Replies Given
|
Your replies to other users's reviews and comments. |
Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Yes, sorry. I'm scheduling new updates with never seen girls right now. The problem is the photographer sometimes has problems with new photosets. But his girls are top notch, you can see it.
|
08-31-10 05:43pm
|
Reply
2
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Man, I was joking as well, and you have a right to make fun of course. It is just that feeling, you know: "if you want to have it been made right, make it by yourself"...
|
06-19-09 07:54am
|
Reply
3
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Well, jokes...
Shame on me, checking every single update by myself again, no trust in photographers and co-workers anymore :( I'll fire them all!
|
06-19-09 07:01am
|
Reply
4
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Can you please email me on support at skokoff.com and describe the problem exactly? I would appreciate it a lot.
|
12-02-08 09:17am
|
Reply
5
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, I didn't want to discuss technical issues here but that was the photographer, that mixed up extensions of the files in some galleries. But that is my fault - I have to control everything.
Re. zip names - easy, I put it on my to do list. Thanks for the tip.
|
11-23-08 06:24am
|
Reply
6
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I don't ask to consult us before the review. I just don't understand - if you found a problem in the product you bought - usually you were contacting support first and then share your opinion about the product and it's support.
In this case I wouldn't even know about this review and mistakes that were found.
The way the reviewing works on pornusers.com is not the best for site owners. I would ask for any review of the new site not earlier than 3-6 months after the launch and not on the second day after or even before the official launch. But we can live with it, we have to, and you're right, this is the place for surfers/consumers to share opinions. That is why I'm here also, cause I do care about the content and members' satisfaction.
|
11-23-08 06:04am
|
Reply
7
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, I don't post the galleries and movies manually. We are improving our scripts to avoid that flaws in the future. I'm sorry, that your impression was kind of ruined by all this glitches.
And yes, I'll post back, when we fix the problems.
|
11-23-08 05:16am
|
Reply
8
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
I talked to skokoff and there are some samples and series that he shot long time ago, when he started to work as a photographer. All the latest series shot by Canon 5D.
|
11-23-08 05:03am
|
Reply
9
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Hello, Drooler and others!
Thanks for the review!
One thing that I don't understand is when you find an error on the site like missing pictures and you don't even try to email me as a support, but you're writing the review here. I don't mind about mentioning my mistakes in the review, but why don't let me know? I don't browse this site too often, thanks that I subscribed to PornUsers' RSS feed.
Well... back to "cons"
-Unruly thumbs: Have been greeted in some galleries, even new ones, with nothing but empty image-tag X’s, not thumb pics. “X” occasionally marks the spot in some other galleries, too.
I'll check every gallery today
-There’s also the “swollen thumb” -- a tiny fraction of the top left of a pic where the thumb should be.
The same as above
-Some clicks for enlargements expand to a full-screen “404” error page.
The same as above
-Wandering watermarks: At least one gallery had the watermark not in the bottom right where it belongs, but in some pics hovering like a drone close to the model, etc.
I will talk to Skokoff about it, would be really appreciate if you send me the links to those galleries
-Oops! I’m a visitor! Some links in the members’ area expose you to the public space. (Click “members” for re-entry with no additional login.)
My mistake, I check again everything
-Slow downloads. 30 min. for a 324MB vid. Started at 175Kbps; eased down to 139. And a 140MB vid clocked at only 105. A photoset crawled its way to me at 70.
Well, this is up to your location and location of the servers, there are no any limitations for downloading set on the servers. We should use content distribution network in the future, like Met-Art does, but we are quite small yet ;-)
-Only 14 videos. Sorry, but this is a photography site, even in motion. Flash-flash! The mood music helps a bit.
There are much more videos prepared already. All HDV, all hot :-)
So, all the cons are technical and will be solved quite soon. Skokoff is not that good in all the computers stuff that is why sometimes you find copyrights not on their place. And I couldn't check every image :-) The site is very very new and we're working on making it better.
Thanks for the review again!
|
11-23-08 04:45am
|
*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|