| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Pee Pee Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
from dracken:
Hmm, I just joined the Lex Cuties network and this site was also offered but as you mentioned it was a bit of a disappointment. There seems to be something lacking from the whole network, although I couldn't say what...
Good review though...
|
08-22-09 10:42am
|
Reply
27
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
from lk2fireone:
Review with nice details. But it sounds like you're getting a little bored with porn. It happens to all of us. Hopefully it passes, and we can appreciate all the beautiful girls out there again.
|
06-06-09 12:19pm
|
Reply
28
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
from arnaud:
Hi artnoir.
About low quality videos : i'm quite surprised. Lot's of websites offer poor 320x240 res videos encoded at 300kb/s, ours are available in divx, mpeg, h264, 720x576@2000kb/s.
About "most photosets are not available as videos", i would say "few" photosets are not available as videos ; the oldest ones (maybe 100, whereas there are 950 vids). Because we've been shooting photo and video for each scene at the same time for years now.
What do you mean by "no video options"? there are 5 different formats for almost all the videos (divx, mpeg, mov, ipod, wmv). One can chose the most appropriate i think.
:-)
Arnaud
|
07-09-08 04:29am
|
Reply
29
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I've gotta say that I finally - after 3 years or so of membership - saw a vid on their site that didn't make me turn it off in less that 1 minute.
Yes, it's by their usual video guy - Goncharov. Yes, it's got that same Cinemax synth-flute music. So what's the difference with their new vid - Marinan? Simple - the model has so much joi de vivre and is such a joy to watch that even the guy that has made more hideously boring vids of gorgeous women than anybody I can think of couldn't ruin it - or maybe he's getting better finally?
Ya never know!
|
06-09-08 08:00pm
|
Reply
30
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
from Monahan:
I totally agree. The videos on Met-Art are awful in many respects; especially that most are merely videos of photo shoots with nothing at all enjoyable about them.
The trend at Met-Art is moving toward more suggestive (sexy) poses away from just figure model poses in various stages of dress but they haven't moved into any insertions of any kind nor have males ever made it into any of their content.
The superior photography and the superior beauty of the models has been enough to maintain this site's success, but it will have to move out of the 20th Century soft core suggestive stuff a' la Playboy to a recognition of the models' sensuality.
|
05-11-08 10:29am
|
Reply
31
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
from williamj:
I just posted a review love to know what you think? I just did a 60 day membership.
|
02-20-08 05:51pm
|
Reply
32
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I don't know when you were a member last, or why you're writing a "What happened to them?" comment if you haven't been a member in a while to see the quality of what they have been presenting, but for 8 months or so they stopped rotating off the vids, except for bonuses. I think their new models have been damned hot.
FYI - if you're a Jana fan, they're going to be releasing a huge bonus of her stuff, remastered to bring it up to today's standards, this week.
|
02-10-08 12:07pm
|
Reply
33
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
from Nubiles Captain:
Thanks for the feedback. If you want to check out girls with more hardcore or more toy action don't forget to check out our search engine which will show you exactly what girls do what. We actually do have quite a bit of toy action.
Of the current 409 girls:
-355 of the 409 girls will at least touch themself sexually
-270 girls use toys while they masturbate
Just last year did we make the promise that one of the 3 new girls each week would be hardcore and we now have 63 girls which is more girls than most dedicated hardcore reality sites.
|
02-10-08 09:05am
|
Reply
34
|
Jordan Capri
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Review
from PinkPanther:
It's hard for me to see why Steve Lightspeed is thought of highly in any way other than having shown a whole LOT of people how they can turn a fast buck on cute girls not doing much. His photography is not all that good, his videography is even worse. His site design is rather abysmal and he doesn't seem to have much in the way of personal charm from anything I can tell from reading his posts at various forums over the years.
Other than that, I love the guy - at least he brought us Jordan, I suppose that's something.
|
02-07-08 08:20pm
|
Reply
35
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
artnoir's Comment
from elephant:
I agree I used to love looking through sexy nude photos of hot european babes, now I think its all a little boring at met-art, it needs vids and start concentrating more on this and they would get loads more people signing up, I won't say all but the majority of people would like also to see a good range of vids in this day and age of the models. And love it if met-art did a spin off site with vids and had the models not do hardcore, (that would be good though he he) but did a little more daring and more lesbian scenes, they would please a lot of people, cause lets face it the met-art girls are top notch and lots of them are on other sites doing slightly harder stuff. Just be good to see more passion.
Still thats my opinion, I know heaps just love the photos. I wish they'd also do more photos with girls doing sexy poses with clothes on too and stripping seductively, maybe flashing no panty shots outside like they do at mpl studios. Can't beat that in my book. well hot lesbian sex maybe does lol.
|
02-03-08 01:32am
|
