Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : marcdc1 (0)  

Feedback:   All (1013)  |   Reviews (264)  |   Comments (156)  |   Replies (593)

Other:   Replies Received (375)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 299 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
26
Visit Maggie Green Live

Maggie Green Live
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Maggie is a (naturally?) big breasted "curvy" woman. She is a classic beauty and looks like a real woman. On top of that, she's got some acting chops and can do fun role plays and not look like she's reading from cue cards.
- Weekly cam show with Maggie. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Kimberlee, Sophie Dee (love her!) are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- Good mix of action (weighted toward solo, but plenty of hardcore and group stuff)
- good role-play (light dom, joi, "family play" (not for me but I see it everywhere these days), nympho, workplace, interracial, etc.)
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
- updated looks Maggie often changes her hairstyle/color. She not afraid to experiment
Cons: Pros CONT:
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- as of July 22, 2020, 591 videos
- pictures available as zips as of July 22, 2020, about 45,000 pictures (not sets just pix)
CONS:
- I appreciate that Maggie does not look like she's been to a plastic surgeon a million times - but I know some guys want to see the "porn star look". She is also in the MILF age and I know some guys won't like that she's not the 98-pound girl they see in other videos. I actually think these are positives but know some would disagree
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile/desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago
Bottom Line: I really enjoyed Maggie's site. I think the combination of her "girl next store" look and her ability to act (plus get wild when the action starts) makes her an amazing find. To me, I don't think I'll stick around for a real long term commitment only because she seems to keep going back to the same creative plots (if you're good at it and it sells good on ya!).

I like that weekly cam shows are available - but I can never seem to get my schedule to work to make it into them. I bet she would be really good in a chat session, but I can't speak with 1st hand knowledge.

The main page interfaces with her twitter account so you can always see what's new in the world of Maggie Green

All in all, I give the site a solid recommendation, with the caveat that you like curvy MILF women. For a solo site, it covers all the bases and keeps fans satisfied

07-22-20  06:57am

Replies (0)
Review
27
Visit Kimber Lee Live

Kimber Lee Live
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Kimber is a good looking young lady. Large natural breasts. Focus is on solo shooting
- Weekly cam show with Kimber. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- 43 site network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Maggie Green, Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network.
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- pictures available as zips
Cons: Cons:
- performances are underwhelming.
- About 271 video
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- only 6 videos load per page. This means lots of search time wasted with page loads.
- Ads on the member side
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line: Seemed to have everything right. Hot girl, fun flirty personality, decent camera work. Despite all those pluses, I found Kimber Lee to be flat and without personality. It seems like she's taking suggestions for content - but doesn't really get into them so the performances come off as wooden and fake. In short, it doesn't seem like she likes what she does.

The 1st time I logged in I downloaded a bunch of videos without doing much of a preview. I thought I was set cause she looked so perfect. I probably downloaded 30 files, but then when I started reviewing them for filing I found they were mostly underwhelming. There just isn't anything remarkable. If you like watching a pretty girl masturbate or screw you'll proably be fine. But if you want role-play/plot/set-ups/kinky or spontaneous there's little of that here.

As you might guess. I give this site a skip. Even if you go in for the network - I don't think there are too many gems in this one.

07-07-20  08:17am

Replies (0)
Review
28
Visit Sara Jay

Sara Jay
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Sara Jay has been described as being a "butter face" performer (beautiful "but for her face"). I think that criticism is harsh. While she has had plastic surgery to be overly enhanced I think she retains her "real girl" beauty. I sometimes think her hair could be done in a more flattering way - but that's a small complaint.
- Weekly cam show with Sara. Across the included cam network there are about 3 shows/day.
- High energy; Sara dives into her scenes making them fun and nasty. Gentle love-making is not her specialty.
- Great MILF network: Shandra Fay, Julia Ann, Puma Swede, Deauxma, Charlee Chase, Francesca, Carmen Valentine, Angelina Castro, Maggie Green Nikki Benz are all included as part of the network. The whole network is in the MILF genre -so if you're a fan this is the place.
- guest stars keep things interesting
- updates normally 1X/week
- Mobile formatting friendly
Cons: Pros CONT:
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- as of July 7, 2020 687 videos
- pictures available as zips

CONS
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
Bottom Line: I've come to really like Sara as a performer. She brings personality and passion to her work. She seems to be a porn performer who loves sex and is having fun with her work. I always find that endearing.

for a solo performer, she mixes in a lot of different genres and works with many different male and female co-stars. She seems to lean toward interracial content - so those of you interested in that might find this to be a plus.

All in all, this is a solid site. I would give it a "buy". She doesn't blow my doors off and make me think that I'll be a long term member (for me long term is a year or more). But I'm very satisfied and not leaving after the 1st month either.

I haven't caught one of her cam shows yet (I'm really trying to figure out a time to do that!) My guess is that she would be amazing at that instant feedback environment

07-07-20  08:02am

Replies (0)
Review
29
Visit All Anal All The Time

All Anal All The Time
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - An anal focused site with unrelated sub-genres. The main video page includes categories for: anal, anal creampies, gapping (which is really more rimming), and cuckolding (which has more of a foot licking with banging category).
- STILL updating about 1X/week
- While I like anal content I usually go for sites that are more well rounded. That said the sex here was good - but as you might guess unimaginative and repetitive. I really felt like the only thing that changed each shoot was the model.
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- pictures available as zips
- The older stuff features more established models (Janet Mason, Barbra Summers)
- Great Stars (but not their best performances) like Lauren Phillips, Kate England, Kaylee Hilton.
- New
Cons: Pros Cont:
- New talent I haven't seen before: Black Angel, Cristin.
- The network includes 43 sites.
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.

CONS:
- It seems to me like they are recycling content from older DVDs? I'm not sure but it has that look to it.
- Formulaic to the point of being boring. I KNOW some of the talents they brought in is killer - but they fail to deliver good performances. Everyone's entitled to a bad day, but when you see great performers wasted over and over again - it's disappointing.
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks old
Bottom Line: I'd give this a skip. If you want anal content there are much better sites. If you buy for the network maybe pass through here and see if you like anything - but I wouldn't spend long.

The dated design, the repetitive content, the underwhelming performances all combine to keep this from being recommendable.

What this site does have going for it is the price (reasonable) and extensive catalog. But short of that this site is middling in every way. There's no personality, there's no passion, there's no hook.

07-07-20  07:41am

Replies (0)
Review
30
Visit DogFart

DogFart
(0)

100.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Membership includes access to all Dogfart network (23 sites). Across the whole network is over 5,700 videos.
- Picture sets are available in .zip format (screenshots of videos)
- Plenty of hot newcomers like Karma Rx, Febby Twigs, Vanessa Vega.
- Big star: India Summer, Adriana Chechi, Natasha Nice, Penny Pax, LAUREN PHILLIPS, Britiniy Amber, Jasmine Jae.
- The catalog goes back to 2002 and obviously, that has a lower quality
- most recent content maxes out at 1920X1080 10 MB/s
- scenes generally run 30 minutes
- all content is exclusive
- as of July 7, 2020 over 5,725 videos!
- STILL UPDATING usually 1x/week
- The organization is good with lots of ways to search. Searching is also connected across the network. The organization is done by date, category, model, and most popular. I tried the keyword searching and it worked well. If anything it returned too many hits. (better than missing content I suppose)
- Wide variety of niches. (However, all of the network is interracial)
Cons: These are really minor points as you can tell from the excellent score

- The picture downloads are mostly screenshots of the shoot. (However the newer stuff has the model holding posterboard of a hot massage or two - some are witty and fun)
- extra fee for 4K content (I'm seeing a lot more places doing things like this maybe it's becoming industry standard?)
Bottom Line: I know 100 is a controversial score (as we discussed on the forums: https://www.pornusers.com/forum/forum_th...d.html?threadid=6023. That said I still stand by it. I think dogfart is the leader in interracial porn (more on that in a minute). This network is one of the granddaddies of internet porn - and they've kept up with the changing time rather well. So why 100? Because they have a giant catalog that is unmatched because they have top of the line quality (some of my favorite stars have given some of their best performances here) because they update frequently because they evolve and maintain creativity (although the sex is often formulaic with the same positions used in the same order).

I know we are having a moment about race in society right now. I myself am IR sex agnostic. I'm not particularly drawn to it - but I don't shy away from it either. To me, the strength of this site is its passion. While adjectives like raw, passionate, intense, hardcore used to be good to describe dogfart's style. Right now I'd describe it as hot - everyone seems to genuinely enjoy themselves (always an important part for me).

While the price is higher than others, I feel it's well worth it. Good production, top talent, and sustained catalog all cost money. I'm not afraid to pay for high quality and this network delivers it.

07-07-20  05:14am

Replies (0)
Review
31
Visit Adult Time

Adult Time
(0)

89.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - The "Nextflix of porn" - very mainstream and a LOT of content!
- STILL updating 5 or more updates a DAY typically
- The strength of this site is its vastness. There's so much porn here I found I would get lost in a rabbit hole of finding one more video after yet another video. My "favorites" collection was huge
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: But it runs the range old stuff from the VHS era are obviously not as good, the latest stuff is full 4K. The 1080 stuff I watched on my 30" monitor looked perfect. I hesitate to give a lot of specs here because there's so much variety depending on where they're aggregating their content from
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- As of June 12, 2020 43,611 videos - but with multiple updates a day that grows really fast!
- pictures available as zips
Cons: PRO CONT:
- tags and keywords make navigation easy. Again it's almost too easy to find stuff and to spend too long here. I think my family started to get worried about me at one point

CONS:
- Porn is never boring. It's like pizza even when it's bad it's pretty good. That said there is a lot of mediocre porn and much of it found its way here.
- Most content is non-original. And a solid chunk of it is so dated that unless you're a fan of stuff from decades ago you're unlikely to be interested in it.
Bottom Line: I respect what Gamma is trying to do with Adult Time - to become "the Netflix of porn" and I think there's a real need for something like this. Adult Time seems to be running the same play as Netflix; buy up lots of old content and work to produce high quality interesting new stuff.

The bought up old stuff: mostly cookie-cutter porn, same set ups; no risks, fun but not exciting. If you're into anything niche, kinky, or unique you'll probably find a few shots of it here - but not enough to find satisfying.

The new stuff: more artsy, shot in unique light/frame rate, lots of plot (I'm a plot guy and some of it was too much for me) - a lot of it reminded me of the 90's era feature films. These are often edgy and have unique plot twists. Like Netflix this is where adult time takes risks PureTaboo (one of their studios) reminds me of when Netflix did House of Cards. (I mean that as a compliment - I loved HoC)

If you're a casual porn consumer or like mainstream porn this site is perfect for you.

However, if you are into niche porn, or want more kinky stuff you will quickly burn through the content that appeals to you and I would recommend a dedicated site that will hit your itch.

In short - Adult Time is the Netflix of porn - they accomplished their goal. But for those of us who want our unique taste (like those of us who want our Disney fix in the non-porn world), We aren't going to be satisfied here.

I grabbed a 3-month membership and certainly enjoyed it - but I decided not to renew it. I'm sure I'll come back and dip into Adult Time. But it didn't do what I wanted it to do. I wanted this to be my permanent membership for all non-ameature content, they couldn't do that for me...yet. I'll keep an eye on them

06-12-20  07:41am

Replies (2)
Review
32
Visit Shanda Fay

Shanda Fay
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Sandra Fay is a busy Canadian with wild dyed hair, an unforgettable voice and one of the dirtiest amateurs I've ever seen. She brings a passion to her videos that few others provide. And her prolific toy collection leaves quite the impression
- STILL updating But very recently sporadic.
- The strength of this site is her the fact that she's crazy dirty. Lots of hot dirty talk, role play (twin/nurse/etc). She also has a strong exhibitionism streak (to my untrained eye it looks authentic) and she kills it with Cosplay her Jessica Rabbit is among the best (also does batgirl and poison ivy really well)
- There's plenty of pegging (mostly non-femdom_
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 350 video
- pictures available as zips
Cons: Pros Cont:
- The network includes 43 sites.
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)
CONS
- No search capability, despite the fact that other sites on the network have it.
- The organization is only done by category - this made it very hard to find what I was most interested in
- only 6 videos load per page. This means lots of search time wasted with page loads.
- Ads on the member side
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line: While I like Shandra's attitude and playfulness I warn you that some will find her voice offputting. It seems like she is intentionally raising her voice like a characteracture of a porn star. I don't mind it at all, but I've seen comments where some have complained.

Normally a site like this would be right up my ally. I like amateur, I like public stuff, I like Cosplay. All that said I went with a rather lower score because there doesn't seem to be a personality with Shandra. She seems like a projection of what people are expecting her to be. I'd love to see her let her hair down and let her fans know who she is.

That said there are some real gems here (but again they're hard to find because of the site structure.).

If your thinking of buying I would say skip it. If you like the rest of the network make sure you stop here for some treasure hunting.

05-29-20  08:41am

Replies (2)
Review
33
Visit It's Cleo Live

It's Cleo Live
(0)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Cleo is a young (to this old-timer, that means less than 30) brunette with enhanced perky breasts and a gymnast's body. She does boy-girl stuff, but I think the site leans harder on girl/girl content. Perhaps what sells this site more than anything else is risky public shots.
- STILL updating (1-2/week typically)
- Good range of videos: public masturbation/flashing, solo, car sex, JOI, 3-somes, orgies (girl heavy), cheerleader role play (I read somewhere that she was a Steelers Cheerleader, maybe that's just rumor. She's certainly a Pitsburg Fan and it shows .
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 320 videos
Cons: Pros Cont:

- pictures available as zips
- 43 sites included in the network.
- Not every guest start is has a tag. For example, she did some work with Lelu (from Lelulove.com) and I want to find all that content (Lelu is my all favorite amateur!) I can't search just for that I have to look at all the thumbnails and guess where she is (sometimes it's in description sometimes it's not 😞
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)

CONS:
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line: I've been a big can of Cleo for a while (mostly on twitter), just couldn't fit another subscription into my budget. I'm really glad I dropped some other stuff to add this in. Cleo is super hot and full of crazy ideas. It's not unusual to see her on a zip line or jumping off a roof and especially doing exhibitionism. Some girls do pretend public stuff - Cleo looks like a true exhibitionist having fun with everything she does.

To me the public content sells the hell out of this site (and the fact that Cleo is exciting and just seems so alive.) She has more personality than just about any amateur girl I can think of. I give this a big BUY

05-25-20  10:29am

Replies (0)
Review
34
Visit Kendra James

Kendra James
(0)

91.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Kendra James is a long time favorite of mine. I have a soft (or is it a hard 🤔) spot for redheads. She does a lot of fetish work and has a great dom persona. She seems to favor girl-girl action which is too bad cause I love her male-female work.
- STILL updating (1-2/week typically)
- The strength of this site is her cosplay. Kendra does a Poison Ivy that just kills. She's also got a couple of hot cuckold videos. There's plenty of femdom, pegging, foot fetish, Latex, and especially strap-on work.
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 160 videos (perhaps that should be moved to con?)
Cons: Pros Cont:

- pictures available as zips
- 43 sites included in the network I'm especially excited for Lauren Phillips (no surprise there - I'm a huge fan! and look at that she's also a redhead), itscleo, Penny Pax (another hot redhead), Sophie Dee (who doesn't love the accent?), Sandra Fay (sometimes a redhead),
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring. Cams include Lelu from LeluLove.com. That's the site I never quit, so I was stoked to find an easy search for her stuff here.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)

CONS:
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
Bottom Line: Cons Cont:

- Cam shows can sometimes be slow to get to the action (not a bad thing sometimes)

I know these days everyone's a superhero fan. But I'm an old school comic collection fan. So to me, this site earned a buy just with the cosplay action. Batgirl, Wonder Woman, Poison Ivy, etc. Many of these fall into Hypno or damsel in distress genres. The result is humors while still being erotic. In other words, Kendra can act.

I can say a little more as a bottom line but that right there is the most important thing: Kendra is a hot as hell redhead with a killer body, acting chops, and playfulness. To me, the only thing keeping the score down is the heavy lean into girl-girl content and the lack of catalog (something that will work out over time)

If you think you might just try out a little Kendra some of these videos seem to be posted on her clips4sale.com page.

05-21-20  01:47pm

Replies (0)
Review
35
Visit Whipped Ass

Whipped Ass
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good creativity. While it's tempting to set everything in a dungeon (especially when you're kink.com and own a whole building with several of them - lol). The resist that trope and mix it up everything from Santa's north pole to a comfy couch, to the office is used as a set and situation)
- email alerts for when you favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to 34 sites each with its own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Updates about twice a month (Before Covid)
- Over 900 videos each video about an hour-long.
- girl-girl action
- Videos looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities including pregnant models.
- Billing by rocketpay
- Bi action if that's what you're looking for
Cons: Pro Cont:
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
- photos available as .zip
- plenty of extremes (if that's a pro?). Nipple torture, anal, drooling (not my fav), suspension/rope play
- Top-notch talent: especially Aiden Starr (recently listened to her in a podcast - the dom persona comes natural and it shows), Mona Wales (she is one of my favorite "switches", Jene Wilde (she's new to me but quickly becoming a favorite she beings excitement like few other performers), Riley Nixon (she's added weight since she 1st started and looks more beautiful than ever!)

CONS:
- No 4K videos yet
- download limit but it doesn't say what it is
- pricy, but you get a lot of bang for your buck
- While the setups are unique I got a little tired of the all girl-girl format
Bottom Line: While they are expensive this is one of those times where you get what you pay for. There's no arguing the camera/sound/direction/light are all professional. Each shoot models good BDSM etiquette and goes through consent protocols.

I'm really struck by the level of production here. One of the scenes features Julia Ann (I just got done doing a big review of her site JuliaAnnlive.com so I'm familiar with her typical performances). The people at kink do such a great job of taking performers (even legends like Julia Ann) and pulling over the top shoots from them. Really no one does it like kink (well I guess that's not true there are no imitators, but kink is the OG of BDSM content).

While this site isn't at my tippy top (because I wasn't more than all-girl action) for those that are in that market this one is a buy

05-20-20  01:06pm

Replies (0)
Review
36
Visit Julia Ann Live

Julia Ann Live
(0)

94.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Julia Ann is a crazy hot MILF (I love MILFs) on top of that she's had a legendary career in porn so it's great to see so much of her content in one place!
- The strength of this site and network is it's cam shows there are several each day and it seems to be where they have their energy
- Mobile formatting friendly
- Good video quality: The mobile version is 1280X720 4.25 mb/s. Desktop is 1920X1080 10.2 mb/s. - I don't think that's 4K but it looks great on my 30" monitor.
- Searching is good (but not great). You can search across the network or just this site.
- Rating and favoriting are supported to make it easy to keep track of what you've watched.
- About 320 videos
- Good range of content: BTS, girl/girl, 3-somes, orgies, studio content, cams, hardcore, interracial, fetish, anal. Can't think of a niche that isn't filled.
- Some of the content is exclusive to only this site (not every video is exclusive)
- pictures available as zips- 43 sites included in the network
Cons: PRO CONT:
- 43 sites included in the network I'm especially excited for Lauren Phillips (no surprise there - I'm a huge fan!), itscleo, Siri, Penny Pax, Sophie Dee (who doesn't love the accent?), Maggie Green (just found here recently - love her too), Sandra Fay (she is dirty with a capital D), and Kendra James (while she does mostly girl-girl, which isn't my fav - her solo stuff is top-notch!)
- Over 16,000 cam archives. I'm not much of a cam guy but I'm enjoying exploring.
- Cam shows are for members (so you don't have the talent waiting until she hits her minimum to start)

CONS
- limited downloading options (mobile or desktop versions)
- Still updating but slow 1/month is typical
- Dated site format. It's functional but looks like it was designed 10 years ago.
- older content is 640X480 0.9 mbps (it looks like some of that is being remastered for better quality).
- Cam archive is poorly organized
- Cam shows can sometimes be slow to get to the action (not a bad thing sometimes)
Bottom Line: I've been meaning hit up this network because they have Lauren Phillips here and I LOVE Lauren Phillips. They also have Cleo and some other amateur talent that I've been meaning to catch up on. That PLUS Pornusers has a points bonus for this site, AND there's a special Covid price of 20/month made this a no brainer.

Like I said in the pros this site is driven by their network - both camming and other stars. A lot of these models have had earlier big porn careers and are now repurposing that content here (and adding some more). Based on just how much talent you get for your dollar this site/network is a BUY.

As far as Julia Ann herself she is the full package. She's hot (well endowed - I'm guessing implants). She has enough acting chops to deliver lines with good effect (that means she's great at the dirty talk) and she's got plenty of softer stuff (solo/girl-girl) while still nasty enough for hardcore (anal, gangbangs, threesomes)

The only two complaints I have with this site are it's lack of updates (which is mitigated by its deep catalog) and it's lack of 4K videos (which since I myself haven't upgraded to 4K is hardly a fault).

05-20-20  12:17pm

Replies (0)
Review
37
Visit Divine Bitches

Divine Bitches
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - An unbelievable array of set ups. I like plot and they never fail to come up with crazy new situations. Medical, corrupt politicians, cuckolding, lots of fun stuff
- email alerts for when you favorite star/site updates
- Includes access to 34 sites each with it's own focus
- 50 "channels" with limited access to other sites content. I've had good luck finding new sites to join based on these samplings.
- Updates about once a month (sometimes 2X)
- Over 465 videos each video about an hour long
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about 1 hour 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- More model diversity than is typical in a network site. There are a variety of body types and ethnicities including pregnant models.
- Billing by rocketpay
- Bi action if that's what you're looking for
- Top notch talent: especially Lauren Phillips (I think I join ever site she shoots for lol), Dee Williams, Maitresse Madeline, Mona Wales, Cherry Torn)
Cons: Pro Cont:
- scenes are rated and you can heart them. I like this because I can then mark the ones I've already viewed/downloaded.
- tags help you find more of what you like
- photos available as .zip
- plenty of extremes (if that's a pro?). Nipple tortue, pegging, castration play, ball crushing. For me it was sometimes too much

CONS:
- No 4K videos yet
- download limit but it don't say what it is
- pricy, but you get a lot of bang for your buck
Bottom Line: I thought I liked Femdom. But this was too much for me. I was able to find some good cuckold scenes and found some hot pegging content, but a lot of it just went too far (CBT, Castration play for example)

I have to say they do have top notch talent. Kink has been around for over 20 years and they have a great reputation for treating their talent with resepect. For that reason it seem like they attract and keep the best performers. And for that I really appreciate my membership at kink. Furthermore it's fun to see women play submissives in one scene and then take on a dominiate role in another.

While this is an expensive site, and some of it is more intense that I could handle I would give it a buy for anyone interested in BDSM content. The women are great. The direction/lighting/sound are all of the highest quality and there's a LOT of it here. While I only found 50 sites that I really loved. 50 is plenty to justify the cost. Hell I think 15 would have been enough.

I was satified enough to push my membership to a year long subscription.

05-19-20  12:39pm

Replies (0)
Review
38
Visit Finishes The Job

Finishes The Job
(0)

100.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - Access to network: manojob.com (hand job site) and Cheici Fox (solo site)Dick Suckers(oral/facial site), MrPOV (hardcore site)
- POV (duh 🙄) pretty standard set up: intro interview, BJ, couple of positition sex, Facial with plenty of dirty talk. I think this family of sites does the BEST job of dirty talk. Just about every video ends in a facial. They then roll camera for another minute or two with the girl looking right into the camera and begging you to pop off too. As a fan of dirty talking, I don't think ANY SITE does a better job then this network
- Consistant theme. Despite that they manage to be rather creative in setups and scenarios. (most involve some idea of meet a nympho)
- "Ok" performer diversity. Casting look like most of porn, but they seem better than most at diversit
- Max quality 1080p (1920X1080). approx 5.2 mbps.
- 4K being rolled out: 4 K format h.264 3840X2160 59.94 fps 29.4 Mbps
- Smaller sizing available
- Model interviews/just pop shot available
Cons: Pros:
- videos run about 15 minutes.
- Excellent costomer service. I had a day where I was on great broadband so I took advantage to download a bunch. Of course that triggered their piracy alarm. It took a fast email to get me back up and running
- Responsive: I requested they book Alex Coal - a couple of month later there she was! I'm sure they can't always do that, but they tried
- They have great bookings so I'll limit to just a couple of favs: Lauren Phillips, Cherie Deville, Sarah Shevon, Ashley Fires, Larkin Love, Aria Alexander, Alex Coal (in 4K), Jessica Ryan
- STILL UPDATING. Everyday there's an update (sometimes upgrade of old video - most days it's something brand new)
- as of March 16, 2020 over 1,300 videos
- Great organization. You can favorite content, grade content on a 5 point scale, use tag

Cons:
- 4K just started, there aren't many videos available in that quality, yet.
- No PU discout
Bottom Line: I know it's controversial to throw down a 100 - but I always hated those teachers that said "a 100 is for perfect work and no one is perfect." To me the 100 is for a site accomplishing it's own goals and I think finishes the job perfectly does what it's trying to do.

The network's focus is on hot girls doing great dirty talk. The typical shoot starts with the performer talking to the camera giving a bit of a warm-up (this is not a get to know you interview, this is dirty fun 😊). Next is typically male talent hand job/blow job (if Mr.POV It then moves to penetration sex, good amount of anal content). Lastly- pop shot with followup dirty talk. The previews give a good estimation of the videos inside. Unlike when you go to the movies the previews don't have all the good parts 🤣.

03-16-20  12:20pm

Replies (3)
Review
39
Visit Jay's POV

Jay's POV
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - billing through CentroBill
- Good production - they have great talent and you see and hear all the action with good lighting/sound/directing.
- 1920X1280 2.5 mbps best video resolution with smaller files available for those of us with limited hard drive space.
- 4K available 13 mbps available.
- photos downloadable as .zip files
- New talent. Maybe it's just the rut I'm in, but I found some models here I'd never seen before.
- Theme consistant: POV with hot talent. Heavy on the Blow Job aspects - but plenty of hardcore action with some cream pies. Some FFM shoots but most are one on ones.
- Shoots run about 20-30 minutes
- Good talent:Abelle Danger, ALEX COAL (I think she's new, at the least she's an up and comer), Athena Faris, August Ames (RIP 😢),
- exclusive content (as far as I know, along with new discoveries (to me anyway like: Skylar Vox, Candy Alexa, and Sky Blue
- clean organization with tags and searching
Cons: - No PU discout
- 168 videos as of March 15, 2020
- STILL UPDATING: slow update schedule 10/month is typical
- no network access available
- With only 168 sites and no wider network there's a fundamental lack of content that's hard to look past. For about the same money I like manojob.com/dicksuckers.com they have just as good POV stars and action - but specialize in dirty talk too.
Bottom Line: The talent is strong and I really like how they mix new comers with established stars.

The quality is great - while I haven't upgraded to 4K I like being able to download my favorites for the day that I do get around to updating.

For me there's too much "step family play". It's probably 15% of the shoots or so. So it's not over done, but it's too prevelnt for my tastes. (Which is a shame cause it's in almost every MILF video they do - and I love the MILF genre)

If I hadd to give the buy or no buy. I'd go with no buy at this point. I think they're just too many good competitors that stack up higher at the moment. But I'll keep my eye on this site. Hopefully they push harder on this and change my mind. Really if they open up more of a network I'd probably jump back in with a multimonth membership.

03-16-20  08:08am

Replies (4)
Review
40
Visit Mom Drips

Mom Drips
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - includes a network of 15 sites (read cons)
- billing through ccbill/epoc/paypal
- Good production - they have great talent and you see and hear all the action with good lighting/sound/directing.
- Real MILFs may sites push the genre - this one doesn't
- 1920X1280 12 mbps best video resolution with smaller files available for those of us with limited hard drive space.
- Good use of tags for easy navigation when you want to find more like what you like - this is very easy.
- New talent. Maybe it's just the rut I'm in, but I found some models here I'd never seen before.
- Theme consistant: Hardcore (full action), all M/F. Creampie every time
- Shoots run about 15 minutes (sweet spot of timing)
- Good talent: Ivy Lebelle, Melissa Lynn, INDIA SUMMER, Blanen Lee, Britney and Amber have stand out performances.
- exclusive content
Cons: Pro Cont:
- actresses having fun (some time you can see that a girl isn't into her scene and it's awkward. I didn't see any shoots like that)

CONS:
- Recycled talent: Maybe there just aren't that many MILFs that want to do creampies? I was surprised that they are so few shoots on this site and add to that some models have multiple shoots.
- STILL UPDATING: slow update schedule 1/month is typical
- Only 39 videos as of March 13, 2020
- captcha at every login
- buy more options displayed every time you log in (before getting to the site you paid money for)
- while this is part of a network, there are premium MYLF sites that you don't get and have to pay an upsell for. It can be very frustrating to see a preview for something you want to see only to find out it's not included.
- next to videos are "locked videos" that you can pay more to see. I know everyone's working on tight margins and tube sites hurt but this is obnoxious.
Bottom Line: I'm a huge MILF fan so this network really was in my sweet spot. I like they way they mix in established stars with newer models. I'm surprised how often I come across someone for the 1st time here.

Everything is done professionally the atresses are good, the lighthing/sound/production is all good. The directing is good (some do a better job of bringing out a good performace. Most of this videos get a solid B/B+ on the hotness scale.)

The big things holding this site back are more content and cutting back on the constant drumbeat of buy more. While I've gone in for some of these (justifiying it to myself with the low price of membershop - I think I got a sweet black friday deal. That doesn't change the fact that I constant feel the sales pitch). I'd rather just pay a fair price once and enjoy myself.

All in all this is a good network and a site that needs time to build itself up. Every MILF fan should check them out - even if you only plan to stay for 1 month.

03-13-20  09:12am

Replies (0)
Review
41
Visit Water Bondage

Water Bondage
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Includes access to all 34 sites on kink.com
- 269 scenes as of March 1, 2020
- Top notch production adn quality.
- Good direction you see all the action and actresses do some of their best work here.
- Top of the line talent I really enjoyed the scenes with Bobbi Starr, Dana DeArmond, Julie Night, Sasha Gray (god how I've missed her), Phoenix Marie, Isis Love, Christina Carter (she's really hard to find and she's so good!), Dee Williams, Jade Fire, Penny Barber (I can never get enough of her)
- Model diversity. More ethnic diversity than most sites. Less body
type diversity than typical of kink network
- More creativity than I have. I wouldn't have guessed that there could be so many different ways to tie someone up and spray then/submerge them in water. I was wrong.
- Video looks great at 1280X720 4.1 mb/s. Videos typically run about an hour 5 mbps.
- Light and sound is always good no poorly light shots even when they shoot in a "dungeon" set.
Cons: PROS CONT:
- mix of action some "disciple" is handed our by men - sometimes a woman
- Post model interview focus on consent and respect
- It's interesting to see talented women pushed into interesting situtations and bondage. However I found that while there were some different setups the niche itself became retative. I found myself only tunning in to my favorite actresses
- pix available as .zip downloads
- Easy organization: tags, search


- No longer updating last update was August 2013 (there was only one update in 2018)
- No PU Discout 😞
- Narrow niche. I just couldn't get excited with the premise of the site, but that's just me.
Bottom Line: The real value of this site comes from the kink network. Kink is a leader in BDSM porn. They care a lot about getting things right so you see the lengths they go through to demonstrate consent. They also don't cheap out on production they have dedicated sound and multiple cameras for all the action.

The preview side give you up to 5 previews a day. The previews run almost two minutes so you can see enough to know if this is what you're into or not. Try before you buy.

The site is a little pricy so if this is all you were into I don't know if I can say if justifies the price. That said I don't think you can get content like this anywhere else on the web. So you may be out of options.

All in all I would give this a pass except for the most die hard BDSM fans. The fact that they haven't updated in a while and don't seem likely to restart is a bit of a killer.

03-01-20  01:00pm

Replies (10)
Review
42
Visit Full Of JOI

Full Of JOI
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - includes a network of 15 sites (read cons)
- billing through ccbill/epoc/paypal
- Good production - they have great talent and you see and hear all the action with good lighting/sound/directing.
- Real MILFs may sites push the genre - this one doesn't
- 1920X1280 12 mbps best video resolution with smaller files available for those of us with limited hard drive space.
- Good use of tags for easy navigation when you want to find more like what you like - this is very easy.
- New talent. Maybe it's just the rut I'm in, but I found some models here I'd never seen before.
- Theme consistant: solo girl (no one else on screen) jerk off encouragement.
- Shoots run about 15 minutes (sweet spot of timing)
- Great talent: Krissy Lynn, Maddy O'Reily, Jasmine Jae, Brooklyn Chase (awesom Leia Cosplay), Summer Hart, PENNY BARBER fan!; this is one of the few places I've found her (other than her clip4sale.com and Kink.com), CORY CHASE (also sort of hard to find, her stuff is incredible)
Cons: Pro Cont:
- exclusive content
- actresses having fun (some time you can see that a girl isn't into her scene and it's awkward. I didn't see any shoots like that)
- STILL UPDATING: decent update schedule 2/month is typical

CONS:

- captcha at every login
- buy more options displayed every time you log in (before getting to the site you paid money for)
- while this is part of a network, there are premium MYLF sites that you don't get and have to pay an upsell for. It can be very frustrating to see a preview for something you want to see only to find out it's not included.
- Only 35 shoots as of March 1, 2020
- associated with Team Skeet but you don't get that stuff here 😞
- next to videos are "locked videos" that you can pay more to see. I know everyone's working on tight margins and tube sites hurt but this is obnoxious.
Bottom Line: I love MILFs so this site is right up my alley. I really appreciate the structure of the site. I like that the only talent is the beautiful MILF. The JOI is done well. Normally there's a strip and talk before mutual masterbation ending with good dirty talk.

To me the biggest downside of this site is the lack of content. With a company like Teamskeet behind them, they should be able to have a greater update schedule than 2/month.

My other big grip is the constant peak at content that you can't access. I love the reasonable price - but would prefer to just pay a reasonable price for everything rather than always shelling out a little more and than a little more.

As a bottome line: I give the site a buy both for it's unique content and for it's strong network.

03-01-20  12:17pm

Replies (0)
Review
43
Visit Pascal's Subsluts

Pascal's Subsluts
(0)

88.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Early videos had new/ameature models (which is nice), the newer stuff trends more towards professionals. Both are hot just in different ways. I like that I can find some favorites and still enjoy new babes.
- Lots of variety in age, body shape, and ethnicity
- British models - I love an accent. More americans recently - including top models like Ashley Lane, Vickie Powell, Charlotte Satre, Sara Jay, Dee Williams (gotta love the dirty MILFs),
- Almost 208 vids as of February 15, 2020
- Lots of anal and squirting
- "degrading" is kept fun and playful (although there was too much spit play for my taste)
- MILF that are MILFS (c-section scars and stretch marks mean casting is done right)I love MILFs and this is really rare. I hope this spreads to other sites.
- PU discount. 1 month at $10 is well worth checking out this site.
- Organization is clean and easy to use. Comments are available and each site has a good description so you can easily find what interests you
- .zip of pix
Cons: - Some of the older shoots seem to have models that aren't enjoying themselves. Perhapes is the move to more professional models but this doesn't seem to be a problem anymore.
- Sound and lighting are sub par. Decent you can see the action but not high quality
- most action is M/F (with a few gangbangs thrown in)
- Some of the models are non-native English speakers which makes them hard to understand.
- Subpar video count. Having started in 2014 it would be nice to see more than 200+ videos
Bottom Line: These videos can be intense. While I liked the dom/sub play, more than a few include puking, that a que for me to fast forward - lol.

This site has come a long way in the last few years. I give it a solid buy. Esecially with the PU discount. There's more than enough here to justify the price and the content is a very unique niche. They do a great job of keeping the action hot, while also letting you know that they are playing and having a good time.

I'm a big fan of dirty talk and this one has plenty (although most of it is the guy talking down to the girl, there's plenty of girls getting whild and letting their inner freak out.)

02-15-20  01:48pm

Replies (2)
Review
44
Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace
(0)

93.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Unique niche. Not a lot of sites do exhibitionism. And this site does it over the top. Public Disgrace stages elaborate shoots with many bystanders. While I'm sure all the backgroud people are in on the scene - it makes very hot and believable public humiliation
- Almost 480 videos as of February 15, 2020
- 1 hour long on average (incudes exit interview)
- Video looks great at 1280X720 5 mbps - great production value.
- Allows download managers
- Extreme action models are spit on, written on, called names, etc. (this could just as easily have gone in the Cons for how extreme it is)
- Never the same thing twice. They have a huge amount of variation within this topic
- Easy organization. There's a heart system to easily find what you want to save. There's also a 5 point rating system so you can see what others have been enjoying
- Top talent along with new comers. I find plenty of my favorites and find new gems.
Cons: PROS CONT
- Good model diversity in every imaginable way: body type, ethnicity, age
- plenty of orgy content, fisting, extremes
- interesting plots and set ups. They have more imagination that I do!
- Models are put in humiliating situations and degraded. This may be too much for some - but if it's what you're looking for, few do it better
CONS
- Infrequent updates: Current schedule looks to be 2/month (although last one was Jan. 21st 2019 - I hope this doesn't mean the end of this site. I'm hoping there was just a break in the action)
- You need to suspend your disbelief a little bit. For example they may be shooting on a bus but it's the same "extras" each time
- Many sets are international - I prefer English so this can be a distraction
- More expensive than most sites (although with excellent production and a wide array of models you are getting what you pay for)
- cross sells inside the member side
- A lot of talent that I've never seen before (this could just as easily be a Pro)
Bottom Line: - Some of the real standout talent includes doms Mona Wales, Steve Holmes and Mz. Berlin. I'm a big fan of both. I find that anytime Mona Wales is dirty talking I go crazy.
- Some of the best scenes with subs were the vids by: Cadence Lux, Ashley Lane, Cherry Kiss, Isabella Clark, Lilyan Red

I don't think any network does BDSM as well as kink.com does. This site does the humiliation/exhibitionism better than any. The imagination is incredible.

If you are interested I highly recommend looking at their previews 1st. Previews run a minute and a half to 2 minutes and give you a good idea of the action. A lot of this was more intense than my interest.

A lot of the shoots start with a girl being stripped outside and walking around before she goes to a "public" place to be gang banged. The "public" place may be a shop/bar/restaurant/bus/whatever. It seems like the windows are done one way so you see people walking past - but since they have no reaction to what's happening inside I'm guess there's some film magic going on.

Even with a high price, I think this is a solid buy. Enjoy some previews to make sure it's not to extreme for you. If you like that, you'll find plenty to enjoy.

02-15-20  01:27pm

Replies (0)
Review
45
Visit Bella Pass

Bella Pass
(0)

97.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Network specializes in young busty (usually enhanced) women. There is a good deal of vatiety in content with no particular niche being focused on.
- Includes access to belle network; 14 sites (including BRYCI.com and KATIEBANKS.com - both of which are awesome! Along with: Cali Carter, Alexis Monroe, Jana Fox, Talia Shepard, Ava Dawn, Henter Leigh, JOE Perv, Bella Nextdoor, HD19, BellaDH)

- Max video quality is great: 4K 1920X1080 7.7 mb/s. Other options available for those of us on older systems and those with limited hard drive space
- Picture sets really shine zips are available and photos are very high quality 4000X2662, 72 pixel/inch, 2mb file size
- about 50 pictures a set
- Just under 1,500 pix sets
- 1,825 video updates as of February 9, 2020
- Update schedule: 2-4/week
- camming is partnered with chaturbate I think that means extra charges. I'm not a camming guy so I have no interest.
- Billing through CCBill
Cons: PROS CONT:
- Good organization though tagging/keyworkds and member ratings
- Comments available on videos, I find this very helpful in sorting what's download worthy.
- Well priced
- Some exhibitionism content (big plus for me)
- Some light girl/girl action (rare)
- Fair mix of boy/girl and solo
- Videos are 10-20 minutes
- Varied setups and interesting mini plots
CONS:
- more use of dildo instead of real thing than I would have gone with
- (old stuff) sometimes spotty lighting. It's rare and unavoidable in a pro-am site.
- This is not a site of extremes. You'll find very little threeways and I don't remember seeing any orgies. (Not really a con - just a description)
Bottom Line: At $25 with renueal rate of $20/month I think this network is a damn good deal. There's plenty to enjoy and the talent is beutiful. The ameature girls can be a little hit and miss but that's the fun of ameature - variety 😃

Each girl seems to be in charge of her own site so there's a good amount of variety (some are mostly solo, others are lots of hardcore) I had a multi-moth membership and will certainly include this as something to return to over time.

I give this network a solid buy.

As you can see from the high score, there's very little to imporve on.

02-09-20  06:45am

Replies (1)
Review
46
Visit Hunter Leigh

Hunter Leigh
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Great looking model. She's described as a teen. She certainly is no older than early 20s, and absolutely stunning.
- Max video quality is great: 4K 1920X1080 7.7 mb/s. Other options available for those of us on older systems and those with limited hard drive space
- Picture sets really shine zips are available and photos are very high quality 4000X2662, 72 pixel/inch, 2mb file size
- about 50 pictures a set
- Includes access to belle network; 14 sites (including BRYCI.com and KATIEBANKS.com those sites really drive the network)
- camming is partnered with chaturbate I think that means extra charges. I'm not a camming guy so I have no interest.
Cons: - 15 videos, seems like they're no longer updating
- software content. Lots of stripping.
- shorter videos, generally under 10 minutes
- Good organization though tagging/keywords and member ratings (not that it's needed with the smaller catalog)
- Comments available on videos, I find this very helpful in sorting what's download worthy.
- Well priced
- 38 picture sets
Bottom Line: I love Hunter's face. She is a real beauty. He picture sets really let that beauty shine, my hat's off to her and her photographer.

As you might guess the problem with this site is the lack of content. While I love the network and will rejoin it again in the future. There's just not enough of Hunter to warrant a score in the 80s.

02-05-20  02:13pm

Replies (1)
Review
47
Visit Katie Banks

Katie Banks
(0)

96.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Katie is beautiful. She has a petit frame with large implants that were very well done (minimum scaring)
- Katie does plenty of BTS shooting it's clear she has a sense of humor and enjoys making her content. This is always a big plus for me
- Max video quality is great: 4K 1920X1080 7.7 mb/s. Other options available for those of us on older systems and those with limited hard drive space
- Picture sets really shine zips are available and photos are very high quality 4000X2662, 72 pixel/inch, 2mb file size
- about 50 pictures a set
- Just about 420 pix sets
- 555 video updates as of January 31, 2020
- Update schedule: 1/week (sometimes more!)
- Includes access to belle network; 14 sites (including BRYCI.com is especially good)
- camming is partnered with chaturbate I think that means extra charges. I'm not a camming guy so I have no interest.
Cons: PROS CONT:
- Good organization though tagging/keywords and member ratings
- Comments available on videos, I find this very helpful in sorting what's download worthy.
- Well priced
- Some exhibitionism content (big plus for me)
- For a solo site more anal action than I expected
- Some light girl/girl action (rare)
- Fair mix of boy/girl and solo
- Videos are 10-20 minutes
- Varied setups and interesting mini plots
CONS:

- more use of dildo instead of real thing than I would have gone with
- Pix sets can sometime be repetitive. There sets sometimes include 5-6 of the same pose with only a facial expression or head tilt of difference. I guess everyone likes something different.
Bottom Line: This is one of the real gems of this network. I thought about staying around longer and will definitely keep this in my rotation. There's a lot of good stuff. If you're of glamour (well put together outfits/make-up) big breasted solo sites this one is worth the money. It has a good size library and the rest of the network is solid. I rate it a solid buy.

One other point of distinction: I would call this a solo site and not an amateur site. The difference being an amateur site might have fun "day in the life/look at me without my make-up" content. This is more produced, Katie does behind the scenes but the bread and butter of this site is well put together fun shoots. They seem to go through just about every popular culture reference and motif. I really like it

02-04-20  03:33pm

Replies (0)
Review
48
Visit Chelci Fox

Chelci Fox
(0)

68.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Chelci is young and hot seem like much of this would be at the start of her porn jourey. It really took me down memory lane to some of the 1st sites I joined.
- Good quality at the high point there are videos that are 5.75 mbps and 1920X1080 and 29.97 fps.
- most scenes are solo masturbation
- Bubbly fun personality. She's simtimes interviewed by the camera man. It's fun and enjoyable (and certainly got hot moments too but this has the sweet down home girl vibe to me)
- Pictures sets available (but nothing very interesting)
Cons: - Old content no longer being updated (on of the links at the top is to her myspace page 😃)
- Only 34 scenes
- most videos are in wmv format with 460X360 formatting. That was good at the time
- NO LONGER UPDATING
- No Zip Downloads for pix
Bottom Line: Found this site with my Finishesthejob.com membership. It really insn't adversited and looks like it's abandoned. I don't see this Chelsi shooting new content anywhere else. I hope she is retired from the adult world and enjoying herself.

For a throw in site I found some fun stuff here. The quality is dated, so don't expect 4K here. But Chelsi reminds me of the porn I found oline when I was young so was the world wide web (any old timers remember that term? haha)

So starting from the premis that I wasn't expecting this site and I accept that it old footage still sitting on a server - I liked it and I hope the producer doesn't purge it from access. It's fun to watch a young

I'd be pissed if I bought this site thinking I was getting something special. But since I just fell into this site as part of my membership to a network I love. I'm just happy they haven't pulled the plug on it. It's nothing amazing - but it's fun and a trip down memory lane.

I worry that my review might make the owner kill the site. If you are reading this, please don't do that!

01-25-20  11:50am

Replies (0)
Review
49
Visit Mylf

Mylf
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - includes a network of 15 sites (read cons)
- billing through ccbill/epoc/paypal
- Good production - they have great talent and you see and hear all the action with good lighting/sound/directing.
- Real MILFs may sites push the genre - this one doesn't
- 1920X1280 12 mbps best video resolution with smaller files available for those of us with limited hard drive space.
- Good use of tags for easy navigation when you want to find more like what you like - this is very easy.
- exclusive content
- New talent. Maybe it's just the rut I'm in, but I found some models here I'd never seen before.
- Good variety
- actresses having fun (some time you can see that a girl isn't into her scene and it's awkward. I didn't see any shoots like that)
- Great talent: Andi James (just found her! - wow!), BRANDI LOVE, LAUREN PHILIPS (I think I've been a member to every site she's shot for, lol), CORY CHASE - she's hard to find) ditto for LADY FYRE, Gotta love Cherie DeVille she hot and dirty.
Cons: PROS CONT:
- trailers able so you can find the good stuff before you download.
- Good diveristy (better than most)
- STILL UPDATING generally every 2-3 days
- set ups can be fun. They are certainly varied - eveything from clowns to weddings, to "step" play. They do a lot of the goofy I can't believe this is happening stuff. By that I mean thye keep porn light and funny (most of the time)

CONS:
- 589 videos as of January 25, 2020. HOWEVER that includes "locked videos" they show you content from their "preimum sites" that you can buy into (normally $10/month for each).
captcha at every login
- buy more options displayed every time you log in (before getting to the site you paid money for)
- associated with Team Skeet but you don't get that stuff here 😞
Bottom Line: If you're a fan of MILFs this network deserves at least a month long membership to try out. I went right for the multimonth and wasn't disappointed at all. I give this site a solid buy. (espcially with the PU discount).

I hate that big porn is doing all these teases to get you in the door at one price and then upsell you or advertise to you once your a member. Sadly I think this is just life in 2020.

There really is very little to complain about with this network it's good old fashion porn and a great spot to find all your favorite MILF models. I appreciate that they've grabbed the biggest names in that genere while still founding beautiful woman that I hadn't noticed before.

Production, lighting, directing, sound, talent everything looks professional and well lite. Of course it is mainstream porn so you may notice that every scene follows the same basic flow (Oral, Oral, couple of positions, normally facial. That said, they do have a whole site dedicated to creampies which made me very happy).

01-25-20  11:12am

Replies (2)
Review
50
Visit Bryci

Bryci
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Bryci is gorgous. In her earlier work (1st update was back in 2014). She had the clasic busty porn star look. Today She looks more curvy, I guess the term thick is also used. I want to be clear she looks amazing she has perfect proportions and reminds me of sexy pin up girls in the 40s-60s
- Ava seems to really enjoy her site and it shows in her smile and work
- Max video quality is great: 4K 1920X1080 7.7 mb/s. Other options available for those of us on older systems and those with limited hard drive space
- Picture sets really shine zips are available and photos are very high quality 4000X2662, 72 pixel/inch, 2mb file size
- about 50 pictures a set
- Just under 300 pix sets
- 150 video updates as of January 24, 2020
- Update schedule: 1/week
- Includes access to belle network; 14 sites (including BRYCI.com and KATIEBANKS.com - both of which are awesome!)
- camming is partnered with chaturbate I think that means extra charges. I'm not a camming guy so I have no interest.
Cons: PROS CONT:
- Good organization though tagging/keyworkds and member ratings
- Comments available on videos, I find this very helpful in sorting what's download worthy.
- Well priced
- Some exhibitionism content (big plus for me)
- Some light girl/girl action (rare)
- Fair mix of boy/girl and solo
- Videos are 10-20 minutes
- Varied setups and interesting mini plots
CONS:
- I guess I could say I'd like to have more content. But that's kinda cheap. I always want more contents. LOL.
- more use of dildo instead of real thing than I would have gone with
- (old stuff) sometimes spotty lighting. It's rare and unavoidable in a pro-am site.
Bottom Line: I REALLY like this site. I think the price is fair. I love Bryci's personality and energy. I like that she has a woman's body.

Bryci experiments with a variety of costums and wigs it's remarkable all the different super heros, movie stars, and characters she can take on with just costum, make-up and hair changes. I found all this a lot of fun.

There's really nothing about this site I don't like. I think it's a solid buy.

01-24-20  05:24pm

Replies (2)

Shown : 26-50 of 299 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.42 seconds.