Pure Taboo (0)
|
|
Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
Pros: |
-Updates are once a week
-Videos are 1920x1080, 4600kbps, about one hour in length
-Photos are zip downloadable screen caps, landscapes
-Plot based sex with just so so acting
-Includes a membership to Pretty Dirty, 206 videos
-Heavy discount through PU at only $15 for a month |
Cons: |
-Small site with only 39 videos
-Scene setups can and often are one third to half of the video
-Most videos are quite dark with an eerie feel to them due to the lighting
-No model variety. Nearly all are American porn stars, white, small in body shape and twentyish. |
Bottom Line: |
This site is an example of what I hope to be a whole new direction for porn. It is plot driven with an attempt at making high quality videos with superior production values. The lighting, direction, camera angles and storylines are serious attempts at making videos that are significantly better.
They remind me of the better porn of the Golden Age of the 1970’s. What they have in common is that they are real movies, not just sex scenes. One difference is that in the ones on this site the story is just a prelude before the sex. In the Golden Age the videos were of feature length and therefore longer, but the sex scenes were interspersed at various points within the movie. Many Golden Age movies had a sense of humor as well, but these do not.
The plots here are of offbeat topics, such as stepchild and parent, or about power imbalance relationships such as border agent and illegal immigrant, or older adult and teen. Although the plot possibilities are endless, most are about step relationships. As such you usually get a teen or twentyish female and her stepfather.
Most of the videos have a soft focus, dark brown, low lighting style to them. This creates an eerie, surreal type of feeling. It fits the plot, but is a bit too much art for my taste. I am not a film art critic and this is not a class in cinematography. The sex itself is not inspired or unusually hot. It is pretty ordinary and similar to what is on thousands of porn sites. Not at all extreme, I would say it is pretty much plain vanilla. Anal is rare, in fact nearly nonexistant. If it were not for the taboo, I mean extreme topics, you might even call this heartcore.
Some known porn stars are to be found here, such as India Summer, Cherie Deville, Piper Perri and Gina Valentina. The acting is at best mediocre, but rarely laughably bad. I guess it is expecting too much to ask for cute porn stars to be actresses as well. I did not see a model that was not white, American and in her twenties except for India Summer. If you check out the tour, you will see some models that have non nude, non porn straight acting roles.
Another negative is that there are only 39 videos on the site. There are weekly updates and the site membership includes a membership to Pretty Dirty. It has 206 videos of a similar stepfamily theme, but there have not been any updates since June of 2017.
I took points off for the site being small, having an artsy cinema style and for very ordinary sex. Sometimes the premise part of the video drags on interminably. In most videos the sex starts at 15 minutes and as much as half an hour into the scene. I give it a lot of credit for originality, creativity and a serious attempt at making superior videos. This is far from gonzo.
I hope it inspires others to make this kind of porn but better. Are there others who will step up and make porn that is both serious and hot? I hope so. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|