Replies Received
|
Replies to your reviews or comments. |
| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from Cybertoad:
I was a member once, and I think the content just never caught my eye cause there was so little content. I think there was a scene with Hayden Winter that was really well done.
|
03-11-13 08:48am
|
Reply
27
|
Massage Rooms
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
CONTINUATION OF MY REVIEW -- FAVORITES:
George on Angel. Angel is the most responsive of the women. She squirms and writhes with arousal. After two hot orgasms, she does cameltoe slide on George which is wonderful. Then she does some energetic and urgent cowgirl on him. Finally, George pulls out and fires away, no hands -- clearly the genuine arousal of fucking Angel was quite enough to make him explode!
Lola on Eufrat. Here I go again with a girl on girl. Lola brings Eufrat to a hard, bucking orgasm, and then Eufrat licks Lola off. Lovely!
George on Kristine. He finger fucks her to her first orgasm. Then while they are fucking, she rubs her clit and cums #2. Then she has a powerful orgasm after vigorous cowgirl fucking. At the end it looks like she cums #4 and George can't hold back and cums inside her -- we can see his cock pulsing as he pumps her full!
|
03-10-13 09:00pm
|
Reply
28
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from pinkerton:
Hmmm, I think you've been a bit unfair on the content of this site.
I've seen much of the content of this site and I have to say I was quite impressed at how (ironically) fresh it seemed, probably because the guys were less "stunt cock" than found in a standard porn site, and I must admit I found the sight of a gorgeous young woman sucking and fucking a much older guy to be a real turn-on.
In most of the vids the guy does pay the girl(s) a lot of oral attention and there are are more 69s and longer-duration clit-licking than in most other sites. I can't say I found the sex boring and repetitive, but some of the scenes are quite humourous, esp. one outdoor scene where just after the guy cums on her face, a cat walks up and curls by her head. Priceless!
I particularly liked the scenes (with Lucky and with Suzy Diamond - yes there are a few porn regulars here, Claudia Rossi, Patricia whateverhernameis and Jennifer Stone) where the girl is getting fucked lying flat on her belly.
The cumshots aren't as impressive as your average site but many of them are good, check out "The Wine Bar" scene for example.
If I was a current member I'd probably review and rate it 78% or more, but as you mention in your review, it is very expensive at around 30 euro, so maybe that's why you rated it quite low.
|
06-07-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
29
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Gazette Risque:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
They could certainly benefit from a search engine or some kind of search mechanism.
As for the video I recommended. It's mostly the angles that did it for me. Still nothing really special but I just thought I'd share my findings.
Too bad you didn't like it very much but not really a surprise as it's hard to find a really good video there ;)
|
05-27-10 02:55am
|
Reply
30
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Gazette Risque:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
Great review. You certainly make some very good points.
The fake cumshots is what bothers me the most about the site. Sure the acting is terrible but I've seen worse... The communication between the actors and director is obviously what's killing this site.
A while ago I finally found a video that I kept. Well, I kept many but this one I actually like so I recommend it ;)
Working Girl is what the video is called. I still have some issues with some of the angles in this clip and the acting and actor. But it's worth a watch in my opinion.
Anyway, great review!
|
05-25-10 07:52am
|
Reply
31
|
Oldje
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Belthazar:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
This site really works for me, because i like old guys with young ladies even if I am 33 years old. I understand that every man has different taste. I have about 120 vids from this site, so i will post some titles i think worth.
Girls - many of them are European experienced pornstars
Men - I recognized only one or two former pornstars
Fake cumshots - quite common even in mainstream porn industry :) - in My little secretary with a wett pussy.. - You can clearly see girl loading her mouth with water mixed with sugar.
Titles i like: Tall and Mini, Hot seduction in the snow, Crazy sex obsessed bitch, Apples of desire, Hot Car Wash, Burglar is paying, At the garbage dump, Students Enquiry, Extra Lessons etc.
|
05-22-10 06:06pm
|
Reply
32
|
Oldje
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
This is a continuation of my review because I ran out of room:
There were a couple of videos where I found the teasing and foreplay erotic (sunny side of noise, puzzle of lust) but once the sex started, it was boring and passionless.
The site has a large number of videos (29 pages with ~20/page, so at least several hundred). After downloading 30 and finding them very consistently unerotic, I ran out of patience and quit. I was hoping to find the occasional exception with chemistry, fun, arousal, orgasms, horny girls, but didn't. If someone else found such videos at this site, please tell me the TITLES -- I still have 28 days left of my subscription!
|
05-21-10 07:13pm
|
Reply
33
|
Stroke My Dick Now
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from yadayada321:
Wow, I know this site is part of FullPornPass, which I believe, should work. You should have access to sites like KatYoung and so on. I didn't sign up for FullPornPass because their discount doesn't work and they have some nasty X-Sales as you've seen! I agree, this network is fishy and people should stay away!
|
05-10-10 07:15pm
|
Reply
34
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from PinkPanther:
I wouldn't recommend this site to anybody as a source of boy-girl porn - which doesn't mean I wouldn't recommend it to anybody. Sorry you made the wrong choice for boy-girl porn. Check out some of the DDF sites - especially with their great August deal.
|
08-24-09 07:36pm
|
Reply
35
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from exotics4me:
I had read your profile right after reading this comment. If I could throw a tip, check out the Viv Thomas bonus content that Teen Dreams has. His movies are some of the most believable on the internet. The other thing, I've often wondered how much arousal or excitement a younger woman can show in front of a camera crew and someone giving her directions. I've been a member on TD many times over the years, but I prefer solo videos and pictures. Of all of my experiences with porn sites, I came away believing the most aroused females in porn are in solo or girl/girl sets. Maybe try out some of the DVD sites like Videobox and go for the "Classic" videos, though not exactly classic, these are still usually from the 80s and 90s.
|
08-24-09 07:35pm
|
Reply
36
|
Teen Sex Movs
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from OneMan:
I think its a little unfair to expect people to list specific video titles. It is after all, very subjective.
Also, a site like this, has 1000's of videos, and they often have nothing but general titles: like: video 400b.wmv, for example or high23.wmv.
These generic titles are actually a bad point of this network, as you need to download to different folders for each of the sub-sites, or you end up with multiple videos with the same name !
So, for example, in TeensSexMovs.com, there will be a title high3.wmv, but you will also find a different video in Teen3Somes.com, with the same title ! So, you need to be on the ball, or you will be over-writing already downloaded videos.
|
09-30-09 05:47am
|
Reply
37
|
The Sandfly
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from CarlitoB:
Tut-tut.
A bit harsh there and light on the info.
May I address some of the cons which are inaccurate:
Videos - the amatuer video section has a range of AMATUER clips from phone clips to home-shot HD. Variety of scenario varies dependent obviously on the situation filmed.
The clip sare served out in flash player at 480x384 pixels, the same, if not greater as in major sites like voyeurweb and voyeurcloud.
The clips CAN be adjusted in size - theSandfly uses a better system than straight large screen - instead using the ctrl keyboard button in conjunction with the + or - buttons clips can be scaled to the users preference.
Memebers CAN download the videos, simply using any of the free vidoe downloader programs out there - the site uses the same progressiv edownload system as youtube.
the Sandfly and Karennudist EXCLUSIVE beach voyeur material IS mostly completely nude and filmed at pretty close rang efor the most part. I don't know where you get this 'long-range telephoto' view from - perhaps only on some of the early sandfly clips from a decade ago. The new collections were shot in HD and served out at 720x576 pixels.
There are a HUGE variety of picture sections to comliment the videos. Updating every week.
I believe your review was too shallow - you didn't check out the site stringently enough as it presents excellent value and amateur variety.
You're around 25 points short at least when you compare it to some of the rip-off sites out there.
|
10-05-12 07:22am
|
Reply
38
|
Velvet Ecstasy
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
CONS CONTINUED:
-There are many key terms for searching, but female orgasms is not one of them. I've asked Victor to add it and he said he's working on it.
-Most of the girls are not as young and gorgeous as at other sites. That would be OK if they were genuinely aroused, but most aren't. In some early videos, they have matted disgusting hair.
-Many of the recent videos are split into intro, main, and aftermath. I don't see the point of having to download 3 pieces when the intro and aftermath are very short, yet add significantly to the main video.
-Navigation problem: when you find a video by actress or title, you can't find out the action keywords, or what year it was made.
-They limit you to 5 gigs/day. Once, this caused me to be blocked for 24 hours, but for the most part, it isn't a problem.
-Although less than half of the videos have anal (which I could do without), Victor seems to love it and makes a big deal of a girl's first anal, also her first facial. I dislike the emphasis that this site puts on those, but YMMV. None of the anal was with condom, which makes it worse.
-In the early years, still photos appear to have been taken during video shoots, not separate modeling sessions. Generally, I find them much less erotic than those at other sites where there are separate sessions optimized for still shots. Also, there are typically just a handful of full body shots, then dozens and dozens of blowjob and facial shots. Not to my taste at all. There are way too many closeups in the still photos. Even when I find the actress quite attractive, in the early years of the site, usually I can't find a single still that I want to keep! In the last few years, stills went to 1600 pixels, and many are of better quality and some are more erotic. Still not as good as the stills on many sites.
|
11-20-09 03:21pm
|
Reply
39
|
X-Art
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Goldfish:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
Hey BGR, This site does a good job getting the most from every girl. I didn't see one clip where the girl seemed uncomfortable or stiff. As a disclaimer, there are some European girls on this site. It's a mix of Euro and American models.
Enjoy, if you sign up!
|
09-16-12 06:34am
|
Reply
40
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review
from Willard:
Hello.
Your review understands easily, and is very interesting.
After finishing having read your review, I became a member on the Karup's Hometown Amateurs.
Thank you!!
Your recommendation is a correct, very good site.
Well, it is a matter of Young Libertines.
I was a member in the spring of this year.
Because time has passed for a while as for me since it seceded, the review cannot be written.
Your review is very correct, impartial, and good.
I came to like video of Cathy of this site.
And, I found her to the advertisement of Teeny Lovers.
It became the member of Teeny Lovers at once.
However, her video did not exist in the site.
I was disappointed.
Afterwards, I saw the video of Cathy of New Porn Talents and Cream Pie Mania.
It was a yawner.
I like her of Young Libertines very much.
It is very lovely that she frantically kisses the boy.
|
09-29-09 11:06am
|
Reply
41
|
Young Libertines
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Review from BabyGetReal:
Cons continued because I ran out of room:
- Infrequent updates, about one/week while I was watching.
- The “top visited” and “top rated” lists are relatively useless: they list only 10 each (a mix of photosets and videos, so less than 10 in each category), and the number of ratings are low.
- Dialog is in Russian(?), and there are no subtitles.
(END OF CONS)
|
09-28-09 07:44pm
|
Reply
42
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from GCode:
While the review cannot be edited, I believe you did the right thing by writing this comment with the information and details included. I think most who may read your review will probably see the comment as well. Another suggestion is to write a reply to your review with a point in the direction of this comment, or even copy and pasting this comment in your review as a reply to your review. Thanks for the heads up.
|
05-10-10 10:45pm
|
Reply
43
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from yadayada321:
cool, thanks for the heads up!
|
05-10-10 09:20pm
|
Reply
44
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from OneMan:
That's great news. Some webmasters are honest, and mistakes DO happen of course.
Some, unfortunately, are not so scrupulous....I had one guy in South America, whose "independent merchant" ripped off some of his customers - including me - and disappeared. Did we receive any compensation ? No....nada....not even an apology....just procrastination and "wo is me!!" bs.
Fair play to you, for pointing out that this site is run by a decent guy. maybe we should have a section devoted to publicising decent sites in terms of customer service ? It's all too easy to criticise, but we are less likely to take the time to commend and recommend !
|
10-03-09 03:09pm
|
Reply
45
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from ControllingMind:
Result!
Good job you mentioned it here on PU. Well done and good on the webmaster for sorting it out.
|
10-02-09 12:50pm
|
Reply
46
|
Young Models
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from khf2004:
(BabyGetReal's Reply)
BabyGetReal,
Please check your yahoo,
I just sent you an email...
Should you have any more issues questions or need anything else please feel free to contact me directly.
I have issued a credit to you account for the full amount.
Again thank you and the Porn User staff for bringing this issue to my attention.
|
09-29-09 03:59pm
|
Reply
47
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from khf2004:
BabyGetReal,
Thanks for posting this message, if you could please reply to the message I sent you VIA your Porn User's account.
I will look into this billing issue and have any issues corrected ASAP.
Thanks again
|
09-29-09 02:15pm
|
Reply
48
|
Young Models
(0)
|
Reply of
BabyGetReal's Comment
from PinkPanther:
Let us know what happens. It's one thing for sites to have poor book-keeping and make mistakes. It's another for them to have systems that are all about taking advantage of people that had the mis-fortune of giving them a credit card.
Private.com was so bad that even when they offered me a free month's membership later, I wanted nothing to do with them. They have an auto-cancel feature at their site. I cancelled, received no e-mail confirmation, then they wouldn't respond to e-mails for weeks on end.
Mystique.com is another site that's built to rip you off, from my experience. They offer deals, then they charge you "erroneously" over and over and it's up to you to prove they were wrong each time - when they reverse the charges, their responses are always surly - no apologies for making their customers do their book-keeping for them.
|
09-29-09 06:42am
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
