Woodman Casting X (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Huge variety of scenes (casting soft, casting hard, straight hardcore, fetish)
+ 4k downloads available
+ Almost every known and unknown EU porn star and the occasional US star
+ Good browsing filter |
| Cons: |
- Confusing payment / coin system
- Quality varies
- Annoying watermarks
- Older videos in the update queue |
| Bottom Line: |
Woodmancasting has some sort of 101 for EU porn stars. Almost every european porn star has met this guy.. and some of them have had his fingers stuck in their butts. When I realized, that Natalia Starr was in theportfolio with a hardcore scene, I decided to give it a try and rejoin the site. My last stay was about 2 years ago.
First off, the sheer ammount of material is pretty impressive. Woodman must have been one of the first guys to shoot in fullHD. The castings are basically all the same. A few minutes of talking, the usual Woodman finger-in-the-butt initiation (for whatever reason) and then a hardcore scene that can get pretty rough, often with 2 or more guys.
Besides the casting scenes, there are also regular hardcore scenes with different settings and themes. Some of them nice and gentle, the majority of them with lots of slapping and spanking. It might not be everyone's taste.
Before I joined the site, I was thinking about purchasing a bunch of coins to download the one scene I was looking for. I then had to find out, that one scene costs 5 coins, which is about 21$. Full price for 1 month is 29$. Not exactly an exciting deal to be honest.
There is also some sort of loyality project going on. If you remain a member for x months/years, you will get a discount on coins and full acces prices for the sister site WakeupNFuck. Someone must have made a huge spread sheet to figure all this out. However, I wonder how many people are acutally taking advantage of this, because the discounts are rather low and a bit confusing.
Also, there is a feature scene thing going on. One particular scene, which seems to be in high demand, is only available for coins until a certain ammount is reached. Then, it will eventually go fully live. This week, it was the scene of Kiara Lord... shot in 2013! Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, Kiara is long retired by now. Oh, and when it finally goes live, it's streaming only for 5 days.
Then, there is this annoying obsession with watermarks. Every scene has one huge permanent watermark slapped from one side of the screen to the other. If the action somehow happens in the lower part of the screen, the watermark will jump to the top of the screen. Occasionally, smaller watermarks are whirling into the screen too. Subtlety is certainly not the core competence of the video director.
Technically, the scenes are mostly well shot, although they are sometimes struggling with proper lighting and the camera is a bit shaky from time to time. If you are going for the 1080p downloads, prepare to get a cooling system for your network cable. The files are HUGE. 6GB average, the longer scenes up to 26GB. Yes.. twenty-six.
Looking at my review so far, it sounds rather negative, although it's not meant to be THAT negative really. This site is still a strong contender in the casting / amateur / porn star niche and quite unique in it's style. It might not be everyone's cup of tea, but then, what is? |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
