Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.

User : rearadmiral (0)

Feedback:   All (3011)  |   Reviews (248)  |   Comments (194)  |   Replies (2569) Other:   Replies Received (1579)  |   Trust Ratings (0) Ratings & Reviews All the reviews and ratings from this user. Shown : 51-75 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date Review 51 Cherry Pimps Network (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge network - 6100+ scenes - A-list models - High production values - Well organized site ¬- Many options to sort scenes - ‘Live’ shows (solo and b/g) - Supports download managers - TBP/PU discount - Bills through Epoch Cons: - Mostly generic porn - Download speeds vary Bottom Line: Please note that I’m writing this as a review of the network and won’t drill down into the sub-sites much. The main network gives access to all the scenes in the sub-sites and the sub-sites aren’t clearly differentiated in the porn they offer anyway. Cherry Pimps is a huge network that currently has in excess of 6100 scenes available with a few that date back 15 years. The site updates with at least one scene being added daily and in many cases two scenes are added per day. The scenes offered here are mostly generic porn. That’s not a bad thing but if you like a particular kink you may or may not find scenes here to your liking. There are solo, lesbian, boy/girl and combinations of models available here. The scenes I downloaded and watched are all well produced. This is most definitely not an amateur operation. While this isn’t unique to this network a relatively rare type of scene are the ones shot live and also made available for download. These are done as solos and as boy/girl scenes. I like these as they allow the viewers to see the model’s personality and we get to see her interacting with fans too. I didn’t participate in any actual live shows so I can’t speak for connection speed but if the downloadable videos are any indication these are high quality. All of the scenes are available for streaming or download. Both streaming and downloads are available in different resolutions. Not surprisingly, the older scenes have fewer options while the new scenes are available in resolutions suitable for a phone all the way up to 4K. I prefer 720p as a balance between quality and file size and I found those to be crisp with no video issues. The 720p files have a bitrate of 5000 kb/s and a frame rate of 30 fps. A network this large would be cumbersome if the site wasn’t well laid out and had options to sort through it all. I’m happy to say that Cherry Pimps has many options to sort through their scenes and all work well. The network allows you to sort by upload date and by model. There are useful tags for the most frequent porn niches. They also offer ‘channels’ which allow you to sort by scenes in a particular niche. The most common niches, anal, for example, are here but they also offer more obscure niches like food play, glasses and high heels. There is also a search function that works well. I used a download manager to queue scenes and had no problems with it. One issue I did have is that download speeds varied quite a lot. There were some times when my downloads were very fast but occasionally I’d download a scene and only get 25% of the speed I’d normally see. One more frequent issue is that the page links and download links would take long to load. On rare occasions the link took so long that it timed out. While annoying when it happened, it wasn’t so bad that it would be a deal breaker for me. TBP/PU offers a discount to the network. Even without a discount the network would be an excellent value but when you factor it in this becomes one of the best values in the business. The network bills through Epoch so you know your CC info is safe and cancelling is easy when you want to do that. The bottom line is that this is a mega network that has never been on my radar in all my years of buying online porn and I’m glad I finally took the plunge. While the porn is relatively generic that’s probably why the network has been so successful. Rather than aim for a small niche, Cherry Pimps aims for the heart of the market where the bulk of the subscribers are. And even though the porn is generic there are enough scenes in other niches to keep most people happy. The network is huge and going back through the scenes is a walk back in time through the careers of many A-list models. The network is well organized and the scenes are professionally shot. I’m definitely recommending Cherry Pimps. Don’t be like me and wait 15 years to check it out. 12-24-19  07:23am Replies (4) Review 52 Club Amber Rayne (0) 70.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Fast download speeds - Pics available for most scenes - For Amber Rayne fans, it has a lot of behind-the-scenes and interview scenes - Some scenes have several download options - Video quality is very good Cons: - I seriously doubt that Amber has any connection to this site - Only 40 scenes (a mix of hardcore, lesbian and BTS stuff) - Doesn’t appear to be updating - Tour pages are misleading – they suggest a much bigger site Bottom Line: I’m a big Amber Rayne fan and was hoping that this site would give me access to a lot of unique content but it doesn’t do that. My suspicion is that this is simply content licenced from a studio that the webmasters lumped together under the “Club Amber Rayne” title. As a fan of Amber’s work and being pretty familiar with her career, she certainly seems like a model who wouldn’t give less than 100% on a site she actually had some control over which leads me to believe that pat362 and mbaya are correct in assuming that Amber really has no hand in this site. As any fan of Amber knows, her career is pretty diverse – with some serious fetish stuff going on – and this site gives no real indication of that. Apart from a few anal sex scenes there is nothing to even hint that Amber has a side to her that is anything but mainstream. For a site that has been operating for a while it is extremely small. When mbaya reviewed the site over two years ago he reported that it had 28 scenes. In the 25 months since that review there have only been 12 scenes added. There are no dates given with the scenes so it may be that the site stopped updating quite a while ago. The scenes that are available are fairly good, though they aren’t really representative of Amber’s career. There is a mix of solo material with toys, some b/g scenes, a couple of b/b/g and b/g/g scenes and several behind-the-scenes and interview clips. Most of the hardcore material doesn’t appear to be exclusive though I can’t say that for certain. The technical bits are okay, but not great. Most videos are only available in one format (wmv) and in two sizes (low and higher resolution). Navigation is pretty basic, but then with only 40 scenes there is no need to have anything that is more than basic. Thumbnails for each scene are really small and not of much use. Many of the scenes also have photos available. The photos are available as a zip. Bottom line is that even though there are no other Amber Rayne sites out there, this one isn’t worth the price. There isn’t much material here and what is here doesn’t give a good example of how diverse Amber’s career really is. The only real advantage to this site is access to some interview material that is interesting, but maybe not exclusive. This is only a site for die-hard Amber fans. 03-13-11  04:20pm Replies (1) Review 53 Club Met Art (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Met art videos and photo sets - Stunning models - Videos and photos - Options for videos and photos - Updates regularly - Outdoor locations - Softcore solo and some lesbian - Support download managers Cons: - Smaller and more expensive than the parent site - Site layout could be improved Bottom Line: I have no idea what, if any, affiliation exists between Met Art and Club Met Art but aside from that question the obvious question is why would anyone join CMA when MA is larger and cheaper due to the TBP discount? When I reviewed Met Art a while ago I scored it high objectively because it is a great site and offers great material. But subjectively it really wasn’t a site that offered what I like. I like hardcore videos and Met Art is more softcore than I prefer. Club Met Art is essentially the same but smaller. The site currently has 600 photo sets, 1200 videos and features 320 different models. Most of the models are Eastern European and Russian, all are stunningly beautiful and the common look is young and petite. You won’t find a lot of tattoos and silicone on this site. The photo sets and videos are either solo or lesbian though the solo stuff is much more frequent. One thing I really like is that many of the scenes and photo sets are shot outdoors. The videos are all relatively short with the longest hitting 10 minutes. The oldest videos on the site date from 2004 so you can’t expect 2016 resolutions and bitrates from them. The newest videos are available in several sizes. There are lower resolution DivX/AVI and WMV files offered and then there are MP4s in 270p, 360p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 1080p files and the bitrates are a bit lower than I’d expect of a site like this. The highest bitrates only hit 5,000kb/s with most lower than that. The videos are updated but not on a regular schedule. It does look like that there is a new video added approximately every three or four days. Oddly, the photo sets only date back to 2015. The good news is that means that the photos are all available in three resolutions: high (5616x3744), medium (1365x2048) and low (682x1024). The photo sets seem to update daily with the addition of three or four sets added each day. The site supports download managers and I had no problem with links timing out. I saw average download speeds. The site doesn’t have a search function but uses tags. The tags aren't consistent though. A minor annoyance for me is that on the video page the scenes are named for the scene and the model name isn't given there. You have to open the scene link to determine who the model is. Also, on the model page there is no easy way to tell if the link is to a video or photo set. Apart from the fact that this isn't porn I’d normally collect the site is decent and is growing. The only reason that I wouldn’t recommend joining if you like this kind of porn is because the Met Art itself, where all of the Club Met Art material comes from, is larger and less expensive. With that factored in, CMA isn't a good value. 03-25-16  07:59am Replies (6) Review 54 Club Red Light (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site - Red Light District makes some great porn - Access to lots of their catalogue - Supports download managers - Good download speeds - Most of the newer uploads have good file resolutions Cons: - Scenes not associated with the DVD they were released on - Scenes widely available on other pay sites - Many ‘sites’ in the network are not updating - Last update at all was almost a month ago - Site may be dying or dead - Some scenes offer no video - File resolutions vary widely - File resolutions not provided - Photos offered are poor quality Bottom Line: I find that studio sites can be a gamble. For every one like Evil Angel that does it well, there are ten that come up short. Club Red Light is lumped in with the majority of studio sites and continues the tradition of being mediocre. Most people will know the Red Light District studio well since they have been around for more than a decade and their material is widely available on DVD sites. As a mainstream porn studio they cover all of the regular niches. Their offerings are almost exclusively gonzo and are harder-edged. This really isn’t couples porn. The site markets itself as a network by creating different niche ‘sites.’ But since the scenes are all from RLD DVDs and are all available on the main page then it really can’t be treated as a network. (While CRL is the name of the network, it is also a separate site within the network.) The sites, with some stats (number of scenes / last update date), are: Club Red Light – 1099 / Dec. 7, 2013 Addicted to Boobs – 188 / Nov. 16, 2013 Ass Crazed – 148 / Nov. 8, 2013 Choke on My Load – 79 / Oct. 27, 2013 Cumfart Cocktails – 38 / Oct. 31, 2013 Cum Stained Casting Couch – 191 / Oct. 28, 2013 I Just Fucked My Best Friend’s Mom – 88 / Sept. 21, 2013 I Just Fucked Two Chicks – 45 / Nov. 9, 2013 In it Goes Out it Cums – 137 / Nov. 1, 2013 I’ve Been Sodomized – 265 / Oct. 18, 2013 Sluts Fucking Sluts – 72 / Dec. 26, 2012 So You Think You Can Squirt – 41 / Oct. 3, 2013 Teenage Fuckholes – 350 / Nov. 5, 2013 Throat Gaggers – 110 / Jan. 24, 2013 Toe Service – 28 / May 29, 2013 Young Tight Latinas – 104 / Oct. 26, 2013 One caveat when counting the scenes: I have no idea because they aren’t labelled as such, but some of the scenes only offer photos and no videos. Another caveat on updates: you’ll note that the last update on the entire site was three weeks ago. Many of the sites haven’t updated in months. I won’t be the one to call for last rites, but maybe we need a porn priest on speed dial. I really can’t understand why a studio who produces DVDs wouldn’t structure their website around those DVDs. To make matters worse, while some of the sites have some RLD series names, and the sites have scenes from that series, there are additional scenes in there too making it harder to sort. For others like me who have a large porn collection, not identifying the DVD title means that I inevitably downloaded a lot of scenes that I already had. Apart from not having the scenes associated with their respective DVDs, the site is laid out in a logical manner. The main site shows thumbnails for 24 scenes per page spanning all the ‘sites. Opening one of the thumbnails brings you to that scene’s page where you can stream, download the scene (if video is available) and the photos. There seems to be a point in March, 2008 when they started offering higher resolutions. Prior to that date the scenes were offered as WMVs in 640x480 and lower. I realize that a lot of these scenes weren’t filmed in good resolution so I can’t fault the site for this, but they are pretty poor quality. When higher resolutions were offered starting in 2008 they were first WMVs at 1280x720 at 4000 kb/s. A problem though, is that even though some of the scenes uploaded after 2008 are labelled “HD” on the thumbnail, they still only come in at 640x480. With file data not provided the best gauge for guessing resolution is file size. The last two years saw another change with the file type switching to MP4. For the past two years the files are offered as an “MP4 High” and an “MP4 Medium.” The “High” are 1920x1080 at 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look good, but not as crisp as on some other sites. The “Medium” are 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 29fps. I know this will sound really fussy on my part, but I do wish they offered 1280x720 to bridge the gap. While there are photos offered (and singles or zips) there are only a few low-res photos offered with each scene, and some of those are screencaps. The site supports download managers and I had no trouble with links timing out. Download speeds were good. I experienced a problem the first few days of my membership with the site crashing and giving me an “internal server error” message. Usually going back to the site and logging in resolved it. It hasn’t happened in the past few days so it may have been a temporary glitch. I found that I had downloaded several scenes where the video and audio were not in sync. It may have been that with bad luck I stumbled on the few like that, but it is more likely that this occurs in other scenes too. The bottom line is that this is a site that could have been great but isn’t. RLD makes some great porn but the cons really outweigh the pros here. Add to this that the site may be dying and I am certain that I won’t be back. The only people I’d recommend the site to would be a person who is just starting to buy and collect online porn and doesn’t already have many RLD titles. 01-03-14  06:46am Replies (6) Review 55 Club Seventeen (0) 78.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Huge site - Multiple updates daily - Great value for video and photo collectors - Multiple download and streaming options - Photos available as singles and zips - TBP discount - Supports download managers Cons: - Mostly non-exclusive - Model names are often incorrect Bottom Line: I can’t really explain why I waited so long to join this mega site but now that I have I wish I had more information. I hope that my comments might make PU reader more informed about what the site has to offer. Club Seventeen is a generic porn site that focuses on young models (18 to early 20s) and covers all of the main porn niches that you’d expect. The site is pretty good but is much better for the casual porn collector rather than the serious porn hoarder like me. I’ll start with the bad news. I think the biggest drawback to the site is that most, if not all, of the material here is non-exclusive. The vast majority of the models are Eastern European and Russian and having subscribed to many EE/Russian model sites over the years I saw a lot of repeats. This isn't all bad since joining this site gives you access to a lot of porn from other sites so this may be a cost-effective way to get some popular EE/Russian models. The bad news about joining to get stuff from specific models is that the site seems to pretty much make up model names as they go along. Yes, I know that EE/Russian models change their names more often than American models change their socks but most of the model names here don’t line up with any known aliases for these models. There are several dozen American pornstars on the site too and even they have made up names. So if you’re looking for a specific model you’ll likely be going on facial recognition. The site offers some ‘bonus’ material from other porn sites. It is clearly identified when it is part of the bonus and the original site is also identified. While it is possible to see this as advertising since you can join the ‘bonus’ site through Club Seventeen you should note that it is more than an ad because you are giving streaming access to those scenes. (It should be noted that Club Seventeen doesn’t use the same trick that Bang Bros is notorious for and when you click on a bonus here you are not deemed to have joined the additional site and have it billed to your card.) The site has a lot going for it too. For one thing, it’s huge. There are over 3100 models here with almost 5000 videos and almost 8500 photo sets. For the subscription fee (with a great TBP discount, BTW) this is an amazing value for your porn dollars. The site updates daily with multiple uploads per day. Both videos and photos are added each day. The site offers a lot for both video and photo collectors. Overall the video quality is better than average. All the newer videos are available to be streamed or downloaded in multiple resolutions, most often in 540p, 720p and 1080p. I downloaded the 1080p videos because the file sizes were reasonable and bitrates for those varied from 12,000 to 8,000 kb/s. Older videos can top out at 1280x720 with bitrates around 5,000 kb/s. The really old videos (the site started in 2000) are mostly 540p but that’s to be expected. Photos are available as zips and as singles. I don’t collect photos but the newest sets (dating back about a year) are offered with a 2667x4000 resolution. They look great. Older sets are lower resolutions obviously. One feature I like is that the site shows you the videos and photo sets that will be released over the coming two weeks. The site allows download managers and I had no problems using IDM. The links didn’t time out quickly. I didn’t find any download limit either and I downloaded 70GB in a day with no issues. As for a recommendation, the answer is both yes and maybe. I’d definitely recommend a membership here to someone who dabbles in porn collecting. For the casual collector this site offers a huge amount of non-exclusive porn on an easy-to-use site with an amazing discounted price. This is likely one of the best values available. But I think the answer has to be different for the serious porn collector: I think the best I can say is that a serious collector may want to consider joining. The reason I say that for the serious collector is that you may find that you already have a lot of what’s offered here and if you’re trying to add scenes and photos of your favorite models you’ll be frustrated that the names are made up. But even for the serious collector, this is an amazing deal. So count that as a conditional recommendation and if you join you’re at least aware of what you’ll get, and what limitations there are, when you do. 03-12-16  05:56am Replies (4) Review 56 Da GFs (0) 65.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large network - 10 sites - Over 3700 videos - Updating - Mix of American and Eastern European / Russian models - TBP Discount Cons: - Confusing site design - Low quality videos - Most videos are fairly old - If there is HD quality available I haven’t found it - Lots of ads and upsells - Most appears to be non-exclusive - Many videos don’t credit the female talent - Can only move ahead or back two pages at a time - Download speeds can vary widely Bottom Line: I’ll do my best to be objective here, but it’s fair to say that my porn collecting long ago reached a point where I’m more selective about what I collect and therefore avoid sites that are more like an all-you-can-eat buffet. I clearly didn’t do any due diligence before joining this network (I joined through Broken Teens, which sounded like something I might like) because I was really disappointed to see that this is mostly a network of older, non-exclusive generic porn videos that can be found on many other sites. To start with the good news, the network is large. It has 10 themed sites (more on that below) and over 3700 videos in the network. The models are a mix of American and Eastern European / Russian which is good for some variety. The network does update but not on what looks like a regular schedule. It appears that a new video is added to the network every three or four days. But sadly, that’s about all the good I can write about this network. The sites all have themes but those appear to be nothing more than mere names. For example, Broken Teens has the tag line of “The Most Extreme Teen Porn Videos on the Internet.” With a name and tag line like those I joined the site with some expectations but learned that the site’s definition of both teen and extreme aren't anything like mine. Much of the material on this one site could just have easily gone into one of their girlfriend sites and some of it could even find a suitable home on their MILF site. The network and sites aren't well laid out. For a site this large there needs to be a cohesive design so that the porn is easy to find and download and this network lacks that. I found the layout, tags and search functions didn’t work well. To make matters worse, there are a lot of scenes here that don’t even list the female talent so finding some scenes with models you like could come down to luck. One reason that the site is so confusing is that it seems they put more emphasis on ads and upsells than they do on the porn that they have to offer. The TBP review of the network said that some of the material is likely exclusive. I can’t say for certain but I didn’t see anything that I could easily identify as exclusive and the network certainly doesn’t do anything to differentiate any exclusive scenes from the others. The TBP review also said that there was some HD offered and that may be the case also but I didn’t find any. To be fair, I didn’t spend nearly as much time on this site as I normally would because the site layout is poor and the all the videos I’ve downloaded were relatively low quality. I’ll likely cancel my membership well before the end of the month and chalk this up as a bad experience. The scenes that I did download to check out were available in either 360p or 720p. These came in at 640x360, 1300kb/s and 29fps and 1280x720, 2300kb/s and 29fps. Given that these specs aren't really up to 2017 standards it shouldn’t be a surprise that the video quality isn't that good. Download speeds also varied a lot. One minute I could get 40MB/s and the next I might be lucky to get 2MB/s. A minor annoyance, but one made worse on a site this size, is that moving between the pages can only be done two at a time. With 158 pages that’s a lot of clicking. The bottom line is that this site can offer a lot of value to some members, especially given that there is a TBP discount. The people who could get a lot of value out of this network are those who favour quantity over quality – and I mean no disrespect by that. A network like this would be a great upgrade for someone who uses tube sites and wants to start collecting. But I’m guessing that the value proposition is much different for most of us active PU members who are more serious collectors. For us, the value proposition is low and our porn dollars would be better spent elsewhere. 03-12-17  03:43pm Replies (0) Review 57 Dark X (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Third site by Mason - High production values - A-list stars - Hardcore without crossing into rough - Many download and streaming options - Supports download managers - Bonus scenes from sister sites - TBP discount Cons: - Small site (but growing) - Scenes could be made part of existing sites Bottom Line: Dark X is the third independent site from the acclaimed director Mason. This site is in addition to her other excellent sites, Hard X and Erotica X. If you’re familiar with either of those sites you’ll know that if Dark X follows in their footsteps it will be a great site. I don’t want to sound judgmental, but I don’t really understand interracial porn as a stand-alone niche. For one thing, it seems that ‘interracial’ in this context only means a black male with white female. In the real world couples from any race can pair up. But what I don’t understand is why these interracial scenes couldn’t simply have been added to the existing Hard X and Erotica X sites since those two sites do have interracial scenes. But, for some reason, interracial porn seems to be a big thing right now and I can’t fault Mason for wanting to capitalize on that. The porn itself is up to Mason’s usual high standards: the models are A-list and beautiful. The women are all white but there is some variation in age and body type. The scenes are all well produced with good lighting and editing to best show off the models. I wouldn’t go so far as to say this is couples porn but it isn't misogynistic either. Credit that to having a woman as the director for giving these scenes a lot of heat and still appeal to a broad audience. There are currently 29 scenes uploaded, but that needs a bit of an explanation. When the site began it added a new scene each day for a short while. That makes sense as it gives members a reason to join. The current update schedule is one scene per week but the overall number of scenes is augmented by the addition of some bonus interracial scenes from Hard X and Erotica X. These are actual bonus scenes in that they don’t count as the weekly exclusive update. As of today there are 21 Dark X scenes, six Hard X scenes and two Erotica X scenes. For those like me who like anal sex scenes, there are six exclusive anal scenes and an additional four from Hard X. Like its sister sites, this one is laid out well and is easy to use. There are different ways to sort the scenes and you can choose a specific porn star or common niche. There is a search function but the site is still too small to really test that. I found that just being able to sort by star and niche was sufficient. Each main page has six scenes with each having a large photo and information on the scene including the model, the scene name and the upload date. Each of those opens into a new page where you’ll have a description of the scene and options to stream or download it. For both streaming and downloading there are a lot of options. Both offer seven different resolutions: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p and 1080p. The downloads are only available as MP4s. I wish other sites would offer this many options. I downloaded the 720p files as those are a good compromise between file size and video quality. The bitrates are just shy of 5000kb/s (though a few were as low as 3500) so they look good on a 24” monitor. There are some photos available but it is fair to say that these are secondary to the videos. The photos are good quality but there aren't many per set and those appear to be screencaps. I didn’t see a way to download them as a zip. The site allows download managers and I found the download speeds to be at least as good as other comparable sites. Some may not see the value in joining such a small (but growing) site even with the TBP discount but that would be missing out on some excellent quality porn. The scenes are all well produced, shot and edited and all of them feature the best stars in the porn industry today. This is definitely a site that I’ll rejoin. 01-16-16  10:12am Replies (8) Review 58 Daughter Swap (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review). Pros: - Innovative theme - Believable scenarios - A-list models - High production values - 82 scenes - Updates regularly (1 or 2 weeks between updates) - Three scene resolutions - Photos available - Supports download managers - Fast download speeds Cons: - Some of the male models are a bit young to be believable - Could use a 720p resolution to close a wide gap - No TBP discount - No search function or model index - No anal (yeah… that’s personal…) Bottom Line: In the interest of full disclosure I should mention that this site has been one of my favourites since I first discovered it 16 months ago. I’ve joined it eight times. I’m confident I can write an objective review though. Let me put it this way – I like the site because the porn covers two of my favourite niches, which is subjective, but it is also a great site and it features high production values, which is objective when measured against other sites. This site, which began in March 2016, offers some innovative porn unlike any other site I’ve seen. Every scene features two older men and two younger women. Each man plays the father of one of the women. The scene sets up some sort of reason why the fathers want to swap and have sex with the other father’s daughter. In this way, the site doesn’t follow the traditional script of quasi-incest porn. Two of my favourite niches in porn are older man/younger woman and scenes that spend some time setting up a sexual tension. A vast majority of the scenes here hit both of those targets. I realize that not everyone is into the same things that I am and I understand that there are a lot of porn buyers who simply want to skip ahead to the action and would likely find some of these scenes boring. If you’re a big fan of Legal Porno which is pure gonzo then these scenes are not likely to be for you. But if you like scenario-based porn I strongly recommend looking at this site. One of the advantages that the site has over other incest-themed sites is that the scenarios here are often more believable. One way that the scenarios can be more believable here are that many of the models are just wearing street clothes through the scene set up. Personally I like this. Each scene takes up to 15 minutes for the tension to build and for the reasons for the swap to be laid out. After that the scenes become pretty much standard boy/girl sex scenes. Another advantage that this site has over some of its competitors in the incest-theme is that all of the female models here are believable in their roles. All of the models are between 18 and early 20s. Other sites sometimes use older models. Most of the scenes use age-appropriate male models though some of the scenes have men who aren’t really old enough to be the biological father of the model in the scene. For me this is a mere annoyance and not a deal-breaker. And speaking of models, most are either already A-list or rising stars. More than half of the scenes on the site are split into two. I don’t view this as either a pro or a con. In one update we have the entire scene set up and then the sex scene between one father and daughter. The following update will have a recap of the first scene and then the sex scene between the second father and daughter pairing. The advantage to this is two full-length scenes while the disadvantage is you may have to wait to get the scene with your favourite model once you know she’s there. The update schedule doesn’t seem to be set in stone. In some instances there will be a new scene added weekly but in others there is a two week gap. I don’t see this as a major issue considering that these scenes have very high production values and probably take a long time to shoot and edit. This is not mere gonzo porn. There are currently 82 scenes available with each scene being offered in three different resolutions. Those are, 640x360 (850 bitrate), 960x540 (2700), 1920x1080 (12,000). One improvement that I think the site could make would be to plug the gap between the middle and highest resolutions with a 720p offering. Photos are also available through this site is not really a photo site. Two resolutions are offered: 620x1081 and 900x601. The site supports download managers and I found download speeds to constantly hit my maximum. One serious oversight, especially as the site grows, is the lack of any search function or a model index. This, with a 720p option, would be easy to do and be a big improvement. Unfortunately the site does not offer a TBP discount. I have my fingers crossed that could change in the future. The site is affiliated with the Team Skeet group of sites. This means that you are dealing with a reputable business but also means that you will have to put up with some ads on the site. My final complaint, and I realize this is entirely personal, is that there are no anal scenes at all. Surely when fathers swap their daughters in real life they occasionally do anal! The appeal of this site is broad enough that I have no qualms about recommending it to a wide audience. At its core it is really just standard B/G porn which appeals to a lot of people. The advantage this site has is its unique theme, the effort they put into promoting that theme, the high production values, the decent acting and the hot models. My only complaints are so minor that I only included them to give a well-rounded view of the site. 08-10-18  09:23am Replies (2) Review 59 Deeper (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Some story to the scenes - A-list models - High production values - Affiliated with other high-quality sites - 86 scenes - New scene added every five days - Multiple resolutions offered - Photos available - Logical, usable site design - Supports download managers Cons: - No TBP discount - I’ve had problems with this company/biller combination in the past Bottom Line: I joined Deeper because every other site under the Mad Cheddar umbrella is a Greg Lansky site and I like his work. (Tushy, Blacked, Vixen, etc.) I figured this would be another Lansky site and fully expected that I’d like it just as much. It turns out that it isn’t a Lansky site and it’s quite different from what I expected and from what I would normally subscribe to but I like it and I’m glad I joined. While the site seems to be a collaboration between several porn stars it appears that Kayden Kross is now the primary director for scenes here. Describing the scenes available here isn’t easy as there is a wide variety. They all appear to be loosely story-based though the similarity ends there. Some are a little rough with some playful bondage while others could be called couples-oriented* or Glamcore. Another commonality is that the site hires only A-list models and all the scenes have class-leading production values. (This is a clear link to the Lansky sites.) The scenes are all ‘standard’ porn in that the site offers two-ways, three-ways and lesbian scenes. Anal, however, is rare. I’ve read on other forums where Deeper has been accused of pulling a fast one in that the scenes are all or mostly from a site called TrenchcoatX. While this is true, I don’t think Deeper is trying to pull a fast one. In fact, they link to Deeper at TrenchcoatX. I think, but I’m not certain, that TCX is a VOD site and it may not allow downloads. Now that TCX is a large enough site it seems that they have spun off Deeper as their traditional subscription-based site that allows downloads. I’m not 100% certain about this but it is an educated guess based on time spent on both sites. It also appears that Deeper may have some exclusive scenes. The site is currently quite large with 86 scenes available. The site continues to grow with a new scene being added every five days. The scenes are available to stream (with only one resolution) and to download with seven resolutions available: 270p, 360p, 480 Mobile, 480p, 720p, 1080p and 4K. I found bitrates to be better than average on all resolutions and the scenes showed no pixilation or stuttering on playback. Photos are available as singles or zips in a 2000x3000 size. The site layout is simple, logical and easy to use. It uses the same layout as all the other Mad Cheddar sites so if you’ve subscribed to one of those you’ll feel at home here. The scenes can be sorted by date, by star and tags are also available. I had no issues using a download manager to queue the scenes and I found download speeds to be on par with or better than other sites of this calibre. I can’t point to any specific negatives on this site though I have had trouble with the combination of Mad Cheddar and the biller they now use, VXNBILL. I’ve had three instances of unauthorized memberships being charged long after I’ve cancelled so I’ll be keeping an eye on my card. The other minor negative is that the site doesn’t offer a TBP discount though when I joined there was no discount offered but it happened that they were offering a $10 Memorial Day special. Let’s hope they make us PU members an offer we can’t refuse. The bottom line is that while this site is not what I expected and not what I’d usually subscribe to I like the site itself and what it has to offer. The scenes are all A-list models in scenes with a bit of a storyline and high production values. The scenes are offered in multiple resolutions and download speeds are good. If you like high-quality porn with a storyline and a bit of an edge this site is worth looking at. Now if they’d only offer us a bit of an incentive… *Caveat: I like sites like Hookup Hotshot and Legal Porno so I may not be the best judge of what is truly couples-oriented. 06-12-19  03:07pm Replies (0) Review 60 Desperate Pleasures (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Unique site - Large site (600+ videos) - Broad range of fetishes - Good mix of model types - Supports download managers - Bills through CC Bill - Some A-list models - Good mix of body types and ages, amateur and pro Cons: - Outdated website - No download options Bottom Line: I wasn’t aware that this site and studio existed and only discovered it when looking for some older man / younger girl porn. This site offers a lot of that but since it was marketed as a fetish site it also offers a lot of other stuff too. The site claims that its origins come out of the 2008 recession when the site owner turned to porn to make a living. The interesting part of that decision is that if the owner is the guy who is in most of the videos, he’s the last person you’d expect to be in porn videos. He’s a typical middle-aged guy with a bit of a belly and an average dick. And he might be the luckiest man alive. For a fetish site it has a broad range of niches that it caters to. In the early days (around 2012) the scenes were frequently bondage with tickling. This isn't a hardcore BDSM site as with Kink or sites like that; it’s much tamer and more playful. As the site progressed there are videos uploaded with footjobs. There are a few biting videos and a few balloon videos (I didn’t know those were porn things). The more recent scenes seem to have more young girl / old guy (with the guy being the site owner, presumably). Many of these push the limits by having an incest theme but unlike the major studios that do these scenes with a stepfather/step-daughter, this site goes right for the daddy/daughter thing. To make this even creepier, many of these scenes are what I’d guess you’d call the impregnation niche. Throughout the site you’ll also find regular updates with MILFs and lesbians. Sex with pregnant models is also fairly common. The site has a good mix of known pornstars and lesser knowns (to me, at least). Some of the models may be fetish models and some of them may be genuine amateurs. With a broad range of models you also have a broad range of looks and body types so there is likely something here for everyone. Both the scenes and the site have a very amateur feel to them. The site is about as simple as you’d expect from a ‘studio’ that appears to be run by a couple of people who run the whole operation. Remember what sites looked like in the 1990s? That’s what this site looks like. Navigation is simple as it is all laid out on 28 pages of videos. Each scene has a medium-sized thumbnail which plays a gif so you can get a sense of what the scene offers. There is a search function but I didn’t find it to be accurate. The camerawork and editing aren't up to major studio standards, but that really isn't a pro or a con, it just is. I like the amateur feel that the camerawork brings to the scenes and it isn't bad enough that it detracts from the scene or distracts the viewer unless you’re really fussy. The site doesn’t offer any download options. You get what they offer. All of the videos are in WMV format and all of them are in 1280x720 resolution. The big variable is that the older scenes have bitrates of 1500kb/s while the newer scenes have bitrates of up to 6000kb/s. They all have a framerate of 29fps. Obviously the newer scenes look better. The site has approximately 600+ videos. It does update but the updates aren't dated (the older ones are) so I can’t really say for sure what the update schedule is. The most recent update saw six new videos added at once and it looks like they do a bulk upload approximately once a week. The site does offer photos but only as a standalone set. The video shoots usually don’t have a photo option and the photo sets don’t usually offer video. The site is much more heavily skewed to video so if you’re a photo collector you may want to think carefully before joining. The photos are 1200x800 so certainly not high resolution. The bottom line? That’s sort of hard to say. Arguing against a recommendation is the fact that the site is pretty amateurish and the video quality isn't up to standard. On the pro side, however, this is some good porn in some unusual niches. I joined to get access to the older guy/younger girl scenes and these are really well done. I’m not into tickling so I can’t really comment on those but I have no reason to think that a person with a tickling fetish wouldn’t like the site as much as I do. So with the caveat that you need to know what you’re getting I’d say this is a definite recommendation if any of the fetishes are to your liking. If you’re into couples oriented artcore then you likely won’t be happy here. But if you like your dirty movies with an extra dose of dirty, you should check this site out. This site is definitely on my list to rejoin regularly. 08-29-15  04:42am Replies (6) Review 61 Device Bondage (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 650+ videos - Many big name stars appear - Updates approximately every four days with the addition of a new scene - Good variation in age, body type, tattoos/ no tattoos - Variety of ways to download and view the videos - Streaming is available - Mp4 in two resolutions - WMV in two resolutions - Photos are available – usually broken down into ‘sets’ with set zips being offered - Supports download managers with no obvious time-outs Cons: - Probably a bit extreme for many - Some may not like the price Bottom Line: Full disclosure: I think Kink.com is likely the best online porn company in existence, but I’ll do my best to stay objective… Obviously with any website if you don’t have an interest in the material being offered then you’re likely not going to like it. That is especially true for a site like this where the material offered is definitely not mainstream porn. If you don’t like extreme BDSM then you definitely won’t like this site, but I trust that you can still appreciate the effort that Kink puts into the scenes. Device bondage is just that: the scenes all involve a female submissive being put into bondage by using various devices rather than more traditional ropes. Kink has amassed quite an impressive collection of implements to immobilize the models. Once immobilized the model is subjected to some further torment and in most cases there are forced orgasms. Actual sex does occur, but not in every shoot. Many of the Doms are females. This may or may not be new since I last looked at this site, but I find that there are more big-name porn stars here. Amber Rayne appears to have shot a bunch of scenes in the past while and there are other stars that I wouldn’t expect to see on an extreme BDSM site. Examples of this are Marie McCray, Sensi Pearl and Kaylee Hilton. The scenes tend to follow a set formula: the scene begins with an interview where the viewers can see that this is 100% consensual. Then the scene is broken down into three segments so the girl isn’t in one device for the entire scene. This adds a lot of variety and keeps the scenes from becoming dull. The interviews have been polarizing here at PU and Kink uses them on all their sites. I suspect that they do this more to appease the puritans and provide some measure of legal protection, but the frequent criticism of them is that including them at the first of the video can kill the sinister mood. I tend to agree with that and would prefer the interviews to be at the end or even as a separate file. But since they’re easily skipped it isn’t that big a deal. As of this writing there are more than 650 scenes and updates are posted approximately every four days with one scene being added each time. This could be a good or a bad thing, depending on how you view it, but the models on the site don’t all look alike. There is a good mix of stars and lesser-knowns, ages range from 18+ to over 40. There are models with lots of tattoos and models without tattoos. The site seems to want to appeal to as broad an audience as possible. Another ‘new’ element (which I may just have not noticed before) resolves one of the few complaints I’ve had about this site. I wish that they’d include more behind-the-scenes material and show the model being put into the devices rather than just start with the model already restrained. The site has posted a few ‘live’ shoots where the cameras are left rolling as the model is put into the devices and the production staff communicates with members watching the show live. There aren’t many of these live shoots, but it does give a glimpse into the inner workings of the site and I hope that the site continues to add them. Being a Kink site, the technical bits are all up to or better than industry standards. Each scene has its own page and you can either stream or download the video. Downloads are available in either WMV or Mp4 format. Two resolutions are available for both formats. The highest resolution for both comes in at 1280x720. The bitrates are a bit different between the formats but both are approximately 7000kb/s. Both play at 30fps. The site allows download managers and I didn’t experience any of the links timing out. Download speeds are a bit faster than I’m used to at other sites. Perhaps the one thing that many prospective members might take issue with is the price. I agree that price is important, but price has to be taken in context too. I think that the price, when weighed against the value of the site, is very fair: this isn’t cookie-cutter porn. This is all exclusive, with mostly top-name models, in a dungeon-like building and excellent production values. Kink has some of the highest production values of any porn company and this stuff can’t be cheap to make. If price is an issue, be sure to sign up for emails from them because they occasionally offer membership deals. Also, once you’re a member of one Kink site you get discounts on the other sites. An element to the value debate is that Kink isn’t a ‘network.’ Each specific site requires a separate membership. Given the high production values and exceptionally high quality of the scenes on all of the sites, I don’t think this detracts from the value. Device Bondage continues to do almost everything very well, and since I was last a member there have even been a few improvements. Even at full price the site is a great value if you like what’s offered. 08-18-12  01:03pm Replies (2) Review 62 Device Bondage (0) 95.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - A very unique niche - Part of the Kink.com network - Over 500 scenes - Updates several times a week - Multiple download options - Pictures available (individual or zipped) - Fast download speeds (1.4MB/sec on a single download) - Interesting mix of amateurs, BDSM models and mainstream porn models - Excellent value Cons: Can get a bit repetitive Bottom Line: I realize that Device Bondage might not be for everyone, but if you have a bondage interest this is an excellent site. The site’s claim to fame is that they don’t use traditional rope bondage, but, as the name suggests, they use a variety of other means to bind the models. The most common is a set of pipes and clamps that can be used in countless ways. It all makes for quite a unique site. Most of the scenes follow an effective formula: first there is an interview (to make it abundantly clear that there is full consent – this isn’t Max Hardcore). Then they move to a bondage scene with some S+M thrown in. Usually a second bondage and S+M scene follows. At some point there will be forced orgasms. Finally, the scene closes with another interview. The basic formula is also followed where there are multiple models. As of this review, there are now well over 500 scenes on the site. They continue to update several times a week. Adding the uniqueness and creativity on the site to the volume of material makes this site an excellent value. On the tech side, this site meets the high standards of all other Kink.com sites. There are both HD and SD wmv files, an HD mp4 and a format for IPods. You can download the entire scene as one file in the listed formats, or you can download it in segments. Pictures are also available individually or as a zipped set. My only two criticisms of this site are subjective. First, at its core, this is really a non-sex site. Mostly the only sex is forced orgasms on the models while in bondage. This is excellent stuff, but it isn’t something that I’m really into. Kink.com has sites, like Sex and Submission that are more to my liking. Second, I’d really like to see the women being bound, either as part of the scene or part of a behind-the-scenes view. All the scenes start with an interview, and then move immediately to the model in bondage. Please Kink, add some BTS here! Finally, the listed price may seem high, but consider the cost and effort that goes into the site when deciding to join. This site doesn’t hire a male a female and stick them in a bedroom setting to fuck. There is a lot of creativity that goes into these scenes. It is definitely a good value at full price. Having said that, there are ways to avoid paying full price. Kink.com usually offers a discount on a second site and having memberships to two Kink.com sites isn’t a bad thing. Also, register as a Kink.com member (free) and get on their mailing list. They regularly email special offers and deals on this and other Kink sites. The bottom line is that this is an excellent niche site. It is unique, it is creative and it exceeds industry norms for the technical stuff. If you have an interest in BDSM, you owe it to yourself to have a look. 03-06-11  06:30am Replies (2) Review 63 Device Bondage (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large site (220+ scenes) of a fairly unique niche - Updates 3X per week - Multiple download options for both videos and pictures (from HD to low res) - Reasonable speed - Many mainstream porn stars - Very well executed - Simple, straightforward layout - Part of the Kink.com business, so quality and support are assured - Not misogynistic or abusive Cons: - Gets a bit repetitive after a while - Non-sex (but definitely not traditional 'softcore' - Not much Behind-the-Scenes stuff Bottom Line: Device bondage is a site from Kink.com that meets their usual high standards. The genre is not one that I’ve ever seen before but it fits well within the fairly extreme BDSM theme of the network. This is bondage using things other than ropes. Various metal pipes and bars are used, as well as handmade device machines. The women (almost exclusively young, fit and attractive – with a surprising number of mainstream pornstars appearing) are bound in two or three positions during the scene. They are then tormented in some way, with clamps, floggers and clothespins being common. The women are not degraded in any way. All scenes contain an interview that makes it clear everything was consensual and the model was a willing participant. It goes without saying, but this site isn’t for everyone. If you’re into mainstream videos or softcore, this site probably isn’t for you. The site is technically softcore in that there is no sex (one test scene is all), but it definitely isn’t ‘soft.’ But it is part of the Kink network and I’ve always counted on them for consistent quality and interesting, unique material. DB doesn’t disappoint on that count. While it is unique, it can also get a little repetitive. I suppose there are only so many ways to bind and torment a model. One thing that makes it repetitive is that we never see a model getting bound. We only see the end ‘product.’ I think it would be interesting to include more footage of the actual process and to see the model get bound. There is also no scene ‘set-up’ – we start right out of the gate in a bondage situation. The site layout might be considered plain, but I think it is simple and usable. It also follows the standard used at other Kink sites. I’m not a pic guy, but pics of the shoot are available in two resolutions. Zips are available too. Videos are available in multiple formats so you’re bound to find something that suits you, from mp4 HD to mp4 for ipods. While I’ve had no problems on this site, I did have an Kink.com account problem a while back that was of my own making. The support staff were just that – supportive. The problem was fixed quickly and effectively the first time. The final issue is price. The price is high for a porn site, and is the priciest of all the Kink sites, and the reason for that isn’t obvious to me. I’m not going to judge on price alone though. I prefer to judge on value. Do I feel I got good value? Yes. A little less than some other fetish sites, even those on the Kink network. But I certainly don’t feel cheated either. The bottom line is that only you can decide if you have an interest in this material. If you do, this site is large, technically well done, gives reasonable download speeds and gives decent value. If this niche is something you enjoy watching you can have confidence that this site delivers what it promises. 08-12-09  03:29pm Replies (0) Review 64 Devils Film (0) 88.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large selection of DVDs from their studio - Updates regularly - Good variety of old and newer titles - Wide variety of DVDs for many interests - Part of a larger network (Fame Digital) - Some HD available - Downloads and streams available - Mix of American and European stars - Screencaps / pics available - TBP / PU monthly discount price - Great value Cons: - Updates by scene, not by full DVD - Not all studio titles available - Problems using Free Download Manager - Video quality is just average - Download speeds just average - Non-descriptive file names - Lots of compilations - No zips for screencaps /pics - No discernable search function - Very few HD scenes available to download Bottom Line: There are approximately 900 DVDs on this one site alone. One advantage, or disadvantage, depending on your interests, is that this studio has a much broader range of niches than many other mainstream studios. There are the titles featuring fresh, young models, but for those with different tastes there are a lot of ‘unique’ titles too. If you like pubic hair, you’ll find it. There are even titles that feature girls using strap-ons on guys and guys felching their own creampies from girls. One thing I don’t like is that some of the titles are compilations. I don’t think a studio should offer compilations on a site that has the original scenes available. While some of the titles available appear to be newer, it doesn’t appear that the studio is putting up their newest releases. The lack of current A-list stars leads me to think that. I may be wrong on that though, since many of the titles feature European models who I don’t know well, so those may be newer. The good news, if you’re like me, is that there are a lot of older titles available from the past decade or so. The site has a very basic navigation. You can sort by theme, by series name and by title name. You can choose to view DVDs or by single scenes. Downloads are available in low or high wmv files. I didn’t try the low, but the high are not great, but not bad. Resolution is 720x528 at 2000 - 5000kbps. HD is available to download on some scenes, but not many. HD, when available, is only offered in mp4. Streaming is available too, in high and low resolution. I didn’t sample it because I prefer to download. HD is offered in a lot more streaming scenes than for download. Pictures are available, though appear to be screencaps only. I didn’t bother with any though the ones I did look at had a very low resolution (711x480). Zips are not available. The site appears to update daily, but that update is just a scene in a DVD, not the full DVD each day. I used Free Download Manager and had some minor problems: many files would time out. There was a lot of reloading downloads. Using FDM, downloads were normally at 1800kb/s, though it sometimes dropped as low as 1300. One issue is the way the site names the scenes you download. The files have a numeric name that gives no indication of which DVD it’s from. That leaves the user to associate it with the title manually. The biggest drawback is the lack of a search function. There are drop-down menus for series, titles and stars, but there is no way to search for a title or star by just entering that name somewhere. As studio sites go, this is pretty good. The TBP and PU pages seem to link to the mobile site, and on those pages they don’t note the monthly TBP/PU discount. It does exist – at $9.95 a month. Even without all the additional sites, this would be a great value. If you like mainstream DVD porn, this site will keep you happy for a while. 07-15-11  09:56am Replies (8) Review 65 Diabolic (0) 50.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Diabolic is one of the best studios around - Access to about half of their titles - Several updates a week - File sizes are large and look good - Download speeds are on par with the competition (but file sizes are significantly larger) Cons: - The website appears to have undergone a major re-work, and it is either really buggy or is still under development - Videos all stutter, sometimes it really detracts from the scene - Many dead links - No obvious support for customers – three tries to contact them got nothing - Some scenes are missing from movies - Many scenes have watermarks, some are small, some have watermarks that are huge and block a good portion of the screen - No star name associated with many scenes - Notwithstanding the many dead links, only about half or less of the Diabolic library is online Bottom Line: This is my second time taking a membership at Diabolic. It appears that they may be undergoing a major re-work. I can’t say that for sure because my three emails for support were never replied to. I deduced the re-work theory from comparing the current site to the most recent review. The biggest problem (assuming they are in the middle of a major overhaul) is that the site just isn’t ready for public use yet. Most of the older scenes I specifically joined to get have dead links. At the time I joined around 40% of the links were dead. (I didn’t test all of them, but I noted that every movie that shows it has had zero downloads has dead links, so I counted all the zero download movies.) If the site is being overhauled, maybe some of the above will be fixed. Regardless of that though, there are some larger issues. I download the wmv versions, which are all large and look generally great. They are listed as HD. But they all (yes, all) have these annoying stutters. Sometimes it isn’t too bad, but other times it can get really annoying. Some of the stutters can last a few seconds. I’m also not a fan of the site navigation. Each page shows 12 DVDs that are available. You select one that you want and that loads a page that shows the scenes in that movie. Under each scene are the options to watch it online, download it, or build you own. Hitting any of those options will bring you to another page (that frequently crashes) where you select how you want to do what you want to do. As in how do you want to view or download the file. Maybe I’m, being fussy, but having to drill down through three pages to download the file seems like one page too many. Maybe I’m just being fussy because I’m frustrated with all the other problems. I have no idea why the site is as bad as it is. Maybe Diabolic is in its final days like someone here suggested (I hope not) or maybe they just don’t put the effort into web sales because they don’t see them as important. It seems to me that web sales are the future. I haven’t rented or bought a DVD in two years – everything is online now. I’m sure I’m not the only person who finds the web a more convenient place to get my porn. If so, Diabolic has to get in the game better than this. Adding to this concern is that Diabolic is updating the site a few times a week, but there are still well over a hundred titles that have never been added. Diabolic has been one of my favorite studios for years. I really hope that they resolve the problems with their website because without it they’ll have no place in the online porn market. And in the past I took it as a positive sign that the webmaster responded to concerns. Not so any more. Twice I contacted them through normal channels, and once through the email here at PU. Nothing in the two weeks since. My recommendation is to avoid Diabolic until we have some assurances that the problems are fixed. 09-25-09  10:08am Replies (1) Review 66 Diabolic (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: Diabolic is one of the best studios out there and this gives access to a large part of their catalogue No DRM on downloads. Kudos to Diabolic for being on the leading edge of this long-needed trend. Streaming at your choice of speeds Easy searches by series title, genre or star Cons: Within individual movies the star's name frequently is wrong. If you're looking for a particular star the star search will get you to the movie but you may need to look at the thumbnails to get the right scene Download speeds can vary from average to painfully slow Bottom Line: (EDIT December 22, 2007 - I can confirm that the larger file sizes are now available. In my opinion, this puts Diabolic among the best sites on the web.) In my opinion, Diabolic is one of the best studios operating today. Their material is consistently good. You may not like a particular genre, but you at least know that they do that genre well. They have some excellent gonzo material with a raw edge that doesn't push the envelope as far as some others do. Technically their work is excellent - always good lighting and editing. And they always have the best and brightest stars in the biz in their movies. The site is well done. There are multiple ways to search: genre, series titles, individual titles and stars. Download speeds are good. If you're a fan of excellent porn with beautiful women who don't seem to know the word 'no' this site can have a bit of a 'kid in a candy store' effect. I'm not shilling here - I found the quantity of stuff so overwhelming that I browsed longer than I would at other sites before downloading. This is certain to be a long-term membership. There seems to be a debate about value. In my opinion this is a great value at the price. I really like Diabolic's stuff so the price seems more than fair to me. I give full marks to a studio with the balls to let us download their stuff. Follow-Up: Now that the 'new car' lustre is gone I'd like to make a few comments. This is still an excellent site in terms of content, but the download speeds are TERRIBLE. You need to use an accelerator but that adds to the cost. I emailed the webmaster to ask if there was a problem on their end and got no reply. If you like Diabolic's stuff this is a great site, but you will need an accelerator. I also had some trouble cancelling my membership. 12-13-07  06:39pm Replies (2) Review 67 Digital Playground (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large studio - Big-budget, plot-based DVDs - 500+ DVDs - DVDs appear to be complete - A who’s who of A-list models - A lot of scenes with normal clothes and makeup - DVDs ranging from 2005 to 2014 - Updates regularly - 50% TBP/PU discount Cons: - Streaming only - Emphasis on models with large breasts (real and fake) – this won’t be a negative for everyone - Older videos stream in lower resolution - Older videos download the whole movie to your cache, which could be an issue for those with caps - Tags don’t appear to be effective in finding scenes Bottom Line: There are two things any prospective member should know before considering a membership here. The first is that the site offers streaming only (though a recent comment stated that with the right software the HTTP stream can be captured). The second is that this studio specializes in plot-based porn, some of it with a big budget and location shoots. If you prefer gonzo this might seem a bit tame for you. (One advantage to plot-based porn is that when the plot involves normal life – as opposed to pirates, for example – the model’s clothes and makeup are more natural. This is big plus for me. I’d rather see a model in jeans and light makeup than wearing PVC clothes and garish makeup.) The site is fairly standard for a studio site and it has many of the same flaws that other studio sites have. While the porn itself is quite good, the site lets it down. Digital Playground is a lot better than some other studio sites, but not as good as many exclusive sites. The site currently has just over 500 DVDs available. It certainly looks like all the scenes in each DVD are available. There is also the ability to sort by scene and while most of those scenes can be associated with a DVD it does appear that some of the scenes are (for now, at least) not part of a DVD. It may be that the scenes get assembled into the DVD once they’re all uploaded. It looks like there is one scene uploaded each day although there does appear to be the occasional gap. As can be expected with any website that has material ranging from 2005 to 2014 the quality of the older stuff is less than the newer stuff. Most of the older DVDs are available in four resolutions: 720, 576, 480 and 320. New DVDs are available in 1080, 720, 480 and 320. Approximately 25% of the videos offered (and all of the new uploads) have the 1080p option. I don’t normally join streaming sites, but one thing I noticed with the older movies could be an issue for some members. Even though you could select a specific scene from a movie, clicking on that scene started streaming the entire movie from the beginning. While it’s inconvenient to have to scrub ahead when you’ve already selected the scene you want, for those with a download cap this means you’re using unnecessary bandwidth to see a scene. This problem doesn’t seem to occur on any movie where the 1080p stream is offered. On those the specific scene you want is queued up. Another quibble is that the tags don’t work well. There is an extensive list of possible tags so I selected ‘anal’ to get a sense of how many anal DVDs there were. The result was six DVDs. That was disappointing, but not entirely unexpected as Digital Playground does seem relatively more couple-friendly than other studios. But it turns out there is a lot more anal here than the tags revealed. The tags don’t appear to be an effective way to sort scenes. A definite advantage to the site is that since this is one of the major studios and it’s been around a long time, their cast lists are usually a who’s who of A-list models. They also have a few exclusive models. Speaking of models, this is a subjective complaint, but the studio tends to shoot larger-breasted women than I prefer. Many of them are natural, but a lot are enhanced. (Teagan Presley, a favorite of mine, has a lot of scenes here but they are almost all post-surgery.) If you like A-list models with bigger breasts though, this site should be considered. The site isn't perfect but it does have more hits than misses. The streaming-only is likely a deal-breaker for many, but that may be offset by the 50% discount offered through TBP/PU. A membership gives you access to some big-budget porn with some of the biggest names in the business. This is a definite ‘maybe’ for a rejoin but as long as you’re okay with streaming I’d recommend checking it out. 01-27-15  03:49pm Replies (2) Review 68 Dirt Pipe Divas (0) 85.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of a small network (Jimmy Pass) - Updates regularly - All videos are available in HD (with one exception) - Video encoding keeps sizes reasonable but with better picture than many other sites - Some A-list porn stars in rare anal scenes - Supports download managers - Seems to have a loose affiliation with Philly Butt Sluts - Great customer service from the site owner / webmaster Cons: - Small site (but growing) Bottom Line: I bought a membership to this site to get access to one scene but I discovered that the rest of the scenes are also great so I ended up downloading just about everything. Unfortunately that wasn’t as big a job as it sounds because the site is relatively new, having started in April 2013. Currently there are only 16 scenes on the site but it is growing with a history of a new scene being added about every five days. Some may feel that spending $30 for a site that only offers 16 scenes isn’t a good value, but in my subjective opinion the scenes are worth every dime. One advantage to this site is that it offers at least two anal scenes from models who aren’t known for doing anal. Taylor Dare has done some (Let’s Try Anal), but this one and the LTA scene are the only ones I’m aware of. The site also has a very rare Kacey Jordan anal scene. To make things more interesting, this is her first. The bad news with the Kacey scene is that it was recorded a while ago and only recorded in SD. All other scenes are available in HD. The HD scenes come in at 1920x1080 at 6000kb/s and 30fps. I don’t know anything about how video gets encoded, but whatever they do at this site they do it right. The videos all look incredibly sharp with no pixilation at all. For videos this clear I was surprised to see that the file sizes aren’t as big as those on many other HD sites. The average file size for HD is around 1GB. The scenes themselves are all gonzo with no plot. The scenes open with the model sitting on a couch while she is interviewed and then the action starts. You can’t argue with simplicity. While there may not be high production values in the scene set up, the technical production values are definitely up to industry standards. Sound, lighting and camera work are all great. Another thing that I was pleased to see is that as can happen with so many sites that feature the same male talent in the scenes, that male talent can get confused and start to think that the site and scenes are about him. In these scenes the male talent never tries to upstage the female. He does what male talent should do and that is to make the female talent look good. Adding to the value of the membership is the fact that it is part of a small network. The other sites are Classic Jimmy, Ivy Bleu and Jimmy Hooligan. I realize this is subjective, but with Dirt Pipe Divas offering great scenes in HD I’d consider it the flagship of the network. Prior to joining the site I had a few questions and took a chance and emailed the webmaster. He replied quickly and gave me all the information that I wanted. One thing I did learn from him is that he is loosely affiliated with Philly Butt Sluts and some of those scenes will be uploaded here. This is good news because the Philly site only sells through Clips4Sale which can be very expensive. The bottom line is this: I’m glad I joined the site, I strongly recommend to anyone with a love of anal to check it out and consider joining, and this is now a site on my list of sites to rejoin a few times a year. I’m looking forward to re-subscribing to see more excellent porn as the site grows. 07-31-13  02:40pm Replies (2) Review 69 Dirty Flix (0) 82.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large network of 14 sites - Nearly 900 scenes on offer - Updates regularly - Good mix of Eastern European/Russian and American models - Wide range of niches offered - Bills through Epoch - Effective search function - Supports download managers Cons: - No model names given on main pages - Download speeds much lower than with similar sites - No TBP discount Bottom Line: I joined this network specifically to get a few scenes with a model whose scenes I collect; otherwise, it would be unlikely that I’d have joined this network. It is a good network of generally mainstream porn and it has a lot to offer but my preference these days is for sites that are more specifically targeted to my interests. The network is made up of 14 sites, each with a specific niche. These are, in the order they are listed on the network (note that the network offers a mix of American and Eastern European/Russian models. For ease of reference I’ll just refer to these as “EE” in describing the proportion of American to EE): • Fucking Glasses: POV with the male talent wearing a camera on his head, 116 scenes, adds a scene approximately every three months. Mix of models but older scenes skewed to EE • She is Nerdy, “nerdy” in this context seems to be that the model wears glasses, 48 scenes, adds one scene per month, mostly EE • Tricky Agent, casting niche, 57 scenes, new scene approximately every six months, almost entirely EE • Moms Passions MILF, 11 scenes, no updates since 2014, all EE • Make Him Cuckold, 60 scenes, last update May 2017, all EE • Young Courtesans, escort theme with emphasis on beauty and sensuality, 59 scenes, was adding a scene per month but last update was August 2017, All EE • Disgrace that Bitch, rough sex, 21 scenes, updates monthly, mix of models • Private Casting X, casting, 86 scenes, adds approximately one scene per month, mix of models • Trick Your GF, model is duped into sex with someone other than her BF, 43 scenes, adds approximately one scene per month but last was June 2017, All EE • X Sensual, passion and sensuality, 237 scenes, adds multiple scenes per week, Mostly or all EE • Brutal X, rough sex, 22 scenes, last updated January 6, 2017, mix of models • Massage X, massage with sex, 58 scenes, updates monthly, All EE • Spy POV, POV with an element of hidden cameras, 18 scenes, last update May 2017, All American • Kinky Family, step-siblings, 31 scenes, two updates per month, All American It may not be obvious from the list above, but the network does update regularly with approximately two scenes being added per week on the network. If you’re joining for a specific niche check the list above for more specifics on updates. It appears that the network started with EE models exclusively but as it grew they began using more American models. The most recent sites are almost all American though the older sites that still update use mostly EE models. If you have a preference for one group over the other there are lots of scenes of both, though it is fair to say that the site has many more EE models than American models. The scenes are offered as both MP4 and WMV. The MP4 scenes are all offered in 1080p (9000kb/s), 720p (2000kb/s), 480p and 320p. 4K has recently been added as an option on the newest scenes. The WMV offers less choice with just 1080p and 480p. My specific interest is anal sex and there are some here (85) they are all with the EE models. There is no specific anal niche and the scenes are scattered throughout the network. There is a search function that seems to work well. I found all of the scenes I downloaded to be very good. The porn is all ‘mainstream’ in that it is similar to what is offered by hundreds of other sites. That’s neither good nor bad; it just is what it is. The site allows download managers and I had no issue with links timing out. I didn’t find any download limits and I downloaded a lot of scenes one weekend so either there is no limit or it is high enough to not impede the average user. The site bills through Epoch so you can join knowing your personal information is safe and that you can cancel easily. The site has two major flaws that could be easily fixed. Some readers may not even see these as flaws. The first is that the network and sites only have small thumbnails on the main pages and those don’t list the model. To find who the model is in that scene you need to open the link. I’m not sure why the network would opt to not provide that key information on the main page. The other flaw is that download speeds were, at best, less than one-quarter of what I’m used to seeing and would occasionally drop even lower than that. In 2017 it is rare that I see download speeds this low. The bottom line is that this is a solid network that has a lot going for it but could also make some key improvements. It is a very good value for someone looking for mainstream porn with a mix of EE and American models. It could be an excellent value if the network offered a TBP discount. While there is nothing specific to recommend this site over any other like it, it is still worthwhile considering a membership. 11-02-17  05:59am Replies (2) Review 70 DogFart (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Large network - 21 sites (including a relatively new BTS site) - All interracial - Some unusual niches - Older scenes are being remastered - Easy to use network - Supports download managers (IDM) - Easy access to download and viewing options - Streaming is available Cons: - Not all sites are updating - Older remastered scenes may be dated and posted as a new update - No effective search function - No (that I could find) high-res or HD scenes - More expensive than comparable sites Bottom Line: Dog Fart Network (DFN) isn’t a network that I’d normally have joined, but I’m glad I did. I joined specifically to access one of their unique sites but I found many of the other sites quite good too. DFN has 21 sites that cover a wide range of niches. The overall theme that runs through the network is interracial sex, specifically black men with white women. One site does feature white men and black women. The sites range from fairly standard porn, straight b/g, b/b/g, anal, etc., legal teen oriented sites, cougar sites, through sites that feature glory holes, and a couple of sites with some unique themes – Wife Writing and The Minion. Both of these are unique sites. The network is simple in layout and operation: the homepage shows all 21 sites. You enter each site through that link and all the sites share the same simple layout: five scenes are listed per page and there is easy access to all the pages. One thing I particularly like about the sites is that on each page, beneath a large thumbnail of each scene, all the viewing and downloading options are available. So many other sites require the users to click through several pages before getting to the download or viewing links; DFN’s choice to keep it simple is appreciated. Speaking of the downloading and viewing options, DFN has more than most other sites. While only two formats are offered (WMV and MP4) those are usually offered in more than one size. I download WMVs and those are offered in two ‘sizes’ – both come in at 640x480 with the only difference being that the larger ones are 4500kb/s versus the smaller ones at 1500kb/s. Both play at 30fps. Some of the older videos are a lower resolution. Oddly, for 2012, the site still allows users to download the videos in segments. While I’m sure that few people still need to do this, I’m sure that those who do appreciate this option. While the resolutions are somewhat below standards, they still look crisp. Streaming is also available in two resolutions that appear to be similar to the WMV downloads. Speaking of older videos, DFN appears to be moving to remaster a lot of their older scenes. This is both good and bad, depending on how you look at it. The ‘bad’ is that they seem to use the remastered videos as updates rather than posting new videos as often. I don’t hold the opinion that this is necessarily bad because it gives access to fairly decent quality videos of stars from the past decade. I consider that to be good. The site also offers photos, and like the videos there are several options. Interestingly, the options are for good resolution photos (1067x1600) taken during the video shoot, lower resolution screencaps and these things they call ‘panels’ which are photos that contain four smaller photos. The higher resolution photos are available as zips but the other two sets are singles only. The site supports download managers. I use Internet Download Manager and had no problem with links dying on me over a period of over an hour. One glaring problem with the network is the lack of an effective search function or the use of tags. There is a search function, but it has serious flaws. It allows you to search for a word or words in the title or description of the scene but that can be a rather blunt tool. For example, I searched the term “anal” and got a number of hits but many of the scenes had no anal sex in them. The site producers frequently refer to a woman’s “birth canal” in the scene descriptions and that phrase was captured in a search for anal scenes. This could be solved by a smarter search engine, but it would probably be better solved by tagging scenes with niches. Any potential member is obviously going to make their own decision on value, but in DFN’s case some people may jump to a conclusion based solely on price. The issue is that DFN charges $35 per month, which is more than most comparable sites. Is it worth $35? My opinion is that it is. I think we’ve become accustomed to lower prices but the market has changed and we all may need to rethink the value equation. In this case, you get access to over a thousand exclusive scenes with decent production values and fast downloads (with no obvious limits, I might add). I think that’s good value. (As an aside, I’m not sure where the upper limit on pricing is, but I note that last week TBP posted a review of a BDSM site, Infernal Restraints, that commands $65 per month. I’m a BDSM fan, but that seems a bit steep.) One potential concern that has been expressed before is that several of the sites do not appear to be actively updating with new material. I’m fine with this as long as the network is updating and the remastering continues. The bottom line is that I certainly recommend DFN. Its top-quality porn, and specifically interracial porn, with top porn stars that’s well produced and easy to access at a fair price. 08-12-12  01:42pm Replies (4) Review 71 Dom The Nation (0) 92.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Creative, innovative site - Beautiful models - Extreme BDSM - Outdoor settings - 25 scenes and growing - Updates with at least one scene per month - ‘Clips’ and photos too - Downloads and streaming - Multiple resolutions for downloads - Supports download managers Cons: - Slower than average download speeds - 4K files cost extra Bottom Line: Dom the Nation (DtN) is a relatively new site by the creative minds behind Assylum and Slave Mouth. If you aren’t familiar with either of those older sites, I recommend checking them out and reading the reviews. Those sites are two of the most unique and creative BDSM sites I’ve ever seen. In terms of creativity, I’ve not seen anyone else come close. DtN is every bit as good as it’s sister sites but adds creativity. What differentiates DtN is the setting for the scenes. Where both Assylum and Slave Mouth are shot indoors, DtN scenes are shot outdoors. Some of the elements that the two original sites are known for, namely bondage, extreme S&M, rough anal sex (there is no vaginal penetration here at all), face-fucking, watersports, degradation, humiliation and general depravity are all present here, but in outdoor settings. For me, shooting scenes outdoors adds a whole new element to these already-unique scenes. It adds an element of risk that, for me, heightens the allure. Instead of using creative devices to bind and restrain the models, in most instances they are bound on bare ground including dirt, gravel and even jagged rocks. Sometimes softer surfaces such as grass are used. Most of the scenes have been shot in the US though the crew recently did go to Italy and some of the scenes shot there are now making their way onto the site. Unlike the sister site, there is no unifying premise here. Here, it simply bondage and sadism for the sake of that alone. The site labels itself as having BDSM “documentariesâ€� and that is an apt description. This site began in earnest in early 2020, just before the pandemic hit. Lockdowns hindered site growth but they are back to shooting and uploading. There are currently 25 scenes uploaded. Here, a scene is called a movie and tends to be 40 minutes on average. There are also currently eight “clips.â€� These are shorter, more focused videos where there may just be oral sex or some specific act or bondage. Blended in among all of these are seven photo sets. The site has made the unusual decision to not have any means to separate the videos, clips or photos. There are simply six thumbnails per screen and a description below that outlines what the file is. I suspect that not being able to filter for just videos, for example, is a creative choice because it is obvious that the site is trying to create a flow. While there isn’t necessarily a story behind these videos and clips, they do tend to flow together. And, even if you don’t want to view the photos, they are very easily skipped over. The models who appear on the site are generally mainstream, though models who also are known for some extreme acts. Models such as Charlotte Sartre, Lydia Black and Rebel Rhyder all have scenes here. But there are also models that I don’t normally associate with BDSM who have scenes here. Those would include Rory Knox, Brooke Johnson and Claire Roos. Regardless of the model, they all give over-the-top BDSM performances. Many of the scenes feature multiple models in the same shoot. In some cases, all of the models are being subjected to BDSM and in other cases one of the subs is assisting the Dom. For the basic subscription price you get access to stream or download files at 480p, 720p, and 1080p. 4K videos are available but require a premium membership. A note if you are streaming: the scenes default to the trailer so make sure to select the full scene. An ongoing minor complaint that I have had with the two older sister-sites is that download speeds are much slower than I’m used to seeing on other sites. Unfortunately, that continues here. I suspect that since all these sites are related that they are all run off the same servers. This is simply a minor concern, however, because while the speeds are slower, I’ve never had a problem with the downloads timing out or crashing. One other minor negative for me, though it may not be an issue for everyone, is that many of the scenes are shot over several hours and some extend into the night. While the lighting can make up for some of that, my preference would be for scenes shot entirely in the daylight. DtN is certainly not a site for the faint of heart. Make no mistake, this is not a playful, vanilla BDSM site. This is a site where the BDSM is degrading and, in many cases, likely quite painful. If, however, you like what Assylum or Slave Mouth offers, then I strongly encourage you to look at DtN. Moving the scenes into a less controlled outdoor environment really adds an illicit element to them. If you do like extreme BDSM, you owe it to yourself to take a look at the trailers here. But, as with my conclusions regarding the sister-sites, DtN is class-leading but most definitely not mainstream porn. 02-03-22  09:31am Replies (2) Review 72 Dominated Girls (0) 87.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the 21 Sextreme Network - 250 scenes - Updates regularly - TBP Discount - Supports download managers - Many file choices - Photos available (singles and zips) Cons: - Can get a bit repetitive Bottom Line: This site is part of the 21 Sextreme network that includes this and 13 other sites. The network is sold as the more extreme side of the 21 Sextury network. I’m a new fan of the 21 S1Sextury / 21 Sextreme networks and a long-time fan of good BDSM so I was definitely interested to see if this site met the standards set by many others in the two networks and how it compared to some of the better BDSM sites. First a bit of a caveat: even if you are a fan of BDSM material you have to admit that it can sometimes get repetitive: girls in bondage can only have so many variations. The same can be said for a lot of other niches too, like massage and old-and-young. This site suffers from a bit of that as well, but I’m still glad I joined and still happy to have a lot of the scenes. The site currently has 250 scenes and four new ones are added each month, though not necessarily on a weekly cycle. One common element of most of the scenes is the same as with the other sites on this and the related network: the models are some of the most beautiful on the internet. For me, this increases my interest in the site since many of the models here aren’t true ‘fetish’ models. The scenes share some other traits too: they all have the models in several different bondage set-ups (almost exclusively using rope), most have some other implements used, like ball gags, clamps or wax, and in most of the scenes there is actually sex, usually while the model is in bondage. This latter point isn’t unique to this site, but it isn’t available on every BDSM site. I suspect that legal concerns mean some sites just don’t take that risk. As a guy who likes watching anal scenes, there are some here but they aren’t in the majority. One thing that is a bit of a negative for some (and others have commented on the same thing on other BDSM sites) but a probably a legal necessity is an interview at either the beginning or the end of the scene where the model ‘breaks the fourth wall’ and talks about what is about to happen or what just happened. As much as some people don’t like it I accept that given the extreme nature of a BDSM scene that is it probably necessary to keep the soccer-moms away. Personally, I find the interviews interesting and usually watch them. The site is laid out in the same way as every other site on this and the related network, which is to say that it is simple but effective. There are some improvements coming with the addition of a large number of tags for sorting the scenes. This feature is visible now but not active so I can’t comment on it. If it works as planned though, it will be a great sorting tool. Each page displays 36 large thumbnails showing the female model in the scene. Rolling your mouse over the thumbnail brings up so data on the scene, including model name and the date it was uploaded. Clicking a scene’s thumbnail opens a new page where you have options to stream and download the scene. Immediately apparent is that there is an option to download just clips, but there is an option in all cases to download one full file. A trailer is also available. Streaming is available too, but I chose downloads. There is a big difference in scenes uploaded before October 2009 and those uploaded after that. Prior to that date there were few options for downloads. In most cases those limited choices were a low-res H.264 file and a medium and high-res in WMV. Depending on when the scene was uploaded though, the high-res WMV is excellent. After October 2009 more options were made available, with three resolutions being offered in both H.264 and WMV. I found the mid-range H.264 to be the best compromise between quality and file size so I opted for that in most downloads. Those come in at 960x540 at 3000kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively they look great on a 23” monitor. (In the interests of clarity, there are approximately 170 scenes that have been uploaded since more options were offered.) Download managers work well and I experienced no time-outs. Download speeds were better than I’m used to with similar sites. Photos are also available and even though the site is really more of a video site the photos are well done and available in good resolutions. The lowest resolution I saw was 1280x853. Newer uploads offer that and 3504x2336. Zips are available. The site has no real flaws: it has some great scenes with high production values and stunning models in a simple to use layout that allows download managers. What more could a BDSM fan ask for? I think that this site offers BDSM that is on par with the best out there, like the Kink sites and Society SM. The bottom line is that if you’re a fan of good BDSM porn you won’t be disappointed by this site. The fact that it is part of a network and also comes with a TBP / PU discount makes this a great deal. 03-05-13  03:30am Replies (4) Review 73 Double View Casting (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - 93 scenes - Russian / Eastern European models - Several download options - Innovative gimmick to have two views available - In streaming you can switch between two cameras - Two separate videos available for download - Lots of anal - Part of a small network (5 sites in total) Cons: - Slow downloads - Models names are frequently mixed up - The male shooting POV needs more practice - Selecting the “remember me” button on log in doesn’t work - Hasn’t updated since February 2014 - The two views are slightly out of sync Bottom Line: I’m a fan of the casting niche and this was one of the few remaining reputable-looking sites that I hadn’t joined. I’m glad I did but if you’re a fan of this niche this is likely one of the weakest sites available in the genre. To be fair to the site, I think that part of the problem is a language barrier in many of the scenes. Not many of the models speak English well, if at all, and the casting niche relies on a lot of conversation to set the scene up and create some heat. In this case that heat isn’t developed well because of the language barrier. Of more importance though is the fact that the site puts less effort into creating the myth of a casting video. When comparing the scenes here to one of the best, Casting Couch X, for example, language is only part of the issue. A site like CCX puts a lot of effort into creating the feel of a real casting that turns into a porn tryout. DVC doesn’t put that effort in. The site’s main claim is that it offers a double view of all the scenes. There is a camera being operated by a cameraman and the male talent has a handheld camera that shoots the same scene at the same time in POV. If you use streaming the video plays within the site and there is a narrow band at the top where you have a picture-in-picture of the second camera. Hitting your space bar toggles between the two views. I don’t normally stream but I can see that this might be a good feature for those who do stream. But it might also be an answer to a question that no one ever asked. I’ll let you be the judge of that. A minor glitch is that the two views are slightly out of sync – only by a second or so but enough to notice. The bigger problem lies with the quality of the POV camerawork. I understand that it must be hard to do, but others have mastered the skill and the male talent/POV cameraman here hasn’t. The models are all Eastern European or Russian and many of them are well-known in the industry. They’re all between 18 and 22 and all are petite and attractive. There aren’t a lot of fake breasts and tattoos. (Maybe those trends aren’t as popular in EE/Russia?) One issue with all sites that use EE/Russian models is that they seem to change their names on a weekly basis. It’s apparent here because the link to the scene will have one name and then when you watch the scene there is text of the model name and that is often different from what is listed on the site. The site uses a simple layout with 15 medium-sized thumbnails per page that open into a page for the scene. There is no search function and I found that using the model search page didn’t work well but that may be due to the frequent model name changes even within the site. There are some download options though they are limited and I don’t really understand why these are offered. The scenes are available in “Windows,” “Apple” and “Android” but in some cases all of them are MP4. There is only one file resolution in each type. Older videos have WMV available, sometimes as the only option. For each scene there are two downloads available: the main camera and the POV camera. One significant flaw in downloading is that the download speeds are about one-third of what I usually get. I used a download manager and had no problems with that. Regardless of what file type is offered they all come in at 1280x720 at 5000kb/s and 29fps. They look crisp and have no pixilation issues. The site shows 93 scenes but the oldest four aren’t available for streaming. I can’t say for certain that the site is now dead, but it used to update by adding one scene per month but the last upload was in February 2014. The site is part of a small network of five sites in total. (One of them, Wanted GFs, isn’t worth joining for so avoid a membership if that’s all you want.) One thing that I listed as a good thing though others will disagree and see it as a negative is that there are a lot of anal scenes on the site. I didn’t count them, but I’d say between two-thirds and three-quarters of the scenes have anal. One minor glitch that was nevertheless annoying is that while the login page had a box to check to remember your username and password that didn’t work. Also, I couldn’t enter the other sites on the network through the links on the site. My username and password weren’t recognized. I had to do a Google search for the site and enter that way. The bottom line is that unless you absolutely have to have all the casting scenes you can get your hands on, or if you really want to collect all the scenes you can from a specific model than it’s probably best to pass on this site. It’s well done, the videos look good and they have their double-view gimmick, but other than that the site is just an average porn site that doesn’t stand out from the crowd. 05-11-14  07:55am Replies (9) Review 74 Driver XXX (0) 80.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Nubiles.net group - A-list models - Many download options - Supports download managers - Rare niche Cons: - Small site - Updates irregularly Bottom Line: I’m a big fan of car-themed porn so when I saw this site listed at TBP I signed up. I didn’t realize that it was bundled with Nubiles.net at the time I subscribed but that worked out well because this site is quite small so having access to Nubiles made the membership worth it. The main theme of the site turned out to be a little different than I had expected. I like watching road-head scenes and I expected that here but didn’t get that. While most of the scenes take place in cars they mostly occur in the back seat when the car is parked. Some of the scenes have the model outside leaning up against the car. The site is quite small and wouldn’t be a good value if it wasn’t bundled with a bigger site. There are currently only 11 videos available. To make things worse, the last update was three weeks ago. It appears that it is in an update cycle that feeds into Nubiles-Porn, the Nubiles site where they separate out all of their hardcore scenes for those of us who prefer those. While the site is currently quite small it is fair to say that the porn on offer is very high quality. The models are the biggest A-list girls working – but it’s important to note that since this site is affiliated with Nubiles that you can only expect models who fit into that category. The models are all young (18-20) and petite. As with other Nubiles sites, there are many download options. There are five MP4 choices (1920x1080, 1280x720, 960x540, 640x360, 480x270) and a lone WMV offering at 1280x720. I downloaded the 1280x720 MP4s and they look great. If you normally download the highest resolution available you may want to check the 1280x720 first because they look really good. Pictures are also available and aren't just an afterthought. The photos can be downloaded as singles or as zips. There are three resolutions available for the zips: 5600x3700, 2000x1333 and 1200x800 Apart from the small size and irregular updates there aren't any serious problems with the site. One minor quibble I have with a couple of the scenes is that they end to reveal that the girl has been tricked and used for sex. I find that adds nothing to the scene. It reminds me of early Captain Stabbin videos where the scene closed with the girl going for a swim, being tossed a life ring and then the boat sailing away. Only two of the scenes here use that closing and I hope that future scenes avoid it. I’d recommend the site but suggest that if you’re interested in a membership you consider that what you’re buying is access to the Nubiles.net network and you’ll also happen to get access to this site with a fairly rare niche. 06-08-15  01:59pm Replies (0) Review 75 Drone Hunter (0) 75.0 Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - Part of the Mofos network - Innovative and unique concept - Most scenes have an outdoor theme - TBP discount - Supports download managers Cons: - Small site - Hasn’t updated in four months - Typical Mofos / Brazzers model look - Site will log you off after an hour Bottom Line: I suppose that with the popularity of drones it was only a matter of time before someone started using them in porn. The concept is unique and it does add to the scenes but for whatever reason the concept seems to have died since the site hasn’t added a new scene since April 2015. In all of the scenes the drone footage is just edited into footage shot by a regular camera. The one possible exception to that is the one lesbian scene which may be all drone footage. In all of the scenes the drone is played up as being surreptitious video that the female model doesn’t know of. The most common scene setup is where the male talent is bringing a girl back to his place and he contacts the ‘drone hunter’ to shoot some secret video of them having sex. There is usually some fake communication between the male talent and the drone operator. A few of the scenes use the scenario where neither the male or female talent know they’re being viewed by the drone. The site is quite small with only nine videos uploaded and it looks like it will stay small because it hasn’t updated in months. Given that each scene has to be set up to allow access for the drone there is an outdoor or voyeur element to each scene. Perhaps that part of it caused some problems in filming. It seems reasonable to think that a drone hovering over a rooftop patio or looking in a hotel window might attract some unwanted attention. On the other hand, if you like outdoor or public scenes this site certainly has that. The biggest advantage to the site is the fact that it’s part of the Mofos network so you’ll have access to a lot of other sites. Also, because Mofos is one of the leading porn sites you can expect their level of quality in the site. There are tags on the scenes but with only nine scenes that really doesn’t add anything. The downside to this being part of the Mofos network is that many of the scenes feature models with the signature Mofos/Brazzers look: big breasts (often fake) and other body mods. One of the models had enough collagen injected into her lips that she looked pretty silly, and to my eyes anyway, not very sexy. The scenes can be streamed and downloaded. The streaming is available in three resolutions (up to 1080p) and there are six options for downloads: 272p, 368p, 480p, 720p and 1080p in MP4 format and a 480p in WMV. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at 8000kb/s and 29fps. With those specs you’d expect them to look good and they do, on both a 24” monitor and a 50” TV. I used Internet Download Manager and didn’t have any issues with the links timing out. If they do time-out that happens after a reasonable delay. One annoyance is that the site itself will kick you out approximately once per hour and require that you sign in again. I can’t say that I’d recommend this site unless you really have a thing for drones because it’s just too small and looks to have gone dormant already. But if you’re interested in the site and you join the network to get it then the real value is in the network itself which has over 2000 videos available. When you consider that you get 2000 scenes for the low TBP discount price of $15USD it really is a good deal. 08-10-15  11:10am Replies (0) Shown : 51-75 of 302 Page : Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13    < Previous Page - Next Page > Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.46 seconds.