Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Beach Hunters
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
07-02-14 03:11pm (Update History)
Reason: Thought score maybe a bit too low, weighing the quantity of the material that the site has to offer.
|
| Pros: |
Content Quantity. As of July, 2014 Beach Hunters indicates to non-members of amassing well over 3,600 "full-size” video clips. Now that may sound a lot, but take in account these videos are in 3 different formats (avi, mpg, mp4, wmv) counted as separate videos.
Content Categories. Videos and photos are set in categories so that members can easily find material to their preference. Categories are as follows: sex on the beach, foreplay, nudism topless, change room, not straight.
Content Variety. Every body form imaginable, age (within legal limits of course) and sexual orientation is captured on site. Beachhunters' videographers seem to have no scruples on what they capture on the beach; skinny, curvy, wrinkly, morbidly obese, it's all here. |
| Cons: |
Photos. Photos are very poor quality screen shots.
Editing. Many clips contain 3 plus minute of no activity, where the subjects are on their backs barely moving an inch. A great deal of editing could be used in the majority of their videos for the lack of activity as well as shaky hands syndrome, however Beachhunters seem to opt in using their editing talents into chunking up their videos in order to extend their library quantity, with no consideration given to their quality. Sadly this seems to be a common practice among these type of voyeur sites.
Sound. Videographers don't seem to be aware of the concept of self-noise, meaning when they move their equipment, it gets fairly loud. Do they know where the volume switch is on their equipment?
Recycling. Currently outside from membership access, I have visited their site to see if they in they had any fresh material worth to join up again and have noticed from their latest screen shots, they are reposting material from years ago! |
| Bottom Line: |
If you're into photos and not much into videos, don't bother with this site. However despite the site's extremely poor edited content, they do have plenty of material for at least one month's membership, however due to its recycling of content, I wouldn't go further than that or ever consider going back again. |
|
07-02-14 03:02pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Beach Voy
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent high-resolution photo sets of gorgeous women.
Predominately Nude.
Mostly exclusive content. |
| Cons: |
Has not updated in years.
No Zip Files.
Not many videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is an image site. Don't bother to put any money down if you're here for the videos, because they're fairly sparse in quantity. Definitely worth at least one month's membership. Wouldn't bother for 2. |
|
06-05-14 02:16pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3
|
I Love The Beach
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Updated: |
06-05-14 02:35pm (Update History)
Reason: With a reflective comparison to other voyeur beach sites. A higher score just seemed more reasonable.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent amount of videos containing some gorgeous women.
Some decent quality in HD videos in their more recent years.
They do not recycle their content.
Great quality in pic resolution, offering true sets. |
| Cons: |
Sone of their real old videos (plus 5 years or so) are so tiny, makes one wonder, "Why bother?"
I think in their advertisements, they're really underselling in the amount of nude material available on site. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have an affinity for voyeur sites, and from my experience. These guys are the best out there. Worth the money. |
|
06-05-14 07:35am
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Voy Zone
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Update Frequency: Updates Daily
Video Resolution Quality: Fairly decent ranging from 720X576 to 1280X720.
Image Quantity: There are an incredible amount of photos on site.
Subject Matter: Some gorgeous women captured in the available content. |
| Cons: |
Image Set Quality: Images are random, not at all visually tied together in a given scene and are by average 4X6” in size, pretty small for a pay site. Also to note many of the images are low res versions from other pay sites, such as BeachVoy.
Overall Business Practice: Incredibly poor due to blatant deception in advertisement in updates and distribution/recycling of material.
Video Quality In Terms of Content: Majority of the videos are in dire need of editing, since many of them have minutes of inactivity.
Price: Way over priced considering the content given quantity and quality of material. |
| Bottom Line: |
Before even deciding on investing 30 bucks on a month with Voy-Zone.com, I noticed the “Last Updates” indicated on their non-member main page were all given (current month/year, but no exact date of entry) when hovering over them individually with the mouse. Suspicion ran over me, telling that these images/videos were not really updates at all, rather these images were the same and the dates were automatically set to change with the current month. So I waited till the next month passed and sure enough, the same images stayed on page, but their attached month auto-adjusted to the current month.
Video Count: 462 video clips (some are however repeats).
Despite this blatant deception toward prospective customers, I was still curious what content was held within their site, and thought maybe Voy-Zone’s page intro was simply a by-product a lazy web management and thought perhaps they still held some exclusive fresh content that maybe worth while, so I still forked over my 30 bones to see what’s up.
First impressions… Once joining Voy-Zone.com, and logging in, the site’s main page was completely different, filled with actual updates with complete dates of when they were posted. As to whether this material has been recycled from any previous posts, I would consider to be quite feasible, due to the fact there’s a huge gap of time where no posted material is to be found on site! Strangely enough between September 9, 2011 and February 5, 2014, there was absolutely no material to be found inside their video collection. Also to note, what little material that has been left on site posted in 2011 has been reposted in 2014! With this in mind, it’s an easy guess that periodically material is withdrawn from the site, then probably reposted later in the site in order to keep material fresh as well as keeping customers from downloading the majority of their archive in a month’s membership. Also if you’re more into high quality image sets (i.e. related pics of a particular scene), than movies of beach voyeurism, stay clear from this site, the image “sets” here are pretty much random unconnected pics, by average 4X6” in size, fairly poor in resolution given their from a pay site.
EDITING: Many of the movies are riddled with mouth breather moments, that being many of these 3 plus minute clips contain women on their backs barely fidgeting an inch, all the while they could have simply taken a photo which would’ve consumed hundreds of megabytes less than a video… It’s often a wonder at times to think if these guys ever consider the topic of conceptual editing; meaning if nothing is happening in a half minute or so through a scene, hit the pause button or at least edit it out the inactivity in the material later when the footage has been captured. And these guys definitely have plenty of experience in editing software, since much of the footage has been divided into individual clips in order to increase appearance of having more content, a common practice among voyeur sites.
QUANTITY VS QUALITY: To say that all Voy-Zone films are like the ladder would be unfair, there are some nice gems scattered through out and about 1 out of 10 films are hard drive keeper worthy, at least to my standards not sparing the smiles and womanly curves, while the rest are simply mouth breather fillers kept on site, just so that it would appear their collection is immense in size: mission accomplished. As of June 04, 2014, to my count there were 462 video clips, including some repeated material peppered within the sets.
De ‘Rena, who has distributed content on other sites, actually captures the best material on site, but still at times have moments of stagnant mouth breather scenes, also having tendencies of attention deficit disorder (ADD) moments with the camera shifting away from main subject at hand toward random uninteresting views, then shifting back toward main subject; this probably is due to the lack of activity with subjects not being in motion, but for the viewer (at least to me) these odd shifts get quite annoying, and the answer again to resolve these mouth breather moments and odd off-base subject shift, is that good ol’ fashion pause button, patience, and/or perhaps the use of editing software as well. Also repeated posts of the same material are not uncommon to find.
VOLUME: Also another tip, lowering the volume is quite an effective measure in reducing self-noise which is another annoyance entirely on its own.
RATING SYSTEM: Each page does provide users a means to rate the material, however there is no way to see the accumulation of others' ratings. The accumulation of these ratings apparently determine the “Top 7 Video Sets” of the site, but unfortunately there’s no optional page viewing system given to see material rated from best to worst, which would be an ideal feature as well.
In short, this is a pass due to their price is a bit steep considering the limited quantity of quality movies on site. |
|
06-05-14 07:13am
Replies (1)
|
Review
5
|
The Sandfly
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Has a few decent photo sets of original content. |
| Cons: |
Majority of the site’s content is ripped from other sites (the low res free sample content versions), such as beachhunters, beachvoy, joypicz as well as others for sure.
In terms of site format, it’s pretty horrible. It doesn’t have optional zip files for pics, nor does it even provide a forward/backward buttons to navigate within its pages!
Regarding its dismal limited in quantity of original content, pic and vid quality ranges from decent to awfully tiny. Lastly videos are only available to stream on site… WTF!!!
Also original content videos is peppered with large, cheesy unnecessary captions and comments, which is a superb reflection of the overall quality and character of the website. |
| Bottom Line: |
It would appear the majority of the site's content consists of random low res pics and vids that were farmed from other sites (legitimately? who's to say). In short, stay clear from this site; it’s simply not worth the money. |
|
04-26-14 07:36pm
Replies (7)
|
|
