Holly Randall (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- More of a softcore site, but not as soft as it used to be and has some of the prettiest models in the world on it.
- Good handling of signing up, cancelling, as it's part of Met-Art's network and uses the same cancelling method as Met-Art.
- 2-3 updates per week depending on the week, this nearly landed in cons, but will explain in BL.
- Excellent navigation, uses the same or similar site format and style as the other Met-Art sites.
- Very good download speeds, right around 80% of my max which is what I get consistently on Met-Art sites.
- Good for photo collectors! That almost gets two pros just because it's so rare to see these days. I'll further this in BL too.
- Some rare slightly harder than softcore sets of models who are more known for just softcore.
- I think this applies across the Met-Art network sites, everything is high-quality. |
| Cons: |
- So, you like amateur models who aren't glam? This probably isn't the site for you.
- Picture sets can be on the small side, not resolution, but amount of photos in each. And the membership I signed up for is only offering 720p on the videos. Not for sure if there's another level that has higher. If there is, I haven't seen it.
- You might run into a feeling of "seen that, saw that" as you go from scene to scene.
- Could be clearer about the biller. I had a charge on my bank card from this site, but hadn't heard of the biller and thought it was fraudulent. |
| Bottom Line: |
A confession: I have had the biggest crush on Lana Lopez for nearly a decade, also known as, Next Door Lana. I was looking through my old content of her and found a video from her own site that's no longer around. It was branded Holly Randall, so I joined for that very reason. A search on their site said they had more content of her and it's the closest I've seen Lana do to even masturbation (not counting those newer scenes or In The Crack).
Getting that content, including the photo sets too, would have been enough to make me a happy customer. As I looked at Lana's pictures, I decided to go look at some of the other models. Much like the top photo sites, this site has very clear, high-resolution photos that are shot in beautiful locations and settings. They also have quite a few of their models starting out in regular clothes or a bikini. It's becoming a lost art so they get a bonus 5 points for that.
The update schedule threw me off. And I'm still going to say it's a little inconsistent. It doesn't help that I'm a dyslexic American and they use the UK way of listing dates with the day first instead of the month. But there is inconsistency in the updates. The month of October had 10 updates, but there was a no-update period of 5 days in the middle of the month.
Then they released a Halloween set of one of my all-time favorite models Veronica Rodriguez and all was forgiven! Didn't even realize she's still active.
My recommendation of this site would depend on several things. Photos are a big enough part of this site that some updates are just photos. There's some b/g content, but it's not that common. I would estimate 20-25% at most. The majority of the content is solo pretty women masturbating. With a catch, this is common across all sites that have solo masturbation, a lot of it is very mechanical feeling.
Then I stumbled on a set with Gina Valentina in it and all was forgiven! Dear lord, where did they find her? Can I move there? I seriously found a new model to collect. Not for sure how "new" she is, but I hadn't ever seen her and she's the first one I've added to my collecting folder in 2 years. They do something else here that I usually only say about In the Crack, the women here look better here than on other sites. An example is Uma Jolie, who I've considered collecting, but changed my mind, the content here makes her stunning.
That's a big plus here. Even if you prefer amateur models and I'm probably 50/50 now myself, there are some really pretty women on here.
My biggest complaint which was only mentioned a little in the cons is the size of photo sets, same with the videos, they're fairly short. That's one of those "it's not really a con since I'm just wanting more of what I see" but since we don't have on-demand porn subscriptions to request to see more of a set, that's a slight con eventually.
Then I saw Karlee Gray, Aubrey Sinclair and Val Dodds. I'm not going to say it again, but I forgot the cons.
It could be that I'm not joining as many sites these days or it could be that I join sites that don't have these newer models on them, but I found multiple models that I started "collecting" folders for.
Technical quality is very high on photos, not as good on videos.
Pictures are downloadable and newer ones are in the 6000 long end range.
Videos for me have 720p option, 360p option and a mobile option. I joined with a normal membership and don't remember there being an option to join a 1080p version, not that I would have since I prefer 720p, but it's worth mentioning since some of the updates being photo sets will already irritate those who like videos only.
Over 300 models, which I think is a little low and might show that they're selective. Most of the models I've like have multiple photo sets and videos.
Roughly 700 videos and 600 photo sets. I should mention here that Holly Randall is the daughter of Suze Randall, a legendary name in porn. Holly, herself, has sets on here as well. Kind of adds a different feel to it since she also is a photographer on the site.
Which I think leads to how I feel about the site. I think with Holly's direction these models, the photo sets, the videos, have very high tease and "slip" photos like Amia Miley, who I thought was long gone from porn, in a bikini and in one photo the bikini has slid over. There's a lot of that here and it's good for me. They even have a tag for "striptease". Sometimes, doing less is more.
Great site overall, but certainly not for everyone. If you're a video lover, you might still like this site, but the best content, on this site, to me are the pictures. I honestly liked it better than I thought I would since my original reason to join was to just grab the Lana Lopez content. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
