Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Warm Kiss
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent Super-HD quality videos (SD and HD MPEG and lower-res WMV formats)
Content is very amateur / pro-am
Exclusive content
Many exclusive / semi-exclusive models |
| Cons: |
Site is TOO amateurish in design.
BMP format preview, logo, and background images
~2 updates per month
No search
No model index
No real still images beyond some screen captures |
| Bottom Line: |
The real ONLY reason this site got such a high rating is the content alone. The content is excellent. The site is primarily a video-only site. There are sets of pictures from some of the videos, but do not look like pro-photos. The photos all appear to be screen-captures from the videos themselves (no still camera involved or was integrated into the video camera). Many videos feature unknown or little-known models (with a few known porn models thrown in). Sadly the site only gets ~2 updates per month (some months may only get 1)... so this site could seriously use more frequent updates. The site design, and quite simply is setup could be MUCH better. I had actually emailed the owner (Ryan, one of the male models as well). He appears to be the sole person running the site from what I can tell and told me he is not very knowledgeable about creating sites. He did give my an in-depth explanation on why most the videos are MPEG instead of the more popular H.264, DivX, or WMV (the lower-quality videos are in WMV). The images on the page typically take 2+ minutes to download on a broadband connection and are in Bitmap (BMP) format. I did suggested to him to use JPEG images that are lower file size and download faster since much of the text is white and the background remains white as well until ~2 minutes later when the blue background image finally loads.
In conclusion, the content is GREAT but needs more updates than 2/month. The site needs a COMPLETE overhaul. At the very least needs images that will load faster and a better stylesheet/color selection. In terms of what the female models; most are very attractive, very amateurish with a few known porn models and unattractive models. There appears to only be two male models: Kyle, and Ryan (who also runs the site). Personally, I think they would be further ahead to hire a 3rd person to work soely on their site and focus themselves on getting more updates out the door... or selling to a company who has more resources to do so. |
|
02-27-10 01:05pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
2
|
Sexy Settings
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Regular Updates (~2/week)
Pro-amateur to amateur European models
Model Index |
| Cons: |
No categorization
No search
Sex (see detailed review below...)
MOV
Older videos are cycled out with new updates |
| Bottom Line: |
I wanted to like this site, I definitely like massage videos and there definitely seems to be a lack of sufficiently good videos in that genre. Unfortunately this site disappointed on a few points. First, it is supposed to be a "bondage" site, but not sure I would call this even light bondage. Videos sometimes show them being tied but many are just tied to begin with and with little to no respect for the bondage. They are typically tied with light rope or even a sheet that I guess they could probably struggle out of easily. They never struggle against it, it's just a forgotten element of much of the content. Previous updates last year used to claim high quality and I believe some claimed high definition, but it is not HD. ~840 x 480 for most and here is the worst part... MOV format. I have had so much trouble just keeping the players from crashing it is not even funny. Although the models seem to really orgasm in the massage/manhandle videos, the sex videos are rather disappointing. It is just the guy who started the site having sex with the models but they don't seem to enjoy it much and are typically much shorter than other videos (hint, hint). I suppose the only major thing that is going for this site is the manhandle/massage content and the somewhat amateurish appeal. No search, no categorization (beyond use of your browser's search function). I still have about half-year on my subscription (I like longer non-recurring subs), but I don't visit often. If videos were in a more playable format and HD resolution it would have bumped the score up a bit. Not the worst site out there but definitely not the best. |
|
01-18-10 09:51am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
3
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
83.0
|
No Review.
|
08-31-07 10:23am
|
Rating
4
|
Nude Sport Videos
(0)
88.0
|
No Review.
|
08-31-07 10:12am
|
Review
5
|
Little Mutt
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good video quality (MPG 320x240; WMV 640x480 about 900kb/s)
- Full video in one file OR download by scene
- Broadband and dialup video qualities
- Multiple updates weekly
- Fast download speeds (200-600kb/s)
- Hot, exclusive content
- Massage videos are very erotic
- Includes girl solo, girl/girl, girl group, and some girl/guy including BJ, vaginal, and anal.
- Picture quality is good (1200px). Not blurred or small images.
- ZIP photo sets |
| Cons: |
- Forum not too active
- Could use some advanced search |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has quite a bit of collected content. Many reviewers claim the bad thing about this site is lack of girl/guy content, but is just as ridiculous as requesting hardcore content from an artistic-nude site. Older content is a bit worse quality, but is to be expected. Site updates are regular and updates in forums are usually weekly. Forum activity is minimal but helpful. Video and picture quality is good, fast server, and great content! This site could use some more advanced search features, but I highly recommend it! Massage (a rare type), solo, and girl/girl are what this site is all about. |
|
07-16-07 09:19am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
6
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
86.0
|
No Review.
|
05-11-07 05:45pm
|
Review
7
|
All Hairy
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Exclusive content
- Medium ammount of content
- User-submission image board
- Non-professional models
- Model directory |
| Cons: |
- Some content not exclusive
- Some videos can only be downloaded in chunks
- Video quality varies
- Image size varies
- Not much user-submitted content |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has a fair amount of content, but could use more. The models are typically average-looking, but some are not exclusive to the site. The only videos/models I can clearly say are exclusive are the few that where an "All Hairy" shirt in the beginning.
The site design isn't bad, but could use some better search features and model information. It includes a model directory sorted by name alphabetically.
The user-submission gallery is a good idea, but there is not a whole lot there and some of it is copied from some other copyrighted site (with watermarks removed), but some looks original.
The video quality varies with many of them showing in a small box on top of a 740x480 black box. The videos, for the most part, can be downloaded in chunks or as a whole. Some videos are WMV (newer videos), older are MPEG.
Images are typically medium sized and good quality (~800-1000px) with very few being massive (2000px+).
If you like hairy girls and want to try out your hand at submitting your own or just viewing what few others have posted and seeing some hairy girls have sex or play with themselves, then go for it. If you are looking for the more erotic aspect of hair, there are better sites out there. |
|
05-05-07 11:33am
Replies (1)
|
Review
8
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Plenty of content
- High-bitrate, large videos
- Great quality images
- Beautiful, skinny European models
- Good site design |
| Cons: |
- Redundant after watching the first few (mechanical)
- Not amateur in nature
- Bit expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall a good site site for lesbian sex. The video quality is excellent (along with the images). It features all girls (Sapphic literally means lesbianism). The girls are the typical gorgeous, skinny models with breast size going from A to D. The design is good with a lot of search features. The reason I left is that the content seems the same for most. Girls lick, toy, touch, prod, etc. but it seems almost mechanical after watching a few. Not amateur by a long shot. The site is a tad expensive also. I recommend it if you have a European model fetish (does it exist?) or you just absolutely LOVE lesbian video (amateur or not). |
|
05-05-07 09:19am
Replies (0)
|
Review
9
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Plenty of content
- Hot, young models
- Real orgasms
- Very sensual video content |
| Cons: |
- No site updates (dead site?)
- No support
- Cannot direct-download videos
- Images not viewable |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has apparently died. No updates since January 2006. Emailed support and got no response. The site itself has plenty of content to keep someone busy for a while, but will not satisfy indefinitely because it is no longer updated. Images are no longer viewable, giving an "access denied" message when a thumbnail is clicked. The models are extremely hot, some very amateur/new to porn. The video quality is good, but does not offer a direct-download. Overall, if you want good archived videos you can join but you will not see any new content. |
|
05-05-07 12:19am
Replies (1)
|
Review
10
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Good selection of content for a new site
-Great quality videos (1000kbs WMV)
-Long videos (some pushing an hour)
-Videos have two options: WMV or MPEG
-Videos have two sizes: Big (720x480) and Small
-Fast Downloads (typically between 200-400kbs)
-Many categories/niches
-Updates are not set, but about 2 videos per week. |
| Cons: |
-Lacking navigation/search features
-Organization could be better
-No defined weekly/monthly updates |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I recommend the site for the videos alone, and for any amateur lover. The site has many more pros than cons. Videos are typically 30-60 minutes (average about 20 minutes) long and the models are beautiful, sexy, and cute. The action is very amateur with the models sometimes just playing around and really enjoying each other. Includes both softcore and hardcore action. Images size in sets could be a bit bigger, but are good quality and offer thumbnail view and compressed download. Navigation is old-school and could use some search and categorizing features. There are advertisements for other sites, but do not get in the way and do not appear on video/image pages. |
|
03-31-07 10:38pm
Replies (2)
|
Rating
11
|
abbywinters
(0)
98.0
|
No Review.
|
03-31-07 08:30pm
|
|
