| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Monahan:
(Nick C's Reply)
I was a member of SexyBabes for several years and got Babelicious when it was introduced. I'm a video guy and, because SexyBabes had a long history of excellent video offerings, I stuck with it until I finally gave up waiting for the quality to return to both SexyBabes and Babelicious.
I'm very happy to see your post mainly because I'd love to see your sites return to their original glory. Please keep us up to date on how it goes. I'm ready to rejoin when you tell me things are back to your original standard.
|
01-04-10 06:31pm
|
Reply
2
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from PinkPanther:
(Nick C's Reply)
Personally, I download the vids that I like and watch them that way.
I recommend going to 1 site that you can concentrate your energies on.
One of the big problems now is that none of the sites have any individual personality, which makes them more boring than they would be if there were just 1 site.
That's my feeling anyway.
You've always been a good guy in your interactions here, Nick. I definitely wish you the best in bringing your sites - or at least 1 - back into the kind of quality that I used to enjoy. It's a challenging economic environment for sure.
|
12-29-09 06:09pm
|
Reply
3
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from hodayathink:
(Nick C's Reply)
It's refreshing to hear someone being this honest. I think I'll check your site out when I get the chance.
|
12-29-09 10:01am
|
Reply
4
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Nick C's Reply)
Good to see you're still around, Nick - given the down-grade in quality of this site and the other related sites, I was thinking that all the real people had gotten the sack and that the sites were all set on auto-pilot.
|
12-29-09 07:06am
|
Reply
5
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from asmith12:
(Nick C's Reply)
At last, webmaster trying to defend this kind of thing, how cute. Then could you please tell us if (as you're saying, I have somewhat different words to describe it) it is "WELL above" and "CLEARLY stated", WHY do you have it PRE-CHECKED?
IMHO there is ONLY ONE possible reason to have such things PRE-CHECKED: to hope that user isn't careful enough and will press "Subscribe" button without noticing it. And please don't tell me it's done "for my own convenience": if I would want to spend another $30/month, I wouldn't care to take another click to join. But other than that, all other explanations are very welcome.
|
09-30-08 11:28am
|
Reply
6
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Cybertoad:
(Nick C's Reply)
Sorry I didnt get back to you.
I will re-join soon I am waiting for a good offer to save a few $$ gas prices cutting into porn costs ya know.
|
06-23-08 09:19am
|
Reply
7
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from JBDICK:
(Nick C's Reply)
Nick C
can I just say that Drooler's review is far superior to that done by Toadmix...and this leads me to a question to you guys as Webmasters...
This may be impossible to do and is a tall order but I think as an enhancement to your site, I think that if you as the Webmasters representing PU and TBP, could nominate reviews that you and us other pornusers value as the best reviews can keep as the best review somehow near the top of the reviews list...
Alternatively, we could have a forum thread where PUs and TBP could nominate the best reviews on PU...so others can refer to them as the benchmark, otherwise you will continue to have mediocre reviews like the one that Toadmix has done...
When I do a review myself, I have a different (unique) style to mine which is natural to me to write...but I can honestly say that my reviews take me anywhere from 1/2 hour to 1 hour to think of and write...and I'm guessing that Drooler has put a lot of effort into his, as well as others like Taodsith...
I just think there are hard workers here and easy riders...
Just a view but one I felt I wanted to share with you guys...
PU and TBP are great sites and the effort I spend inputting to your site should indicate to you that you have my loyalty, and I would imagine looking at the other player, much bigger than me, but Toadsith and Drooler come to mind spend a fair amount of time on your site aswell...
By the way, this is my 100th reply, and I chose this as my reply because I want this anniversary to be a good one for me...
Here's to more happy hunting and good reviews...Thanks, Keep up the good work.
|
04-27-08 02:02pm
|
Reply
8
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Monahan:
(Nick C's Reply)
EuroBabez and Dream Babes are back up and running with all the past missing updates now posted. All seems well.
Up do date sites through today:
Babelicious
Sexy-Babes.tv
DreamBabes
EuroBabez
Inactive sites:
BabesUK (last updated in Dec. 2007)
BabesOnFilm
BikiniBabes
CumminAtYa
RoyalBoobs
|
03-18-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
9
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Monahan:
(Nick C's Reply)
Nick,
Good to hear and thanks for your response on the member forum as well. Hope all goes well as you are getting back up and running.
|
03-18-08 06:52am
|
Reply
10
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from PinkPanther:
(Nick C's Reply)
And those new vids with just the sounds of the babes getting off are just great!
|
02-24-08 09:47am
|
Reply
11
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Drooler:
(Nick C's Reply)
I'm still a member, and occasionally there's something that I really like. The recent one of Annette Dawn in the kitchen was nice. (Can't remember if it was on Babelicious or one of the bonus sites.) And there was one of Marina/Euphrat under a tree not to far back that was great for what I'm after, which are nice pics of the girl showing her tail.
So I wrote the review and scored it in terms what I thought was appropriate for the general subscriber.
Personally, I don't care for the amount of toy play that's there. I actually wouldn't mind at all if it didn't push the nice tail shots off the page, which it seems to do on most sites.
I don't know if you can get what I mean. That's why I mentioned that shot of Klaudia in the review. It's an example of doing it right, at least as I see it.
|
02-20-08 02:49pm
|
Reply
12
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Davit:
(Nick C's Reply)
It's encouraging to see the music being dropped. I never understood why anyone would prefer to hear someone's taste in music rather than just the natural moans of the girls. It's just off-putting!
Kind regards
Davit
|
01-03-08 06:25am
|
Reply
13
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from Denner:
(Nick C's Reply)
Thanks for response.
The sample video from that link sure looks much better than the ones I've seen.
If that's the general quality, there's certainly nothing to complain about.....
Cheers!
Denner
|
09-16-07 01:06pm
|
Reply
14
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from roseman:
(Nick C's Reply)
Your site is totally awesome. I will surely try it in a few days. Thank you!
|
08-21-07 05:22am
|
Reply
15
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from Drooler:
(Nick C's Reply)
If you don't know what Geico is, all I can say is: Lucky you!
It's an insurance company with a huge ad and marketing campaign. Ads on TV with "cavemen," talking geckos, etc. etc. And my mailbox at home has received countless promotional offers, every single one of which go immediately into the bin for paper recycling. It's all very obnoxious. But this is in the US.
I have to remind myself that this is an international site, being on the WWW and all. Sorry about that.
|
08-18-07 04:16am
|
Reply
16
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Drooler:
(Nick C's Reply)
Thanks! I've just been back to Babelicious and to the browsing experience that I know and love.
My only regret is that I doubt I could have the same, immediate effect on GEICO!
|
08-18-07 01:55am
|
Reply
17
|
Sexy Babes
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Gonzo84:
(Nick C's Reply)
Oooh... A rebuild and beta testing... who gets to test and can it be free??? :-D
I submit my name for being such a good customer over the years... :-D
But seriously, any idea how long this will be? and will you be keeping all the content? (and can you, for the love of all that is holey, get some of the older sets zipped!!!! ;-P)
|
06-22-07 03:56pm
|
Reply
18
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Nick C's News
from King:
WOW! That is a good news! You've just ranked 10 places up in my queue ;)
|
06-22-07 02:29pm
|
Reply
19
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Gonzo84:
(Nick C's Reply)
Cheers for the prompt and thorough reply :-)
I can't remember the specific site, and I only recall seeing it on one, but instead of offering multiple links on every page they've set everything to a defualt 'medium setting' and every user gets a settings page where they can customize how they experience the site (images can be opened in new/same window, in a html page or image only, movie and zip downloads can be set at maximum, stuff like that) which I liked, I got on with it well, what others thought of it I do not know, but it seemed like a good idea, and it worked flawlessly... Although the zip's could be downloadable from the model page, under each image for the set you could have a small S,M,L for the 'right click save as' method (I am a fan of this method, had you guessed...) ;-)
Regarding download speeds, I'm currently downloading from your site at 343kbps, which is quite good, earlier it was floating between 120-140 though, and I know from previous experience that I'll get something from another site simultaneously at 900kbps to 1mbps without it affecting the Babelicious download, I can also only download 2 files simultaneously form your site, yet still download from others, and still at a higher rate. The speed isn't my main gripe, it's the dual download only, and this affects the sister sites too, if I'm downloading 2 files from one I can't download from another til they stop, but then again, I may just be being greedy here... :-D
While I'm at it, what's with the massive emphasis on ratings? I'm neither for or against it, but I do pretty much ignore it and look for myself regardless, but you guys seem to have dedicated quite a lot of space and page size to this subject...
|
06-22-07 02:23pm
|
Reply
20
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from raystar:
(Nick C's Reply)
Sorry, I was answering to the content on the other sites that are affiliated to you. The Bonus sites as you call them.
|
06-13-07 03:32pm
|
Reply
21
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from raystar:
(Nick C's Reply)
Actually, what I meant to say was that the material used for the updates are sometimes not fresh. In other words, they may have been used on another site previously.
|
06-11-07 03:53pm
|
Reply
22
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from juanchopancho:
(Nick C's Reply)
I prefer no music. Hearing a womans pleasure is enough music for my ears. :)
|
06-10-07 09:32pm
|
Reply
23
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from MrHappy:
(Nick C's Reply)
To reply to the replys.
A:
I have a 10mb connection, so why 500K which is about a medium dsl speed is ok, Its not what would be broad band compatable. Most DSL's are pushing 1.5 mb min. and up to Seven and I have cable which is 10mb. So why 500k is ok its not keeping up quite.
C:
Ok let me see how well I can address this, the site why has a good menu system it not that easy to manuver around. Some times when going off into model areas I have to click past the model to another list to download it. Seems that going down three level to get a file isnt as easy as it sounds. Having it right under the main menu would be super.
again it not a complaint, just seems a tad weird to go around through the menu system thats there.
Hope my answers helped.
|
05-29-07 10:41am
|
Reply
24
|
Babes.tv
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MrHappy:
(Nick C's Reply)
compared to other sites however, the group has the same ammount on content that many sole websites have. Exclusive is nice but other sites make the same claim and have only one site.
JMTC
|
05-29-07 10:33am
|
Reply
25
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from PinkPanther:
(Nick C's Reply)
Glad to hear it, Nick - I continue to enjoy this site a lot and look forward to seeing it get even better.
I like the navigation of this site - I like the way the site uses members' ratings to push and pull you to check out other hot stuff.
|
05-17-07 06:14am
|
