Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Public Disgrace

Public Disgrace (0)

Newbie
94*
exotics4me (0) 08-14-18  02:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - The much-maligned public sex site of the Kink network.
- There are a few newer sites that are trying to do the same genre and niche but Public Disgrace, to me, is the best at it and you get access to the Kink network too.
- Very good download speeds, 80% and up of my max.
- All of the scenes over the last year and a half are at least 50 minutes long and some are over an hour. (The importance of this will be in the BL)
- Still has that Kink style of quirkiness in the majority of the scenes.
- Though I think the creativity has dropped a little over the years, they're still setting the bar for production values.
- For this type of content, their catalog is huge, by my count they have 481 scenes. Most sites like this one have less than 100. And they update twice a month, like clockwork, including sometimes three times a month if the weeks fall right.
- If you're just focused on this site or one of the others on the network the navigation is very good.
Cons: - I think they still have some problems with laws, you kind of get the feeling that it might disappear one day and never come back.
- If you're not careful the content can seem to be very repetitive but it's probably not fair to say that considering it's public sex.
- Another one for those who like to nitpick, not all scenes are truly "public". All scenes do have a crowd of people watching but seem to be in controlled environments.
Bottom Line: Public Disgrace pushed boundaries when it first opened. The mere thought of what their scenes had them would make most people's eyes bug out of their head. They have a model or in a few cases, models, meet them somewhere usually public, could be a bus, could be a park, could be a bus stop, an adult video store or pretty much anywhere public you can think of. Most of the scenes start with the model being stripped, bound by rope and led around a city. If that makes you laugh or smile you'll probably love this site. In some of the scenes they stay in fairly public place but I've never been fully convinced that any of these areas aren't controlled environments. Does that take away from the experience? Not for me.

The model(s) is the most important part of the Public Disgrace scenes. Some are either really horny or wanting to leave a good impression. Those models are touching the clothed people while two guys are double penetrating her. Some are not as involved with the crowd and whether it's fair or not, those scenes fall pretty flat for me.

There's even a comment here on PU about when Kink was shutting Public Disgrace down. And they were down for awhile but out of nowhere, they showed back up and started updating again. This is the biggest compliment I can give this site and Kink overall:

This site is why I join Kink's network with year memberships. There's months that I only get two new scenes then the lucky ones with three and I think those scenes alone are worth the subscription price. I like other sites on the Kink Network but I could join once a year to get those scenes. The Public Disgrace updates are ones I don't want to wait for.

Not to advertise a different site but to show how difficult this style is, especially in the United States, Brazzers had Asses in Public. It was similar to Public Disgrace without bondage. The last time I was on Brazzers, Asses in Public only had a dozen or so scenes. It used to have near 100 but they had to take some of them down. Public Disgrace/Kink obviously spends a lot of time making sure they are cleared to shoot this style of porn.

You will notice a difference in the scenes if you go back and watch scenes from the first few years compared to now but I do believe in the last year and a half, their scenes have improved from where they were. The was a lull when no new scenes were coming out then they went to shorter scenes that were 20-30 minutes long. As mentioned in the pros, the last year and a half has scenes that are at least 50 minutes and a few go near 75 minutes. In this style of porn (exhibitionism, voyeurism, especially), that's a big deal. It gives more time for the buildup, the parts that don't look as controlled. You also get to see the model often laughing, sometimes blushing and I think that helps keep Kink on the "good guys" list as it shows the model's willingness to be involved in this debauchery.

The Kink quirkiness: This is the only porn studio I know of that surprises me. Sometimes it's something goofy like for those Game of Thrones fans, shortly after the Cersei "Walk of Shame", Kink put two nude models in a near identical walk of shame scene. There's psychology going on there since they know a lot of guys and women too were aroused by the Game of Thrones scene. There's more too, like the elderly man who jumps into a scene and starts groping a model. Is it staged and planned? Maybe but it's more than other studios are doing.

This site itself has 481 scenes as of 8/14/2018, they do have pictures but I still haven't seen a way to download them. I would think only the public pictures would be of any value to a viewer since you might see things you didn't catch in the video.

I'll mention that in my Kink Network review, I said Public Disgrace now has a subtitle of "Sluts in Spain". I'm not for sure why they did that other than to release two scenes that I assume were shot in Spain. I don't know where the majority of these scenes are shot but do know in the older scenes, there are some from San Francisco. I thought the Sluts in Spain was their new main location to film from since their header had the subtitle in it but it does seem to be just a few scenes as the newest scenes no longer say it.

It takes brave people to do these scenes. I would imagine performing in front of even planned audience members, would make it difficult for some models (both the males and females). Public Disgrace does by far the best job of it and their models, overall, are the most believable in this style of porn.

I do not list their video resolution as a con, anymore. The videos max out at 720p resolution but with the scenes being around an hour each, anything bigger on the resolution and the file sizes would be massive to download. It's still not perfect but it's well-above similar sites and in a class of its own.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

rearadmiral (0) This is a very thorough review. Thanks for writing it.

This has always been one of my favourite sites. I like the public niche and I'm not aware of any site that does much of it. Public Disgrace has certainly pushed the boundaries. (There are many examples, but one that I still watch regularly is where a model named Molly is in a large European city and is made to roam through traffic topless with her ankles bound and her panties down and offer windshield cleaning to people in cars. Insane!) You note that there are a few others. Can you let me know what those are?

Thanks!

08-14-18  02:31pm

Reply To Message

2

exotics4me (0) REPLY TO #1 - rearadmiral :

One that I think might be a little touchy here in North American is the Western Chikan website. They use CCBill but I don't think it's ever been listed on TBP or PU. Chikan is known as the Japanese bus/train groping sites. Those wouldn't be that popular here since they are censored. The Western Chikan site isn't censored and it has the train/bus groping, touching of all sorts, sex on the train/bus with people watching but I do know it's not the most-accepted form of porn in our Western society since it can look "forced".

A much more accessible option is the Porn Doe Network. I discovered the network and these sites by accident awhile back.
They have Chicas Loco which is a public sex site set in bookstores, bars, diners but I will say these are very controlled environments with sometimes less than 5 people watching.
Also on Porn Doe is Crowd Bondage. This is the direct ripoff of Public Disgrace. Some of the humiliation goes beyond my threshold for enjoyment. Including at least a couple of scenes where the "public" drops their cigarette ashes in the model's mouth while she has sex. They do the scenes with random people squirting the model's face with water hoses. Their scenes, especially at first glance, could easily pass as Public Disgrace scenes with most of the male talent wearing all black clothing. But even these scenes end up in very controlled environments.

Still, if you ever join Porn Doe's Network they're worth checking out.

JP Outdoor has some good "public" Japanese scenes that are uncensored but these are much tamer than Public Disgrace.

Cum Louder, a once promising network that is a mess now, has Latin Asses in Public, used to be known as Publico Culoes, that has the scenes where they walk a naked or flashing woman through the streets of the big cities in Europe. I'll put a link to this one because it's hard to find the content on their site. Even with the search supposed to only show Latin Asses in Public, you'll see that there's plain hardcore scenes mixed in the results too but you'll see the public ones too.

https://www.cumlouder.com/site/latinassesinpublic/

08-14-18  10:00pm

Reply To Message

3

rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #2 - exotics4me :

Thanks for the detailed reply. Porn Doe has been on my radar for a while now but I've never joined it. This will probably be what pushes me off the fence. One thing that always bugged me about that network is that their tour pages are terrible. But that's common these days. But having a trusted source say that a membership is worth considering is a big help.

I am overdue for a rejoin at Kink too so I think I'll do that too. I've been holding off on a Kink rejoin because earlier this year I did a major reorganization of my collection and I deleted a lot of Kink stuff just because I never watched it. But Public Disgrace is one of their sites where I kept most of what I've downloaded over the years.

(As an aside, I really wish they'd bring back Water Bondage...)

08-19-18  02:54pm

Reply To Message

4

PinkPanther (0) To download pictures - using newest public disgrace scene as an example - scroll down to where it says, "Download images". Left click on that and it will show you a list of the zip files of the images available to download. Across the spectrum of Kink sites, some sites, such as Sex and Submission, might have a number of zip files of images to download for any particular scene. In the case of this scene, there's just one. Then you right click and save it where you want it.

fyi - it took me a while to figure this out. For the longest time, I was trying to right click on "Download images" for various scenes, getting nothing and thinking, "huh, must be a broken link". Nope - just not very intuitive.

08-20-18  05:30pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.