Nerd Pervert (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Appear to be British porn stars and perhaps a few amateurs.
-A mixed bag of looks. Some attractive, some ordinary.
-Part of My All Access Pass network of about 30 sites
-Great discount through PU. Only $10 for a membership.
-Nice full HD1920x1080, 8000 kbps. 210 40 minute videos. |
| Cons: |
-Undisclosed download limit of 15 GB per day. With HD videos averaging about 2GB, this is unreasonable.
-Very blabby videos with far too much talking. The sex starts approximately 20 minutes into each scene.
-No way to search
-Navigation is not easy or even intuitive. Difficult to scroll forward or back.
-Bill through Rocketpay. Not a big name biller.
-No confirmation email from the biller or the site.
-Prechecked cross sells on sign up |
| Bottom Line: |
Recently I joined the My All Access Pass network of 30 websites. As it was only $10, I thought I had not much to lose. In going through the sites, most are of less than HD quality and therefore I felt not worth bothering with. One that had better quality was NerdPervert.
The videos have top notch stats with most being nice full HD 1920x1080, 8000 kbps. The ones that are not at that level are at worst HD 1280x720. Not bad at all. The videos are about 40 minutes on average. However they also average about 2GB in size and the network daily download limit is a mere 15GB. I had to ask about this limit as it says nothing on the site, nor on any page that I saw when I signed up. Downloading 210 videos at about 8 per day is ridiculous. I was told most users download an average of 5GB per day. That may be ok for lesser quality, smaller sized videos, but here?
The videos come in three categories. First are 210 undated full videos at about 40 minutes each. Next are nearly as many “verdict” videos where the site stunt cock gives his evaluation of his experience with each woman. This is about three minutes of Paul blabbing about what he liked and did not like. Who cares?
There are also twelve videos labelled as bonus. The only difference between these and the 210 first category videos is that these cannot be downloaded.
The site features Paul Taylor as he has sex with various British women. The idea is that he pretends to be a fake porn talent agent who can get modeling work for the various women. He claims to us that he is conning these women into doing the sex. Each video has the same premise and he is the only stunt cock, except for only one video starring his friend that he lost a bet to.
In each video, he starts by endlessly talking about how he needs sex and how long it has been since his last time. You see him placing ads for models, talking to the camera woman, as well as his friends about everything imaginable. Some is about porn, sometimes other topics. Blab blab blab on and on in every video for about 20 minutes in each one. When he finally interviews the female model you see them pretending to not be the porn stars they really are. I checked and nearly every one is a pro who has made videos for years and now is making her “first appearance”. A few are too plain to actually be porn stars and I could not find any information on them. By the way most of his banter is about how little respect he has for the women he has sex with and how little he cares if they enjoy the scene or not. He sounds like every womanizer I have ever met.
The sex is ordinary, mostly blow jobs, some vaginal and a rare anal scene. Paul expects the women to be energetic, but he does little to make the scenes hot.
There is no search functionality of any kind, the photo sets have only a few screenshots in each, and the site navigation is not easy, not even logical or intuitive. It is hard to get around. Sometimes Paul as well as the models are difficult to understand as their British accents get in the way for Americans.
The site has prechecked cross sells when you sign up. I know for a fact that I unchecked all the boxes, I would even bet my life on it. Yet I was charged $34.95 for a site not in the network but run by the same ownership that I did not authorize or want. I saw this very same complaint on a competing review site and this may be the way they do business. As of this morning I have Amanda contacting the webmaster about a refund.
I cannot recommend this site even though it is part of a 30 site network and is only $10 a month.
I will post the results of my appeal for a refund and maybe even raise my score.
But not today, not today, sadly. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
