Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Teen Filipina
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Mostly exclusive Filipina and Thai collection.
• Variety of scenes including solo, lesbian, hardcore with some anal.
• CCbill is the processor; no issues signing up or canceling.
• Secure site (https).
• Approximately 500+ videos available dating back to 2010
• Currently updating at a rate of about 2 or 3 videos weekly if one is to believe the dating. [As of this writing, there have been no updates for 2 weeks.] |
| Cons: |
• One of my biggest complaints is that many, if not most videos, you have little idea about the type of scene you are getting until you download it. There is no description of the videos and the title is generally meaningless. The thumbnail is generally of no help either.
• For whatever reason, streaming did not work with Google but generally OK with Safari. Streaming did now work with older videos.
• High quality photos but I did not see any way to download sets, only individual photos.
• Only 1 download option, 1280x720 for the latest videos and it goes downhill with older videos. For the most part, I found the quality adequate, albeit, not stellar. The oldest ones are low quality wmv files.
• Probably a personal thing, but I detest the predominant male actor – he’s obnoxious and is a stereotype of the ugly American, though he might be European. He has a large presence in many Filipina and Thai sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site has a vanilla layout. There are various categories including “videos.” I went straight to videos and downloaded all of them. There are no bells and whistles, like a search feature, meaningful descriptions, meaningful file names (for the most part) or any other info except a date. I have a hunch that very few, if any of the scenes, at least the recent ones, are dated honestly due to the lack of video quality. However, downloading was straightforward and fast.
That being said, as a whole, I liked the site as it fits one of my favorite niches… amateur and innocent hot, mostly young Filipinas and Thais. Despite the poorer video quality, I liked the older scenes significantly better than the more recent ones. The recent scenes don’t have the same amateurish charm and innocence as the older ones. You’ll find more tattoos, piercings and makeup in the more recent scenes, not my thing. As mentioned in the cons, another reason I liked the older scenes better is that frankly, I can’t stand the male actor that predominates in the recent scenes.
Recommended for those who like hot Filipina amateurs. Otherwise, the less than stellar video quality and lack of diversity will make the site unappealing to a wide audience. |
|
10-28-17 05:06am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Teen Thais
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• 2-day trial membership available; all membership options include access to the entire network
• Variety of payment options including Epoch, JAVbill and Segpay for credit card processing
• Streaming and downloads available. Fast download speeds.
• Good streaming quality – HD
• Most downloads available in HD with two other lesser formats available
• Photos have good resolution with 2 different download options (zip)
• Good search features – in advanced search, you can type in keywords
• There is a favorites feature so you can return to any video easily |
| Cons: |
• Last update was May 2016
• Too many scenes of women with enhanced boobs, tattoos and dyed hair
• Not all content exclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
[In my opinion, the Japan HDV network is amazing in most every respect. Not only are all 7 sites winners as far as content, but they also contain most of the small and not so small qualities that are just as important to the overall experience, i.e., video/photo quality (though that varies somewhat), searching features, organization, support, etc.
I’m prefacing all my reviews of the 7 sites with the following caveat. For all intents and purposes, 3 of the sites are virtually identical in type of content – Japan HDV, AV Idolz and JAV HQ. The entire network is similar in format and structure. After some consideration, I decided to do separate reviews instead of one overall review since 4 of the sites are vastly different in content. However, because of the similarities, some of the reviews are repetitive. It’s a great network and IMO, the best JAV network, plus you get a bonus of a very hot Thai site.]
I initially joined this site on a trial membership. I had no idea it was part of a network or that $4.95 got me full access to the entire network. Pay dirt! Unfortunately, there are only about 80 videos / photo sets available.
The site is extremely well-organized as noted above – the layout and features are ideal, i.e., search tools, layout, ease and speed of downloads, HD, etc. While there are a good many women who seem to be hardened pros, there are also many amateur and girl next-door types with natural everything. In my opinion, Thai women are among the most beautiful in the world and don’t need enhancements.
There is a fair share of anal and lesbian scenes, something not all that common in Thai porn except on the raunchiest sites. Most of the scenes feature these babes getting pounded by white guys. There’s very little pretense at a plot or storyline, something I miss. Bottom line good Thai sites are not easy to come by but Teen Thais does its share to fill the gap.
Network
Japan HDV
AV Idolz
JAV HQ
My Cute Asian
Asians Bondage
Brutal Asia
Teen Thais |
|
03-20-17 05:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
28
|
Trike Patrol
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
07-18-16 05:13pm (Update History)
Reason: I had a major gripe when I first joined. Video downloads were only in 480P. However, 2 days later they started offering high quality downloads.
|
| Pros: |
* Epoch is the biller
* Young, mostly cute Filipina models
* Minimum amount of tattoos
* Site owners / managers are very responsive to emails and concerns, a big plus.
* You're dealing with a small personalized site instead of a behemoth bureaucratic site.
* Downloads in 480p, 720p and 1080p
* With a $10 discount offer, I paid $19.95 recurring monthly. No problem cancelling |
| Cons: |
* Videos not dated
* Not much variety, though that’s hard to avoid unless there are multiple directors. |
| Bottom Line: |
I reviewed the site 2+ years ago. It was one of the first sites I reviewed and I was also inexperienced with porn sites. Now that I’m a little more savvy thanks to PU, I can shed a little more insight.
The premise - it’s about 2 or 3 Swedish (?) guys who travel the Philippines and film their sexual conquests. For the most part, they ride around in a Trike, which is something like a motorized tricycle, kinda like a motorcycle with 3 wheels and a backseat. They ride around looking for women to take back to their hotel. The women are amateurs - mostly young and pretty, though they’re bar girls or prostitutes. For the most part, most scenes seem realistic and unscripted. If this is not so, I would be surprised. Many of the women are very shy.
This is a refreshing change from most sites. Real women trying to get by. The Filipino culture is one to be admired. I visited the country twice and its people, especially the women, are its greatest asset.
The entire premise is fairly unique and one that I find very appealing. Scenes are mostly one on one hardcore, though there are some threesomes and a few anal scenes.
Last week I received an email from them announcing that downloads were back. As a result, I'm back after they went through a period of streaming only.
I would rejoin this site but it'll be a while. It doesn't seem that they update more than once every two weeks, though it's hard to tell since videos aren't dated. |
|
07-18-16 07:22am
Replies (2)
|
Review
29
|
Trike Patrol
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Women are young and mostly gorgeous
-Although most seem to be pros, many still seem like the gal next door (in the PI) - shy and amateurish. [this may be a con for some.]
-no San Fernando glitz or overproduction
-generally good quality and production |
| Cons: |
- a recurring membership is not worth it
- scenes generally follow the same pattern (only a few guys) and it gets tiresome
- just a handful of anal scenes
- group scenes, FFM, seem forced |
| Bottom Line: |
Reality filipino porn shot by Swedish guys. The premise is to go around in a trike (a filipino taxi) and pick up girls off the street... mostly. Although it seems to be entirely shot in Angeles City, known for its pickup bars and prostitution, the girls are mostly pros, and they seem to enjoy what they are doing with little acting.
There are a decent number of videos, all about 25 minutes, which I managed to download in a month. There's only 1 upload per week, so it doesn't pay to shell out roughly $30/mo. for 4 or 5 downloads. I suggested restructuring their pricing but I was told they have tried different billing models and full price each month works best for them.
Which leads me to - they are very approachable and support is excellent. Highly recommended. |
|
12-23-13 03:29am
Replies (3)
|
Review
30
|
Tuk Tuk Patrol
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
** Excellent customer service
** Epoch is the biller, canceling takes seconds
** It's a great deal with the discount - $4.95 monthly recurring at a higher price, I forget the amount. I would think twice if I had to pay full price of $29.95
** Exclusive content
** All amateur, no rock stars. I like that.
** The scene descriptions are quite lengthy like a blog entry, if you're into such things.
** Filming on locale, Thailand
** They now allow downloads. It was previously streaming only
** Users can rate scenes and post comments |
| Cons: |
** Formulaic - seemingly only 2 male actors that never seem to vary the scenes. And they're often boring! They should hire me ;) It's hardcore sex, but nothing out of the ordinary. The few anal scenes are very poorly shot and the few thressomes (ffm) are very much staged.
** So-so camera work, often jerky. Big minus.
** Not a huge amount of content - 378 videos
** Updates seem haphazard, like about every 2 weeks
** No access to other Video Dream (VD) network sites, but for $4.95, who's complaining? Just mentioning it.
** Quality on older videos not up to snuff (but excellent quality on newer stuff). They advertise HD, though I wonder. |
| Bottom Line: |
Tuk Tuk is a reality site shot in Thailand that focuses on street-pickups using tuk-tuks (instead of trikes as in Trike Patrol). However, the meetings are not always random and are pre-arranged.
Most of the girls are 18 to 25, some very beautiful and others average.
Tuk Tuk is very similar in concept and in other respects to the other VD sites that I have experienced, Asian Sex Diary and Trike Patrol. Crossover with actors, scenes that generally follow the same pattern, jerky camera work, blah blah. The three sites seem like one big site. This is okay by me since I love the concept, but I wish they would offer a package. Actually, the concept of Tuk Tuk is identical to Trike Patrol except it's the Thai version. Trike takes place in the Philippines.
Bottom line - if you like amateur Thais and reality videos featuring some many above average young women and you can overlook the drawbacks, the site is worth a month. The site is too small with updates too infrequent to justify more than a month periodically. |
|
11-26-16 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Vintage Classic Porn
(0)
59.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
• The photo sets and videos that are available are invaluable and lots of fun, especially the photos.
• €14.95 monthly with PU discount, probably recurring at the regular price, €19.95, though there’s no indication.
• Billing through vxsbill, excellent customer service (see comments).
• Videos, streaming and zipped photo sets with no limits. |
| Cons: |
• Most videos prior to the 1950s have broken links; many of the later ones have the same problem.
• Streaming is offered as an option but unavailable for the videos with broken links – when it is available, there a noticeable buffering issue.
• Streaming required me to install Silverlight, the first time I encountered this on a streaming site in a decade. And then, there’s the buffering, sigh.
• Navigability is dreadful.
• Site assigns username and password.
• The site logs you out after a relatively short period of inactivity, less than an hour. To make matters worse, you’re forced to deal with a very unfriendly captcha each time you log in.
• You can search by decade or niche (category) or open search, but you can only use one of these options. In other words, you can’t search for 1940s plus anal – one or the other.
• No updates since 2012 although their FAQ states updates daily. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a limited review. I received a refund in full after 1 day and perhaps 4 or 5 hours of browsing the site. The site is broken in many places which renders it close to useless. Kudos to VXSBill/IMC for giving me a refund after I politely asked and explained the reason was the plethora of broken video links. It is the first time ever asking for my money back.
The site contains photos and videos from before the 1920s through the 1980s. Unfortunately, the older videos (up to the 1950s) are mostly unavailable due to broken links. Many of the later videos are also unavailable. Streaming is also unavailable for the videos with broken links.
It should be obvious that on a vintage site the quality of the videos and the photos are not gonna be anywhere close to the HD we’ve come to expect. Not only was technology ancient in the Paleozoic Epoch, there is wear and tear, i.e., scratches on the photos and videos. The videos were probably shot in 8mm, 16mm or 35mm. This state of affairs is unavoidable and anyone joining a vintage site, particularly one with content up to 100 years old, should know the quality is going to be lacking. I’m only bringing it up so there are no unrealistic expectations.
The one redeeming feature of the site is the photos. There are plenty of them and an absolute thrill to look at some babe who would be a great great grandmother today.
There are 2 other sites included in membership though I only got a chance to explore them briefly. Navigating these sites is even more difficult than the main site, Vintage Classics. However, they both appeared to contain mostly 1980s content. Remember Seka, Ron Jeremy, John Holmes, etc? They’re all there and more. However, the quality of the videos could have been better even by those day’s standards.
If, and this is a big IF, the site worked and contained the content it purported to have, I would recommend it. However, I’m sure there are other sites available with the same or similar content that aren’t as broken as this site. Using the site was like having root canal. |
|
05-26-17 06:55am
Replies (2)
|
Review
32
|
Vintage Cuties
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
• Very large and comprehensive photo section dating back over 100 years.
• Includes probably some of the oldest photos and smut videos available, though it’s unlikely that they are exclusive.
• No pre-checked cross-sell.
• CCBill and Epoch are two of the processors, though I had issues with CCBill. See comments.
• Streaming for most videos is available plus unlimited downloads.
• Meaningful file names for most videos which includes year of release in the name most of the time.
• For its time, good video and photo quality. Videos remastered in digital avi or mp4 format, though only 1 DL option. The old stuff was undoubtedly shot mostly in 8mm or16mm. Photos show little wear and tear, i.e., scratches.
• Daily updates.
• Free 1-day trial with full access – however, see comments.
• Each video lists the stats, i.e., year, format, size, duration, resolution and date added.
• HTTPS. |
| Cons: |
• A huge drawback: photo content only available as individual downloads.
• Viewing option for photos is laborious and antiquated.
• Not really a con because It’s unavoidable but I’ll mention it so that there aren’t any unrealistic expectations – although digitized, the videos are low quality as are the older photos.
• No search tools.
• Poor navigation.
• Signing up was fraught with problems, see comments. However, I did get a discounted price of $15.95 recurring at $15.95 – regular price is $29.95 recurring at $29.95. |
| Bottom Line: |
Pornography has a long and rich history. One of the earliest pieces of evidence dates back 25,000 years! A 4” statue of Venus of Willendorf dating back to that period was discovered in Austria. There is further evidence of statues and explicit images throughout ancient times. A major game changer was the invention in 1440 of the Gutenberg Press. As a result, the first book of erotic engravings was published in 1524. Then came the invention of photography in 1839 which basically ushered pornography into today’s modern era. That is roughly where Vintage Cuties begins its foray into porn, a.k.a., smut, dirt, erotica, filth.
Vintage Cuties may be the only site you’ll ever need for a titillating reference of what I’ll loosely refer to as modern porn, the era following the invention of photography. The site includes a vast photo collection as well as an abundance of videos from 1850 to the 1990s. At least some of the content is member submitted. While the quality of the photos and videos reflects the standards of the time, the content on VC seems mostly free of excessive wear and tear, i.e., scratches. Of course, the quality of the content from 30+ years ago seems primitive by today’s HD standards. But alas, that is part of the charm.
There are several other sites included with membership but they warrant no attention. They are unrelated to vintage porn. While the content is mostly current (within 10 years), quality and content lack any redeeming values. For example, there’s a site “Home Made Junk,” an apt title, and consists of poor quality photos and short poor quality videos. These sites detract from the main site and I recommend not spending more than a few minutes, if that much, checking them out.
The site is painful to navigate. Hitting the back button doesn’t always take you to the last page viewed. It sometimes took 4 or so clicks to get back to the menu. This is frustrating. On a similar note and another major drawback is the lack of any search feature. However, there is an extensive menu.
The photos are the real draw, at least for me. This is an enormous section consisting of 200,000 photos (as per the site) and one which you can spend days going through. However, it is unforgivable that the files are not zipped and you cannot download the sets, only individual photos.
The oldest photos date back to 1850 and were shot using t process known as daguerreotype, a photograph taken by the earliest photographic process introduced in 1839 employing an iodine-sensitized silvered plate and mercury vapor.
As mentioned, the menu is extensive and logical. The photo section includes many subsets. They’re separated by date range (1850 - 1920, 1920 - 1940, 1940 – 1950, 1950 – 1970, 1970 – 1980 and 1980 – 1990). There are different subsets under each period. For example, under 1850 – 1920, subsets include daguerreotypes, erotica, fetish, filthy, risqué cards and world people. In case you’re wondering, the “filthy” stuff is the hardcore smut, “erotica” consists simply of nudes, “fetish” is mostly spanking and bondage, “world people” consists generally of Africans and “risqué cards” which are simply nude photos. Each period has different subsets.
Also listed in the photos section after the options for date ranges are further options, some which only serve to confuse, others which are lots of fun. The options following the date range options are:
• Amateurs –1,000 photos from circa 1980s.
• Burlesque – 1,400 photos - the title says it all, undated but I’ll guess 1960s – 1980s
• Covers & Posters – 2,000 images of what seems to be entirely magazine covers apparrently from the 1950s – 1980s
• Exotic Art – 2,000 images of erotica drawings – again, undated but seemingly spans the early 20th century thru more modern times
• Magazines – 1,350 sets (~30,000 photos) with subsections by time period from 1880 to 1990. Some sets include only photos from the magazines and others seem to include the entire magazine. Very comprehensive and fun.
• Playing Cards – 360 images of, guess what? -)
• Retro Ads – over 100 sets (~5,000 images) of ads seemingly most from the 1950s, mostly nostalgic but not erotic. Remember Schlitz beer? Beech-nut gum?
• Retro Stars – 100s of mostly pinup models which tally several thousand photos - subsections by time period from the 1920s to 1980s. Retro stars include the likes of Josephine Baker (the oldest one and from 1920), Jean Harlow, Barbara Eden (clothed), Rita Moreno (clothed), Betty Blue, Anita Ekberg, Babette Bardot, Annie Sprinkle, etc. A fun section.
Unfortunately, viewing the photos is a tedious task. There is sort of a slide show feature but it’s not automatic and it’s time consuming. In addition, navigating to and from sets often requires several mouse clicks. I’m confused why they would have such a fantastic and enormous photo section with very limited viewing and download options.
CONTINUED IN REPLIES |
|
05-29-17 06:18am
Replies (1)
|
Review
33
|
Yes-Movies
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Uncensored as in no mosaic
* Gorgeous wimmin - I'm not knowledgeable enough to know the amateurs from pros, but I'm guessing they were mostly pros
* HD video quality
* No download limit
* large collection of videos, about 1000
* About 25 Hentai videos, though that's not my thing
* Good value for money, $29.95. No problem with canceling... I'm not familiar with the credit card processor but it was not an issue. |
| Cons: |
* I found it very odd that the videos are all long, averaging about 90 minutes. They're mostly of one model in different scenes. I would have preferred downloading scenes and being able to pick and choose.
* Although there is a main menu and another one for categories, in reality, almost every video could fit into many of the categories. This is because of the length of the videos, sometimes more than 2 hours, and many scenes. Also, I found that the categories were not always accurate. I could find no anal in a number of the videos in this category.
* Some of the Japanese oddities are a negative for me but will be a plus for others... I think toys are overused and I'm not into bukkake. Virtually every video contains one or more of such scenes.
* I would have liked to see more amateurs.
* Why do "threesomes" almost always mean 2 guys and a gal for the Japanese? I rarely see it the other way around and YES is no exception. I can recall only one such scene. |
| Bottom Line: |
Frankly, I've never come across such a wealth of uncensored and gorgeous Japanese wimmin. However, my experience is limited. This is one of my all time favorite sites now despite its shortcomings. I was able to download every video in less than 3 weeks with my upgraded internet speed, so it really was a bargain. Fyi, the videos amounted to over 1TB. There was only one update of about 8 videos in the 18 or 19 days I've been a member.
I had no interest in the photos, hence they're not reviewed.
There are no bonus sites but the abundance of content here makes that more than forgivable. Besides, I've found that bonus sites are generally useless fluff. |
|
02-15-14 05:29pm
Replies (0)
|
|
