Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (0)

Newbie
95*
exotics4me (0) 02-27-18  01:24am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Making a strong case for the best photo and video porn site.
- The amount of content combined by their current update pace continues to shame even some networks.
- Another of those sites that has a farm growing pretty teens. It's like they never run out.
- Softer than most hardcore sites but harder than most softcore sites, if that makes sense.
- Still updates daily and has been around since 1996. I might make an uncomfortable joke in the bottom line about that.
- If you like slender models this is the site for you.
- Download speeds are very good, about 75% of my max.
- Met-Art boosted the navigation and site design.
- Very high quality throughout the site will cover that in BL.
- Some variety thanks to "helpers" in some otherwise solo scenes, girl/girl and girl group in the vacation scenes. But solo is the focus.
- Very good at capturing the girls personalities which is a lost art in porn these days.
Cons: - There's so little to complain about that I'm going to have to nitpick. I think all of the Met-Art ran sites are frustrating at sign-up because they transfer you to the login page and send your password to your email. Meaning, if you don't know your password yet, you can't sign in and you get stuck in that lock-up screen "sign-in" box that shakes when you get it wrong.
- Same complaint I've always had and that is while I like slender models as much as anyone, I also like some variety.
Bottom Line: ALS Scan and ALS Angels are two of my favorite sites of all-time. The funny part is I don't and haven't ever preferred shaven women but these sites require it. I prefer a trimmed triangle, airstrip.

I keep coming back to this site because I still am steeped in solo porn. It's been my favorite since 2004. Most solo sites are tame, very soft and that's even more true in 2018. The difference now is you can't find more than a dozen or so sites with high quality content that is solo. Even when the competition was much more populated than now, ALS Scan was one of my top 3 sites in the genre. I will say that ALS Angels can outscore it for me personally, but ALS Scan has obvious advantages that can't be ignored like the amount of content, update frequency and much improved navigation/site design.

Kind of a funny complaint, I can't count the models because they have so many that they've gone to an alphabetical listing (would take forever) and a "top models" filter that shows a couple hundred. They continue to do things that make me shake my head in disbelief, like:
Daily updates. Shocking enough in this day of age of networks with 36 sites barely releasing one update per day but there are days like February 2, 2018 that had ... 16 casting updates, in one day. Your average porn site these days would release those over 16 days. Some might say those casting scenes are tame since it's mostly a woman taking her clothes off and little else but it's still a photo shoot and for someone who likes seeing a woman in her regular clothes, then naked, it's very good.

I try to always mention the collector side when reviewing the ALS sites since they have been around a long time and have a lot of models many of us have forgotten. A couple of favorites here are Alana (Anetta Keys) and Zuzana (Zuzana Z.). And to show how much content they do have for some models, Zuzana has 46 videos/photo sets. Considering their site has enough models to split their "top models" into a top 200, it kind of gives you an idea of how big the overall site is.

One of those objective opinions I usually avoid. The ALS sites are two of the only sites that I do watch the Behind the Scenes videos from. I know I've groveled over the ALS Angels BTS of Regina Ice becoming genuinely horny but ALS Scan has similar too.

Listing the numbers would take me a month. While I think their navigation is very good, it's not the best in the world for writing a review. If you click "movies" it takes you to a page with 60 videos on it and there's 30 pages of those 60 video pages. But that only goes back to July 2009. If you click "updates" you see that the content is dated back to 2006 AND there's an archive too.

My thinking is they're showcasing the videos that have 1080p options but from what I've seen they have 1080p dating back to January 2008. On the other side, they do have some 4K in the newer videos but I'm not for sure how they're doing that since one update will have it and one won't. Still, over 2,000 videos in 1080p.

They've always stood out to me because of their picture sets. They not only will push the 5000 long end side of pictures but also will include anywhere from 150-500 photos in a set. These are not screencaps from the videos, they are separate photo shoot photos.

Which leads to another objective opinion. I prefer their shooting style as they don't go and try and to create this porn looking area for the photos or videos. The makeup is light or natural and the clothes really look like what the model most likely showed up in. I used to prefer glam and do still like it but I prefer this more natural style now.

If you like slender models and you've never been a member, you should plan on staying longer than a month or else you're going to be overwhelmed with the amount of content. The scenes are typically longer than a lot of solo sites as there's usually a full strip and tease, some talking, and by the way, ALS won me over way back in 2008 with a scene with Anetta Keys. She, like many Euro models, usually won't talk much but they had her talking more than I've seen and they do that as well as anyone. The only sites I've seen that have as good of a relationship with the models are Twistys (when Shap was there, not anymore), Pacino's Adventures (think it's shut down now), one I've mentioned before and who has worked ALS, Zoliboy's old site and last is FTV. You miss out on that interaction with the model on 98% of sites these days. I thought the recent Liza Rowe one was cute when she noticed bees. While it won't top Eve Angel's once slapping of a fly on her thigh, while masturbating, it's still fun to see the normal moments.

One cross-sale to avoid but it's easy to avoid and it's to Met-Art, they would take care of it if you missed it. My score is only lower than before because I've adjusted my scoring scale. For me, it's the best of the slender solo models sites, so if one of mine is higher it's just because I've not updated it.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (0) I think I can explain it, but ALS Scan is a site I went cold on five or six years ago. Actually, I know I can explain why. I'm not a fan of solo stuff even though a vast majority of the models here are exactly what I prefer. Your description of the scenes as being hard softcore is accurate. I don't like any porn that strays too far into being gynecological and some of these do.

For me, the biggest reason why I went cold on the site was because I really liked when they did Caribbean shoots and especially liked when they did some risky public shoots. I don't think they've done any of those in going on 10 years now. But I can understand why they've stopped the Caribbean shoots - they were probably prohibitively expensive even though they'd get dozens or more updates from one trip.

I think the last time I was a member there was 2015 so maybe it's time that I check them out again.

02-27-18  03:59am

Reply To Message

2

jloud952 (0) Well Spoken and well said my friend, are you a professor or a doctor? You seem very precise in you description and I say again, well Done!!
07-22-18  04:02pm

Reply To Message

3

exotics4me (0) REPLY TO #2 - jloud952 :

Thank you, good intuition, I used to be a psychologist and do work in a college now. Sometime in the future, I'll most likely try out being a professor. I try to be as informative and straight-forward as possible in my reviews.
07-22-18  08:46pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.