "once was great" - or at least really good - site.
|
07-19-18 06:09pm
|
