Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Dylan Ryder

Dylan Ryder (0)

Newbie
62*
standard (0) 03-13-18  08:19am
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Pictures available
- Some hd content
- Um... Let me think... No download limits? Yeah. No download limit.
Cons: - Small site
- No longer updating
- Most videos are low quality
Bottom Line: Boy, I sure do like Dylan Ryder. Sure the fake breasts take away from the overall glamour of such an attractive woman, but I understand the direction the adult industry has gone. Hey, maybe since this is Dylan Ryder's official site there will be lots of content with her natural breasts and maybe some hair down... Oh, wait. Nevermind. I forgot that the Openlife.com network doesn't really do content or updates.

Let's see, the last update is listed as 2013.

Content-wise, there are 25 or so hi definition clips out of the 60-ish video total on the site. There's a decent mix of solo, lesbian, and M/F, but there are still only 60 or so clips available, and more than half are low quality. And when I say low quality I don't mean not HD. I mean early 2000s dial-up thumbnail gallery advertisement quality. The content may be exclusive, but I'm guessing you'd do much better spending your $20 at bang.com (40 Dylan Ryder clips listed) where you also get a few thousand other actresses on the network, too.

It looks like there are fewer than 20 photo sets. It's a shame because some of the photo sets are very well done. Most are glam sets and the approach really suits her. She's a very attractive, very nicely shaped older woman who should do more of this work. The sets are available for downloading as zip files, too.

I don't think that's enough to warrant a recommendation, but the photos are solidly in the "pro" column. It's just a shame that something that should be a given on an adult site has to be marked as a "pro" and focused on so heavily because other "pro" things are so hard to come by when reviewing the site.

Recommendation? Avoid.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

marcdc1 (0) That really stinks. I really like Dylan it's a shame that no attention has been paid to such a beautiful woman.
03-14-18  05:50pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.