| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Thanks for the info. I am aware that its the law but I was talking about the reasons behind the law that seem to be more cultural than anything else. I mean we are talking about a law that originates in the Meiji Era of Japan which is late 19th century to about 1912. Many of Japans law were altered by the occupation force after WWII. It's just that they didn't see any reason to alter the ones regarding pornography but then again their idea of pornography is different than ours today.
Japan has had 60 years to alter the law but they haven't so there has to be some kind of cultural imperative that prevents them from doing it. The strange part is that japan already produces a lot of non-pixelated porn as long as it's for Foreign sales.
|
08-23-13 05:51pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Cybertoad:
(turboshaft's Reply)
lolol
|
08-11-13 02:59pm
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Wittyguy:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I agree that personal info is far more worrisome than a hard drive full of cracks and cleavage. I doubt there are many techs who haven't seen a machine full of porn and I assume that most of the time if they are rescuing a hard drive they're not really paying attention to contents: put the download on auto pilot and go do something else. The cost of trying to save a drive can be pretty expensive so I'd probably just go with the important nonporn stuff and focus on rebuilding the collection later; you'd probably save money doing this but not time.
|
07-18-13 02:18pm
|
Reply
29
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from pat362:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I don't know if I try to be different and maybe that's impossible for me since I have stolen the styles of other reviewers but I do like to add a perspective that I didn't see in the other reviews
|
07-11-13 02:28pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from Drooler:
(turboshaft's Reply)
You said it about CNN.com. That and the TV networks (exception: CNN International) are at about the intellectually challenged level of the gossip fare as well. Didn't it use to be a good news source that didn't try to manipulate your emotions (on TV) or trick you into clicking one of those "spammy" links (site)?
Try this weird trick and just avoid it all together.
|
05-02-13 03:45pm
|
Reply
31
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#18
from KET924aab:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yes they did turboshaft, but the movie had robots that you could have sex with.
|
04-09-13 06:33am
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from Dracula:
(turboshaft's Reply)
LOL, true, with pointed wooden projectiles. :)
|
03-25-13 01:56pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#24
from Khan:
(turboshaft's Reply)
|
02-27-13 08:02pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from jberryl69:
(turboshaft's Reply)
For some reason, I doubt that this "Orgasm vs Ejaculation" would occur unless you consciously developed it. Not that it couldn't as I mentioned when I was a youth starting off it occurred but for a very brief period of time (a sec or so). It's just something I vaguely remember. But until recently, I've always assumed the point was to ejaculate.
When my friend talked about Tantric Sex, there were no Internet resources (circa 1977) AND, like a lot of people here, I thought he was full of shit. The way he explained it I wondered WTF - why would one care to do that? I don't remember any explanation regarding the concept of orgasm.
If you were attempting to explore the concept further, either as an individual or with a partner, no one would be getting freaked out, inasmuch as you need to consciously apply certain techniques to make it work, so your fears of freaking out would not apply since the application of technique is the point.
Which, if anyone is following up on this thread, you can easily try - as you are approaching ejaculation, just relax your body - stop straining - maybe even stop stimulating yourself and try to delay the ejaculation ... you should get a brief moment of an extreme tingling sensation. The object would be to extend that feeling.
Which brings me to the subject of Kegel exercises. This technique was introduced to me, again in the late 70s, by an ex-roommate of mine who bet me she could get me off in 2 mins. Well she could!! It was like having sex with a vacuum pump she controlled. It was crazy good. Only once though since she was a married Mennonite in an open relationship and we lived in separate States.
Again, because of the lack of the Internet, I didn't think much about how this might apply to me only that it let her control the contractions of her vagina. A while back it came across my mind with respect to men and I found a site that does more in explaining the benefits and techniques as it applies to men - and I think it would go hand in hand with helping to allow orgasms but delay the ejaculation.
See http://www.askmen.com/dating/love_tip_60/67_love_tip.html Though this site is not talking about Tantric sex, I think it's a good resource for the idea.
|
02-17-13 07:06am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from hodayathink:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I agree with this. I've shown different porn to friends that I thought they would enjoy, and once or twice it has even led to them paying for something. While literally watching porn is a solo experience, I'm not so ashamed of the fact that I watch it that I'm not willing to talk to other people about it, and show examples if that's what the conversation requires.
|
02-12-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from messmer:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I guessed that much, ts. :-) You still haven't told me where to go to get a fairly lengthy strip sequence and you were my last hope!! All the scenes I've seen lately haven't gone much longer than 60 seconds before full nudity. Oh, to be young! :-)
|
01-16-13 06:02pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#23
from messmer:
(turboshaft's Reply)
"....skipping through all the useless striptease" ??? Please, please tell me the name of those sites, turboshaft? I would love some useless strip tease to look at. LOL.
|
01-16-13 12:07pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#16
from messmer:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Absolutely. It shows as an empty drive unless you clicked on True Crypt and mounted the drive as a volume. And this "empty" drive can easily be formatted by your Operating System.
|
10-16-12 10:02am
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Toadsith:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yes they could. True Crypt only makes it near impossible to access the data, protecting the drive from destruction would be best done by storing it in a lockable fire safe. You can use True Crypt to make the drive look empty. It is called a "hidden volume", basically you have a secret format underneath the format, it hides in the empty space on the drive. As long as you don't fill the drive up, the hidden data is safe. It is a pretty impressive program.
|
10-16-12 03:35am
|
Reply
40
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from Claypaws:
(turboshaft's Reply)
No. It is on all the members' content too. Those samples are actual members' content. WYSIWYG (unfortunately).
|
08-25-12 04:29am
|
Reply
41
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#25
from Cybertoad:
(turboshaft's Reply)
I hear ya Turbo , that a good thing :-)
|
07-28-12 05:38am
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#10
from Toadsith:
(turboshaft's Reply)
A lot of times if you play hard-ball and refuse to purchase the packaged deals, the company's sales person will be able to get you the high speed connections outside of the bundle. It is annoying, but sometimes one still has to bargain for a better price.
|
05-24-12 04:44pm
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Well, if there can be mixed metaphor, maybe there's "missed metaphor," too.
|
12-27-11 12:04am
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Cybertoad:
(turboshaft's Reply)
LOLOL
|
11-17-11 07:50pm
|
Reply
45
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#15
from Monahan:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Shoulda read your options turbo before answering.
When I do my taxes I've got my porn stash running. I need something that makes me happy whilst getting sick about how much I support the gummint.
|
10-23-11 08:49pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Cybertoad:
(turboshaft's Reply)
LOL Turbo, Other was well things maybe I should leave to the discretion
of the poster. :-)
|
10-23-11 07:19am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#17
from selphy:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Forbidden to act and shoot the film/video/photo without condom by a Low
|
10-03-11 03:23am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#9
from manholelover:
(turboshaft's Reply)
It's my personal opinion, of course, but I think it's a bit more creative and original in terms of different gay niches, scenarios etc. I don't know whether the Brits are a particularly more creative bunch in general....
|
10-01-11 04:29pm
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#14
from Drooler:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Yes. I know/knew/meant ...
|
09-20-11 04:24pm
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#12
from jberryl69:
(turboshaft's Reply)
Logically, the reason would be that the other person lives some distance from you - at least all the ones I met were not even in the same State - that even had you met them and had sex, phone sex might be the only alternative you had for mental sexual stimulation. The poll here wasn't suggesting you met on Craig's List.
|
09-08-11 04:40am
|
