| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Dare Dorm
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Updated: |
08-27-10 04:40am (Update History)
Reason: Needed to lower rating due to tentative recommendation.
|
| Pros: |
Earliest videos look authentic
Excellent orgy action
Most girls very attractive
HD streaming
Extra long videos (1hr approx) |
| Cons: |
No downloads - streaming only
Only 29 videos thus far
Cost - content does not justify cost for a stand alone site. Needs to be part of the RK network.
Latest videos look staged and unauthentic
Majority of female performers in latest videos do not appear to be true amateur dorm students. |
| Bottom Line: |
I had high hopes for this site after viewing the first few episodes starting at the beginning. The guys and girls in the first video looked like dorm students in a real dorm filming spontaneous action leading up to sex. However, as I moved into the newer material, the girls started looking less like students and more like porn actresses, and the action started to look more like a scripted porno. I do recommended the site because there are a good number of never before seen amateurs in some hot orgy action, however they need should focus on attaining true authenticity by staying away from using professionals. |
|
08-26-10 11:48pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
27
|
ALS Scan
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Excellent photo quality
Excellent high definition video quality (Later shoots)
Attractive Babe type girls
Regular updates |
| Cons: |
Vaginal shots are garish (Candy red) which is very unnatural looking.
Excessive focus on fisting
Many older videos are flagged as no longer available |
| Bottom Line: |
This site really is taste dependent. You have to like candy red vaginal shots and excessive fisting which I don't. Also, for some reason, many of the older videos are shown as no longer available for viewing. I guess the site owners don't want to spring for the extra cost of storage. |
|
11-26-07 04:16pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
28
|
Girls Out West
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Consider this site a poor relative of Abby Winters. Some of the great looking girls found on Abby Winters are also featured here. The site features both photos and movies which are updated on a regular basis.
Cost for a month membership is reasonable a reasonable $20. |
| Cons: |
Photo quality is mediocre by todays standards
Video quality is mediocre by todays standards
Many of the girls are unattractive. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like Abby Winters, this site might be worth checking out to see more of the same girls in a different setting. However, be warned many of the girls are not as attractive as those found on Abby Winters. In addition, you might be disappointed at the mediocre photo and video quality. However, for $20 I think it is worth a shot because there are some real gems here.
Follow-Up:
I rejoined the site recently and was disappointed to find no real improvements to note. Video is still noticeably inferior by todays standards and most of the girls would still never make it on Abby Winters. One of the more popular recurring models from Abby (Paula) appears in some videos packing on quite a bit of extra baggage in the rear and thighs. I'm leaning towards giving this site a thumbs down recommendation for membership. |
|
05-13-07 05:36am
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
Dirty Jason
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Decent start for an amateur porn producer
Girls are decent looking |
| Cons: |
Expensive - $34.95
limited selection of girls - 15 as of now
Only average quality video
Most girls do not look or act like amateurs. |
| Bottom Line: |
Here is the premise: A pudgy farm boy from Texas (think Hoss Cartright's little brother) decides to film his dates without their knowledge. He lures the girls back to his apartment and then proceeds with a lengthy seduction ending most times in sex. There are two big problems I see with this site. First, many of the girls do not look or act like dates. In fact, many are familiar faces seen on other websites, so I am assuming everything is staged. The other big problem is the price. You pay $34.95 for only 15 girls. Here is how I got snookered. I joined a much better website "Exploited College Teens" and there was fineprint at the bottom of the signup screen which asked if I wanted to join Dirty Jason for $34.95. I thought it meant $34.95 for both sites, but it was actually $34.95 extra. In any case, the site is worth a look if you can get it for $3.95 on a trial basis. Otherwise, I advise you to pass this one up until the selection increases and the price declines. |
|
10-08-07 02:22pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
30
|
Ron Harris
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Professional skill of photographer
Worth a look for fans of the Babe look and glamour photography.
Monthly membership fee is more reasonable then other sites. |
| Cons: |
Sets are way too small.
The voice of the photographer is quite annoying in the videos. He sounds like a dirty old man.
Most of the girls are not new faces. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have to say I was quite disappointed in this website. For all the hype, there is just not that much beef. First of all, the sets are way too small. You get some high definition videos of the girls, but I was not impressed with those either. The guy filming the action, I'm assuming it was Ron Harris, sounded pretty course and obnoxious in the way he conversed with the girls during each shoot. In addition, the girls just look a little too made up for my taste. However, if you are a fan of the Babe look, maybe this site might interest you. The only reason I joined was because of the reasonable $20 fee. However, if given a chance to do it over, I would not join again. |
|
06-28-07 06:04am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Homemade Paysite
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
One of the girls (Chayden) is decent looking (At least in her earlier videos).
latest web videos are in high definition |
| Cons: |
Girls "DO NOT" look like girl next door amateurs. They look like bored looking professional strippers.
Only several girls in total for the entire website.
Poor value for the money |
| Bottom Line: |
I was quite disappointed with this website. The girls are not, as other reviewers have mentioned, "girl next door types". I would say they look more like burned out strippers. There was one good looking chick featured in early videos (Chayden). She looked about as close to a girl next door as any girl on the site. However as the videos progressed, she started looking more like a more like a bored gum chewing professional stripper. Another thing I was disappointed in was the lack of variety in girls. There are only several girls in total. While some of the scenes are hot, it would be nice to have more variety for the money you pay. There are many other sites out there with tons more girls offered at nearly the same price.
In summary, every once in a while I hit a clinker and this was one. Don't waste your money. There is much better out there. |
|
07-22-08 01:34am
Replies (5)
|
