Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Female Hard Body

Female Hard Body (0)

Newbie
70*
mbaya (0) 08-24-17  11:34am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Heavily discounted membership price through PU
-Part of network of 30 sites
-Female Hard Body has its latest video at full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps
-However Model Muscles videos are lesser quality at 1280x720, 2500kbps
-No download limits
Cons: -The biller is Rocketgate. No confirmation email and none from the site
-Prechecked cross sells on signup
-No way to search
-Model Muscles does not have dates listed for new updates.The site may even be dormant and not updating.
-Zip downloads link does not work for photo sets on Model Muscles
-Female HardBody has only 4 updates in 2017 and may not be updating.
Bottom Line: The My All Access Pass network includes 30 sites and is available through PU at a steep discount at only $10. Included are two similar sites, Female HardBody and Model Muscles.

Porn Users lists Model Muscles as a glamour site. Maybe there is no better description, but this is very far from what glamour usually means when describing a porn site. These two sites feature extremely muscular women.

When I go to the gym, there are always a handful of women who are serious enough to be called fitness buffs. I would describe them as athletic and well built, sometimes even muscular. I find fit bodies to be attractive, but these two sites have models who are way beyond any level I have ever seen in person.

These look like body building contest winners and therefore I would expect that the number of fans of this type of model in porn is rather small. The two sites are very similar and really I don’t know why there are two different sites.

Mostly the videos are non nude, about the level of bikinis. The number of sets/videos that show breasts is few and the number that have full nudity is even less. The nudity is never explicit. The sex is close to zero as there is only a tiny number of masturbation videos/photos.

In the typical porn photo set, the emphasis is on showcasing the models as sexual. In contrast that is not really true here. The photos and videos mostly showcase muscles and posing, somewhat like what you expect to see at a body building contest. In all fairness there are also a few models that could be on any site and are hotly erotic. Specifically, Charlotte McKenna comes to mind. She has four videos on Female Hard Body that are over the top. Most of the other models have to be a matter of taste. Muscles per se are not really my thing.

Added together there are presently 289 photo sets with 30 to 40 photos in each. There are 81 videos of about five minutes at length. You could easily download all the videos in an afternoon.Both Rabbits and TBP show higher counts in their past reviews. If anyone knows the reason might be for that, please feel free to respond.

The two sites may not be updating any longer.

Model Muscles does not show dates for its updates, but the best quality videos are low level HD 1280x720. Female HardBody is a bit better with full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps. However there are only four updates in 2017. Muscle Nudes has photo sets, but the link to zip download them does not work. Female Hard Body has larger photo sets and the zip download function works.

The member pages were uncomplicated without any advertising. The navigation could have been a bit easier to figure out as it was unnecessarily complicated to go forward or back. There was no search engine and no broken links.

The network has about thirty sites, representing many niches. Porn Users has a great discount price of $10 for a monthly membership. The biller is RocketGate, an ok biller, but not CCbill or Epoch.

I never got a confirmation email from either the site or the biller, but had no trouble canceling. On the sign up page there were two prechecked cross sells, so be careful.

Was it worth joining? There was not enough quality erotic content to satisfy my fussy taste, but it was cheap and maybe the rest of the network will have some better porn. $10 for a network is a price that is very enticing.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (0)

Replies to the user review above.


  Be the first to reply to mbaya!

  Reply To Review


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.