| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
SexMex.xxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from exotics4me:
(pinkerton's Reply)
I have talked about it a little. I have vision damage in one eye. I think the videos look good and even download the 720p versions. My vision damage is most noticed in colors and lights, which possibly makes me not notice the lesser pixels. I don't know what all their preview shows but the last scene I watched was Angie Posion Amor and it looks very good to me. To put the vision damage in perspective, I have a Samsung 4K Qled television but can't tell that much difference between 4K and 1080p on it. I can tell the difference between 1080p and 4K on video games.
|
04-18-21 10:07am
|
Reply
27
|
SexMex.xxx
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Hey pinkerton,
They're surprisingly not that big of files. Just looking at 3 of the newest scenes, the 1080p files (24-28 minutes each) are between 775 and 900MB. Their bitrate is 4200. Something I forgot to mention in the review since I do understand some Spanish is the scenes are subtitled are English.
|
04-18-21 02:34am
|
Reply
28
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from UMBA8:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Thanks for getting back to me :-)
That's sold me on the site then, I'll give this one a go for my next porn sub. I tend to steer clear from the more professionally style shot porn sites due to the 'over performing' of their models in scenes. Good to hear the majority of the scenes here come across as slightly more natural!
|
02-05-21 09:09am
|
Reply
29
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from UMBA8:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Great review Pinkerton! I've had my eye on this site, and SexyHub as a whole for a while...but haven't bit the bullet on joining just yet, partly due to the extras for downloads but it not really being advertised.
With regards to the scenes themselves - would you say the performers seem to be having a genuinely good time? Or is it very much still playing to the camera style porn? One of the tag lines on the site is "We love to focus on real female orgasms and the natural beauty of the female form." Just wondering how true that is in your opinion?
|
02-05-21 07:02am
|
Reply
30
|
Old 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from rearadmiral:
The lack of model listing is odd. Why, why, why leave out a simple but important piece of information such as that? And it isn't even consistent across the network.
|
02-02-21 08:14am
|
Reply
31
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review from pinkerton:
A few things worth a mention that I couldn't fit into the main review:
-One of the most erotic endings features the female masseur (Ivy) deeply fingering the guy's oiled asshole whilst she jerks him off with her other hand, the guy eventually erupting with a volume cumshot over her hand.
-Special mentions go to the girls Rita Peach, Sofi Goldfinger and Ivy (aka Iwia or Eva Strauss), who for me stand out as exceptional in their scenes, Rita for her magnificent boobs and sexual prowess, Ivy and Sofi for their way with a guy's cock and ass. Annoyingly you can't search for Ivy's scenes because there's no model info or the model info in her scenes is for the guy!
|
02-02-21 08:11am
|
Reply
32
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(pinkerton's Reply)
I'm liking the entire network. One odd thing is that in a lot of the videos the model names aren't listed.
|
01-30-21 12:13pm
|
Reply
33
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from rearadmiral:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Just wanted to say thanks again. I joined through Hunt 4K and got the discount. It includes the whole network, including Rim 4K.
Thanks!
|
01-29-21 10:49am
|
Reply
34
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from rearadmiral:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Thanks! I will.
|
01-28-21 07:54am
|
Reply
35
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from rearadmiral:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Thank you Sir! I prefer to subscribe through TBP/PU but if I can't, I can't.
|
01-26-21 12:30pm
|
Reply
36
|
Rim 4K
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from rearadmiral:
Excellent and informative review. I am a huge fan of rimming content and this site has been on my radar since it was listed here in May of 2020. But, as with many new sites I'm a bit hesitant. Your review removes that hesitation.
It does appear that the TBP/PU discount is gone. I don't see that now and when I go through to the site I see a full price $30 USD price. Let's hope they reoffer that as I don't think I'll join at full price.
|
01-26-21 05:50am
|
Reply
37
|
Fake Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review from pinkerton:
... bottom line continued from previous reply:
Aside from the constant advertising every time you login and on each page, the biggest bugbears for me are:
-having to pay extra for downloading - it's not clear when signing up.
-the lack of model info in a very large number of scenes.
-the limit of 100 items in the favourites and watch-later lists - why they can't be paged lists with unlimited items makes no sense, especially for someone with an annual membership.
The lack of model info is somewhat made up for by members very helpfully providing the model's name and aliases in the comments of may scenes, especially as very often the model's name is wrong, but generally the quality of model info is below average.
The amount and variety of content provided by FakeHub make it an easy recommendation, despite the aforementioned drawbacks, but be sure to get a heavily discounted membership because you'll have to pay an extra 14.99 to be able to download scenes. Also remember that when you cancel your subscription, you'll also need to cancel your download subscription, which is separate and isn't included in the standard cancellation process - instead you'll have to contact customer service via chat or email.
Overall it's easy to recommend FakeHub for the sheer amount of content, the majority of which is great quality so it's worth joining provided you're aware of the gotchas.
|
10-15-20 10:13am
|
Reply
38
|
Fake Hub
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review from pinkerton:
... bottom line continued:
Fake Hospital - a doctor treating his female patients at a local hospital has sex with them, on the pretext of it being part of the treatment. The camera angles are fixed, with scenes featuring only a few camera angles along with the occasional POV courtesy of the doctor's glasses-cam, which probably doesn't help and as a result makes this one of the least interesting sites. There are a few fairly hot scenes but they pale in comparison to the other sites in the network.
Scenes date back to December 2014, last update was March 2018.
Across the network there are over 3890 scenes dating back to June 2011 and almost all content is 1080 HD or below, though for some reason some scenes that aren't that old are only available as 720p maximum.
The sheer amount of content in the network provides a wide variety of categories, so as well as boy-girl there's plenty of two guys on one girl, two or more girls on one or two guys, there's DP, plenty of anal, lots of creampies, plenty of lesbian, MILFs, teens, latinas, Asian, Indian, with most of the girls from Eastern Europe, then the UK then the US and Australia.
Scenes are a mixture of conventional and POV, with generally good production values (only Fake Hospital and Public Agent are a bit weaker in that respect) with the endings either cum on ass or pussy, cum on tits or face, or creampie (both anal and pussy), basically most types of cumshot are all here. The scene storylines are better than you find in most porn sites.
The search and filtering works depending on whether the scene you're searching for has any model info, so the search doesn't work very well with model names; the same applies to filtering on model name and category. Filtering by date range is limited to upcoming, last week, last month and last year.
One potentially time-saving feature is that you can view a scene trailer to save you having to watch or click through the entire scene to decide whether to download or favourite the scene. Also, the scenes viewed history is useful but is limited to 100 scenes, so a major missed opportunity but still useful though.
When browsing the scenes listing, you can sort scenes by release date, rating, most viewed and title.
There are no 4K downloads, which I'm not bothered about, I also feel the same about the lack of photo galleries.
Review is concluded in next reply...
|
10-15-20 10:10am
|
Reply
39
|
TS Pussy Hunters
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Alybator:
(pinkerton's Reply)
It's definitely a favorite of mine. I just hope they aren't ending it. Most TS sites I have tried have almost no story and it just seems out of place for this genre. Like the straight woman isn't going to question why this pretty woman has a dick? Most of the sites just leave it open to interpretation. This one does a good job of I guess what would be called "selling it" or making it seem more realistic.
|
09-30-20 12:04am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Tom D Admin:
(pinkerton's Reply)
When I pass the winners along to Yujin in future, I will remind him of their location. That info is generally easy to verify in the user profiles. And I'll do it even for repeat winners just to be sure!
|
09-18-20 03:49am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Tom D Admin:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Hey Pinkteron - I will let my coworker Yujin know about needing to cancel and reissue the gift card for you.
Sorry to make you wait a little longer, but it should be taken care of tomorrow morning here - so I guess tomorrow afternoon for you.
In the future, I will try to make sure to give Yujin a heads-up for non-US winners.
Cheers!
|
09-15-20 03:45pm
|
Reply
42
|
Fake Taxi
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from Kody:
I love how the recent scenes play on how well-known this site is. Makes it more believable, which is always a big pro for me.
|
09-15-20 07:51am
|
Reply
43
|
Fake Hostel
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from LKLK:
"Cancellation of membership doesn't cancel the recurring download add-on, I only found this through the failed attempt at taking the funds from my card which had insufficient funds."
Smart move on your part using a pre-paid credit card.
I've never used a pre-paid credit card, figuring they were more bother than they were worth.
But for this membership, it was very handy.
I will stay away from the site because I think the billing practice is borderline scam.
What is the reason for charging for downloads after a membership has been cancelled/expired?
|
09-03-20 09:49am
|
Reply
44
|
Filth Flix
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from wetandpuffy:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Thank you for your message and your kind comments. In order to use your EBF login please go to https://members.eurobabefacials.com/
|
06-16-20 01:53am
|
Reply
45
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from tangub:
(pinkerton's Reply)
I've just checked out their recent photo updates from the last couple of months on a forum and they all seem to be 3400 pixels but I have to say the quality of the latest photo sets is abysmal. They look like poor quality video screencaps rather than professionally shot photo shoots, they lack the clarity you find on professional photo shoots on sites like MetArt and are often blurred in places. If this is the new standard of the photo shoots at Wet and Puffy as a photo collector I can't see myself joining again anytime. I wouldn't even waste my time downloading these recent sets for free from the forum.
|
06-13-20 05:19am
|
Reply
46
|
Wet And Puffy
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Review
from tangub:
Hi pinkerton, another fabulous review. I should mention though that I think you'll find only a few of the very oldest photo sets on the site from 2010 and earlier had the 1600x1071 pixel size. At the time of my membership last year newest photosets were 2267x3400px. An easy mistake to make though if you don't collect photo sets, as I recall the high res versions were not available to view online and only in the zips unless things have changed in the last year.
|
06-12-20 12:37pm
|
Reply
47
|
Simply Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Homegirl:
(pinkerton's Reply)
I wish I got a commission!
|
05-20-20 03:14pm
|
Reply
48
|
LetsDoeIt
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from LKLK:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Thanks for the generous helping of information.
I believe you're right, the problem was with Firefox, not with Windows.
The new version of Down Them All is much harder to use, and I haven't tried to learn how to use it.
The old version of Down Them All was much simpler, easy to use.
At the moment, I'm kind of snowed with problems.
I got a re-newed desktop, which I'm learning to use.
And, off topic, I have a bunch of cavities in my teeth, which are going to be slow and expensive to fix, as well as freaken painful. The freaken pain has already started, and that's before they have pulled any teeth yet.
So until I get the time and energy (and ambition--at the moment, all I want to do is crawl into bed and hope the pain goes away), I won't be trying your excellent suggestion.
I think someone else suggested something similar a while back, but I didn't follow up on it, because I was thinking an older version of firefox might be more open to viruses.
But I hope to try your old version of firefox with the old down them all, because it was so easy to use.
|
05-20-20 11:08am
|
Reply
49
|
Simply Anal
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Homegirl:
(pinkerton's Reply)
Hi Pinkerton,
I just looked at one and it was 6766. It was 1.10 GB for a 23 and a half minute video. It was very sharp and clear on my monitor too.
|
05-20-20 09:31am
|
Reply
50
|
New Sensations Network
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from rearadmiral:
(pinkerton's Reply)
I agree. 8000 is fine for me too. What I don't like, and what I have occasionally found on other sites is 1080p videos with bitrates as low as 3000kb/s. Those look noticeably pixilated in curves and movement. And let's face it, porn is all about curves and movement!
|
05-20-20 03:52am
|
