Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Comment
from hondaman:
The live cams is the feature that I use the least on MET-ART I guess it is not bad from time to time but nothing really special. I notice that alot of the cam models dont ever appear in photo sets too.
|
11-13-08 07:30pm
|
Reply
2
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Comment
from RiverW0lf:
The live chat would be much more pleasant if the "administrators" were actually associated with the Met website. Instead they are paying members who are recruited by management to enforce the Met Rules. They also are given exclusive power to ban those in the live chat.
An administrator can ban you from chatting with the model for any or NO reason. They may not like your username or make up an excuse to 'ban' you. There is also an option they can use that bars your posts from being seen by anyone but you and the admin. You think you are still participating in the chat but no one can see your posts.
As I said none of the administrators actually work for Met-Art but are members, like you, in the free chat.
Most of the models are stunningly beautiful on the live cams and well worth the price of membership to the site.
Overall I would recommend the website but be aware the administrators of the live-cams ARE all male, despite some of the female names. administrator_natasha is definitely male, just as all the admins. The admins also have their own agendas beyond the site rules and will regularly ban someone they do not like.
|
07-01-08 09:20pm
|
Reply
3
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Yeah, the cam chats are a rather "unique" community of regulars - lol. Then there's the rules about not using nasty language like the word "ass". It's funny. I rarely go to the cam chats, though there's a model Masha that I look out for, because she is truly DDG, in my opinion and only does cam chats, has no photo sets or vids on this site.
|
11-03-07 06:45pm
|
Reply
4
|
Sweet Apples
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Comment
from roseman:
i have no idea
|
02-09-07 04:43am
|
Reply
5
|
Topcams
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Review
from roseman:
thanks for the review!
|
02-09-07 04:38am
|
Reply
6
|
K Live Cam
(0)
|
Reply of
fonzie's Review
from roseman:
According to the review, site seems bad :-/
|
02-08-07 04:55am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
