| Bottom Line: |
This was a clone site for Naked Gymnast, which apparently is gone, but this site is identical. My original review was for NG, but since that site is gone, all of the reviews are gone also. So...I'm writing an updated review here.
I saw a couple of very nice sample images from this site someplace and decided to sign up. The site is somehow affiliated with Club Seventeen and there was a cross-check that would have signed me up for it if I had not unchecked it.
I like the flexy-sexy type of images and the girls in this category are usually very fit. For this site, the analogy is more like that of a nude beach. What you think of and what you experience are usually two very different things. This is the reality version of nude beach. A few honeys and a lot of forgettable things. It isn't that the site is horrible, it's just nowhere near where it should be compared to other sites today. Even among sites in this niche, this site is sub-par and a little less than truthful in the way it presents material.
This site has about 500 sets that are not dated. There is a little log that announces updates about once a week. An update might be a set or a video. No idea if they are recycling. Most sets have between 50 and 100 images. One size, 1670x2500 or so max. Older sets are 1200x700 or so. Older sets also have NO ZIP FILES. Most models have 2 ore 3 sets, so there are probably about 100-130 models. Just 4 pages of sets with about 140 sets per page. The sets on the last page are really odd and many are not nude at all. There are no model pages so if you see a girl you like, too bad, you have to look through 500 sets to find her again. A few sets are linked though, but the logic of why some are linked and some are not escapes me. A few girls have different names in their different sets. Purchased stuff? Maybe.
Watermarks on the images say different things: Most say Flexyteens.com. Many say naked-gymnast, which was a clone site.
The models are typically young, but there is an odd lack of sexiness that one would normally associate with young, fit gymnasts. Most of the sets are practically clinical and many of the poses are neither gymnastic nor flexy and certainly not sexy, just strange. Curl up like a ball on a bar-stool strange. These are all eastern European girls with eastern European names. There is very little make-up...well...maybe it is gymnast make-up, I guess. And zero glam. Most girls start out dressed and in some sets the girl stays dressed. Oh, and for most models there is little to no eye contact with the camera. That is a significant factor in the clinical feel.
The two models that I see here (I went through the entire list of 500 sets in about an hour with a lot of "nope, nope, nope" on the first page), are Melena A. and Annett A. from Met-Art, both very popular. The sets of these two models here are different from the other sets on this site...better...almost like they are the marketing teasers. Purchased, maybe. Certainly shot in a better studio. And unlike pretty much every other model on this site, these models know how to look sexy...and how to look at the camera.
Here's another gauge. I just looked to see what I saved from the 500+ sets on this site. 6 photo sets and 6 videos from 4 girls I considered attractive (two were the ones I mentioned above, more recently at Met Art.). The rest were totally forgettable.
Bottom line? Pass. Maybe if it is a side-bar on club Seventeen for $10 or so, but for $30 this site is not worth visiting by itself. There are better sites in this niche for your money. |
