Review Replies (6)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
Great review. I like the level of detail you provided and the rationale behind some of your comments. Reviews like this make PornUsers a valuable tool.
|
05-19-14 01:10pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
host2626 (0)
|
IIRC, all their videos have this fish lens distorted effect, like the ones in Spizoo's PornGoesPro. This "House of Mirrors" effect doesn't do it for me, zero excitement.
I understand that making proper POV is difficult. Even more so when you are a cheapass wanting to do it alone.
So either you do it with a normal lens, and convince your viewers who never had sex that it's exactly how it goes, you either see the closeup of her face or a closeup of your dick as if your eyes were popping out of your navel. The sad thing is that they believe it.
Or you use a fish eye lens to widen the field of view, thus completely distorting her body. Neither of this is exciting for me, and the proper way to do it, by having someone else hold the camera a bit higher that the guy's head, is almost never used.
It seems that mostly it's some guy wanting to get laid, have us pay for it, and make a living out of it. Understandable, I'd do the same :). Why pay a second guy to hold the camera, customers will swallow any crap. Some even think that it's normal to have camera shake, your pelvis is in motion after all and all that. No it's not, IRL your eyes are not fixed in their orbits, they move by themselves so your image is stable. There is no excuse for shaky cam, as there is none for any Hall of Mirror porn.
Anyway, /rant off, sorry. I wish my search for a proper POV site was over. Tired of having to content myself with 5 seconds of non-crappy footage in one video out of 10.
|
05-22-14 09:40pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
skippy (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - host2626 :
Absolutely true about the fish eye. What is interesting about this site is that many (not all) of the videos are a mix of go-pro on the head and tripod-over-the-bed-behind-the-guy video. This method avoids the shake-as-you-bang effect. There are also a few seconds here and there where one of the cameras is visible. One of them is a small, decent quality HD video camera with internal stabilization. And there almost always seems to be a 2nd person involved in the shoot in one way or another. So these guys are not out to make cheap videos, they are out to make a lot of money by spreading their collection over as many sites as possible. That strategy will work once their collection is a little larger, but right now it is just frustrating.
|
05-23-14 02:00pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
frank nasty (0)
|
So I have had mixed experiences with povD in the past. When I first joined in Jan 2014 It seemed very cool. I was very impressed with the shooting style. It seems like pov where mostly the entire female is visible on screen is quite rare. Idk why this is, just butt cheeks or boobs or just a face on screen by themselves is not appealing to me as a viewer... I digress...
The first 10 or so scenes are hot. Great performers, sets, shooting, and high quality video resolution. I was happy, I thought that I finally found a credible POV site that would update regularly.
now for the second month. I was very excited to see Janice G. there but I was quickly disappointed to find the video quality was horrible. Not offered in 1080p, only 720p and the pixelization was plentiful. I mean this was not even good 720p; it was not clear video, it was dark and the color was way off. I don't see how they can get away with saying "highest quality video on the net" and not even offer a quality 720p or 1080p, much less 4K (which most would argue to be the highest mainstream quality these days). It is clearly not the highest quality.
There was also the issue of an oversized watermark that covered 1/4 the screen which included the pussy, but at least that got taken care of, eventually.
I have also noticed that they have started "recycling" many of the girls now. D.Carter is in 4 different scenes and there aren't that many vids on the site yet ...not cool. I mean maybe if they had her in different costumes or something to switch it up I would say "its cool" ...but its not
This has been my experience on povD.com
My main question to you is are the videos looking better yet? I mean are they back to 1080p? and at what update/girl did the 1080 start back up on? Any 4K yet?
Are there any other POV sites you know of that offer the full body view I am looking for? I have checked out many and so far all I really liked are povd, P.north.com, & HW101. The latter 2 sites are good but hardly update. HW101 over at Naughty A. is def worth a look if u like this style and haven't seen it.
I be very happy if one of these sites could offer up an ebony babe in full body pov. If you know where I could get a scene like this let a bro know. I would greatly appreciate the heads up, and thank you for any info you may provide.
Good day & good fapping 2u.
|
07-28-14 02:36am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
skippy (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - frank nasty :
The videos in general are very high quality but there are a few that don't rank up there with the rest. In general the video is MUCH better than your typical hardcore or amateur site.
|
08-30-14 07:15am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
frank nasty (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - skippy :
So to answer my own question the newer videos are 1080p starting with the Kacey Lane scene. Like skippy says some of these videos still aren't great so far as quality goes, but others are. More recently all the videos have been high quality, still not the best quality by far but still a pretty good 1080p, so hopefully they have got it together now. Honestly only about 3 videos are not up to par since the 1080 switch. The updates are pretty consistent, about twice a week. I would have to say the strongest aspect of this site is the performers. There are some really hot ones here and it is definitely worth a look if you are a fan of pov. I am still not happy about them trying to fool people into thinking they were getting the highest quality 1080p videos when they were getting 720, or the blatant lack of consumer support. If they can keep it going like they have been I think they have a strong chance of becoming one of the best POV sites out there. Check it out.
|
09-03-14 01:17am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
