Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
Fucking Machines
(0)
88.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Video quality is outstanding
Large selection of videos and photos going back several years
Girls are very attractive, friendly, intelligent, and well adjusted.
Interview of the girls before using the machines allows viewer to get to know the each girl and how they feel about their experience. In virtually all cases, the girls are eager to get started and seem very happy afterwards.
Membership cost is very reasonable
Trial memberships with full access are available making this an even greater bargain.
Regular updates |
Cons: |
The format of a girl getting pleased by an electronic dildo can get boring after a while. There are over a dozen other sites on the Kink network that are more interesting.
Photo quality is not emphasized on this site.
No extra sites included in membership
Download files are extremely large. You will need a fast connection to avoid waiting. |
Bottom Line: |
If I had to name the top five networks on the internet right now, Kink would definitely be included on the list. It features an amazing assortment of high quality bondage sites, featuring top notch production quality, and gorgeous extremely positive and motivated amateurs. Fucking Machines is one the sites included in the Kink network. Unfortunately, when you subscribe to one you do not get access to the others. However, this should not deter you from joining the site. The quality here is unsurpassed by virtually any other porn site of any other kind on the net. The only downside to this particular site is that watching video after video of a girl getting plugged by an electronic machine can get boring after a while. |
|
06-05-12 01:27am
Replies (1)
|
Review
2
|
Yanks.com
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
One of the best collections of authentic looking amateurs on the net.
Most girls are extremely attractive, intelligent, articulate, and very likable.
Huge selection of videos. Most have both interviews and individual masturbation scenes.
Excellent value
Site features written biographies of each model, similar to Abby Winters.
Site is very active and updated regularly |
Cons: |
Video quality could use some improvement although it is totally acceptable. As with most sights that have been around for a long time, the quality improves as you go along. |
Bottom Line: |
This site is a hidden gem. I would rank it up there as one of the top amateurs sites on the net today. Here you have a very large collection of authentic looking college intellectual bohemian co-ed types primarily from the Northwest usually performing their first porn shot. Believe me, these are not the type of girls you expect to be doing a porn! In any case, The girls are usually very positive about the experience and it shows. The typical format is to open with an interview of the model in street clothes with no makeup, conducted by a very cool laid back female who really knows how to relax the girls and get them to open up about themselves. This serves as a warmup to one or more masturbation scenes. If ever there was a site that fit the term "Organic porn" this would be it. Very highly recommended!!!! |
|
06-04-12 05:29pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
3
|
Simon Scans
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Huge collection of photos going back over a decade.
Most of the girls are very attractive and can not be found on other websites.
For fans of cute girl next door british amateurs, Simon's earlier work is unmatched. |
Cons: |
In the last several years, the type of girls found on the site has shifted radically. Less cute british amateurs, more Eastern European, or Spanish babe types in glamour photos.
Many of the photos are oversaturated (Too much red). |
Bottom Line: |
Several years ago Simons Scans was one of my two favorite amateur sites, alongside Abby Winters. Simon used to feature numerous never before seen cute british amateurs photographed beautifully. How the times have changed. Now most of the girls are from other countries and the style of photography is less amateur and more glamour. This may or may not be a positive depending on your tastes. A few years back I posed a question to Simon as to the reason for the declining numbers of british girls on his site and he replied they are getting harder to get. My hunch is they were more expensive and he decided to go where labor is cheaper. Here is my bottom line advice. If you are a fan of cute looking british amateur photos, and have never subscribed to Simons Scans, I would highly recommend the site for the older collection which is very substantial. On the other hand, if you are a former member looking to see some new content of british amateurs, I would not recommend you do so. Even if you have been away for 2-3 years. It's not worth it! For fans of babe type girls in glamour photos, you should find enough content 4-5 years to justify the subscription price. |
|
06-03-12 09:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
4
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Updated: |
08-27-10 04:40am (Update History)
Reason: Needed to lower rating due to tentative recommendation.
|
Pros: |
Earliest videos look authentic
Excellent orgy action
Most girls very attractive
HD streaming
Extra long videos (1hr approx) |
Cons: |
No downloads - streaming only
Only 29 videos thus far
Cost - content does not justify cost for a stand alone site. Needs to be part of the RK network.
Latest videos look staged and unauthentic
Majority of female performers in latest videos do not appear to be true amateur dorm students. |
Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes for this site after viewing the first few episodes starting at the beginning. The guys and girls in the first video looked like dorm students in a real dorm filming spontaneous action leading up to sex. However, as I moved into the newer material, the girls started looking less like students and more like porn actresses, and the action started to look more like a scripted porno. I do recommended the site because there are a good number of never before seen amateurs in some hot orgy action, however they need should focus on attaining true authenticity by staying away from using professionals. |
|
08-26-10 11:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
5
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Girls look like True amateurs
Decent quality photos (1600X1200) have a very stark realistic look to them.
Biography info on how the photographer succeeded in picking up the model
Reasonable price - $24.95 |
Cons: |
No zip downloads of photos
Only a handful of videos
Quality of videos is mediocre
Model poses are repetitive
Too many sets of the same model |
Bottom Line: |
I liked this site despite its shortcomings for several reasons. First, I have never seen any of the girls, except for one, on any other website. The girls appear to be right off the street, most without makeup, and some appearing to need a shower. The photography appears to be done in a home and usually starts off on a couch with subsequent sets taking place on a bed. The overall look of the photos is of a snapshot you might take at home with a flash. The flesh color of the photos, unlike other sites and this is important, does not look overly warm or oversaturated. Skin color looks close to natural which lends to the gritty amateur look. The poses of the models tend to emphasize the butt and feet. The only problem is there are too many shots of the same pose throughout several or more sets for each model. It just gets repetitive! The girls themselves are not exceptionally attractive, but neither are they unattractive. I would say average to above average. I counted about 165+sets for the website in total and several videos. For many of the girls, there is a brief biography describing how the photographer met the model and convinced them to pose. The site is updated on a regular basis, but new model debuts are infrequent. Most of the new sets are just additional ones of current models. |
|
07-07-09 02:29am
Replies (0)
|
Review
6
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Outstanding quality and quantity of cute girls who appear to be enjoying themselves.
Excellent HD quality WMV videos, format recognized by Playstation 3.
Navigation is well thought out.
When you consider the equal quality extra sites thrown in, this is an excellent value.
Regular updates. |
Cons: |
A small number of the videos are repeated among the bonus sites.
No Mov format |
Bottom Line: |
If I had to put this review into one phrase I would say, the Russians are cumming and yes they are. Prior to a year ago I was really down on Russian produced sites which I am assuming this site, and the extra sites are. To be specific, they seemed a big drab to me. The girls never seemed to smile, the clothing looked a bit drab, and the poses looked forced. Not anymore. There appears to be a new wave of Russian porn that is just taking hold in this country. The sites now feature some of the cutest girls I have seen on any site. Now most sites have some blue chippers, but this one and most of the included bonus sites include an extraordinarily high percentage of them. I get the impression they must have mass auditions with hundreds of applicants providing the luxury of selecting only the very very best and boy does it show. WOW!
Not only that, but the girls all seem to be having a lot of fun performing and posing and this really makes a big difference. The sets too are very bright and cheery adding to the positive atmosphere. That amateur nervous energy you very rarely see anymore is very apparent on many of the videos. Technically, the videos are very high quality. Although Teen Sex Mania is not currently advertised as HD, it is close, and many of the bonus sites already area. The photos are very high quality also. Not the state of the art best, but close enough. Navigation is another strong point. When you click to view a video set and press the back key it does not automatically go back to the top of the page forcing you to scroll down to the where you were at. It remembers where you were which makes navigation that much easier. Also, when I try and play videos from other sites on my play station, I often get an error message stating the format is unrecognized. Not here. All the movies downloaded on this site and all the bonus sites are recognized by the PS3. In summary, I am very impressed with the latest product from Russia. This site exceeds anything produced over here. It appears there is a golden age of porn emerging over there and you would be wise to check it out. |
|
07-01-09 04:03pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
7
|
Cezar Capone
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Some of the amateurs are real gems.
Streaming quality is exceptional (Adobe HD)
Cost is reasonable ($18 per month)
Growing site with regular updates |
Cons: |
Limited content for now (Currently approximately 150 full scenes)
Movie downloads limited to two per day!!!
Photos are too small
Quality of photos is fair at best
Boorish behavior of male participants towards girls might offend some.
Unoriginal website layout - A clone of Bang Brothers
Unoriginal style of videos - Again a clone of Bang Brothers. |
Bottom Line: |
Very similar to the bang brothers, but with nicer looking girls. However, there is one major flaw in that you are only allowed to download two videos per day. The exceptional streaming quality partially makes up for this, but it still is a serious shortfall. |
|
03-12-09 09:53am
Replies (1)
|
Review
8
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
68.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
One of the girls (Chayden) is decent looking (At least in her earlier videos).
latest web videos are in high definition |
Cons: |
Girls "DO NOT" look like girl next door amateurs. They look like bored looking professional strippers.
Only several girls in total for the entire website.
Poor value for the money |
Bottom Line: |
I was quite disappointed with this website. The girls are not, as other reviewers have mentioned, "girl next door types". I would say they look more like burned out strippers. There was one good looking chick featured in early videos (Chayden). She looked about as close to a girl next door as any girl on the site. However as the videos progressed, she started looking more like a more like a bored gum chewing professional stripper. Another thing I was disappointed in was the lack of variety in girls. There are only several girls in total. While some of the scenes are hot, it would be nice to have more variety for the money you pay. There are many other sites out there with tons more girls offered at nearly the same price.
In summary, every once in a while I hit a clinker and this was one. Don't waste your money. There is much better out there. |
|
07-22-08 01:34am
Replies (5)
|
Review
9
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
92.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
One of the few megasites on the internet out there with "true" girl next door types.
Massive collection - over 3,600 folios to date.
Many many many cute girls.
Regular daily updates since 2003.
Includes detailed personal information submitted by the model herself.
3 month membership including "extras" on $45. A real bargain!!! |
Cons: |
Non professional photography includes numerous odd angles and soft looking pictures.
There are few web videos |
Bottom Line: |
I am surprised there is only one review of this incredible site thus far. It features a massive collection of girl next door types, mainly from Australia, and yes, some featured on the venerable Abby Winter site. Here is how it works: The girls express an interest in submitting a portfolio of themselves and the website sends the girl a camera to photograph themself. The pictures are digital snapshots, of generally high quality. The girls themselves all appears to be amateurs doing this as a form of self expression. The website also features extensive personal information submitted by the model including her reason for posing. I would say most of them look like the kind of girls you would see at a local club.
There are only a handful of websites which feature a huge quantity of genuine girl next door types. Abby Winters is the most famous, but this one has the same quality of girls, and more quantity to boot. The photographic quality and navigation is not up to Abby Winters standards, but I still recommend this site highly. All in all, this site is a tremendous value at $45 for 3 months. You can opt for a $29 membership, but does not include additional sets submitted by the girls. Trust me, you want to spend the extra $16 over 3 months to see the additional sets. It's worth it!!!!!!!!!! |
|
07-21-08 02:36pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
10
|
My Precious Virgins
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Large selection (Approx 300-350 sets) of cute fresh faced (mostly European - If you believe the biographical data) teen amateurs
Updated weekly
Very sexy poses |
Cons: |
Site is mostly softcore tease
No Videos available
Photographic quality is slightly below average.
The information regarding country of origin for each model seems phony. Girls listed from Korea, China, Mexico, etc.. look European to me. |
Bottom Line: |
This site is a bit hard to classify. You might call it an amateur teen photo site, mostly softcore tease, with enough lingerie and feet shots to fall under the fetish banner. The site is updated weekly and there are currently over 300 sets available. I would like to see better quality photography, high definition web videos of the girls, and more credible biography information. However, I would still consider a subscription well worth the money, just as is.
Follow-Up:
I noticed this site now features hard core HDV videos. It looks like they started adding this feature in January of 2008, so the selection is still limited. |
|
12-02-07 03:46am
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates |
Cons: |
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available |
Bottom Line: |
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage. |
|
11-26-07 04:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
12
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
89.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Excellent selection of authentic looking college girls - All never before seen.
Videos are extra long
Viewer offered choice of camera angle. POV or off to the side (One file for each angle)
Videos can be streamed or downloaded by individual scene or in total. |
Cons: |
Video quality is only average by todays standards
No photos
Style and format of videos is copied from Exploitedteens.com which may bother some individuals |
Bottom Line: |
I highly recommend this site to anyone looking for fresh faced amateur college girls. I counted 45 with no familiar faces. They all look and sound like they just stepped off of campus. Supposedly the girls are all from Arizona State. Anyway, I really need to mention something strange about this site. It seems the style and format is almost exactly like that of Exploitedteens which is one of my favorite sites. The only thing different is the guy behind the camera and the girls. The script is almost word for word
from Exploitedteens which by the way is very unique. I'm thinking either "Mike" from Exploitedteens is franchising his schtick or this is a blantant ripoff of another site. I don't have the answer, but I can say this is a great site and well worth the price of admission. |
|
10-09-07 11:30am
Replies (0)
|
Review
13
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
72.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Decent start for an amateur porn producer
Girls are decent looking |
Cons: |
Expensive - $34.95
limited selection of girls - 15 as of now
Only average quality video
Most girls do not look or act like amateurs. |
Bottom Line: |
Here is the premise: A pudgy farm boy from Texas (think Hoss Cartright's little brother) decides to film his dates without their knowledge. He lures the girls back to his apartment and then proceeds with a lengthy seduction ending most times in sex. There are two big problems I see with this site. First, many of the girls do not look or act like dates. In fact, many are familiar faces seen on other websites, so I am assuming everything is staged. The other big problem is the price. You pay $34.95 for only 15 girls. Here is how I got snookered. I joined a much better website "Exploited College Teens" and there was fineprint at the bottom of the signup screen which asked if I wanted to join Dirty Jason for $34.95. I thought it meant $34.95 for both sites, but it was actually $34.95 extra. In any case, the site is worth a look if you can get it for $3.95 on a trial basis. Otherwise, I advise you to pass this one up until the selection increases and the price declines. |
|
10-08-07 02:22pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
14
|
Mouth Target
(0)
78.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Cute girl next door types. Some seen before on "Exploited Teens" partner site.
Regular updates (At least there was when I joined) |
Cons: |
Only average video quality
Newer site with limited selection of videos at this time.
No way to view all past updates which is key to determining if you want to join or rejoin. |
Bottom Line: |
If you like "Exploited Teens", this site gives you more of some of the same girls in a different setting and a different guy behind the camera. The real achilles heel of this site right now is that it does not offer a way to view past updates. Before rejoining I would want to see a list of the updates which have occurred since I last was a member. |
|
09-12-07 02:15am
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
ATK Premium
(0)
81.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Good selection of models (Mostly European) many seen before on ATK's other sites
Written Biographies for each model with hobbies, likes, dislikes etc..
Offers MOV and WMV format videos |
Cons: |
Photo quality and size does not justify "Premium" label.
Video quality is only average by todays standards.
Should offer HDV to justify premium label.
Many of the models are not attractive enough to be included on a supposed "Premium" ATK site.
Too little depth provided for each model. |
Bottom Line: |
When I first subscribed to ATK premium a few years back, I was impressed at the concept. Take ATK's best models (Josie, Karen, Kimber etc..) were the first examples), and feature them on a website which allows the subscriber to get to know each of them much more in depth. Similar to what FTV girls is doing now. In addition, the photography and video quality was a cut above that found on the standard ATK sites. Coming back to revisit this site after a few years is a shock. There are now many more girls, but it clearly a case of increased quantity and decreased quality. The majority of girls do not belong on so called "Premium" site. Photo quality is no better then ATK's other sites (1536 X 1024) and video quality for the latest movie update was only 640 X 480 for both WMV and MOV formats. By todays standards, you need to offer HDV video and large format photos for a regular site just to keep up with the competition. Another gripe I have is that background info for most models now includes just a written biography and thats it. In summary, I think this site needs a total rework in all areas just to justify being called "Premium". Very disappointing!!! |
|
07-02-07 04:16am
Replies (4)
|
Review
16
|
Ron Harris
(0)
72.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Professional skill of photographer
Worth a look for fans of the Babe look and glamour photography.
Monthly membership fee is more reasonable then other sites. |
Cons: |
Sets are way too small.
The voice of the photographer is quite annoying in the videos. He sounds like a dirty old man.
Most of the girls are not new faces. |
Bottom Line: |
I have to say I was quite disappointed in this website. For all the hype, there is just not that much beef. First of all, the sets are way too small. You get some high definition videos of the girls, but I was not impressed with those either. The guy filming the action, I'm assuming it was Ron Harris, sounded pretty course and obnoxious in the way he conversed with the girls during each shoot. In addition, the girls just look a little too made up for my taste. However, if you are a fan of the Babe look, maybe this site might interest you. The only reason I joined was because of the reasonable $20 fee. However, if given a chance to do it over, I would not join again. |
|
06-28-07 06:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
17
|
ATK Archives
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Excellent photography (Newer sets), Older sets reflect technology available at the time.
Huge selection of girls
Excellent value for the money.
Very good navigation
Sets featured here are no longer available on ATK's main websites. |
Cons: |
Quality of web videos looks increasingly outdated by todays standards. |
Bottom Line: |
Just a few years ago ATK Galleria and ATK Hairy were two of the best amateur sites out there. These sites featured a huge selection of mostly American girl next door amateurs. However, in recent years the use of European babe types has increased dramatically. Finding a real amateur American girl on these sites is now more of an exception then a rule. Anyway, if you have never seen the old ATK websites, the ATK archives is a treasure trove of the type of material that made ATK famous. Even if you previously visited the older ATK sites, you might want to revisit the Archives to see some of your old favorites.
I will admit, some of the older material from the late 90's does look a bit primitive compared to today's technology, but they are still worth viewing and you can see the improvement in quality as you move forward through the years. I highly recommend this site. |
|
06-28-07 05:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
18
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
87.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Great selection of cute amateurs. Some not seen on other sites.
Excellent video quality - Some HDV
Very fast download times for videos
Excellent navigation tools
Photos are very good quality and include a slide show function.
Good value |
Cons: |
Extensive use of European girls to enhance selection. Videos of these girls are lesser in quality then the girls of the USA.
The large format selection feature for photos is somewhat cumbersome to use. |
Bottom Line: |
This is a very nice find. Many of the girls you have seen elsewhere, but here you can see them in some great looking videos. One of the guys who shoots the videos also does work for Karups Hometown. However his videos look better here. I found the AVI files looked the best for non HDV. I I was also impressed by the navigation tools. You can tell there was a lot of work put into this component. the photos are very good quality, but the videos are the star attraction for this website. |
|
06-15-07 04:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
19
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
85.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Large collection of cute British amateurs
Absolutely huge photo sets
Emphasis on Lingerie
Photos are sharp and color balance is very natural looking. |
Cons: |
Photos are medium size only
Videos quality needs improvement
Videos detract from the wholesome girl next door impression given by the photo shoots.
Extra bonus websites such as one eyed jack and UK Amateurs are mediocre quality. |
Bottom Line: |
This is one of the two best British Amateur websites out there. Simonscans being the other. In some ways Suburban Amateurs exceeds Simonscans because the girls here just look more like amateurs and the color balance of the photography is much more natural. Simonscans tends to look overly warm and red and his models look more professional looking. One thing I really love about Suburban Amateurs is the emphasis on lingerie modeling. Each of the girls seems to have at least one lingerie set where they start fully clothed and then peel off the layers in a sexy fashion. The sets themselves are larger then anything I have ever seen. The real achilles heel for this site for me was the videos. You really want the video to serve as a teaser or enhancement of the amateur quality of the photoshoot. However in this case the girls are asked to act and talk like low class sluts which completely detroys the impression formed by the photoshoots. I still recommend this site highly, but I strongly recommend you avoid the videos. |
|
06-09-07 05:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
20
|
Girls Out West
(0)
75.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Consider this site a poor relative of Abby Winters. Some of the great looking girls found on Abby Winters are also featured here. The site features both photos and movies which are updated on a regular basis.
Cost for a month membership is reasonable a reasonable $20. |
Cons: |
Photo quality is mediocre by todays standards
Video quality is mediocre by todays standards
Many of the girls are unattractive. |
Bottom Line: |
If you like Abby Winters, this site might be worth checking out to see more of the same girls in a different setting. However, be warned many of the girls are not as attractive as those found on Abby Winters. In addition, you might be disappointed at the mediocre photo and video quality. However, for $20 I think it is worth a shot because there are some real gems here.
Follow-Up:
I rejoined the site recently and was disappointed to find no real improvements to note. Video is still noticeably inferior by todays standards and most of the girls would still never make it on Abby Winters. One of the more popular recurring models from Abby (Paula) appears in some videos packing on quite a bit of extra baggage in the rear and thighs. I'm leaning towards giving this site a thumbs down recommendation for membership. |
|
05-13-07 05:36am
Replies (0)
|
Review
21
|
Donny's Girls
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Photography by the sites founder (Donavan Philips) is top notch. Very sharp photos, with natural skin colors. Girls for the most part were attractive girl next door types. Detailed biographies of the models added depth and character to the photos. |
Cons: |
The sites founder appears to have left the porn business. Site is still updated regularly, but much of the "newer" material is just technically enhanced older stuff. The actual new material is not up to the standards set by the sites founder. To be specific, the girls are not as attractive and lack the girl next door quality which made the site a success in the beginning. |
Bottom Line: |
A mixed bag. Recommended for an initial subscription to view the top notch photography and fresh faced amateurs featured by the sites founder. Not recommended for subsequent subscription due to the
lower quality of the sites new operators. |
|
04-30-07 04:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
22
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
94.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Tons of down home American girl next door types (Karups uses it's sister site for showcasing the Eastern European talent). Very high quality of photos. Outstanding color accuracy (Skin colors are true to life and natural).
Video interviews to allow you to get to know the model. The video quality is very much improved from a few years ago and is excellent by todays standards. Updates virtually every day. Dating of updates allows you to easily pick up where you left off when resubscribing. |
Cons: |
None |
Bottom Line: |
One of the top Amateur sites on the net for down home American girl next door types. Photos and Videos are top notch! |
|
04-30-07 12:25am
Replies (0)
|
Review
23
|
Sapphic Erotica
(0)
80.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
High Quality of of videos (Recent only)
Almost exclusive use of European Model types (If that is what you prefer)
Tons of content with regular updates
Tons of Hot Lesbian Content. Many featuring three or more girls. |
Cons: |
If you don't like Eastern European model types, look elsewhere. This site is not for you. I personally found the site to be pretty boring. |
Bottom Line: |
Strictly for fans of Eastern European model types.
In my opinion this site is over rated by many of the
professional reviewers. |
|
04-29-07 02:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
24
|
FTV Girls
(0)
90.0
|
Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
Pros: |
Videos let you get to know the girls by following them around town doing normal activities and talking about themselves.
Video quality has improved considerably over the last year.
Large selection of girls, many never before seen.
Lots of graphic closeups and extended masturbation scenes. |
Cons: |
Some of the girls have appeared on other sites.
Photo shoots are uninspiring.
Could use more girl girl scenes.
Navigation is somewhat cumbersome |
Bottom Line: |
Well worth the price of admission. If you have not been to the site in a while, it is worth revisiting for the improved video quality. This really makes a huge difference. |
|
04-21-07 01:39am
Replies (0)
|
Review
25
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
84.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Lots of horny girl next door types. Many not seen elsewhere.
Very similar to Rodney Moore in style.
Regular updates and interesting and unusually personal Blog.
Recent upgrade in quality of videos - Windows Media Files now supported although quality is similar to the Mov files. Full movie files are also now supported, where before you could only get small clips.
The download times are very fast. |
Cons: |
The videos are done with an annoying fisheye type lens.
Video quality could use further improvement.
Photos are below average quality (By todays standards) |
Bottom Line: |
Not bad. One of the better amateur sites out there for videos of never before seen girl next door types. The score would improve considerably if Thomas were to ditch the fisheye lens and provide HD quality full video files of current and past models.
See Simons Scans for an example of how to do this. |
|
03-28-07 06:12am
Replies (2)
|