| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
26
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
01-03-17 09:41am
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
Wow Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-When you join WowGirls.com, you also get access to WowPorn.com as well.
-The quality of the teen, early-twenties models is outstanding. Physically attractive young models.
-The models have very few tattoos (my personal preference. I don't like tattoos).
-Most of the girls are slender white females (from Russia). Some members might want more variety in race, build, etc.
-The quality of the photography and videos is outstanding. Excellent lighting, sound control, camera-work, etc.
-You can stream or download the videos.
-Choice of download definition of 480p, 720p, 1080p for videos. Some videos have a 4K option as well.
-Can stream the videos in your choice of 480p, 720p, 1080p for videos. Some videos have a 4K option as well.
-The videos have a matching photoset. The phtosets are screencaps, but the screencap quality is excellent.
-You can download the entire video, or selected clips from the video.
-A zip file for the photoset.
-Fast, easy to use software to view each photo online. |
| Cons: |
-Cross sales on join page.
-Nag screen and constant advertisements to upgrade to Diamond level status.
-No easily found area in site that discusses upgrade options, or rules of membership.
-The videos of All Fine Girls (a separate site, that requires an upgrade to Diamond status) are mixed in with the the videos you have normal access to. You don't realize the All Fine Girls videos are an upgrade, until you click on the video to play, and you get the notice that this is an "Upgrade video" that requires a Diamond upgrade.
This is a deliberate annoyance that makes using the site more frustrating, unless you are willing to pay to upgrade to Diamond status, or overlook the fact that many of the videos being shown are not available to a Gold standard member.
-Membership price is relatively high. $29.95/month (recurring), or $99.95 (150 days, recurring).
I was able to get a Christmas discount for substantially less. But it was still higher than many other teen hardcore sites. |
| Bottom Line: |
CONS (continued):
-The site is not as easy to use as it used to be.
The "Models", "Updates" and "Search" links are not shown on the home page, as they used to be.
The Updates listing page is difficult to browse.
-When they announce a news update, they don't publish the date of the news announcement. So you can't tell how fresh the new update is.
For example:
"Our WOW Live shows are currently disabled. We are working on ? new software to provide you and our girls with the best quality and uninterrupted service. We will release the new software in March/2016. The second live channel stays online and will cover the absence of WOW shows."
I have no idea when that announcement was made.
It's now January 2017. Are the WOW Live shows now available?
I believe the WOW shows were discontinued.
So not only do they not date their "news announcements", but they also don't provide any updates on the news announcements.
A very poor and sloppy way to communicate with your members.
========================
BOTTOM LINE
Site structure could be simplified, making the site easier to use.
-1. Eliminate the videos from sites you do not have access to, until you do have access to those videos.
-2. Place a blog link, or explanation of when you get access to the sites you will get over time.
-3. On the blog page, explain what are the rules of the site.
One of the highlights of the site is the collection of attractive teen/early twenties models.
For example:
Nikia (AKA Goldie Baby, AKA Goldie) is a tiny, slight, blonde with an innocent face who can play to the camera like a true porn star, unlike many porn starlets who have almost zero chemistry with the camera or audience.
Nikia has an interview scene, posted 2015-07-20, titled "Interview with Nikia".
Most porn star interviews seem fake or canned.
But in the interview, Nikia comes across as honest in her replies.
Whether she is honest I have no way of checking, but she seems relaxed and open in her replies, more like an actress than most in-experienced porn starlets.
And she has a sense of humor, that comes across in the interview.
For example, the interviewer ask who is her favorite movie actors or actresses.
Nikia answers: "I don't have one".
The interview then asks: "Don't you watch movies?"
"Only your own porn films?"
Nikia answers: "Yeah, my own porn films only."
Interviewer: "You like watching yourself and your favorite actress is you, right?"
Nikia: "Yeah, the best employee is me and I employ myself."
This girl is smart, fresh, and appears to have a brain.
I only hope her career as a porn star does not damage her.
Because I think she could actually make a career in movies, if she is lucky.
Wow Girls is a good site, but it's expensive.
My suggestion would be to join for 1 or 2 months, and download everything you need from the site. |
|
01-03-17 05:50am
Replies (3)
|
Review
28
|
Wow Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Plenty of very attractive women
- Good variety of content, hardcore, softcore, lesbian, some group
- Access to sister site WowPorn
- Camerawork is generally good
- Lighting and makeup are both generally good
- Download speeds are very good, I was getting 6-8 MB/s most of the time, more or less maxing my internet connection
- Video quality is excellent, even in the smaller videos, their 720p videos look better than some 1080p scenes I have.
- 4k videos are available for some sets, they look great, but I didn't keep any of them due to space issues (4GB for one scene is just too big for my budget)
- Respectable biller, no major suspect practices (nice after my experience with BangBros)
- Pretty large site, but certainly not as large as some of the big networks. ~4000 total sets (photos and videos) on WowGirls, and 2600 on WowPorn.
- Navigation is pretty good, but can be somewhat annoying (see cons) |
| Cons: |
- Not a very diverse site, the model type is typically the same (white, athletic, thin). There are some Asian models, but not a site to go to for diversity.
- Relatively expensive compared to many other sites (when accounting for discounts), although I will say the good:bad ratio on this site is much higher in my opinion than most of the bigger sites.
- I am not sure why there are two sites (Porn/Girls), I don't really see how it serves a purpose, it just makes navigation more annoying
- I feel like they should just merge it with AllFineGirls, they show all the content on the site, and it isn't really like there is some distinction between AllFine and Wow, they have mostly the same models, same style, same variety
- Some content appears not to be original |
| Bottom Line: |
My main concern is that I feel they should just go ahead and merge this site with AllFineGirls. I understand the idea of trying to upsell someone to a diamond membership (at least they ask before signing you uh, ahem, BangBros) to make a little extra money (for some reason the Diamond membership is way more expensive than if you joined the site on your own), but the sites are just so similar, I don't see why they should exist as separate entities.
Also, the site is somewhat expensive these days as compared to it's contemporaries when considering discounts. It would be nice if they brought a discount back for the PU folks, I know they used to do it from time to time.
My bottom line: good, bordering on excellent site, acceptable navigation, attractive ladies, wish it was a little cheaper and more diverse, but certainly worth joining if you haven't been here before. |
|
09-20-16 12:04am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
29
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
09-02-16 07:03pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
30
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
08-11-16 05:22am
Replies (0)
|
Review
31
|
Wow Girls
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- My first time as a member to this fairly large, technically impressive site.
- Very pretty models. You might actually get bored with the models because they're all so pretty.
- Technical quality is excellent. Most videos start out with the 540p option, have the 720p option and the 1080p option. Things can get confusing here and I'll go into that in the cons and BL.
- Also a good site for those who like pictures. The pictures are downloadable at 1000 long end, 2000 long end and 4000 long end. Most sets have 75-100 pictures.
- Very good download speeds. I've consistently downloaded at 7.5 MB/s
- Daily updates.
- Decent blend of scenarios, solo, b/g, g/g.
- Very good navigation, clear and easy to use site overall.
- Uses Vendo as their biller, I've used them a few times and haven't had any problems.
- Good passion and believable scenes. |
| Cons: |
- Well, there's one really big con. I feel duped at times. I go to model list and there's a really hot model, so I click on her and there's no content of her. I find another really hot model, click on her and it has one scene then says out from it, "If you're interested in more from this model check out FantasyHD with our special discount. No, no, no. This is a premium cost website. I understand when Reality Kings lets a person join for $10 then advertises their other sites, but not for a $30 site. Then I click on some other videos and it says, "Upgrade to diamond level". What the hell? I was going to upgrade until I saw the price of $68. I'm sure to go on about this more in BL.
- It wouldn't hurt them to add some variety to their models. Maybe a few tattooed models? Maybe a model that has ate a full meal in the last month? No offense is meant, but look at as a warning for those who aren't into just slim/slender models. |
| Bottom Line: |
Edit: Just want to add that I received both Wow Girls and Wow Porn right off the bat. I had forgot this when typing out the pros. Looking at the past comments, I see several members talking about having to wait a month or two before getting access to Wow Porn. It is available now right from the start with Wow Girls, but it too also has the scenes that want you to upgrade to diamond before you can see them.
I've of course heard a lot about this site over the last few years. I will say, there's some really pretty models on here. Some of the prettiest I've seen. And many of them are doing hardcore. This site kind of reminds me of the heyday of 1byday/Twistys/Club Sandy, the mid-2000s boom of glamour models. Except most of these Wow Girls do more than solo scenes.
I'll get the negative out of the way since it really hurt my scoring of this site. Ads are one thing, but to have dozens of models in Wow Girls model list that are being pushed for you to join other sites is even more annoying than ads. There's even some models in the model list that have no content available anywhere on any of their sites or partner sites. Then there's scenes in the updates section that are not available with your "gold" membership and can only be seen if you pay $68 to upgrade to diamond/Shane Diesel. I complain enough about the American networks using tricky advertising to get you to click on them, but making me open a scene only to find out I can't see it, might be even worse. Why not just shade it out and put a diamond on it so I know I have to join diamond to access the scene?
The good news is, the rest of the site is very good. I'm still not really into the whole heartcore-style of porn, but it's not quite as mushy here as on other heartcore sites. The girls make up for it. Very few sites can compare with the quality of models this site has.
There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to which scenes are "diamond" scenes. I've been able to access some of the 4k scenes and 60fps scenes, but others say I have to upgrade. While even worse, it seems like the older scenes are all stashed away somewhere since they too say I have to upgrade to diamond. Meaning, it's obviously not just the high technical quality that defines a "diamond" scene.
The pictures are probably an overlooked strength of this site. All of the picture sets I've looked at have the model starting out clothed and ends up fully nude.
The site's navigation is easy to use. Click a scene, scroll down to the bottom and click your desired format/quality, done. No goofy dropdown boxes or 61 formats.
The most important part of this review, for me, is that this is one of the first sites that has made me really look at the price of the site. I'm not for sure I can justify the $30 for this site. I've reviewed sites recently that had double, even triple the amount of updates, 1080p videos for 1/3 the cost of this site. The quality, production quality, is higher here, but I still don't know if it's enough for the price.
I did not figure the price into my rating, but it does give me reason to wonder if I'll join this site again.
I could see recommending it to anyone that doesn't mind the price. At least for one join. And I at least appreciate them not automatically upgrading me when I clicked on it to see what the price was going to be.
I don't think it's as good as Sex Art and I've just joined X-Art for the first time too, but haven't had time to spend comparing this site to it. I will eventually.
I would recommend this site most for those who like really pretty, glamour, prissy, girly-girls. Back 10 years ago, I probably would have rated this site a 100 just for the overload of prissiness from the models. I've gotten older and probably dumber. I'm just not as picky anymore. And as said above, would compare this site very favorably to Twistys at its highest point. Beyond that though, it's comparable to nearly all the other sites with Art in their names.
Also will say I love the settings used on this site. All the way from the furniture to the distant views behind the action. It's really great.
I know my score is pretty high for all my complaints, but I can only score so low when there's this many pretty/prissy girls in one place. Will be interesting to see if this site starts to offer their upgraded membership cheaper. I would give it a go at $20 upgrade or $50 for the full experience. I took off roughly 10 points for the annoyance factor of the upgrade to diamond/model upsells to other sites and models with no content. |
|
07-19-16 12:27am
Replies (4)
|
Review
32
|
Wow Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Quite a few 60fps videos (1080 and some 4k)
(So far the first site with 4k60fps videos i could find) |
| Cons: |
After i joined i'm only GOLD member, to see all videos you need to be PLATINUM member.
You get platinum after 60 days membership or by paying 69$ extra it seems (Diesel Access).
Needless to say that many (the best ?) hardcore/4k scenes are platinum only...
Bitrates on the 4k files are WAY to low.
On the scenes i downloaded so far only 17-22 Mbit.
(for comparison, Legalporno has 32Mbit for 30fps4k, looks much much sharper and crispier)
This was a real disapoint after the initial exitement over the 4k/60fps video format.
The 60fps are great because it makes scenes look much more natural and fluid compared to the standard 30fps on most sites.
But 4k is, as it is on most sites just a label used to lure in quality seeking customers. |
| Bottom Line: |
Since this is a quite expansive site already i'm pissed off by this additional platinum paywall.
Even more so because it was not clear before i joined.
And as mentioned above i'm disapointed that their videos don't look as good as they could if they where not bitrate starved. |
|
07-04-16 02:18pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
33
|
Wow Girls
(0)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Videos:
Over 1000 videos about 23 minutes average each (download and stream)
DRM: No restrictions
+ Full Movies, Multi-Bandwidth
Format:
WMV (12000kb/s, 1920x1080)
MP4 (7200kb/s, 1920x1080)
Flash (876x480)
MP4 (latest) (20000kb/s, 3840x2160)
Flash (1920x1080)
Pictures:
Over 1516 galleries about 80 pictures each
+ Fullscreen pictures, Zip archives.
Fast server no lag on download.
New They have a new system,called the Venus 4K. |
| Cons: |
Navigation is not my favorite I am not a fan of the new so called improved navigation many sites are using.
There is a repetitiveness of this site,some stars
like Angelica seem to be in the same scene over and over. |
| Bottom Line: |
Overview:
You get here get softcore, hardcore and even fetish content from this site with multiple updates a week. The eye behind the camera during filming is certainly a connoisseur of sexual content because they have the lens at the right place, at the right time….every time. There’s such beauty to these bodies, a freshness, purity, and also eagerness that depicts through the dirtiness to give it a classy look at their inner wild-child ways. Even when the sets carry solo masturbation, they make sure there’s an extra spark that will keep you intrigued and engrossed in their every movement.
Pro:
The site is fast real fast download are quick no issues at all. The quality is top notch for any viewer and photos are spectacular. There is a clean, crisp feel about these videos and almost an innocence about them, but at the same very erotic. Hardcore is limited when compared with other sites as this is not a slam bam thank you mam site. Yes the girls get fucked good. But its done in a way that feel very real. 80 Niches keeps ones tastes active.
The videos are done as well as any motion picture top notch quality control I was hard pressed to find any errors.
Cons: I am not a fan of the navigation I am old school and why I realize many like this new format I am not a fan so this is a personal taste not huge reflection on my score.
There is sameness to the scenes Lesbian scenes seem to be the ones I notice to be very similar in they way they are done. I also realize that getting differences is hard, but still scene to scene there was sameness noticeable enough for this member. But it should be noted the site is amazing just.
Toads Take.
I give this 4.5 outta 5 boner points.
Great site, stunning models and allot of content, as well as many updates very often. I got a deal at 19.99w when I joined and was well worth it even at the current price its worth a try just due to the quality alone. Keep in mind this is not a super hard core site why every position and act is observed its done very often in a sexxy way, not a fuck you very much kinda way.
Definitely a winner here. |
|
04-14-16 10:00am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
34
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
06-04-15 11:09am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
35
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
01-01-15 11:26am
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
Wow Girls
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content-streaming and downloading available,
HD scences always. After joining 18girls was upgraded 2 months later to access of all Diesel sites. Models are all young and good looking. Lots of variety in content. Price is resonable for what you get. |
| Cons: |
Though I did say lots of variety in content they are a bit lacking in one of my favorite niches-anal and just plain old cumming in ass and pussy-NOT on the ass or pussy. |
| Bottom Line: |
To me a quality site-worth the money,I dont usually subscribe to porn sites but this one has kept my attention and I feel its worth the price. Despite a great amount of my favorite content the rest makes up for it. |
|
09-07-14 01:52pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
37
|
Wow Girls
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Gorgeous models
- The group vids which I really of loved to of seen more, one especially stood out Invites Only with a party of 6 girls just partying naturally and stripping of, it was awesome, very fresh and unique. I did like some of the other group stuff but sadly there is not many. |
| Cons: |
- Not enough anal for my liking.
- Not enough passion and spontaneity
- Not enough group scenes
- Lesbian movies seemed too soft for my liking |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm just writing about my time on the Wow Network again as I figured I'd join up again. I've come to the conclusion its great if you like softer kind of arty porn, its got all of this in abundance and you won't be disappointed here. The models are amazingly cute and if you like Abby she is featured lots and lots.
For me though I was left slightly disappointing, I thought lots of the videos seemed like going through the motions with not as much passion as I'd like to of seen and often I felt like I'd seen it all before cause it was just someone having sex on a bed or couch. I do these days to prefer to watch something out of the ordinary, there were some like this don't get me wrong but I would of liked to of seen more.
There is little to no anal on the site which seemed to of changed since I was last a member, its rather odd as they state under the search feature most searched term is anal lol and there is hardly any. Lots of the models have done anal work on other sites so it would of been nice to of seen more.
Overall I'm not regretting joining as I got to see a couple of absolute gems like Invites Only and handful of other group girls getting together.
I also got to discover Heidi (Vanessa on the site) and Patritcy (Marie Pie on the site) and got a couple more Diamond Cross and Britney S who are adorable, the odd anal video, so all in all I'm a reasonably happy chap.
But since my last video it seems to of moved away from what I loved about the site before, the funness, on one hand I complain about being too soft but I do love spontanous fun movies with girls doing exercising, dancing, hanging out, I love these type of videos and the Invites Only movie would fit into this category. I could be getting it mixed up with 18 only girls though as I remember lots of fun movies with Beata and Sasha.
So no its not a bad site, they clearly know what they are doing and are making some very hot stuff working with the most beautiful models in the world. I guess my tastes have altered of the last few years and I do prefer either funness girls doing spontaneous things naked or more harder porn.
Anyway that's all folks. |
|
07-06-14 04:02am
Replies (0)
|
Review
38
|
Wow Girls
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Gorgeous models
-High definition content (pics and videos)
-Download images singly or as a zip file
-Ability to bookmark scenes or performers
-High production value (good direction, lighting, etc)
-Wow-girls is part of a network of sites (albeit a very small one) |
| Cons: |
-Landing page (after login) is arbitrary and unhelpful
-No download manager support
-Member-only cam shows are inconveniently timed (if you live in a US time zone, be prepared to take a day off work if you want to catch one).
-Graduated access to network (2 sites for one month, 4 sites after 2 months, etc). |
| Bottom Line: |
Can't go wrong with Wow Girls (and it's sister-site Wow Porn); the girls are gorgeous and the scenes are artistically done (I'm serious about this, watching one is really an aesthetic experience...as well as a turn on). The site releases videos at multiple resolutions, including 1080p. Pictures are in the same boat, with some of the available resolutions being almost absurdly high (up to 6000px, if my memory serves).
Negatives:
I was disappointed to find that download managers like FDM are unsupported. Browser add-ons like DownloadThemAll worked just fine, but I actually got better speeds just using Firefox's built in download utility. This is a feature I would like to see the site implement.
When you first log in, you're taken to a landing page that shows you the most recent updates for Wow Girls and Wow Porn. No other site-functionality is available on this page. You have to click on one of the sites to go to its homepage (and once there, I wasn't able to find a way to switch sites without returning to the landing page). It's a minor gripe, I know, but this is dumb.
Lastly, while I love it when a site is part of a network (especially when I didn't know when I signed up), I hate it when sites have a graduated access plan (even when there's an option to upgrade and see all the content now). Wow Girls network has this. For the first month, you get 2 sites, after 2 months you get 3 or 4, and so on. This sort of set up has never once encouraged me to remain a member of a site long enough to get access to the locked sites. It pissed me off when 21sextury used to do it, it pisses me off now.
Having said all that, none of these gripes is enough to ding Wow Girls' score very much (most of the deduction comes from the lack of download manager support). If you've got $30 burning a hole in you're pocket, give Wow Girls a try. |
|
06-08-14 10:17am
Replies (1)
|
Review
39
|
Wow Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
HD Video
HD PIC
Large Selection.
Stunning Girls |
| Cons: |
Bad navigation system.
Links go all over.
Dead links. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is amazing with very good HD and stunning models. They look fresh, sexxy and horny.
The HD is very very good and pictures are amazing details for photos.
I know there is new software is being used by all these pornsites. But that software is unproven and every site I have tried in the last year is bad bad bad. The problem is this software allocates a smaller amount of ram to save server load, problem is this same software makes it hard on members.
I think this gave some conflicts with Firefox, i switched and chrome worked best on this site.
No answer from support is is another minus.
I have been a fan of this site once before but the format change is not good since I was last here.
I would join but be aware it was buggy on Firefox.
CT. |
|
04-13-14 09:46am
Replies (4)
|
Rating
40
|
Wow Girls
(0)
95.0
|
No Review.
|
10-30-13 04:26pm
|
Rating
41
|
Wow Girls
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
07-23-13 04:43pm
|
Comment
42
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
07-18-13 07:30am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
43
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
04-30-13 01:31am
Replies (4)
|
Comment
44
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
03-18-13 10:37pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
45
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
03-05-13 03:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
46
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
02-28-13 01:01pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
47
|
Wow Girls
(0)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some very quality shot porn, highest quality seen anywhere with directors being superb on occasion.
Great choices of downloads, no complaints there, they give you choices and not too sill like over 3 gb like you see on some sites which was good to see.
Great photography, not really my bag but with models like Gloria and Stasha, gonna have to see more of these amazing girls.
Easy navigation on the sites and done very modernly. |
| Cons: |
Not enough anal scenes for my liking.
Too many toys, would prefer never to see a toy again in a porn video.
Would of liked more group hardcore scenes.
I'm a movie man so don't quite understand having a girl like Stasha come in and only do a photo set of her when she is even more amazing on film, at least offer both would be nice. |
| Bottom Line: |
I liked the site don't get me wrong and I'm just saying my preferences in making it even better would be.
Ok first off my fav niche of all is BGG and even better if both girls are also doing anal, this is the ultimate in porn but sadly rare on sites, I dream of a site that just did threesomes with girls like this, doesn't matter if its GBB but I prefer two girls with a guy. Then foursomes are also good. So would of loved more.
More anal one on one scenes. (my second fav)
Lesbian scenes, when done right bloody damn amazing, the Britney and Zoe movies should be a blueprint on erotic lesbian movies the first girl date could and should win lesbian erotica awards, I don't say that lihtly either, both girls are as yummy as you can get and shot to perfection and really beating most lesbian only studios, I love slow, lots of kissing, perfect girls, great camera work. Some scenes I found too many toys, hate toys in my lesbian porn and would of also loved some ass licking in some of the scenes. Some scenes didn't even have pussy licking, which to me I found a little boring I ave to say, watching two girls masturbate with dildos seems a waste of hiring them in my eyes. But then there are scenes like Margot and Millagres and The lesbian scenes in with Gloria, that just tickle my softer lesbian palette.
Solo stuff too, would love much less toy work, love to the see the girls flirt with the camera more like Stasha ,Gloria and Jasmin can do. Stasha in one scene with the bath (sadly no more than two scenes which was painful to find out as she is probably top 5 hottest girl alive) I also have Gloria in there too, who is a natural beauty and doesn't need loads of makeup to look stunning. Anyway back to Stasha, she is looking over top of the camera and flirting down into the camera, such a unique and perfect angle I've never seen done, would of been great to see her or more scene like this with them even kissing the camera, would make for an awesome movie. I also would love to see some dancing to music and doing some naked dancing, its very hot to watch and not many sites have discovered it, not like strippers more fun in a room in the home and have them flirting with the camera, if they are good dancers it can really be amazing eye feast.
I guess the wow porn will grow which I look forward and not going to diss it too much cause it is a new site so doesn't have hundreds of movies yet.
So overall not bad and well worth the money of the deal I got, no complaints. I would join again but looking forward to joining next 18 only girls and if I read right the new network membership coming back this weekend or next, sounds great and I think its awesome if its going to happen, I would for sure be joining back there.
I'm giving it such a high mark cause seen some absolute gems of movies that would be worth the joining fee alone.
Still its probably never going please me fully cause it is more for the softcore fans so could go any higher. |
|
02-09-13 12:51pm
Replies (10)
|
Review
48
|
Wow Girls
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-A nice number of cute or attractive models.
-High quality videos.
-High quality photosets.
-Easy login. Once you have logged in, and saved your login information, to re-enter the site, just click on the "member login", you don't have to re-enter your login information.
-One update per day. Either a photoset or a video.
-Content is dated by when it's posted to the site.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-Simple site design. Makes it easy to search the videos or photosets by model or by posting date.
-No download limits.
-Preview section for non-members has large-sized thumbnails of many of the models, so
you can see what they look like, and if they will appeal to your taste.
-Free access to the Diesel Access Live shows. These are live shows/live chats that
feature a few models that appear at the Diesel Access network and the Wow Girls site. |
| Cons: |
-Cons are basically minor. This is an excellent site.
-No model bio. These girls are so lovely, it would be nice to know at least something more about them. No age, no physical statistics, no background information, nothing.
-Trivial point: eliminate the background music on some of the videos. It doesn't add anything of value.
-This is not a con, but more like a suggestion: Preview section for non-members has 10 video samples that give you an idea of what the videos are like. Each video sample is only 16 seconds long. 30 seconds or even 60 seconds would give you a better idea. Or be a sport and make each video sample 90 seconds. The sample video is supposed to be a tease, to make you want to join. But I think a longer sample would be more effective.
-Not all photosets or videos are hardcore. Some photosets show only a topless girl. Some photosets show topless and bottomless, but no sexual activity. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is brought to you by the same people who run the Diesel Access network (Young Legal Porn, 18 Only Girls). But here, instead of being part of the Diesel Access network, this site is marketed as a separate offering.
But the main point is that this site offers the same approach in their content to the Diesel Access network: girls that are in their teens or early twenties, girls that are clean with little or no tatoos or piercings, a lot of young girls that are attractive to really lovely. And the photosets and videos are high quality: professionally photographed or videotaped, good focus, good sound control (very little random
noises), good lighting, good colors (skin tones, etc.), clean, sharp photos and videos.
Number of videos: 205+
Number of photosets: 349+
-Choice of definition for download of videos: HD 1080p, HD 720p, SD 480p, LD 360p.
-You can download selected scenes from each video.
-Streaming options include: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
(The LD 360p is for iPods.)
-Choice of definition for zips for photosets: 1000 px, 2000 px, 4000 px.
The site offers a variety of porn. The sex is not gonzo or rough. It is young girls who are are enjoying themselves in a variety of situations:
-A solo girl undressing partway or all the way. It may be simple nudity, or nudity with slight masturbation, or heavier masturbation.
-Two girls together.
-Sometimes three girls together.
-A boy and a girl.
-A boy and two girls.
Each video is broken down into scenes, with an illustrating thumbnail, so you can get an idea of what the model looks like, and what the action is, for each scene. And the individual scenes in a video can be selected for either download or streaming. So the site gives you a easy way to select how to treat these videos and photosets for your own individual taste.
This basic approach/setup is used for the Diesel Access network and at the Wow Girls and Wow Porn sites. It's an extremely user-friendly design that makes the site easy to use. The fact that the videos and photosets are high quality, and that many of the girls are extremely attractive, means you don't have to hunt through a pile of junk to find the hidden jewels: Some of the girls are fucking lovely, and their videos and photosets prove it.
As a bonus, if you remain a member of Wow Girls over a certain period of time, you probably gain access to Wow Porn. That's the way it worked for me. I was a member of Wow Girls, and one day when logging in to the Wow Girls site, I was given the choice of logging in to Wow Girls, or to Wow Porn. There was no official notification of when I first gained access to Wow Porn. And when I first joined Wow Girls, there was no notice that Wow Porn would be a bonus site if I stayed a member for a certain period of time. Actually, I had never heard of Wow Porn, before it popped up on my computer screen as an alternative choice to logging in to Wow Girls.
I'm giving Wow Girls a score of 92. That is based on how attractive many of these models are, the high quality of the videos and photosets, the ease of use of the site, and the nice amount of content at the site. |
|
02-03-13 04:05am
Replies (26)
|
Comment
49
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
02-02-13 11:19am
Replies (8)
|
Comment
50
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
|
01-19-13 08:35am
Replies (2)
|
|
