Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Shoplyfter

Shoplyfter (0)

Newbie
87*
Kody (0) 05-16-18  09:04am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The only site in its niche (actually kind of a surprise that it wasn't done before)

-Weekly updates

-Believable acting compared to a lot of other "reality" sites.

-Very affordable pricing ( $7.98/month if you take a full year. Which is worth it with the weekly updates)

-Listed pros for the content in bottom line
Cons: -Could use more diversity

-Not a lot of scenes yet. But you do get access to other TeamSkeet sites now, which hasn’t always been the case according to older reviews.

-Usually the scripted intros take up half of the scene… That’s a lot even for someone who usually likes these.

-Photo sets were not as hot as the videos IMO. But I personally don't mind, as I rarely fap to these.

-Further discussed the cons for the content in bottom line.
Bottom Line: As a fan of reality porn, I was easily convinced by their landing page.

I love how they paid attention to detail and made a page that really sells the story concept. They labeled every video with a case number and added a little "reality show intro" to draw you into it. The thumbs were pretty hot too, so I became really curious if the full scenes lived up to my expectations.


Now, about the CONTENT:

There's lots of things I like about the scenes, and lots of things I don't. But they're all kind of connected together.

The general format of the scenes is well execute and really turns me on. They subtly increase the power dynamics at play. And girls look a bit repelled / disgusted when he whips out his dick but then end up really loving it. Or don't! Sometimes they also look as if they want it but pretend not to, which is even hotter.
(A side note here: The general premise of this site is that the girls do not want sex but get coerced into it, if this is not your thing, you won't like it).

Some of the scenes involve 2 friends, twins or mother daughter combos. Most of these are executed pretty well and actually come across as believable. IMO, this is unique when it comes to mother/daughter scenes. Most of the time these aren't very believable, but here they always nail them (pun intended). So I thought this was a huge pro.

There are a couple of things that add to the realism. I like these things but they also has drawbacks:

1. The guards face is always blurred. I think this is actually something that makes the scenes better. But sometimes they do a bad job and blur his entire shoulders and chest + some random air above his head. In those case it's a bit of bummer when he is leaning over their body and it blurs their body too as a result. In other scenes they don't have this problem.

2. The camera angles ar static (sometimes shaky for effect) to get a hidden cam feel. I've seen users complain about this in previous reviews. Too be honest: I liked it. It adds to the realism, it's well executed and the quality is still high enough. There's one thing I didn't like about it though: The facial shots usually don't do it for me from this angel. The sex/bj scenes before it are really hot, and it's a bit of an anti climax to finish with a facial viewed from a side distance. I guess this is because they didn't want to make the transition from hidden camera seem unnatural. Maybe they could fix it by having a replay of the facial through the guard's cellphone? Just thinking out loud here in case any one would read this, haha!


I'm usually a fan of long intros to get into the story. But they could've at least cut them in half in most cases.

There's usually one or more parts during the intro where the girls get left alone by the cop.
This really kills momentum. Generally the acting is great and those would’ve been perfect parts to cut out of the long scripts. It’s one thing when they do this with 2 girls. But if it’s just one girl this can get really boring. Sometimes she starts talking out loud to herself, which is a little weird). But sometimes she literally sits there waiting in silence for a few minutes. You can skip through these parts of course. When there is conversation, it's usually good (sometimes it moves slowly but they build up the tension), and the second half of the scene is always worth the wait.

Even the it’s pretty much the same setup for every video, they do at good job at keeping the scripts varied within that formula.

I thought that the models were a bit too monotone in terms of body and skin type for my tastes. However, all all of them looked like the kind of girl that wouldn’t normally act like a slut, and they acted very well too. So this leads me to believe they did put some effort in the casting.

Even with some of these drawbacks, the content is exclusive and really good if you like amateur/reality porn. Considering the low price, I’d say this site is definitely still worth the money.

If over time they wouldn't improve on the things I didn't like, I will still continue to watch it. So they must've done something right ;-)

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (5)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

pat362 (0) Thanks for the review.

My biggest issue with the site is that the producers in their quest to create the illusion that what we are watching is somehow real have either by conscious decision or omission missed the key element that is a must for me (and I suspect many others)to enjoy a porn video. I need to see the action and not just from one camera angle so badly placed that you honestly don't know what is happening half the time and the other half you don't care but from multiple camera angles that show the women enjoying themselves.

The content feels a lot like those Eastern European hidden camera videos that were popular in the late 90's early 2000 but no one would care to watch now because quality was horrible and you couldn't see what is happening. The only difference is that you know the women in the videos and there is a little scenario but that's about it.

05-16-18  06:18pm

Reply To Message

2

BoyWithaProblem (0) REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :

Couldn't agree more with pat362. When the action finally starts, after 20 long minutes, I want the fly-on-the-wall camera angle to give way to something up close and detailed. Shoplyter have done this for the BJ scenes, which look good as the original reviewer rightly said. So why am I watching most of the penetration from far away?

Shoplyter need to remember that the best porn is closely filmed in HD. The mock spycam needs to vanish once the action finally starts. Take a look at gyno-x.com for how this should be filmed.

ENF/CMNF is a really underserved niche; strip/cavity search would be such a winner if Shoplyter could just make a few minor changes. The E is for embarrassed, and the undressing and searching needs to be made slow and intimate and detailed. Split/inset screen showing the model's face whilst her lower regions are examined (as in the slow anal penetration of Backroom Casting Couch) could transform this site from a frustrating letdown into something special.

06-24-18  01:14am

Reply To Message

3

marcdc1 (0) REPLY TO #1 - pat362 :

I agree. While I think the concept has a lot of potential the implementation is really off.

In addition to the points, you made the fact that in many of the scenes the girl never seems to consent puts this site more on the icky side.

07-26-19  04:49am

Reply To Message

4

pat362 (0) REPLY TO #3 - marcdc1 :

In this instance consenting would kill the vibe they are trying to create but I agree that it's icky.

Mind you it's a moot point for me because I don't understand how this type of porn is even fun to watch when you little of the action and what you do see if badly shot because they are basically doing the kind of hidden camera type of porn that died about a decade ago.

07-27-19  09:17am

Reply To Message

5

marcdc1 (0) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 :

^^^ Well said.
07-27-19  09:34am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.