Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Girls Out West
(0)
60.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
+ Lots of amateur content
+ Different file types available
+ Tabbed navigation
+ Pictures: 1026, 1280, 1600 pixels long side, Some available @ 2000
+ In browser flash video
+ Bonus material from Yanks and ATK Hairy |
Cons: |
- File types are ridiculous to figure out
- File naming is another pain
- Split files in 2013?
- Minimal previews/ descriptions on videos
- Picture/video quality varies, often for the worse
- Site crashes while using Opera browser
- Not compatible with FreeDownloadManager |
Bottom Line: |
I'll preface this by saying that this will be, without a doubt, the most disjointed bottom line I've ever written. I'm just going to call it, "Issues". Joining this site was a major disappointment and what follows might tell the story.
I will say that the speed issue I commented on was somewhat resolved. I still can't use FreeDownloadManager, but the "Save As" speed is up to 1.2 mb. Not great, but certainly better than the 200kb I saw in the beginning. Other than this being a strictly amateur site which I absolutely love, that pretty much ends the positives. Here we go...
Normally, I would go into detail about the various file types. GOW seems to go out of their way to make that confusing as hell. You get columns labeled mp4, mpg+wmv and wmv. Then, quite often, you face a cryptic list like this: Source MP4 1080p, Source MP4 720p, High (1024x576 @ 3200k), High (1024x576 @ 3200k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), HD (1280x720 @ 4700k), Low (512x288 @ 600K), Low (512x288 @ 600K). On top of that, there are sometimes 5 links that say the same exact thing (e.g. Medium (1920x1080 @ 1500K)) Seemingly duplicate links that link to different files? Same file with slightly different names? I have no clue. I'll just leave it as this - I tried to download only the highest resolution video and was frequently disappointed in the quality of even the newest scenes. Lighting quality, especially on the outdoor scenes was hit or miss.
File naming. Fine on pictures as the name of the model and the set are used. On video? Another nightmare. A lot of the B/G and G/G videos download using the couple's names with no mention of the scene/episode. So, even though a couple has done more than one video, each one has to be renamed so you can download the different videos.
Opened a solo girl video that showed it was the second of 3 parts. Went to the model index to get the other two parts and there were only two videos listed. WHERE'S THE THIRD? Guess I can browse the entire site to see if it's there.
Clicked on the thumbnail for part 3 of a video and the flash preview shows part 2
Picture sets showing up in the video section.
Thinking there might be a browser issue in how the site was displayed, I tried Opera. That kept crashing so I went back to Firefox.
It's pretty bad when the bonus sets are better quality than most of the host site's material - higher resolution and better lighting.
Preview thumbnails for several full length videos open to a page with no download links.
*********************
I actually got a headache trying to figure out how to write all of this, so I'm going to stop writing and just leave it at this - For such a well known site, it's a mess. If you really like amateurs, in all their non-glamorous glory, and don't mind digging for files and renaming almost every video, go for it. Otherwise, avoid this site. |
|
06-01-13 12:41pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
27
|
Girls Out West
(0)
60.0
|
Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
Mostly good quality videos
Fairly well polished site
Good variety, nice mix of girl/girl and boy girl
Girl/girl stuff is genuine! Have joined some sites where its faked - it's all good on Girls out west |
Cons: |
The major problem is that most of the girls are either fat or unnatractive. This is a major issue for me. Most other sites have stunning girls, there's no excuse for all these fat women.
Some of the videos are in several parts |
Bottom Line: |
A good quality site, with good quality videos. However, there are only a few videos that really did anything for me, due to a lot of the videos containing unnatractive or fat girls. |
|
01-08-12 02:31pm
Replies (8)
|
Comment
28
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
07-28-13 01:59am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
29
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
06-29-13 09:40am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
30
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
06-18-13 09:55am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
31
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
05-31-13 07:07pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
32
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
09-04-11 03:18pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
33
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
04-17-11 01:08pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
34
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
12-13-10 09:28pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
35
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
09-29-10 08:36pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
36
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
07-19-10 04:24pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
37
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
07-19-09 05:17pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
38
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
04-28-09 09:07am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
39
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
|
01-15-08 12:02pm
Replies (4)
|
|