We Are Hairy (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The latest videos are at best 1920x1080, 6000 kbps, very sharp, but not 4K.
-Recently updates are 4 or 5 a day.
-808 models, 6912 videos, 7492 photosets. Each has over 100 photos in each.
-Excellent preview tour. You can check everything out, but can’t download.
-For the most part the models are very natural. Few tattoos, implants, piercings or even makeup.
-Nice variety of ethnicities, ages and body types..
-Easy navigation using a logical site layout.
-No advertising on the members pages.
-No download limits.
-Excellent search engine using a tag system.
-Active forum as well as the ability to leave comments on individual videos.
-Free live cam shows. Also available as downloads. |
| Cons: |
-Alphabet soup site generated user name and password’
-Proprietary biller. Not a big name. However, cancellation was simple by using a link under customer support.
-Standalone site with no extras of any kind.
-A bit pricey at $35 a month. |
| Bottom Line: |
I remember a few years back, this site was new and well received by many at PU. I wrote a complimentary review, but had as a con that the new site was still very small. It has grown a great deal since then with 808 models, 6912 videos, and 7492 photo sets. The webmaster was quite active on PU and I remember Basil quite well. If you read this, your helpfulness was and would be very much appreciated here. Please come back. You have a wonderful site.
I recognized a few porn stars such as Chloe Camilla, Lola Gatsby, Laurie Vargas, Max Mikita, Nina Devon, Selma Sins and Sasha Yung. However the the site says that the models are 90% amateurs. Most models are in their twenties, but many are in their thirties and even a few in their forties. Body shapes vary. Many are very thin, but there are some that are a little more full figured. Some have imperfections and they are shown exactly how they are. There is no attempt to glam them or use photo shop. There is little to no makeup and they appear to mostly be natural girl next door types. Few have tattoos, piercing, implants or even bleached fake blond hair. They are very real women that you might someday meet, unlike the too perfect clones that can become a turnoff in a glam model site. Many are beautiful by anyone's standards and some are more appealing in a different way. Many can only be called an acquired taste. Some of the most ordinary looking put on the most sexy performances.
For the most part the Eastern European models don’t say anything and as a result you don’t get to know them. The US and UK models personalities are more accessible. Some are quite excellent at making the art of the verbal being as hot as the visual. What they have to say as they strip or masturbate can be quite erotic.
The best videos strike a good balance between full body eroticism and close ups. Too much of either can kill an otherwise great scene. Most start off in either ordinary, but attractive street clothes, or in a few cases in costumes. One features a harem girl, another in a police woman uniform. The strip scenes have their own tag “striptease” and many are quite hot. Most scenes feature masturbation, mostly with fingers or dildos. The scenes that I liked the best were of the models putting on a show, however. With a site as huge as this one, there were many, even if they were not as plentiful as the masturbation videos. A small number of scenes had either lesbian or heterosexual sex.
Photo sets are mostly indoors, which I prefer over outdoors. The lighting just works out better indoors. Each set has over 100 photos and is zip downloadable. You can even customize which photos to download. Most are not photos from the videos, they are instead unique shoots. Most of the photos are portraits, not landscapes as portraits showcase the models bodies better. By the way, you get mostly landscapes when photos are taken from videos. Most sites take the easy way out and the photos are not as hot as a portrait taken by a high quality camera would have been. The details are 2000x3000 pixels and 72 dpi. This is excellent, but perhaps not as detailed and sharp as in some other photo sites.
Some of the photographers have done work for other sites, so their style here looks familiar. I am a big fan of both Toby and R Williams, whose updates show a true sense of how to get the models to be erotic performers. Even the sexiest models need direction to do their best.
The only reason to deduct any points is that it could be a bit cheaper. This site is crying out for a PU discount. Be that
as it may but it is very true that you get what you pay for. With multiple updates every day for the last several years, this site is well worth the premium price. If you like hairy women, this is the best site in its niche. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
