| Incoming Feedback |
All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
51
|
Femjoy
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+++ beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ mostly right mood of the models
+++ professional photography
++ "best of FEMJOY"
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ reasonable default for pic size (fits into normal screen) |
| Cons: |
-- nude-only, almost no undressing
-- movies are recording of photoshoots
- no "extras"
- lack of categorized search |
| Bottom Line: |
After trying MetArt (see my review) I've decided to try another top-rated site with about the same idea. As a result of reviews being that close, I will mostly compare these two sites.
But first, I shall note that screenshot on PU doesn't do justice FEMJOY's home page - it looks really ugly, while FEMJOY's design is very clean and clear.
Now to site comparison on different accounts:
1. "Art". IMHO MetArt is a bit better in this category (while FEMJOY is good, MetArt's pictures are IMHO a bit more "artistic", at least the covers).
2. Beauty of the girls. IMHO about the same ("stunning" is the right word for it).
3. Mood of the girls. As it was mentioned about MetArt, girls there look "bored"; as Monahan has put it for MetArt, "There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics". It is IMHO MUCH better with FEMJOY, so FEMJOY is a clear winner here.
4. Quality of photography. IMHO about the same (MetArt has better "covers", but FEMJOY gets it IMHO a bit better "inside" galleries).
5. Beauty of locations. IMHO MetArt has a bit better locations overall.
6. Variety. Because of clothing and undressing on MetArt, they win this one.
7. "Extras". Free web-cam obviously brings MetArt some extra value.
Bottom line: these 2 sites (FEMJOY and MetArt) represent about the same niche, and while they obviously have their differences, overall I can't say that one is clearly better than the other one, hence the same rating for FEMJOY as it was for MetArt. |
|
10-01-08 12:44am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
52
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
09-04-08 06:52am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
53
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
08-27-08 12:56pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
54
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
08-27-08 04:41am
Replies (2)
|
Review
55
|
Femjoy
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
* Beautiful Girls
* Lots and lots of Girls
* Very High Quality Pics & Videos
* Download Different Video Formats
* Regularly updated |
| Cons: |
* Download limits do apply
* Lack of Creativity
* A little bit expensive |
| Bottom Line: |
* For those who are only willing to fork out a few months worth of membership, download limits do apply, 2 gigs an hour, might seem like a lot, but for those with fast and unlimited internet access, and a mind set to download a lot of content, that is really not much, (this is called leeching).
* Gorgeous naked girls, no doubts about it, young hotties, and a whole lot of them,(which might collide against my previous comment).
* Easy and simple to use menus.
* Above all, absolutely amazing and stunning girls, and well worth getting a membership, just sit back and relax, this site is surely worth it. |
|
08-02-08 10:32am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
56
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
06-30-08 07:57am
Replies (0)
|
Review
57
|
Femjoy
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
# this site spoils pic lovers; models are shot either in lavish interior settings or beautiful outdoor settings.
#if you have a large flatscreen monitor, these Femjoy pics, vids will rock on that monitor
# beautiful woman in beautiful setting is mastered; probably the best aesthetic photography of its type.
# two updates per day; and 10 new HDV films per month.
# many video options: WMV 640 x 360;WM HDV 1280 x 720; Quicktime 640 x 360; Quicktime HDV 1280 x 720; iphone 320 x 240
# some of the pics made me gasp, simply beautiful
# some updates are marked best of to identify exceptional and popular shoots
# navigation is non convoluted, large magazine style avatars; simple to see what they have; you just click on the month of the year that you want on the left hand side.
# pics come in three sizes either 4000 X 2667, 4000x 2667 or 3500 X 2333, 2333 X 3500; and 1200 X 800, 800 X 1200 pics; 800 X 533, 533 X 800
# offers two months for $49.95 which is $25/ mo |
| Cons: |
# this is not atk style photography, no pussy play- just models posing.
# vids are models posing, are of lesbian models posing, dancing, walking in scenery, interacting in scenery- but not hardcore
# $34.95 a month is on the higher end for those who want to pay on a month to month basis
# models do wear clothes to start out the set, but most sets are strictly nude for those who want to see the models wear clothes |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like enjoy the shape of a woman in the nude posing or being filmed in natural light of a beautiful indoor or outdoor settings. Then this site will interest you.
I recommend this site especially to those with large flat screen monitors - these pics are gorgeous. videos too. Previously, I had a flatscreen when I was a member a few months ago. I rejoined 2 months for $49. I currenlty have a small laptop so I don't have the advantage of seeing the full potential of these pics/ vids.
When I joined this site, I wasn't sure that I'd like it. I was unsure about joining a nude site. But there are gorgeous updates like Koysusha, under the tree..or Larissa. some of the models arch their back and tilt their head back and let lose with their hair flowing in the breeze such as on top of a rock; or wade through a gorgeous field of yellow flowers or purple thistles, and it is gratifying to look at in a way that I didn't think was possible.
You can get your rocks off to this style photography believe me. This site proved to me that it can be done; and quashed the hardcore-is always-better theory. The gorgeous models in beautiful landscapes: mountains, shoreline, river, meadow can grow on you just the same as hardcore. So I would suggest this site for those who want to try it. There are many backgroundable pics in this site and very few wasted pics. |
|
04-21-08 05:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
58
|
Femjoy
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- High quality site that has a site full of content
- Videos checking in 1280 on high end over 5000 bitrates
- Pictures go as high as 4000 on high end and come in zip files as well
- Good download speeds for me, about 20% faster than my average download speed.
- Site navigation is good enough, which is important for a site with this much content
- Couple of updates per day
- Thank goodness, they have some models here that are well built, some of these artsy sites stick to those 102 pound models, but this one has some different sizes. |
| Cons: |
- Videos can be a little on the tame side, not quite as bad as Met-Art
- Something that I am not real fond of, starting out nude. This for me takes away part of the fantasy
- Nothing close to hardcore, though they don't advertise that they do, wanted to mention it for anyone reading this.
- Price is too high at $34.95 |
| Bottom Line: |
I have mixed feelings about this site. I really like their quality, the large pictures and HD video, but keep in mind that the older sets of pics and videos are not this high quality. Also, if you are like me and like to see the girl clothed, then stripping down to nothing, you won't find much of that on this site.
I really didn't take much off my score for those negatives because the site is trying to stress the beauty of a naked female, not the beauty of a stripper!
The site navigation is easy, but you will still get the feeling that you are missing something, because there is so much content. I was happy with the download speeds, and the speed of the site, despite having so many things on each page.
I was also happy to see models that weren't tiny skinny, this to me is important when trying to show the beauty of a naked woman. And it was a worry I had before joining the site.
There also are some exotic looking models, which you rarely see on these art sites. Still, there could be more and need to be more. You will find some well-known models like Eufrat, Ariel and Suzie Carina. One slight complaint is that the g/g photo sets are just boring. I don't know how many more g/g sets I can look at of the women leaning against each other.
Oh and you can't use any download manager that I know of. I tried 3 different ones.
Overall for a month, I was satisfied, even with this high price, and I will recommend it for one month, maybe 2 times per year. Recommended! |
|
04-14-08 08:58pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
59
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
02-28-08 10:05pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
60
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
02-21-08 12:32pm
Replies (4)
|
Rating
61
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
01-28-08 05:41am
|
Comment
62
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
01-28-08 05:30am
Replies (0)
|
Rating
63
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
No Review.
|
01-25-08 11:15am
|
Comment
64
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
01-21-08 07:17am
Replies (3)
|
Review
65
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
One of the best Erotic Photo sites on the web.
Exceptional models and photography
Frequent updates
Good search tools |
| Cons: |
One of the highest priced sites on the web |
| Bottom Line: |
If you are willing to pay the price the qaulity will not dissapoint you. |
|
12-28-07 06:42am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
66
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
11-25-07 12:18am
Replies (2)
|
Review
67
|
Femjoy
(0)
97.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- First Class Erotic Photography.
- Ton Of Material.
- Beautiful Models.
- Hi-Res Photos, Zip Files.
- No Download limit.
- Hi-Def Video, NO DRM Protection.
- Frequent Updates.
- Useful Member Interaction.
- Fast Download Speed.
- Very Attractive, Fun, Interactive Site.
- Exclusive Content. |
| Cons: |
- Expensive.
- No Hardcore. |
| Bottom Line: |
I couldn't wait to review this site because it may be the best one I've seen, and I've spent a lot of time there and haven't scratched the surface. A treasure trove of high class material. Photos go up to 4000px, available in quickly DL'd zips. Browse them by thumbnail or flash slide show. You can rate the sets, and leave comments, and add to favorites. Here's why this is great: there is an option to view what everyone else is picking as a favorite, it continually updates. It's fun, and you find great stuff that way by viewing someone's fave photo, which is linked to the set. It's easy to get lost here, there's so much stuff. The videos are great too, with a hi-def option of 1280x720 (wmv & QT), plus a more standard size of 640x360. You can preview a vid before DL. I'm not always a fan of the softcore vid, but these are very nice. They look great, and BTW, the girls here are gorgeous. So many of them, many well known, others not. Photography and videography is total first class, not some schmoe with a camera. It's fun just to be in the site, the search engine could be better, but Femjoy is well built. The price was recently increased to $34.95, the high end of steep. But if any site could justify this, I guess this one could.It updates frequently. You will not find any hardcore action here.It's difficult to know where to start, they do have a random selection link that brings up different sets each time. But you can get lost in this site and never find your way out. |
|
11-14-07 08:37pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
68
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
11-11-07 07:46am
Replies (1)
|
Comment
69
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
|
07-04-07 05:28pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
70
|
Femjoy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lovely girls
Girls presented in an extremely erotic and tasteful manner
Great picss
Lots of pubic hair
Love the fact that shoots are in intersting places eg outdoors, in the woods, on a railway line, etc |
| Cons: |
Scenes too much the same -they all start nude. no sense of the tease by an erotic strip
Videos very dull (for the same reason)
Too softcore for my liking |
| Bottom Line: |
An extremely good niche site for people who like softcore high quality nude pics. If that's your niche, then this site's for you. |
|
07-04-07 05:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
71
|
Femjoy
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Regular updates of 2 photosets per day from Nov. 2006; one per day before then
+Usually very beautiful European women and great photography
+Exclusive content
+Archive from June 2004
+3 pic sizes: 800, 1200, and 3-4000px, in zip or singles for photosets going back to May 2005 or so; earlier sets max at 2-3000px
+More recent videos at 1280x720 in WMV or Quicktime |
| Cons: |
-awkward navigation (but you can get used to it, and some features you might come to like)
-occasional excessive darkness or light, or blurriness where you don’t want it
-middle size on earlier galleries is 1000px
-a few galleries are only 25 or so pics
-“Best of” links are just to sets that were published earlier, but first-time members might like them being pointed out
-sometimes a sluggish server response, but it’s been improving |
| Bottom Line: |
FemJoy has become one of best softcore nude photography sites out there, pretty much on a par with MetArt. The models include Nikky Case, Susana Spears, Bambi, Peaches, Jana Mala (here as “Jane”) … and others with aliases too numerous to mention.
Since I first joined in Sept 2005, it’s had a makeover: a more visually appealing design and better organization. The navigation is a learning experience, though.
As a member, you open to the latest updates. Click one, and the next page has links to rate the gallery, download zips of it, make a comment on it, or just go somewhere else in the site! But what about that gallery, which you haven’t even seen yet? Why not just go straight to it, and put the gallery-related stuff in it?
The actual gallery opens in another window of one to several pages, or you can “View All” on a single page.
Choosing pic sizes depends on where you click on a thumb (top = largest, middle = 1200px); this feature I like now, but for a while I didn’t even realize that the little thing at the top of the page was a “visual” explanation of it. (Too cryptic? Your call.)
Another thing is the models index. You can either search by name, or FemJoy name, or you can view ALL of the approx 400 models at once, alphabetized, on one page! Even if they just put them in A-D, E-H, etc. visually separated sections, there would less “overload.”
FemJoy: excellent quality content + some interesting features + a few quirks.
Follow-Up:
Since I wrote the above review, they've recently changed to a more tasteful and visually appealing design that's also easier to use. Just wish they had more ways of searching for models, like, say, ATK Galleria does. The model list is so long, it's staggering. (Kinda like being in the orgasmatron in Barbarella.) One thing is clear: they are doing a lot to make this site better. |
|
05-31-07 06:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Rating
72
|
Femjoy
(0)
75.0
|
No Review.
|
02-02-07 03:59am
|
Review
73
|
Femjoy
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
*High resolution pics
*Models are stunning
*Content is updated frequently
*Did I mention the models are hot? |
| Cons: |
*Video section is an after thought
*No hard core content
*Navigation is cumbersome and sluggish |
| Bottom Line: |
Femjoy seems to be a knock off of Met-Art but the content is fresh and on a lucky day, you find dozens of extremely attractive nubile models to drool over. The video section is not very exciting and imho, if you want videos on your site, do a 100% effort and make it worth the subscription price. |
|
01-27-07 01:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
74
|
Femjoy
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
very good quality of pics
nice models, even if not all the models are worth |
| Cons: |
NO HARDCORE!!!
some models not nice
not nasty
boring boring boring videos |
| Bottom Line: |
If you like simple nuduty this is for you, otherwise look for something else!! |
|
01-23-07 07:05am
Replies (0)
|
|
