Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Rating
26
|
MetArt
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-02-08 03:48pm
|
Rating
27
|
MetArt Network
(0)
75.0
|
No Review.
|
11-22-13 04:08pm
|
Rating
28
|
My 18 Teens
(0)
82.0
|
No Review.
|
02-18-11 09:08pm
|
Rating
29
|
My Dirty Hobby
(0)
59.0
|
No Review.
|
01-17-20 03:28pm
|
Rating
30
|
Natasha Shy
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
04-08-12 09:22am
|
Rating
31
|
Nebraska Coeds
(0)
70.0
|
No Review.
|
04-12-14 06:58am
|
Rating
32
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
76.0
|
No Review.
|
05-27-17 02:05pm
|
Review
33
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Big catalogue of models (763 as of May 15th 2010)
+ Site navigation and design is way above average
+ Different choices of video D/L options
+ Mostly petite and small-breasted girls
+ Fast downloads, no limits on d/l
+ Pretty much define the Teen Paysite
+ See the hardcore content as a bonus (it's just a few girls anyway) |
| Cons: |
- There's still some OLD licensed material which they would get rid off
- The search function needs some tuning
- No technical detail of the videos on a models page, you get the choice of downloading the video in either 5 or 6 parts in .mpg or full video in 4 different formats. Problem is that the download links doesn't state the resolution or quality of the video, only the extension and size (and two of them is .mp4 with no distinction between them other than the size)
- Newly uploaded videos have that info, which I take as a minus
- The videographer(s) seems a bit afraid to get up close with the models
- No upgrading of older videos
- Bonus sites suck goat |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, third time member of the site and I was actually quite impressed at first.
Lots of new models and it looked promising. Had a night of downloading and came to the conclusion that it was more exciting to download than to watch.
I mean, I might be a bit cynic here, but it's the same scene over and over again. Even if it's a beauty it get boring because you know excatly how it's going to be.
With that said, Nubiles is still a good site. I downloaded some 80 GB (which of I'll probably delete half of it), but it's still worth the money.
There are some memorable girls in there. |
|
05-14-10 03:56pm
Replies (6)
|
Review
34
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of models
- Good mix of models
- A lot of pretty girls
- Nice site design and navigation
- Offers different video download options
- Offers zipped phosets
- Good video quality of newer models |
| Cons: |
- Video quality on average is just ok
- Video quality on older videos are very bad
- Most models only strip
- The contents are too soft
- It would be nice to see some toy action |
| Bottom Line: |
A very good site indeed, which offers very beautiful girls but which will leave you with a sense of unacomplishment. |
|
02-09-08 05:39pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
35
|
Pee Pee Babes
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great video options; either scene by scene download or full video download.
- Videos are available in HD (.wmv - 3122/kbs / 1280x720) and in slightly lower quality .mp4's
- Decent mix of well-known EU actresses & up-rising starlets and some no-names
- Access to a 30+ sites from the same network
- Good value for your money ($29.95) |
| Cons: |
- Unfortunately, there's not a lot of pee on this site. It's the usual solo/lesbian masturbating and dildoing and right at the end of the video one of the girl pee. It's not exciting, it's just predictable and boring.
- Would be nice to have a main site for the network, where you could browse through all featured models and their respective scenes instead of jumping through 30 different sites
- Too much focus on those "soon out of commission" Hungarian babes; Eva Angel, Sandra Shine, Sophie Moone, (the old ALS scratch off) and what have you.
- Slow download speed.
- Large file sizes. Well that's not that surprising considering the video options. The HD videos are ca 400-500 MB and mp4 files ca 120-300 MB. So you'll need a big HD if you join this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Peepeebabes.com is somewhat of an anticlimax. The "peepee" in "babes" is more or less 5/95%.
So if you're looking for your favourite eastern European porn star to pee for you (like I admittedly did when I joined this site) you won't be overwhelmed, on contrary you'll probably be disappointed.
However, the network of sites around it has a couple of good videos too. There's also consistency, most of the models are featured on most of the (more popular) sites.
I've been through a couple of network sites before, and though this is not one pof the best it's worth taking a dive into if you have some spare money and some spare HD space. |
|
12-23-08 02:30pm
Replies (1)
|
Rating
36
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
72.0
|
No Review.
|
02-18-11 09:05pm
|
Review
37
|
Piss Bank
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- A site dedicated to pissing/watersports
- Works like any other pay site; you pay a monthly fee and download all you want
- Excellent video options ranging from Full HD (1920x1280) to 640x480, in different formats (old vid's have been upgraded as well)
- No token-system and no pushing you to buy DVD's
- The Spanish trio is very sexy, and they carry this site
- Think of ALS Scan but with pissing as the main theme
- Natural and fun videos, the girls seems to enjoy it
- Behind the scenes videos |
| Cons: |
- Limited content (but growing)
- Older videos are in poor quality, as is the models
- Site design is confusing at first and old-school, but when you get used to it, it works great. (like ALS, again)
- The three Spanish girls is really the only good content on the site |
| Bottom Line: |
I was really exctatic when I found this site.
Finally some quality videos in the fetish that I like so much.
This site does deliver, but it is pretty much the three Spanish babes that does it.
However I'm glad that I joined and it was money well spent, especially on a site like this.
Highly recommended! |
|
08-20-10 06:40pm
Replies (3)
|
Rating
38
|
Policeman
(0)
50.0
|
No Review.
|
04-08-12 09:20am
|
Rating
39
|
Real Squirt
(0)
72.0
|
No Review.
|
05-26-08 06:32pm
|
Review
40
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ No guys
+ Beautiful girls
+ Good video options, you're not forced to download HD (1280 x 720) there's always an option for 640 x 480 in Great Quality (which I and my harddrive prefer)
+ logical navigation
+ Finally a good website, it remembers where you left off on the model index, and pick you up where you finished last night (cookies, I know, in this case it's good cookies!) |
| Cons: |
- some sets are to generic, no sense of lust, although some sets has it
- blondes on blondes & brunettes on brunettes, please seperate
- some of the models look the same, it's hard to get a feel of their personality
- a fair deal of "licensed" material from the 90's
- picture sets only from most of the licensed old sets (more of a novelty value) |
| Bottom Line: |
I scoured PU & TBP for a site I havn't joined before and that has received a rating over 80%, but to my dismay I winded up with, Sapphic Erotica, a site I were a member of back in 2004, and had some mixed emotions about. So what had happened in those years of abscence?
Well, quite a lot, actually. The website is amongst the better porn sites out there, and a big improvement since last time.
The site is structured down to your basic 'search my model name' or by 'model type', be it shaved, hairy, small or big boobs, they're all there.
Unfortunately the search engine don't give the results you want, so it's better to go with the 'model by name' method, which is where you find the strenght and weakness' of this site.
Theres' an abundance of beautiful girs on this site, so it's wellworth joining, problem is most of them look the same, and the ones who don't are just some washover photos from the 90's, some of them incredible hot though, but still...
It is still a great website, and the content overall maintains a high level, although a bit generic, but all the same recommendable. |
|
06-03-09 09:13pm
Replies (2)
|
Rating
41
|
Skinny Super Girl
(0)
75.0
|
No Review.
|
04-08-12 09:19am
|
Rating
42
|
Team Skeet
(0)
78.0
|
No Review.
|
11-22-14 12:45am
|
Rating
43
|
Teen Flood
(0)
86.0
|
No Review.
|
05-04-16 08:16pm
|
Review
44
|
VideoBox
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A lot of great content (it will eat up yourd hard drive in an hour)
- Clear navigation
- Fast and easy to use
- Continous updates
- Several download options
- The drag & drop scene selection download system
- Enough content to keep you occupied for months (or an hour depending on your...speed) |
| Cons: |
- Mostly mainstream movies
- Not a lot of European movies
- Only two peeing movies (that iunfortunately sucks)
- I wish there were more quality fetish videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
Videobox is the only site that I've never regret I've joined. Although lacking some quality fetish content the site has everything else. Well worth the money! |
|
02-02-08 02:54pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
45
|
Vika Nymph
(0)
80.0
|
No Review.
|
04-08-12 09:19am
|
Rating
46
|
We Live Together
(0)
65.0
|
No Review.
|
04-09-08 06:21pm
|
Rating
47
|
WTF Pass
(0)
79.0
|
No Review.
|
01-16-15 05:11pm
|
Review
48
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Very good video quality overall
+ Excellent download speeds
+ Girls from east Europe/Russia
+ No pornstars
+ Some exclusive content
+ Somewhat easy navigation on the website
+ updating older videos to new standards |
| Cons: |
- The site is heavily based on Flash
- Viewing a single photo in a photoset is inpossible, you have to select which photo you want to see (out of up to 100 pics in a set) and then get another annoying flash strip with thumbnails, and as you select the pic you want to see the thumbnailstrip is covering the end of the photo.
- The solo videos, although include very beautiful girls, are slow and boring.
- Uneaven content - a lot of the girls on the site are licensed photosets from early '00.
- Ivana, Masha & and other Russian newcomers dominate the site) |
| Bottom Line: |
Youngporn.net is a completely new place nowadays. I remember some years ago, when this was something else...a dump of old scanned photos that looked like they came from a 1970's porn magazine.
Good riddance, the Russians came to fix it...or?
Well, they managed to cook up a pretty nice site, which is definitely worth a one month subscription, considering the amount of content that's inside. |
|
11-04-09 04:01pm
Replies (0)
|
|
